Thursday, August 5, 2021 8:01 PM
This is to verify that no one has yet asked me for the phone numbers I wish to verify the conversations on that are proof DHS did not do their job with respect to Diligent Efforts.
This is to verify that DHS has not ever once verified professionally one single conversation to date?
Corrected text in the following email NO OTHER CHANGES TO THE REST OF THIS EMAIL.
This is to verify that neither of those premises was ever presented to me through the proper channels for a refute and that you have no confirmation of how I was informed of both DHS premise aforementioned above were never subject matter for a hearing I was personally summoned or subpoenaed to at any hearing relevant to Diligent Efforts.
Oops, one more correction:
This is to confirm that discovery opens for both sides of any civil case after the mandatory scheduling for all critical court dated has been attended therefore no discovery for either side is opened up yet especially with respect to me and is grounds for the RECUSE of Linda Hughes and a MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE.
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 7:46 PM
To: linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; Jessica L. Cheely; Sabrina.Leach2@dhsoha.state.or.us <Sabrina.Leach2@dhsoha.state.or.us>; rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us <rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us>
Subject: Genocide! Genocide! Genocide! Treason and Genocide! you are allowing the second generation of Treason and perjury by the Deputy District Attorney for a second generation in a row TREASON AND LIES
Mind you. Pray do tell. What authorization under the laws of the land do you have to ignore the forgoing allegation of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law. On the grounds that the prosecution is also required to be a defender. And mind you and pray do tell don’t look to the color of law since that is not the ties that bind us to any of the following:
Melanie V LeBaron expressed to me that she wants all her Rights upheld and those of you who do not know how to identify or uphold those rights are not authorized by law to approach the bench so apparently the Deputy District Attorney is not authorized since all law is not upheld. Regardless, but if learned in the law it is evidence of intent to deprive rights not covered under the immunities extended to the prosecutors by law which is not covered by the color of law violations pointed out here below and is a prosecutable arrestable offence against the Oath of Office.
SABRINA LEACH IS FIRED WITH RESPECT TO NOLAN J STEVENS!
SABRINA LEACH IS FIRED WITH RESPECT TO MELANIE V LEBARON!
SABRINA LEACH IS FIRED WITH RESPECT TO VICTORIA R COUVILLION!
SABRINA LEACH IS FIRED BUT IF NATHAN A STEVENS IS NOT FULLY ADVISED OF HIS RIGHT TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE SABRINA LEACH CANNOT HAVE ANY CONTROL OF CUSTODY WHILE THE MOTHER OR FATER OBJECTS, SO WITH RESPECT TO NATHAN A STEVENS AS WELL!
SABRINA LEACH IS FIRED WITH RESPECT TO MARILY LEBARON AND I SPEAK FOR MYSELF DENYING THE JUVENILE JUSTICE COMPLEX SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION!
This is to verify that it is not the duty of the District Attorneys Office to win at any cost but it is also the duty of the District Attorneys Office to ‘defend’ and act upon exculpatory evidence letting all those that cannot be prosecuted and convicted beyond a reasonable doubt go along with only prosecuting only the most heinous of criminals as the lawful legislative intent of the District Attorneys Office and that a MOTION TO DISMISS in the best interests of justice is a thing in the united States?
This is to verify that there are multiple reports in the Sheriff's Office that are exculpatory in nature and grounds for a MOTION TO RECUSE and in essence, a MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE and ESTOPPEL which is evidence or a preset disposition and that the Deputy District Attorney is not doing His/Her/Their job with respect to the criminal allegation and the future criminal allegations as well in both my and my daughter’s Reasonable Efforts and Diligent Efforts cases amounting to the unlawful simulation of process and Deprivation of Rights Under Color Of Law and ground for the arrest of the Deputy District Attorney for acting outside the scope of His/Her/Their authority supported by 1983 lectures on what qualifies as advocative or supervisory, qualified and absolute immunities.
This is to verify that this very point breach causes a ripple effect on the allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel as pattern and practice across the desk of every single attorney allowed to approach the ADMINISTRATIVE BENCH and that points directly to the ADMINISTRATIVE De Facto Juvenile Justice Complex in support of the political allegation of an unlawful present disposition and grounds to put every single one of you Nazi Mentality Babylonian Whores in jail.
Dear Treasonous Nazi Plantation Master Mentality Babylonian Whores
Linda Hughes,
Jessica L Cheely,
Sabrina Leach,
This is to verify you may not prosecute me for my zealous religious belief you are a Treasonous Nazi Plantation Master Mentality Babylonian Whore
This is to verify that you have not forwarded any of my emails to all interested parties regardless of the judicial code of conduct stipulates it is lawful
This is to verify that my request to be updated on the names of attorneys on this case has not been honored by anyone
This is to verify that silence is acceptance and that you have all been silent and in receipt of multiple emails and that regardless of my zealous efforts to verify and confirm conversations all my emails have been met with silence.
This is to verify that DHS and the Juvenile Justice Complex have not complied with the Federal Civil Rules of Procedure to set mandatory scheduling of all critical court dates.
This is to confirm that discovery opens for both sides of any civil case after the mandatory scheduling for all critical court dated has been attended therefore no discovery for either side is opened up yet especially with respect to me and is grounds for the RECUSE of Linda Hughes and a MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE.
This is to verify that you have not included all naturally interested parties as parties which infers no notices of all court dates will be mailed out by the court clerk regardless of if all naturally interested parties who self-present are more interested than the average family member.
This is to verify that no discovery has been delivered to me through a criminal prosecutor regarding any DHS premise.
This is to verify that DHS premise prior to July of 2019 was successfully refuted and that DHS presented another premise in November that was also refuted.
This is to verify that neither of those premises was ever presented to me through the proper channels for a refute and that you have no confirmation of how I was informed of both DHS premise aforementioned above were never subject matter for a hearing I was personally summoned or subpoenaed to at any hearing relevant to Diligent Efforts.
This is to verify that you are not contesting my demand you recuse from all subject matter pertinent to bureaucrat protection.
This is to verify that bureaucrat protection is not child protection
This is to verify that fictitious plaintiffs are not lawful merits for prosecution
This is to verify that no subject matter jurisdiction is available for prosecution of a victim of a future crime holding that future victim liable today as a fictitious defendant where no complaint no victim applies by retrospect once that fictitious date and time of the future crime has passed.
This is to verify no furtherance hearing may be set until a prosecutor has filed a criminal case against the future fictitious defendant.
This is to verify that no Grand Jury Indictment can be held on future fictitious crime when the intent is to hold the victim liable today.
Your ORS abuse of contract law stipulating our heirs have to agree to be adopted does not produce a meeting of the minds between De Facto Personam on the specific point the STATE OF OREGON nor does it qualify as a binding contract between our nations heirs or adoptive parents and the STATE OF OREGON agents are not living souls and on those points offer no binding contract while arranging adoptive placements, in violation of the theories at law relevant to what makes a binding contract, and a meeting of the mind can only happen between two living beings capable of contracting, being old enough, fully advised, which my teenaged, isolated, deprived of an affidavit, cannot be identified as a competent contracting party, while under duress – being bounced around from place to place, separated from her sibling while you are required to keep siblings together and do not – which is a supply and demand subject matter juvenile justice complexes control.
This is to verify that not a single time has Linda Hughes asked for me to refute a single premise or forwarded any exhibit qualified as discovery to me relating to DHS premises one and two.
This is to verify that DHS has raised a new premise and that is symbolic of filing a third ala carte case against my which is illegal as well as unlawful, yet DHS does not object which is not Diligent Efforts or Reasonable Efforts especially when relevant to points above and the attorney yelling at my daughter for her signature.
This is to verify that phone conversations are recorded by the jails and that those phone records can be subpoenaed in support of a MOTION TO QUASH on the grounds a defender should not be your prosecutor.
We have no policy given to us on the stipulations relevant to our MINOR ACCOUNTS which BANKERS ABUSE since none of us are educated on how to claim these MINOR ACCOUNTS.
These policies put into effect through ORS are not voted upon by the people adversely affected by these policies.
Special interest groups approaching the capital for policies to increase the child removal rate is not in compliance with having a meeting of the minds since the people do not vote for these changes or receive notice of such addendums to the former statutes put in place in effect making the stakeholders the only influence over STATE OF OREGON legislation.
Regardless of the fact Supreme Court Ruled ‘Man is immune to statute and code’ and that ‘statute and code are not law’, you would have to classify the people as something other than man to hold subject matter jurisdiction for the preset disposition at the Juvenile Justice Complex to ignore our heirs cannot agree to anything since that indicates a contract between the adoptive placement and the adopted, which makes that topic moot, since teenagers have not claimed their MINOR ACCOUNT either so not a controlling party over how the money is moved, with no update or addendum accepted by the people that we are not of the status as man, which is two points under which DHS and the Juvenile Complex are in breach of contract law, leaving the duress point through intimidation where the attorney is reportedly yelling at my daughter to sign whatever is put in front of her to sign and that being yelled at by the attorney is a point of duress indicating no meeting of the minds took place between attorney and WARD.
Genocide! Genocide! Genocide! Treason and genocide! You are allowing the second generation of treason and perjury by the deputy district attorney for a second generation in a row treason and lies II (typos removed – expounded)
We the people are not held to the same standards as bar members.
Who will verify the second and third phone numbers of the social workers having multiple cell phones?
Rebecca Jones Gaston,
Rebecca Jones Gaston, MSW
Child Welfare Director, Oregon DHS
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
C: 971-332-0799
Assistant: …redacted…
Linda Hughes must recuse. She has no jurisdiction. She is a human trafficker Nazi subjugator fulfilling Hitter’s dream of enslaving us through abuses of statute and code that are not law for the purposes of subjugation to sever blood ties and commit Nazi genocide!
Just a pile of Nazis following orders.
Who is going to verify the second and third contact points for social workers for the purposes of verifying diligent efforts were never made while DHS do not maintain family bonds and sabotage them instead for over three years and allow the state of Oregon seal to commit fraud and issue death sentences to children?
Regarding: Melanie V LeBaron reunification with Nolan Stevens and Victoria Couvillion.
My daughter was abused by Max Ryan Wall. He committed an open act of treason in open court before a duly elected judge and took advantage of my daughter while not advising her of her rights. Then Chandra Snyder grabs the motion to dismiss my daughter later signed and filed. So, you have no case to deny my grandkids their relationship with their grandmother since this matter has been refuted and refuted over and over again. DHS moves to get the third set of continuances when they were out of continuances and asked my daughter to allow a third set of double continuances where the criminal prosecutor lost jurisdiction, but somehow ‘ DHS wants, DHS gets’ is the only rule of thumb subverting all good standards of law. My daughter had a conflicting court date crossing over the one set for trial on Polk County Petition and Nicole K Hall cannot advise my daughter on her rights or have a meeting of the minds nor can Max Ryan Wall extend his bar card to a non-licensed DHS agent to give legal advice to my daughter when DHS is not practicing law which is due process rights, not her job description oar and ORS. Besides, an incorporated personam can have no opinion or have a meeting of the minds with a living being like my daughter, in this case, to say my daughter was fully advised, which amounts to perjury by Max Ryan Wall, an arrestable offense while colluding to deprive due process under color of law waring against the constitution for the united states of America, which is treason softened by bar constituents as unconstitutional just as sodomy and rape are replaced by maltreatment so cause the reality of an egregious act to fall upon deafened ears avoiding the shock value of truth whitewashing facts dumbing our senses and deductive reasoning. Chandra Snyder stated on the first petition, “we were bringing Melanie home” so no premise relevant to child abuse when I was arrested, so no premise relevant to child abuse when Max Ryan Wall abused the court process to include future crimes not relevant to child abuse to get a third set of double continuances on a non-child abuse related matter and allow a rapist to continue having access to my daughter while she went to trial on a foster rapist she was exposed to and he gets acquitted on the one little inference of willing participant when foster parents should not be having sex with foster kids especially ones that can bust you down and isolate you keeping your from field trips while DHS is failing to provide attorneys to my daughter when she demanded on and DHS is controlling the topic of her counseling in foster care – she did not even graduate from high school – everywhere she went she was sexually harassed – and DHS did not have a shelter hearing to have custody of her when they were bringing her home – my subsequent arrest was not relevant to child abuse and I was never charges with a count of egregious child abuse – never – my daughter was abused and raped due to DHS activity without my consent to take my daughter into custody – DHS owes her a settlement for the rape she endured and the actions of Sabrina Leach acting as an unlicensed bill collector for the prosecution she is not to work closely with the criminal prosecutors to collect all county charges ‘clear up all county charges’ that is racketeering and my daughter is forced to aid the prosecution against herself while ‘defenders’ set up double jeopardy and double dip as juvenile case defenders and then hop over and act as criminal defenders where DHS already offered her kids back and that settlement offer was accepted in July of 2019 by and between Helmar Lochmann and Melanie V LeBaron and it is not justice for the criminal prosecutors to collude and win at all costs – the duty of the criminal prosecutors is to prosecute the most heinous of criminals and it is the duty of the defenders to defend instead of setting up double jeopardy and in two jurisdictions while allowing my daughter to become a fictitious / adversely affected / defendant petitioner on more false allegations not relevant DHS subject matter jurisdiction while ignoring all their duties then choking the life out of the people with the only ones they feel like adhering to severing all our communications between kin. Sabrina leach is not retained by my kin to forced divorce – this is not a social service – she is not a divorce attorney and is way out of line! This is a violation of counsel of choice – she is forcing her will upon my kin on matters not relevant to child abuse investigation on subject matter not available in the list of DHS forms. She is out of line. My family got along just fine on custody and control – Melanie did not ever have a problem with any of the stevens family and they were never denied access when they requested it however far and few and between were the requests to visit and phone calls or emails or text messages or face chats were even less while visits were less than a few hours and less than four hours a month so grounds for abandonment in a custody matter, not a forced divorce so DHS can hand my grandson over to the same type of allegations they are removing the kids from just to stall and move more federal dollars to their own hands and programs stalling and stalling and not keeping blood ties strong between kin on mere technicalities between common law, nature, and statute and code subject to the Clearfield Doctrine that attorneys do not declare rights – which is Nazi subjugation fulfilling Hitler’s dream to subjugate – which is all you people do is subjugate monies while in breach of contract.
All these facts are grounds for the arrest of Sabrina Leach – it is treason – and you are aiding and abetting it and can guarantee nothing
DHS committed treason against me and now again for a second generation selling my kin
My granddaughter is not for sale!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your ORS stating she has to agree to be adopted does not produce a meeting of the minds with a de facto personam ‘the state of Oregon and the Oregon state agents are not living souls and a meeting of the mind can only happen between two living beings – this is racketeering con artistry set up by learned criminals – and DHS has to be learned in the law to approach the bench and are not – that is two counts of treason you allow as RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR and is treason on your own hands – you have been put on notice – you are allowing genocide in violation of maxims of law suppressing the rights of the people with statute and code we are immune to – while attorneys, creatures of statute ignoring our immunities, just stand there, take the cash exchanging hands and that is not leadership that is treason.
Nathan stevens has the same history of allegations as my daughter and if you can give the kids to him, you can give the kids back to their mother!
You cannot have a double standard!!!!!! Just to stall and move money to your programs and a fat yearend bonus per head count while you cannot guarantee nothing but money to your hands.
So, Sabrina Nazi Yes Man Leach is forcing a divorce to stall for another whole year while you people use statute and code, we are immune to commit genocide!
The return of my grandson to his rightful caregiver is relief not forced divorce or adoption so you all stall more and can keep a paycheck rolling in while social workers have several phone numbers similar to what criminals, drug dealers, and people hiding from predators, or pimps use to traffic full gown women
Nathan stevens has the exact same history of allegations
So, Sabrina Leach is forcing a divorce to stall the return of my grandson to his rightful caregiver he had his whole life, so you all can keep a paycheck rolling in and having several phone numbers pimps use to traffic full gown women –
Your ORS abuse of contract law stipulating our heirs have to agree to be adopted does not produce a meeting of the minds between De Facto Personam on the specific point of the STATE OF OREGON's standing nor does it qualify as a binding contract between our nations heirs or adoptive parents and the STATE OF OREGON agents are not living souls and on those points offer no binding contract while arranging adoptive placements, in violation of the theories at law relevant to what makes a binding contract, and a meeting of the mind can only happen between two living beings capable of contracting, being old enough, fully advised, which my teenaged, isolated, deprived of an affidavit, cannot be identified as a competent contracting party, while under duress – being bounced around from place to place, separated from her sibling while you are required to keep siblings together and do not – which is a supply and demand subject matter juvenile justice complexes control.
We have no policy given to us on the stipulations relevant to our MINOR ACCOUNTS which BANKERS ABUSE since none of us are educated on how to claim these MINOR ACCOUNTS.
These policies put into effect through ORS are not voted upon by the people adversely affected by these policies.
Special interest groups approaching the capital for policies to increase the child removal rate is not in compliance with having a meeting of the minds since the people do not vote for these changes or receive notice of such addendums to the former statutes put in place in effect making the stakeholders the only influence over STATE OF OREGON legislation.
Regardless of the fact Supreme Court Ruled ‘Man is immune to statute and code’ and that ‘statute and code are not law’, you would have to classify the people as something other than man to hold subject matter jurisdiction for the preset disposition at the Juvenile Justice Complex to ignore our heirs cannot agree to anything since that indicates a contract between the adoptive placement and the adopted, which makes that topic moot, since teenagers have not claimed their MINOR ACCOUNT either so not a controlling party over how the money is moved, with no update or addendum accepted by the people that we are not of the status as man, which is two points under which DHS and the Juvenile Complex are in breach of contract law, leaving the duress point through intimidation where the attorney is reportedly yelling at my daughter to sign whatever.
These treasonous Babylonian [Money] Whores and their formalities and love for monies moving to their hands are putting my grandson with the same situation they purport to save them from - their dad has been in and out of jail for years and that does not guarantee stability, which is their permanency lie exposed, and I have been sitting here this whole time immune to the treasonous abuse of status, standing, and jurisdiction, while dad has the same history allegations the same as my daughter but that is what that treasonous money whore Linda Hughes is authorizing - forced divorce to stall and keep the kids till custody can be established, to make up for not having dad’s name on the safety plan ala carte, and is impeding the dad’s own mind, when we already had an implied agreement in place under which DHS is impeding, ignoring the methods used are not under litigation or petition to any circuit court, nor under the scope or prevue of DHS social working license, to the day is make sure when he is not stable and acted like he wanted nothing to do with Nolan and only visited him once or twice in a total of a year when he lived in the same location, same apartment complex as me - right here - these money whore administrators only care about their power and control and not the lives they destroy when that is egregious emotional harm for the sake of control through money plunger isolation tactic and false contracts we are not liable for till they step in and force us to a higher standard under duress though never applicable before - this is forced contracts under duress where FIP is available family independent program, which is federal and we are required to have equal protection of the laws, meaning due process of law and are denied discovery which prevents a refute, and sets up gossip sessions I never once consented to or authorized human trafficking and violations of counsel of choice to have a social worker not learned in the law authorized yet am forced by DHS to allow secret gossip sessions to have DHS represent fictitious plaintiffs where the terminology respondent or defendant does not apply although sentencing everybody to the equivalent of the death penalty of a criminal case without due process of law or a demurrer just so DHS can steal and sell kids - it is the same thing done to the Indians in USA and Canada - controlling where kids live as if we are reduced to the status of negro slave and passing possession of human beings from one hand to another, severing blood ties in the name of ‘contract for money plunder’, without due process of law so bar members can get at retainer fees at ten thousand dollars minimum - while these Nazi administrators have the moto " DHS wants DHS gets", as the only policy and 'law' and is nothing but treason you all stand around and to nothing about it while money is laundered and possession of our nations heirs exchanges hands - treason nothing more.
ALL THESE FACTS ARE GROUNDS FOR THE ARREST OF SABRINA LEACH – IT IS TREASON – AND YOU ARE AIDING AND ABETTING IT AND CAN GUARANTEE NOTHING
DHS COMMITTED TREASON AGAINST ME AND NOW AGAIN FOR A SECOND GENERATION SELLING MY KIN
MY GRANDDAUGHTER IS NOT FOR SALE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOUR ORS STATING SHE HAS TO AGREE TO BE ADOPTED DOES NOT PRODUCE A MEETING OF THE MINDS WITH A DE FACTO PERSONAM ‘THE STATE OF OREGON AND THE OREGON STATE AGENTS ARE NOT LIVING SOULS AND A MEETING OF THE MIND CAN ONLY HAPPEN BETWEEN TWO LIVING BEINGS – THIS IS RACKETEERING CON ARTISTRY SET UP BY LEARNED CRIMINALS – AND DHS HAS TO BE LEARNED IN THE LAW TO APPROACH THE BENCH AND ARE NOT – THAT IS TWO COUNTS OF TREASON YOU ALLOW AS RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR AND IS TREASON ON YOUR OWN HANDS – YOU HAVE BEEN PUT ON NOTICE – YOU ARE ALLOWING GENOCIDE IN VIOLATION OF MAXIMS OF LAW SUPPRESSING THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE WITH STATUTE AND CODE WE ARE IMMUNE TO – WHILE ATTORNEYS, CREATURES OF STATUTE JUST STAND THERE AND TAKE THE CASH EXCHANGING HANDS AND THAT IS NOT LEADERSHIP THAT IS TREASON.
NATHAN STEVENS HAS A DRUG HISTORY AND IF YOU CAN GIVE THE KIDS TO HIM YOU CAN GIVE THE KIDS BACK TO THEIR MOTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU CANNOT HAVE A DOUBLE STANDARD!!!!!! JUST TO STALL AND MOVE MONEY TO YOUR PROGRAMS AND A FAT YEAR-END BONUS PER HEADCOUNT WHILE YOU CANNOT GUARANTEE NOTHING BUT MONEY TO YOUR HANDS.
SO SABRINA FUCKING Nazi yes man LEACH IS FORCING A DIVORCE TO STALL for another whole year while you people use statute and code we are immune to commit genocide !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE RETURN OF MY GRANSON TO HIS RIGHTFUL CAREGIVER SO YOU ALL CAN KEEP A PAYCHECK ROLLING IN AND HAVING SEVERAL PHONE NUMBERS PIMPS USE TO TRAFFICK FULL GOWN WOMEN -
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 3:46 PM
To: Jones Gaston Rebecca
Subject: hone numbers with respect to former C.I.A. operative, Robert David Steel saying, "Cell phones are just a hammed up two way radio communication device"
Jones Gaston Rebecca <Rebecca.JonesGaston@dhsoha.state.or.us>;
ALL THESE FACTS ARE GROUNDS FOR THE ARREST OF SABRINA LEACH – IT IS TREASON – AND YOU ARE AIDING AND ABETTING IT AND CAN GUARANTEE NOTHING
NATHAN STEVENS HAS A DRUB HISTORY
SO SABRINA FUCKING LEACH IS FORCING A DIVORCE TO STALL THE RETURN OF MY GRANSON TO HIS RIGHTFUL CAREGIVER SO YOU ALL CAN KEEP A PAYCHECK ROLLING IN AND HAVING SEVERAL PHONE NUMBERS PIMPS USE TO TRAFFICK FULL GOWN WOMEN –
• From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 10:07 AM
To: Jones Gaston Rebecca
Subject: RE: Phone numbers
Rebecca Jones Gaston,
REGARDING: “This is to verify DHS employees only get one cell phone provided to them by the STATE OF OREGON, not several per child protection, foster retention, social worker”
If the above statement is not true where is the second cell phone bill, or logs tat register or assign the second cell phone published?
To clarify my question and what I am attempting to accomplish
I understand cell phones have very small memory capabilities and there should be a method for showing efforts made by social workers relevant to Reasonable Efforts or Diligent Efforts linked to ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION at the Juvenile Justice Complex and I am wondering how that is accomplished through an unlisted cell phone number and wonder if there is a secondary listing and bill itemized in STATE OF OREGON public records linking those extra cell phones to the Social Workers full legal name and a policy requiring text messages to be printed out and phone conversations recorded, like the police department, Central Precinct, has available for verification. As I have called and verified the phone numbers for police through supervisors what police officer is registered to what cell phone number for use in field contact as a contact point.
I look up DHS employee's second cell phone numbers and get messages verifying that is not an official STATE EMPLOYEE PHONE NUMBER and they are verified as unlisted which is conserving to me. I copy-paste the text messages and emailed it to them and no reply to verify the second phone number or content is verified which is even more concerning since not I need a detective to go and prove who contacted me with what phone number and that is known to run in the excess of $300.00 an hour and does not allow for transparency.
I ask these social workers i.e. Donald G Dowell, Bonnie M Kemball, Guendolynn L Slippy to verify the second phone numbers all three of them have used to contact me in the past and that is not honored. To which neither has Laura Freewood (Henry). I get no reply through text or email although their answering machine appears to be a point of contact relevant to official social work yet that is not a sole means of allowing court exhibits to be made available since the phone numbers are not registered to their State employee names.
The listing for STATE OF OREGON EMPLOYEES and the secondary contact cell phone number is not the same as the cell phone I am contacted with by Bonnie M Kemball, Donald G Dowel, Laura Freewood (Henry).
There is no way to verify the conversation with official listings related to the secondary cell phone numbers I am contacted through which presents a legal disadvantage and potential ‘talk and toss stealth’ used by criminals not wanting certain phone calls tracked back to them.
This use of multiple phones is also true with Foster Adoption Retention Specialists as well as Social Service Workers like Donald G Dowel, Sabrina Leach, Bonnie M Kemball and does not promote confidence or court EXHIBITS for referencing conversations to the registered phone number.
Donald G Dowell has three contact points with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory he has not responded to verify his second line nor has Bonnie M Kemball and I have requested they both do several times.
Laura Freewood (Henry) had two with one unverified with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory
Bonnie M Kemball has two with one unverified with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory
Gwendolyn L Slippy has three and there is no way to check her phone numbers in the Oregon state employee directory.
I have sent several emails detailing my concern to the state police.
Sabrina Leaches phone does not work (it sounds like a fax machine) and she had several email addresses
My belief is stealth is for war, not welfare and it is conserving to me that these social workers do not verify their second and third contact points with official documentation or written verification from which court exhibits are created for litigation purposes.
Marilyn [LeBaron]© grandmother of Victoria R Couvillion and Nolan J Stevens
10:54 AM
Now
• These treasonous bitches and their formalities and love for monies moving to their hands are putting my grandson with a drug addict - their dad has been in and out of jail for years and has a drug history allegations the same as my daughter but that is what that treasonous money whore Linda Hughes is authorizing - forced divorce to stall and keep the kids till custody to the day is make sure when he is not stable and wanted nothing to do with Nolan and only visited him once or twice in a total of a year when he lived in the same fucking apartment complex as me - right here - These money whore ADMINISTRATORS only care about their power and control and not the lives they destroy through money plunger isolation and false contracts we are not liable for till they step in and force us to a higher standard never applicable before - this is human trafficking and violations of counsel of choice to have a social worker not learned in the law authorized to force you to have them represent you just so they can steal and sell kids - it is the same thing done to the indians in usa and cannada - controlling where you live like we are negor slaves and passing posession from one hand to anoher without due process of law for retainer fees up to ten thousand dolars - while these nazi ADMINISTRATORs HAVE THE moto "DHS wants DHS gets", as the only policy and 'law' and is nothing but Treason you all stand around and to nothing about while money is luandered and posession of our nations heirs exchanges hands - TREASON NOTHING MORE
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 11:53 AM
To: Jones Gaston Rebecca
Subject: Phone numbers with respect to former C.I.A. operative, Robert David Steel saying, "Cell phones are just a hammed up two-way radio communication device"
From: Marilyn LeBaron < dogetty@live.com >
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 10:07 AM
To: Jones Gaston Rebecca Jones Gaston Rebecca <Rebecca.JonesGaston@dhsoha.state.or.us>;
Subject: RE: Phone numbers
Rebecca Jones Gaston,
Rebecca Jones Gaston, MSW
Child Welfare Director, Oregon DHS
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
C: 971-332-0799
Assistant: susan.sigleer@dhsoha.state.or.us
Is your assistant available to aid me in verifying the extra cell phone numbers for Laura Freewood (Henry), Donald G Dowell, Bonnie M Kemball, and Sabrina Leach and the correct email addresses for each of these STATE OF OREGON DHS employees?
CORRECTION: Laura Freewood (Henry) had three CELL PHONE NUMBERS SHE CONTACTED ME WITH two unverified with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory. She was reportedly fired as per Helmar Lochmann. And it is verified that when people have conflicting stories over things they are liable for they are not credible which is regarding DHS not having similar verification policies to corroborate facts regarding injuries, like pick up and drop off logs in daycare and public schools similar to work-related injuries or slip and fall in grocery stores utilized to show claim of harm, date and time of fats pertinent to litigation and liability being documented properly. The complaints relevant to forensic signs of sex abuse and intent of communication are in my grandson’s case presenting unresolved conflicting stories Laura Freewood (Henry) verbalized, three different explanations for the same incident, all within an hour of each other, without any proper refute from an independent investigative body to the satisfaction of family. This is child endangerment, not child protection.
REGARDING: “This is to verify DHS employees only get one cell phone provided to them by the STATE OF OREGON, not several per child protection, foster retention, social worker”
If the above statement is not true where is the second cell phone bill, or logs tat register or assign the second cell phone published?
To clarify my question and what I am attempting to accomplish
I understand cell phones have very small memory capabilities and there should be a method for showing efforts made by social workers relevant to Reasonable Efforts or Diligent Efforts linked to ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION at the Juvenile Justice Complex and I am wondering how that is accomplished through an unlisted cell phone number and wonder if there is a secondary listing and bill itemized in STATE OF OREGON public records linking those extra cell phones to the Social Workers full legal name and a policy requiring text messages to be printed out and phone conversations recorded, like the police department, Central Precinct, has available for verification. As I have called and verified the phone numbers for police through supervisors what police officer is registered to what cell phone number for use in field contact as a contact point.
I look up DHS employee's second cell phone numbers and get messages verifying that is not an official STATE EMPLOYEE PHONE NUMBER and they are verified as unlisted which is conserving to me. I copy-paste the text messages and emailed them to them and no reply to verify the second phone number or content is verified which is even more concerning since not I need a detective to go and prove who contacted me with what phone number and that is known to run in the excess of $300.00 an hour and does not allow for transparency.
I ask these social workers i.e. Donald G Dowell, Bonnie M Kemball, Guendolynn L Slippy to verify the second phone numbers all three of them have used to contact me in the past and that is not honored. To which neither has Laura Freewood (Henry). I get no reply through text or email although their answering machine appears to be a point of contact relevant to official social work yet that is not a sole means of allowing court exhibits to be made available since the phone numbers are not registered to their State employee names.
The listing for STATE OF OREGON EMPLOYEES and the secondary contact cell phone number is not the same as the cell phone I am contacted with by Bonnie M Kemball, Donald G Dowel, Laura Freewood (Henry).
There is no way to verify the conversation with official listings related to the secondary cell phone numbers I am contacted through which presents a legal disadvantage and potential ‘talk and toss stealth’ used by criminals not wanting certain phone calls tracked back to them.
This use of multiple phones is also true with Foster Adoption Retention Specialists as well as Social Service Workers like Donald G Dowel, Sabrina Leach, Bonnie M Kemball and does not promote confidence or court EXHIBITS for referencing conversations to the registered phone number.
Donald G Dowell has three contact points with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory he has not responded to verify his second line nor has Bonnie M Kemball and I have requested they both do several times.
Laura Freewood (Henry) had three with two unverified with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory.
Bonnie M Kemball has two with one unverified with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory.
Gwendolyn L Slippy has three and there is no way to check her phone numbers in the Oregon state employee directory.
I have sent several emails detailing my concern to the state police.
Sabrina Leaches phone does not work (it sounds like a fax machine) and she had several email addresses
My belief is stealth is for war, not welfare, and it is very concerning to me that these social workers do not verify their second and third contact points with official documentation or written verification from which court exhibits are created for litigation purposes.
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 10:07 AM
To: Jones Gaston Rebecca
Subject: RE: Phone numbers
Rebecca Jones Gaston,
REGARDING: “This is to verify DHS employees only get one cell phone provided to them by the STATE OF OREGON, not several per child protection, foster retention, social worker”
If the above statement is not true where is the second cell phone bill, or logs tat register or assign the second cell phone published?
To clarify my question and what I am attempting to accomplish
I understand cell phones have very small memory capabilities and there should be a method for showing efforts made by social workers relevant to Reasonable Efforts or Diligent Efforts linked to ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION at the Juvenile Justice Complex and I am wondering how that is accomplished through an unlisted cell phone number and wonder if there is a secondary listing and bill itemized in STATE OF OREGON public records linking those extra cell phones to the Social Workers full legal name and a policy requiring text messages to be printed out and phone conversations recorded, like the police department, Central Precinct, has available for verification. As I have called and verified the phone numbers for police through supervisors what police officer is registered to what cell phone number for use in field contact as a contact point.
I look up DHS employee's second cell phone numbers and get messages verifying that is not an official STATE EMPLOYEE PHONE NUMBER and they are verified as unlisted which is conserving to me. I copy-paste the text messages and emailed them to them and no reply to verify the second phone number or content is verified which is even more concerning since not I need a detective to go and prove who contacted me with what phone number and that is known to run in the excess of $300.00 an hour and does not allow for transparency.
I ask these social workers i.e. Donald G Dowell, Bonnie M Kemball, Guendolynn L Slippy to verify the second phone numbers all three of them have used to contact me in the past and that is not honored. To which neither has Laura Freewood (Henry). I get no reply through text or email although their answering machine appears to be a point of contact relevant to official social work yet that is not a sole means of allowing court exhibits to be made available since the phone numbers are not registered to their State employee names.
The listing for STATE OF OREGON EMPLOYEES and the secondary contact cell phone number is not the same as the cell phone I am contacted with by Bonnie M Kemball, Donald G Dowel, Laura Freewood (Henry).
There is no way to verify the conversation with official listings related to the secondary cell phone numbers I am contacted through which presents a legal disadvantage and potential ‘talk and toss stealth’ used by criminals not wanting certain phone calls tracked back to them.
This use of multiple phones is also true with Foster Adoption Retention Specialists as well as Social Service Workers like Donald G Dowel, Sabrina Leach, Bonnie M Kemball and does not promote confidence or court EXHIBITS for referencing conversations to the registered phone number.
Donald G Dowell has three contact points with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory he has not responded to verify his second line nor has Bonnie M Kemball and I have requested they both do several times.
Laura Freewood (Henry) had two with one unverified with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory
Bonnie M Kemball has two with one unverified with only one listed in the Oregon state employee directory
Guendolynn L Slippy has three and there is no way to check her phone numbers in the Oregon state employee directory.
I have sent several emails detailing my concern to the state police.
Sabrina Leaches phone does not work (it sounds like a fax machine) and she had several email addresses
My belief is stealth is for war, not welfare and it is conserving to me that these social workers do not verify their second and third contact points with official documentation or written verification from which court exhibits are created for litigation purposes.
Marilyn [LeBaron]© grandmother of Victoria R Couvillion and Nolan J Stevens
From: Jones Gaston Rebecca
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 8:21 AM
To: Marilyn LeBaron
Subject: RE: Phone numbers
I am not sure I am clear about your question. Would you clarify what you are asking?
Kind Regards,
Rebecca Jones Gaston, MSW
Child Welfare Director, Oregon DHS
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
C: 971-332-0799
Assistant: susan.sigleer@dhsoha.state.or.us
Messages to and from this email address may be made available to the public under Oregon law.
From: Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@live.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2021 5:51 AM
To: Jones Gaston Rebecca <Rebecca.JonesGaston@dhsoha.state.or.us>
Subject: Phone numbers
Think twice before clicking on links or opening attachments. This email came from outside our organization and might not be safe. If you are not expecting an attachment, contact the sender before opening it.
This is to verify DHS employees only get one cell phone provided to them by the STATE OF OREGON, not several per child protection, foster retention, social worker
Comments
Post a Comment