AS THEY PERTAIN TO CONSTITUTION AND ENFORCEABILITY PERTINENT TO INSURACE
From: Victoria
Couvillion
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 11:26 AM
To: paralegal@patbrownlaw.com; corey@patbrownlaw.com; jessica@patbrownlaw.com; laura@patbrownlaw.com; tiffanylouisehumphrey@gmail.com; drwilson@co.marion.or.us; Aiello Jody L; Reynolds Alicia L; vixybellaz@gmail.com; Victoria Couvillion; tcrofts@co.marion.or.us; SPDTRO; ppbpio@portlandoregon.gov; Nolan Stevens; KELLI CARPENTER; Jesse Turner; ipr@portlandoregon.gov; execdir@youthrightsjustice.org; dhs.info@state.or.us; DHS.INFO@dhsoha.state.or.us; DA@mcda.us; cpitman@pps.net; crc@portlandoregon.gov; rep.alissakenyguyer@oregonlegislature.gov; Rep.SheriSchouten@oregonlegislature.gov; Rep.RonNoble@oregonlegislature.gov; Rep.TawnaSanchez@oregonlegislature.gov; Rep.CheriHelt@oregonlegislature.gov; Rep.AnnaWilliams@oregonlegislature.gov; Rep.MarkMeek@oregonlegislature.gov; Grandma
Subject: You realized you are fired and continued to represent and
negotiate which means you work for the court and not my daughter and are a
criminal treasonous yes man having no authorization.
To:
Mr. David Russell Wilson
Bar Number 075610 Status Active Member
Admit Date 9/28/2007Company
Marion County District Attorney's Office
Mailing Address Mr. David Russell Wilson
Marion County District Attorney's Office
555 Court St NE Ste 3250
PO Box 14500
Salem OR 97309County
Marion Phone 503 588-5222Fax
Email drwilson@co.marion.or.us
Website www.co.marion.or.us/DAn
Recipients redacted for the most part and listed above and at the bottom
Ms.
Tiffany L Humphrey
1250
Cannon St SE
Salem
OR 97302
LAST WARNING:
Your continued contact and attempting a settlement is not lawful and is subject to arrest for an act of Treason.
Tiffany L Humphrey is FIRED by my daughter AND CONTINUES TO VIOLATE COUNSEL OF CHOICE AND IS IN NEGOTIATION A SETTLEMENT THAT IS NOT LAWFULLY HERS TO ALLOW, INITIATE, OR SUGGEST, AND IS AN ACT OF TREASON.
This is to verify that Tiffany L Humphrey, was in receipt of the email telling her she was fired and that my daughter wished she is fired before she ran down there to reassert herself as counsel by just getting a conversation in since retainers have to be done in person. That all she did is retain my daughter and my daughter did not retain her which I definitely believe was not covered in the psychological evaluation.
This is to verify that Tiffany Humphrey is not in receipt of a retainer agreement allowing the court to appoint attorneys.
YOUR BOTH
A COUPLE SCUM BAGS. YES MR. WILSON INCLUDING YOU.
My daughter has the right to Counsel of Choice her choice was to fire Tiffany Humphrey all americans have a right to a District Attorney’s Office looking our for the greater good which this case does not qualify as and had many, grounds to dismiss on it faces built-in collusion between counties is what he offers as leadership amounting to human trafficking regardless if kids get raped or not on any given case and are not for the greater good of anyone.
My daughter was not represented when her retainer is not verified then she has to raise her voice to get a word in edgewise while getting talked over in legaleeze that she said meant nothing to her and that is the level of her advisement, that nothing Tiffany Humphrey said is meaningful therefore Tiffany Humphrey cannot assert my daughter was fully advised on any premise when she did not undertake and all this is a grab for BOND MONIES to settle the matter quickly and get paid. Hit and run representation and no authorization or privilege with either of the privileged relationships my daughter should have to work for her instead of being used as a money concubine.
This is to reaffirm that my daughter had to talk over Tiffany Humphrey and Tiffany Humphrey could have gotten a continuance or came to speak to me as she said she was going but did not call or arrange for a time to meet and is not by that acting like she is in the least bit interested in the case and goes by the narrative that has very little cross-referencing as to who is available for cross-examination which is nothing but slop.
This is to verify that Tiffany did not sign any waivers and that trial was not pending and that ship had already been sunk and that the discovery of the case or the conversations between Olcott Thompson and my daughter were not authorized by my daughter so that Tiffany Humphrey was using a rubber stamp on a shipwreck and did not see the water for the ocean it sank in, which is all I will give her, and what conversations took place between her and Olcott Thompson need to be verified prior to any power to represent my daughter is legitimized by any stretch and any emails or recorded phone calls are required to verify Tiffany Humphrey did anything but ‘finish the job’ from a pirates speech and point of reference and motivation since all the discovery and ‘detective work Olcott Thompson reportedly had could not have possibly been made known to Tiffany Humphrey unless she was a member of the same law firm and a member of the Defense Team or that all the discovery had been delivered to her and ran past my daughter for approval and comments yet I would say not.
So she is fired and all the discovery is to be delivered to my daughter on all the matters pertaining to herself for an appeal needs to be filed which I’m sure Tiffany Humphrey sabotaged by her hit and run representation not having a single affidavit of truth from anyone on either county to verify or cross-reference and just does the will of somebody else or acts like a good hamburger grinder and churns out what she is trained to rubber stamp gets paid, and moves to the next pile of meat.
Yes, this is to verify that she was not in receipt of the discovery or all the facts or correspondence from Olcott Thompson and myself and why he was fired was never discussed and that is the biggest point on the evidence of a hit and run I have. No consideration whatsoever for the subject matter of the case that had collusion between the District Attorney’s Offices written all over it and the question remains who was directing Tiffany Humphrey when Olcott Thompson was fired?
A receipt of all contact between Olcott Thompson and Tiffany Humphrey needs to be verified and all conversations regarding my daughter need to be documented and her billable hours verified and what her notes on the case presented.
Tiffany Humphrey nor Olcott Thompson are my daughter’s Counsel of Chose and evidence neither work for her at onset is blatantly obvious and due care is not needed when they all work from the point where the SAFEGUARDS of a trial are as a pattern and a practice waived and attorneys are just there to finish driving the dagger a little deeper while twisting it under deliberate force and utter clumsiness in place of due care.
You are not authorized. And if my daughter was not in the hearing then she did not personally appear and Tiffany Humphrey is not allowed to retain herself.
Tiffany Humphrey is not privileged to anything said before she came along and told my daughter, she would call me and did not. But, of course, the criminal code and the BOND SETTLEMENT is the main objective and done ASAP. WHERE YOU all get your share of the plunder IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE FACTS NOBODY EVER CARED TO LOOK INTO WHILE INTENDING TO SEVER ALL OUR FAMILIAL TIES AND IS HUMAN TRAFFICKING PIRACY ALLOWED BY THE BAR AND UTTER CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR.
WHO IS NAMED AS RESPONSIBLE FOR NARRATIVE WHICH CANNOT BE ATTESTED TO BY TIFFANY HUMPHREY AN AFFIDAVIT AND THAT NARRATIVE CAN NOT BE CROSS EXAMINED AND DOES NOT LIST THE WITNESSES THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY CALED AND HAS NO DATED ENTRIES OR CROSS-REFERENCED BY ATTORNEY OR COURT DATE AND TIME FOR THE APPEAL PROCESS NONE OF YOU CARE TO GUARD AND IS RACETTEERING WHERE NO WITNESSES CAN BE CALLED OR CROSSED WHICH IN ITSELF IS ANOTHER ACT OF TREASON.
THE FIRST
ACT AS REPRESENTATION OUT OF YOUR MOUTHS IS TO PERPETRATE A LIE. THEN OFFER A
PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION AS A POLITICAL DEFENSE FOR YOUR SIDE AND IS MORE
COLLUSION AND NOT AUTHORIZED WHEN OBVIOUSLY USED TO COVER YOU ASSES INSTEAD OF
INTENDED TO CLINICALLY ASSESS AND YOU DO NOT ALLOW HER TO HAVE A WAY TO CROSS
EXAMINE HER EXPERT IF THAT EXPERT IS TO SWITCH SIDES AND GIVE HER PROOF OF WHAT
WAS SAID AND YOU ALL KNOW EXPERT WITNESSES CAN CHANGE SIDES TO WHICH IS LOOKS
LIKE IT IS EASILY DONE IF THE ATTORNEY DOES NOT GUARD THE ISSUE AND IS
EVIDENTLY, THE INTENT HERE BY HER KEEPING THE SESSION OFF RECORD – AND EVIDENCE
OF BAD FAITH AND TIFFANY HUMPHREY WAS NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANYBODY BUT THE COURT
SO TIFFANY HAS TO GO BY WHAT IS IN THE NARRATIVE INSTEAD OF WHAT HER
‘APPOINTED’ CLIENT SAYS AND NO PRIVILEGE IS AVAILABLE TO PROTECT AND THAT WHICH
IS COVERED UNDER PRIVILEGE IS NOT UNDER HER CONTROL – SO WHAT DID TIFFANY
HUMPHREY DO? NOTHING AT ALL BUT DRIVE THE DAGGER IN DEEPER WHILE TWISTING IT AS
IT HARMED MY DAUGHTER MORE. BUT THE CRIMINAL CODE ALLOWS YOU TO ACT LIKE
PIRATES AND ALL THAT IS LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE JUDGE, WHEN ENTRAPMENT BY
THE ATTORNEYS AND COLLUSION BETWEEN THE OFFICES OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY IS SO
OBVIOUS IS MAKES ME WANT TO VOMIT –
From: Vi Couvillion
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 10:38 AM
To: alex@patbrownlaw.com
Subject: drwilson@co.marion.or.us
The court ‘merits’ are a narrative that is not available as evidence due to mental cruelty and prolonged abuses of experimental COVID COURT that was abused not to mention the violations of the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree that was gotten while abusing TIME SERVED and do not provide for her safety while under the control and custody of the court in and out of jail and you must grand her relief for the abase of power of your court prosecution team you are party to after the fact by continuing to allow this to go unnoticed locking her up when reasonable doubt was met. I asked Emily Palmer and Olcott Thompson to help save her life and they just continued to ignore me then use cruel and unusual punishment not authorized in her DEAL THAT PUT MY WHOLE FAMILY TO DEATH.
TREASON, COLLUSION TO DEPRIVE RIGHTS AIDING SANCTIONED ENDANGERMENT FOR PUBLIC USE FORCING US TO DO BUSINESS JUST TO SUBJUGATE CASEH TO PUBLIC POLICY CONTROLLED OREGON STATE DRIVEN REVENUE GENERATING INDUSTRY AND IS TREASON
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 10:11 AM
To: linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; Jessica.l.cheely@ojd.state.or.u;
Cheely@ojd.state.or.us
Cc: drwilson@co.marion.or.us
Subject: Please Refute my Premise of your acting outside the scope of
your authority which is to be governed under the light of the greater good.
Mr. David Russell Wilson
Bar Number 075610 Status Active Member
Admit Date 9/28/2007Company
Marion County District Attorney's Office
Mailing Address Mr. David Russell Wilson
Marion County District Attorney's Office
555 Court St NE Ste 3250
PO Box 14500
Your Oath of Office
The merits used to threaten my daughter into a sentence was not negotiated by your Office under Emily Palmer and Olcott Thompson and there is not cress reference available to call witnesses for verifications of the court our your office upholding the fruit of the poisonous tree which is unlawful to waive and not agreed to nor was it stipulated that she had to put of with PHONE COURT and was unconscionable use of COVID under experimental mental torture of my daughter and makes your participation in the uses of Tiffany L Humphrey’s political phycological evaluation an act of Treason against my daughter just to make her a slave confiscated for public use when that requires a Trial by Jury of Peers and indicates the level of incompetence of Tiffany L Humphrey and is not conducive to keeping the court’s respected and an utter violation of public trust which is your duty to maintain and our trust in the system was already demolished and not your activity is reduced us to abject despotism.
I demand your resignation if you do not withdraw from this case. You last warning.
There is a real need for it’s enforcement where you must mitigate all the abuses you are made aware of that is proof of abject incompetence and disregard to the greater good you are bound by and where justice is delayed justice is denied where she and my entire family have been denied justice and more injustice is inflicted at the failure of the District Attorney’s Office to enter exculpatory evidence and prosecuted against the greater good while not reciprocation to me when I asked leaving us as food on the plate of the BAR Affiliated regime were not falling under the maxim of law that applies to the uses of insurance through your Office.
Treason - REFUSAL FOR CAUSE WITHOUT DISHONOR - it is Treason to aid Treason after the fact and you had your chance to do the right thing. you are added to the list of Treasonous by aiding Treason after the fact with open eyes by allowing Torture, & Murder
19CR78748 - Offense Felony - State of Oregon vs Melanie Victoria
LeBaron - Bureta, Jodie --Annex - Courtroom A - 11/03/2020
8:30 AM - Hearing - Further Proceedings are not authorized
How can we comply in a way which hares us when your colluding is adding and abetting Treason?
Tiffany L Humphrey is removed from this conversation.
Maybe you can go ask her what plea she was following up on and what they told her was her deal.
I don’t see anywhere a plea listed as it is bought under extenuating
circumstances by false promises that are not under your billable hours or
expertise for another County. I don’t see anything that includes a point by
point initial of her ability to comprehend all her options were explained and
that the Office of the District Attorney was fair or just and did not ‘negotiate’
the sentence at the time of the plea where she changes what might be her
sentence when she speaks about how much time she might be up for and is used to
intimidate her and confuse her and put her under duress when the penalty is
utterly unjust while no real negotiation is available for a monetary settlement
to bill her BOND. Arguable it is cruelty and unusual since duress is not
allowed and unusual since not defined and left open to them when is was not
accepted by her so no deal was ever made and is not agreed to so TIME SERVED
under psychological abuse is a secondary level of mental abuse when not in her
agreement.
Appeal waivers
Even after a plea, you can appeal your sentence as illegal or excessive. Yes, I told her to enter a VERBAL MOTION TO QUASH PLEA. However, with the proliferation of appeals from sentences in guideline sentencing regimes, it has become routine for federal prosecutors to insist that as part of the plea agreement, you waive any right to appeal either the conviction or sentence. THIS IS REALLY A CRIMINAL ACT. She was not convicted by a Jury and the explanation Olcott Thompson Offered her is total bunk and he cannot negotiate outside of his expertise,
The federal courts uniformly have upheld appeal waivers, while a minority of state courts have disagreed.
The waiver also may include any collateral attack rights such as habeas petitions. This provision is more problematic because it forbids you from attacking the process that resulted in the very agreement with which the government seeks to bind you. Thus many courts will permit you to raise issues of ineffective assistance of counsel and the involuntariness of your plea despite explicit waivers of collateral attack rights.
Bench trial with stipulated facts
If your jurisdiction does not provide for conditional guilty pleas and you and your attorney desire to preserve a meritorious legal issue for appeal, consider a bench trial on stipulated facts.
Judges grant leniency for guilty pleas because they save time and demonstrate the defendant’s contrition. If you waive a jury and stipulate to the facts and your attorney explains that though you do not contest your factual guilt, you have a meritorious legal issue which deserves appellate review, you might be able to preserve the issue for appeal as well as obtain the sentencing discount which a guilty plea warrants.
No Contest Pleas
Sometimes people realize that the evidence is stacked against them and
they want to secure the benefits of a guilty plea, but do not want to admit
guilt. (not what was done here they used the old stuff they did not press with
a new case that had reasonable doubt) They may have difficulty facing friends
and family or they actually may be innocent. Other defendants rightfully wish
to avoid the collateral estoppel effect that an admission of guilt will have in
subsequent civil litigation brought by the victims, regulatory agencies or
shareholders. What a pile of bull shit the collateral estoppel was what they
were after unjustly and is political when they let the other guy go just before
her out to the streets while saying he intended to go work with kids and did
not swear him in and swore my daughter in to lock her into a ‘perjury trap’
imposed directly by Judicial Officer David E Leith and is purely political in
motive and a demonstration of extreme bias, that is screaming in your face. And
while they build their case against the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree we could
use it to show D.E. Leith has a special interest in this case since I was
accusing him of Treason and yelling into his answering machine and siding him
threats of prosecution and disqualification telling him no f’n way he is going
to block my daughter from having contact with me when is blatantly obvious it
Is a divide and conquer move where she is ‘called delusional’ addicted and
living in the streets and a criminal act on his plate to refute and say what
his grounds was like the other assault that DHS used to divide and conquer to
isolate her from me by telling her, “Your mother wants you put to death”. What
a pile of Treasonous colluding bitches. And the best they can do is make her a
slave in jail when they belong in front of a firing squad.
A no contest or nolo contendere plea is one in which you do not plead guilty but consent to the entry of a judgment of conviction.
So why was not nolo contendere offered because it would mean ‘cave’
and she did not want to cave?
So what is the position of the District Attorney?
In an Alford plea, you plead guilty but maintain your innocence. With reasonable doubt available on the charge where the punishment fits the crime if prosecuted.
Uh meaning you can move to go to trial without a penalty without the threat of immediate incarceration under a promise of things not under the scope of the authority of the court-appointed attorney, like the Non-Adversarial thing pre printed out before the deal was entered into court record, and the one imposed other people making it a permanent plight of their life, and is imposed on my daughter, who they are calling delusional, and made before the politically motivated phycological evaluation took place and goes to the level of collusion between Counties, Attorneys, psychologists, Judge David E Leith, Olcott Thompson to get the JJC a couple kids to sell, when they might need to avoid liabilities and hide them from the obvious claim of harm they are aiding and abetting and then used to exonerated a Treasonous JJC of the Treason committed against my heirs and I and the Treason allowed under an ongoing inherent conflict of interest including insurance fraud by ambulance-chasing, but not only that level of insurance fraud, and not limited to controlling all the evidence and both sides of the argument, multiple levels in two directions compounded by each family member adversely affected, and not bring relief according to the rules of a settlement based on the relief sought means to put back to the state under which you was found or as close as possible, which is the practice of insurance and insurance claims, yet it is used to grab and displace kids. What am I wrong about? How does my daughter deal that ties her into instant jail time mean when reasonable doubt was available when exculpatory evidence was available? She was under duress and that cannot be ignored.
A court is not required to accept either any contest or an Alford
plea. In some jurisdictions, the court cannot accept any contest plea without
the prosecution’s consent. Some prosecutors’ offices have the policy to oppose
no contest pleas except “in the most unusual circumstances.”
So what is USUAL about this case? Meaning not unusual – cuz if it is he is a pig that needs a bullet in his head by a firing squad.
Conditional pleas
A guilty plea waives all but nonjurisdictional issues, even hotly litigated pretrial motions. Some jurisdictions permit, if the prosecution consents, “conditional pleas” in which the parties agree that the defendant may appeal specified pretrial issues.
The open plea
An open plea is one in which you plead to the full indictment or
information without any agreement with the prosecutor or judge.
An open plea may be to your advantage where both of two conditions apply:
• The judge either will not or cannot (because of rule or statute)
promise a particular sentence.
• The prosecutor insists on disadvantageous conditions or stipulations without offsetting concessions.
For example, in federal fraud cases where you contest the loss amount
and the prosecutor wants a waiver of appeal, the prosecutor may offer to
dismiss some counts for a plea. However, where no count carries a mandatory
minimum or consecutive sentence, the dismissal may not earn you much, if
anything. On the other hand, with an open plea you might reap the benefits of a
plea, seek a more favorable sentence and then appeal the sentence if it is
excessive.
Again Tiffany L Humphrey.
CEASE AND DESIST CONTACTING MY DAUGHTER of 19CR78748 - Offense Felony - State of Oregon vs Melanie Victoria LeBaron - Bureta, Jodie --Annex - Courtroom A - - Hearing - Further Proceedings are not authorized – no settlement is authorized when punishment was not agreed upon when the plea was not lawful
You are in violation of the Right to Counsel of Choice creating legal disadvantages after legal disadvantages while entrapping her by your method of invitation to edit the expert witness testimony impeaching him as if you know he is of low morals to commit perjury and disqualifies him since you invited my daughter to commit collusion. You are fired!
You are committing an act of Treason by your contacting my daughter seeking to tacitly retain you again by speaking to you makes you Treasonous against the Oath of Office, our Sheriff’s are Sworn to Uphold and Defend and you are fired. Not authorized to negotiate a settlement or authorized to represent her CLAIM since you already set her up and tried to impeach her and you allowed apolitical line of questioning process and denied her discovery and it was for a private party other than her where she cannot redirect the use of it after the trial is not allowed and no more witnesses can be called or used when no redirect is available and is our of order to force her to redirect on herself and deprives her right to have a court record since all that testimony whether collusive or not is by closed quarter proceedings which are not lawful and your incompetence is utterly and blatantly evident that is raised the inference it is deliberate on your part.
Treason - REFUSAL FOR CAUSE WITHOUT DISHONOR - it is Treason to aid
Treason after the fact and you, Judge Jodie Bureta, have your chance to do the right thing and Quash the plea or be added to the list of Treasonous for aiding
Treason after the fact with open eyes by allowing Torture, & Murder by
Lethalized Use of the administrative pen or worthless printed monies from the
enemies of our land and you must step over into the side of the law and see my
daughters TORT CLAIM is valid CLAIM OF HARM lead in a direction that sends the message you do not aid an enemy within due to the violations against her and
her heirs is greater than the claim of the STATE OF OREGON against her where
her heirs are innocent and neither she nor her heirs deserve the equivalent of
a Capital Punishment where you cannot prosecute with dirty hands when
punishment does not fit the crime, to begin with. And she demands a Trial by Jury of Peers to see if the punishment fits the crime which is grounds for an
acquittal on the second counted reasoning of why the plea is invalid. It is not
fair that while we are at a legal disadvantage and the TORT CLAIM IS NOT COMMON
KNOWLEDGE that the STATE OF OREGON only in both civil and criminal or family
law only make forms that make your court federal monies and give us no printed
remedy for relief and is a legal disadvantage by design that is used to procure
‘clients’ unwittingly believing attorneys will advise you of your rights which
is deceit since the Belligerant Claimant clearly states they do not nullifying
the use of Miranda Warning that does not clearly state they do not as if it is
designed just to deceive us when the badge is clearly enough to let you know
the police mean to prosecute you by making their presence known and even your
court-appointed attorneys are utterly incompetent by deliberate design and our
right to remain silent is not upheld when we are named the defendant and
speaking to a court-appointed attorney is a collusive act to deprive rights
while our university professors are afraid to teach us how to use critical
thinking or get fired like in Natzi Germany and utterly pisses on our war
memorial naming the fallen men that died in World War II now made a trophy for
the Hitler Regime instead of a place to grieve for those that laid down their
lives to keep us a free nation.
Judge Bureta, Jodie –
COLLUSION TO DEPRIVE RIGHTS FOR TWO GENERATION OF RAPE IS PUNISHABLE
BY DISQUALIFICATION
1.
You allow murder by Lethalized us of a pen of two innocent kids when you allow
this collision between two District Attorneys Offices to violate: No Double
Jeopardy.
2.
You allow attorneys who are incompetent and required to be incompetent to fail
to declare our rights for Federal Funding then say you cannot hear
Constitutional arguments and the Amendments of the Constitution are reiterated
and revised to be included in statute just to then say it does not apply and is
duplicity and deception.
3.
You allow the civil procedure to subvert equal protection of the beyond the
reasonable doubt standard of evidence that is granted to the Indigenous
populations when DHS influence a consolidation and use a lower standard even
below prima facia to put entire families to the equivalent of death as if a
Capital offense has been committed where no penal code is defined and is
deceptive when affidavits are never used and a complaint process does not allow
you to face your accusers in open court and no first-hand witnesses are called
when bureaucrats cannot write an affidavit of truth and use it for their
personal gain.
4. A
lower standard of evidence than prima facia case to sentence an entire family
to death and allow the maltreatment of my heirs to be congealed.
5.
You allow DHS to be the Appellate Court on things they never refiled or
appealed
6.
You allow perjury of the District Attorney in two generations.
7.
You allow a double standard to protect pedophiles more than family.
8.
You allow child endangerment.
9. You
allow the conflict of ‘statute’ that is feigned words according to the Supreme Court that statesman is immune to statue yet it is used to put entire families
to death.
10. You allow
DHS to bring all family members on to the petition ‘al la cart’ by using
Diligent Efforts that is nothing more than duress to contract and buy our kin
back from the system.
11. You force us
to go and pay for our own judiciary that is not elected or duly appointed or
authorized by any amendment of the Constitution and is coercion where no
redirect is possible and is a closed quarter proceeding that is sanctionable
and not an open court and is an abuse of Section 18 of the Oregon Constitution.
12. You allow a
seat not independent from the agency that has been by mechanical delegation to
use judicial discretion that violates our right to an independent judiciary.
13. You allow mental abuse, emotional torture, the violation of false imprisonment of two kids, and the destruction of our blood ties when you allow prison time without the Trial by Jury of Peers to decide if the punishment fits the crime when she was put over for sentencing under collusion, failure to provide,
But not limited to the above which does not preclude racketeering and conspiracy to deprive rights under color of law insurance fraud endangerment violation of many supreme court rules theft by deception according to the Oregon Bill of Rights –
Your new vocabulary phrase is REFUSAL FOR CAUSE WITHOUT DISHONOR
Why are you talking to that treasonous bitch. Why do you allow the Sheriff to take you to speak to her? Why do you accept phone calls from her? Or mail for that matter. she worked for them no you.
You cannot be tacit about anything or it will be presumed your acquiesce to be represented by Tiffany L Humphrey who did you huge disfavor by allowing a political evaluation which is treason on so many levels wanting to be reimbursed by your BOND to pay for selling your privileged relationship to somebody else. GET IT? SEE IT! You saw it and by instinct asked the right question and she blew you off and is trying to use your disadvantage and fear just to make you cave under the presumption in the presence of the Sheriff that she is you, your attorney, you, allowing it when she is not acting in your favor and will cover the ass of the judge and let you get into a place where the expert can turn on you and say you are dishonorable by her intention to allow you to edit what the expert said and is intent to commit collusion and is a criminal act you should run away from. I have already told toons of people what is going on and it is up to you to stiffen up your back.
I am you by extension of your assignment. I am the agent you are the principle and I am also a direct witness and have already sent in many things the court attorneys have collectively ignored. Tiffany L Humphrey is the will of the court and the will of DHS and are prejudice, bias, sloppy, incompetent, and not a witness to anything, and not assigned to represent your kids, and it is a conflict of interest since they have no billable hours for them and helping the DHS in any way is a prosecutor in nature and that is not allowed.
That is your broken record. "She is not authorized" to the
Sheriff. "You are not authorized" to her face and don't let her in
your cell and don't meet with her.
Sher is not authorized which is your Oath of Office to Uphold and Defend and refuse her calls, her meeting with you in your cell, or the Sheriff escorting you to meet her. Do not allow her in your cell and ask the Sheriff to not open your cell door. That is the personal retainer method by tacit agreement to your even speaking in her presence and not declaring your active refusal. She calls you a defendant when you are on the matter lawfully the Accused. Just allowing the title Defendant means 'guilty as charged'. Do not allow the Sheriff to escort you to visit her and tell them like a broken record, "Sher is not Authorized, my mother, Marilyn LeBaron, is my Counsel of Choice, and if she comes to your cell under escort by the Sheriff's you say, "You are not authorized, my mother is my Counsel of Choice.
This is apart of your TORT CLAIM and Tacitly allowing Tiffany L Humphrey to speak to you and you reply she will presume she is allowed to represent you and negotiate a settlement in the favor of the court that she allowed your abuse in then wants to set you up to compromise your integrity by editing the expert witness and she is setting you up for a perjury trap and that psychological evaluation is out and you need to fire her or they can use it to turn the expert against you and you do not have the ability to redirect and that is another act of treason when they are not holding trial yet still bringing witnesses against you that will never get a redirect and incompetence on Tiffany L Humphrey's part or deliberate collusion against the rules of admissibility. Just the logic it was not available for a redirect and you did not get a copy of the session is putting you at a legal disadvantage making her a piece of shit.
I am holding them accountable for what their rules are designed to do and your tacit allowing her to negotiate for you is allowing treason against you - two years of treason - get it!
They are obtaining federal funding through their office which is fraud
Four topics
their rules, their language, their job, and what congress said is supposed to be done
Do not meet with her. Do not allow her in your cell. Return all mail
REFUSED FOR CAUSE WITHOUT DISHONOR.
They will utterly ignore me if you do not do that and let her make her presence with you 'retain you in prison. if you did not know what she is doing every time she makes contact with you by tacit allowing her to even speak accept her as your representation and anything she does is allowed by your lack of refusal and all my work will be utterly ignored.
She is not helping you write an affidavit of truth and repudiation or helping you file a grievance which is not handled through the court you are in and SHE WILL NOT AID YOU SHE IS A LIAR WHEN SHE SAID SHE IS THERE TO AID AND ASSIST. SHE IS NOT ALLOWED TO AND ONLY WORKES FOR THE COURT. THAT IS IT. SHE IS BUNK
I SCREAMED TO HAVE YOU MOVED. WHEN DID THEY MOVE YOU? THE STATE CANNOT OWN ANYTHING THEY FAILED TO DEFEND THEIR OATH OF OFFICE WHICH IS DERILICTION OF DUTY THEY ARE PRIVATE CITIZENS AND WE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE THE SAME IMMUNITIES YET THEY RESERVE THEM ALL FOR THEMSELVES AND FORCE US TO WAIVE OURS THEY CANNOT DENY THE OATH OF OFFICE IT IS ALL PAID FOR BY FOREIGN BANKS WHICH COMES FROM YOUR BOND THAT IS FEDERAL AND YOUR KIDS ARE OUT OF YOUR BOND COLLATERALIZED TO YOUR MAIDEN NAME AND YOUR KIDS CANNOT BE CONFISCATED TO SATISFY THE DEBT WHEN THEY ALREADY OFFERED YOUR KIDS BACK SO IT IS FALSE IMPRISONMENT OF YOUR KIDS SINCE THE DATE OF JULY 15, 2020.
CLAYFIELD DOCTRINE OVERRIDES DUE TO ACCEPTING FEDERAL FUNDING AND THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THEN THEY ATTORNEYS WILL NOT UPHOLD YOUR RIGHTS - WHICH PRODUCES A VORTEX OF CONFLICT OF LAWS AND THEY ARE NOT BLIND TO WHAT THEY DO AND IT IS NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY TO LOOK UP AND DECLARE YOUR RIGHTS - AS THE 'DETECTIVE' TOLD YOU TO STOP DOING AND HE IS A TREASONOUS SCUM LIAR WHEN REASONABLE DOUBT BELONGS TO THE DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY (WHICH IS DERELICTION OF DUTY) AND ALSO THAT OF OLCOTT SENDING A DETECTIVE TO GO FIND. SOMETHING THAT WAS IGNORED BY EMILY PALMER AND OLCOTT THOMPSON YOU WAS TOTALLY LIED TO AND OLCOTT THOMPSON IS A CON.
ATTORNEYS ARE SWORN TO SECRECY - NONE OF THEM WILL TELL YOU U.S. CITIZEN MEANS 'PROPERTY OF D.C.
I DEMANDED THEY MOVE YOU AND HAVE FILED YOUR AFFIDAVIT BY MAIL AND AM DRAFTING IT UP ON TWO ANGLES THAT EITHER WAY THERE IS A PREMISE THAT IS A CRIMINAL ACT AGAINST YOU AND YOU GOT MOVED SO YOU WILL NOT BE PRESSURED TO CHANGE YOUR STORY OR HAVE PEOPLE LIE YOU DID.
WRITE DOWN YOUR STATEMENTS ON PAPE IN ANY WORDS YOU HAVE. THIS HAS TO BE DONE. AFFIDAVITS ARE REQUIRED IN THE FIRST PERSON AND YOUR ATTORNEYS ONLY MOVE TO GET THE BOND MONIES AND WHEN I ASKED AND ASKED FOR HELP THEY JUST IGNORED ME AND IS PROOF THE ATTORNEYS ARE COMMITTING FELONIES BY ALLOWING FEDERAL FUNDS TO GET AROUND ALL OUR RIGHTS
ADMINISTRATIVE TORT CLAIM FOR REMEDY THEY CANNOT PROSECUTE WITH DIRTY HANDS
Point 1. ATTORNEYS ARE OFFICERS OF THE COURT AND WORK FOR THE COURT AND DO NOT WORK FOR YOU Point 2. ATTORNEYS ARE OFFICERS OF THE COURT AND WORK FOR THE COURT AND DO NOT WORK FOR YOU Point 3. ATTORNEYS ARE OFFICERS OF THE COURT AND WORK FOR THE COURT AND DO NOT WORK FOR YOU.
TREASON HAS BEEN DECLARED AND IS GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION
You need to keep telling that Attorney, "You are not authorized". She is incompetent and you are the Accused not a defendant and she will not take a prosecutors stance where she wants them to keep handing her cases to make her bread and butter. As long as she is your attorney she has the authority to negotiate a settlement and she will do whatever keeps cases coming in her by assignment of the court. There is a serious conflict of interest there considering she does not actually represent you she only represents you BOND. She is not countering or preparing a TORT CLAIM like what Rod Class explains in Q & A With Rod Class #1 https://youtu.be/EDNogI6nBGU
You want a REMEDY, not a SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATED BY COURT APPOINTED 'ENEMY'' APPOINTED TO YOU BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
YOUR COMPLAINT HIS HIGHER AGAINST THEM THAN THEIR COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU AND THEIR COURT SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN
We are not without a remedy when dragged in front of a Judicial
Setting which is an Administrative Agency and not an independent court.
Administrative Hearings not listed and the DHS skip all of it with the Notice of Liability that shifts the burden of proof. The tail end of it. Who are you? Where is your authority come from? Show me the law. Prove it is me.
Bypassed the Administrative hearing we never were summoned to and never had. No jurisdiction for a judicial review Title 5 Section 702. And give us a penalty equivalent to death without a penal code available in Judicial Justice Complex with no jurisdiction to impose death sentences.
The Administrative Court to deal with these administrative
Rules, Job description, language, Administrative Offices, for impeachment before representatives before each state to hold them accountable.
Where are the Affidavits? to prove the standard prima facia evidence what upheld on my daughter's case with corroboration of another sworn affidavit. That establishes Probable Cause to give my entire family the equivalent of the death penalty for a capital offense and deny all my heirs contact for over two years when it is evidence of child sex trafficking of my heirs.
Where is the law that stated we have no natural rights to our family
and kin when anything you can call mine is deemed personal property and
protected under the Oregon Bill of Rights Article 1 Section 18 eleven that
requires we allow a judge to preside the case instead of a trilby jury of peers
when confiscated for public use which goes to DHS is a business and foster
homes are a business that provides money to them that belonged to our BOND?
Probable Cause
Bust them under their own rules of procedure Criminal rules 3, 4, 5
Complaint Affidavit Summons or Warrant from a Judge Probable Cause
Charge Criminal rules 3, 4, 5
Civil Rules Procedure Rule three Complaint Affidavit
Rules of evidence 402, 501, What is admissible as evidence in a courtroom Using Federal Statutes
All people have been confiscated for public use to get Federal Dollars without upholding Section 18. And it is under the abuse of power allowed by the BAR. What belongs to our kids is what was confiscated and stolen from using the TAX CODE to deprive the natural right without JUST COMPENSATION OR TRIAL BY JURY OF PEERS, without and AFFIDAVIT, COMPLAINT, OR WARRANT, OR SUMMON,
Section 18. Private property or services are taken for public use. Private property shall not be taken for public use, nor the particular services of any man are demanded, without just compensation; nor except in the case of the state, without such compensation, first assessed and tendered; provided, that the use of all roads, ways, and waterways necessary to promote the transportation of the raw products of mine or farm or forest or water for beneficial use or drainage is necessary to the development and welfare of the state and is declared a public use. [Constitution of 1859; Amendment proposed by S.J.R. 17, 1919, and adopted by the people May 21, 1920; Amendment proposed by S.J.R. 8, 1923, and adopted by the people Nov. 4, 1924].
Section 19. [Constitution of 1859; Amendment proposed by S.J.R. 17, 1919, and adopted by the people May 21, 1920; Amendment proposed by S.J.R. 8, 1923, and adopted by the people Nov. 4, 1924]
Section 19. Imprisonment for debt. There shall be no imprisonment for debt, except in case of fraud or absconding debtors. — My grandkids are imprisoned for a debt, they fail to announce as a True Bill, yet Bill for a settlement my heirs are not responsible to pay and are confiscated for the public business uses of DHS we are all forced to contract into to save ourselves like chewing on your hand to feed yourself when forced to ask a service we are not allowed to refuse while our heirs are the equivalent of a prohibited direct tax taking the item of property dedicated for a future tax grabbed by the one intending to tax it and are used to move monies as a settle a debt of their family member when relief is intended to put you back as close as you were when the matter arose and that does not include putting you up for sale without cause for the adoption since not an orphan as we all define an orphan by common consent of what an orphan in.
Section 20. Equality of privileges and immunities of citizens. No law shall be passed granting to any citizen or class of citizens privileges, or immunities, which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens. —
Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, abused, and Privacy bolstering the Fifth Amendment of the pedophile and all the rules of court and the equivalent of the death penalty where no plea or acquittal or a clearly defined penal code is available to give bureaucrats and attorneys a special place in society to abuse us and make us money concubines.
Section 20. Equality of privileges and immunities of citizens. No law
shall be passed granting to any citizen or class of citizens privileges, or
immunities, which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all
citizens. — This is blatantly violated repeatedly on so many levels I could run
on a three-hour typing session and not repeat my self
Melanie LeBaron Principle
Marilyn LeBaron Agent for Principle above
by her assign
|
Ms. Tiffany L Humphrey |
|
|
Bar Number |
165698 |
|
Status |
Active Member |
|
Admit Date |
11/4/2016 |
|
Mailing Address |
Ms. Tiffany L Humphrey |
|
County |
Marion |
|
Phone |
503 933-7141 |
|
Fax |
|
|
Email |
|
|
Website |
|
Comments
Post a Comment