Conflict of Laws

Witness the healing power of God and those that know Him and still continue to do evil remain His opponents, rather than bow to His will. He does give you the choice... and the consequences of your disobedience into time in the eternal conveyance is heavy considering there is no end or beginning, which is His, He said, "I Am the beginning and the end'... https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2507735025979999&id=573643882722466 And this is a Come out from her oh My people message to the people who don't want to be subject to the Sodom and Gomorrah 'psediudiciary' sitting on a high place presiding a seed war against the right of kin. https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/public-notice-david-lester-straight-affidavit-of-truth-repudiation-and-revocation-of-citizenship.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0cKW6KIpc_6aM-ryXxBBMj-jYX5xCmqKKfsMK3hbQLDu92YJz1YGnI9zQ

Witness the healing power of God and those that know Him and still continue to do evil remain His opponents, rather than bow to His will. He does give you the choice... and the consequences of your disobedience into time in the eternal conveyance is heavy considering there is no end or beginning, which is His, He said, "I Am the beginning and the end'... https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2507735025979999&id=573643882722466

Bunch of behaviors 24. Schizophrenia  No resemblance to how the term is used. Disease of thought disorder, 

Children in cottage houses

Servants: Orphans became servants.  The industrial revolution, suppressed passions, strict hierarchy, obsession with status and class, "We were underdogs". "We weren't on the same level as them". "We ought to know our place".  The True Story of Life Below Stairs.  Part 1 of 3 - Knowing Your Place.

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,”

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,”

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,”

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,”

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,”

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,

"There is no "license to practice law"! November 15, 2013 at 6:26 PM The practice of law is a common right, law is common to all.. Here's the proof! https://youtu.be/vieooNH-SkE      The practice of Law is an occupation of common right, the same being a secured liberty right. (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))      No state may convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, issue a license and fee for it. (Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105 (1943))      The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))      Should any state convert a secured liberty right into a privilege, charge a fee and issue a license for it, one may ignore the license and fee and engage in the exercise of the right with impunity. (Shuttlesworth vs City of Birmingham 373 U.S. 262 (1962)) "A 'Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,