Skip to main content

Meet The Press Broadcast (Full) - August 22nd, 2021


I am denied discovery. You have no subject matter jurisdiction without presenting discovery.

 

MOTION TO FUCKING DISMISS YOUR NAZI TREASON

 

RECUSE

 

YOU ARE COMMITTING NAZI TREASON

YOU ARE WITNESS TAMPERING

YOU HAVE NOT PENAL CODE TO SENTENCE ME AND MY GRANDDAUGHTER TO EMOTIONAL DEATHS

DHS COMMITED PERJURY

IT IS UNLAWFUL TO HAVE A PRESET DISPOSIION AND CANNOT SETTLE A MATTER BETWEEN AN ADOPTION AGENCY DEMAINDING MY SIGNATURE WHEN THAT IS NOT A SUABLE OFFENSE OR A CRIME WHERE NO STIPULATION UNDER LAW REQUIRES A SIGNATURE AT THE ORDER OF ANOTHER ENTITY

THIS IS TREASON IN DISHONOR OF ALL THE SOLDIERS THAT EVER DIED IN THE REVOLUTIONARY WARD, THE CIVIL WAR, AND WORLD WAR II, AND DISHONORS MEMMORIAL’S, FOURTH OF JULY, THE JUDICIAL CODE OF CONDUCT, BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PRCEDURE, AND THE LOGIC OF MAXIMS OF LAW DEFINING WHAT A BINDING CONTRACT IS WHEN FORCING US TO CONTRAT UNDER DURESS WHILE HOLDING HOSTAGE OUR YOUNG IMPEDING CONTRACTS ALREADY IN EXISTENCE THAT SUPERSEEDED YOUR INTURSION WHEREAS YOU CANNOT MAME MY SIGNATURE VOID. YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE OATH OF OFFICE AND SUBJECT TO THE PAIN OF DEATH FOR AN ACT OF TREASON AND AM DEMANDING YOU BE HUNG BY THE NECK TILL DEAD OR DEATH BY FIRING SQUAD AND IF YOU REFUSE TO RECUSE I DEMAND YOUR PERFORMANCE UNDER THE CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE THAT FAILURE ON YOUR PART TO SHOW CAUSE YOU AGREE MY DEMAND FOR YOUR TRIAL AND EXECUTION FOR THE COUNTS OF TREASON PERPETRATED AGAINST THIS NATION AS AN ENEMY WITHIN AS A CALLUSE RACKETEERING HUMAN TRAFFIKER NAZI WARMONGERING PIG.

 

I do not consent to your discretion over Diligent Efforts without a Trial by Jury of Peers under the conditional acceptance you hang if you cannot produce a guilty verdict for the invisible penalty of Willful Failure to Apply to Contract Under Duress when Americans to not contract with terrorists or negotiate with enemies without a Treaty or it is Treason aiding the enemy within as you do by pretending to have tied hands while it is our nations heirs you murder.

 

Go impair yourself with the Nazi fang pole as a favor to the troops that died on the island of Iwo Jima and  please make sure I am present to watch.

 

Victoria Couvillion

Nolan J Stevens

Melanie V LeBaron

Marilyn LeBaron power of attorney in fact for the above

 

 

 

Marilyn LeBaon

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 1:08 AM
Cc: linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us
Subject: You are committing Treason punishable by death. I have demanded the Right to No Double Jeopardy Be Upheld

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

 

 

Sent from Mail for Windows

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 12:41 AM
To: james.c.egan@ojd.state.or.us
Cc: linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us
Subject: I have demanded the Right to No Double Jeopardy Be Upheld

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 10:26 PM
To: BARBER Kellie; Sabrina.Leach2@dhsoha.state.or.us <Sabrina.Leach2@dhsoha.state.or.us>; jody.l.aiello@state.or.us; Aiello Jody L; Kate Brown For Oregon Information; rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us <rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us>
Subject: I have demanded the Right to No Double Jeopardy Be Upheld

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 10:21 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject: I have demanded the Right to No Double Jeopardy Be Upheld

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 10:09 PM
To: michael.schmidt@state.or.us

Subject: I have demand the Right to No Double Jeopardy Be Upheld. The sentence of not being allowed my grandkids is already served and cannot be imposed again. I cannot be arbitrarily sentenced to more than six months time without Trail by Jury of Peers to render a verdict of guilty. I am not in possession of any allegation worthy of being tried and sentenced to the pain and penalty equivalent to the death penalty of a criminal case extending the same pain and penalty already served to the fullest of the sentence imposed regardless of how arbitrary. My time has been served and my Right to No Double Jeopardy cannot allow that pain and penalty to be served twice and the Juvenile Justice Complex remain in violation of the Oath of Office to Uphold and Defend the Constitution of for the united States of America in dishonor to no penalty is clearly defined that a Trial by Jury could impose.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 10:04 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
I have demand the Right to No Double Jeopardy Be Upheld

 

I was punished by the Juvenile Justice Complex to the maximum of time allowed under law without a Trial by Jury of Peers to render a verdict regardless if that pain and penalty was imposed and not clearly defined as pain and penalty relevant to the matter revealed to me through a witnesses and an unknown District Manager to that decision handed down and denied my grandkids for six months as well as told DHS was trying to put my grandkids into my custody by an unnamed female on an unknown number and served to the fullest of that pain and penalty which does not allow for another sentence to be imposed due to the Right of No Double Jeopardy yet an unknown District Manager unlawfully extended that pain an penalty beyond the limits of law while forging the original to intimidate me with unlawful prosecution through unlawful simulation of process for reasons not available as a criminal charge so not a matter that can be pressed and DHS remain in contempt of court without lawful case. So for no reason available under law I am denied my grandkids while DHS arbitrarily extend pain and penalty not relevant to child abuse while trying to put my grandkids into my custody.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:40 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Willful Failure to Apply to Contract Under Duress while forced to UNDERSTAND I have no standing is redundancy considering all our blood ties are already disrespected by the BAR Association and redundancy is not allowed in contract law

 

A refute under law is required to show there is a law stipulating Diligent Efforts carries the weight of a penal code as a Juvenile Justice Complex discretion without my agreement to allow Trial by Judge which must be presented willingly to the Judge prior to subject matter jurisdiction of the seated judge. I do not consent to a seated ADMINISTRATOR that allows DHS to remain in contempt of court and unlawfully extend a penalty beyond the six months I had already served over and over which is prohibited by the Fifth Amendment Right that I cannot be sentenced to more than six months without a Trial by Jury of Peers.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:32 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
Willful Failure to Apply to Contract Under Duress while forced to UNDERSTAND I have no standing is redundancy considering all our blood ties are already disrespected by the BAR Association and redundancy is not allowed in contract law.

 

Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:25 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject
: Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter while intending to sever my own head.

 

I was told I must apply to arbitrary things as an approval method to adopt my kin as an Applicant not clearly defined as a binding contract with the conditional acceptance I UNDERSTAND my grandchildren are made adoptive commodities upon my signature and that I am a competitor having no standing for the adoption of my heirs which is not binding unto me regardless if I applied since not a contract or an offer to contract. I have no duty to perform defined nor does the application stipulate any obligations owed to me therefor I did not refuse a direct order of a judge and am not liable or subject to a mandatory default for not applying to be made subject to arbitrary abstract non contractual motives to gain a non judicial argument in my favor while also in contradiction denied visits with the message DHS gets it both ways when there was nothing relevant to a show cause while burden of proof is shifted to me while imposing random arbitrary things not binding to us.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 8:47 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
JJC must present waiver of trial by Jury of Peers to allow Juvenile Justice Complex subject matter jurisdiction on any matters relevant to Victoria Couvillion and other no press gossip criminal or civil where not fully advised of Clearfield Doctrine.

 

My granddaughter does not know how to defend her Rights under sustained combat as stipulated in the Clearfield Doctrine by the Supreme Court that attorneys do not declare Rights which is not done through attorneys declaring privacy as a Right while under DHS control. Attorney client privilege is defined as a contract between two adults eligible to contract under the right to Counsel of Choice, which is evident the social workers are allowed to ignore so not having a professional rules of conduct to say they have a right to a privileged relationship, to which our nations heirs are not able to supervise their attorneys or the social workers, not capable to learn or become knowledgeable of the law to understand the abuses of privacy used to put them in danger as if Privilege with Predator is the legislative intent of the Constitutional Right to Privacy and the Definition of Attorney Client Privilege is set up to guard the secrets of predators as if sacred while also guarding the secret of the Client suffering abuse when mandatory reporters.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 8:33 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject: Office of the Deputy District Attorney CANNOT get it both ways, No Plea Deal, No Unlawful Bargaining Chip, since not having subject matter jurisdiction over a matter where a plea bargain is not defined. No Criminal Charges No Intimidation by BAR Attorney

 

If my daughter has to sign to relinquish her parental rights than her parental rights have not been terminated and that signature has been handed over to me. My daughter vacated her pen and handed her power of attorney over to me so her signature is made void.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 8:27 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
Intimidating her to sell her kids to avoid criminal prosecution using my grandkids as a plea bargain chip and get out of jail card while her parental rights are ‘not permanently terminated yet’ needing her signature to allow an adoption is presumable.

 

I presume the ‘defender’ is threatening my daughter before the prosecutor has charged the foster rapists or the serial rapists so no plea deal relevant to this prosecutor defender demanding a signature while that endangers my grandkids more forcing her to relinquish her parental rights herself while using kids as a bargain chip is not listed on the PENAL CODE as lawful plea bargain agreement and criminal activity by the attorney appointed to my daughter which reflects on the Office of the Deputy District Attorney since not having subject matter jurisdiction over a matter where a plea bargain is not defined and I want her fired, disbarred, and thrown in jail. My grandchildren are not plea bargain chips

 

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 8:17 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
Rights to contract not exercised of your own free will are not binding. My grandchildren are not bargaining chips pursuant to judiciary cannot impede contracts already in place prior to a matter arising constituted interference of existing contract.

 

My grandkids are not money concubines for the ADMINISTRATION to impede existing contracts we already were bound by and entered into those contracts in the same manner all men do while all the stipulations of said contract are fully disclosed upon both parties signing which is violated by DHS forcing another contract under Diligent Efforts in violation that the judiciary cannot impede contracts. Rights to contract not exercised of your own free will are not binding.

 

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 7:48 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject: So no prosecution of the mother means the defender appointed to her should not be yelling at my daughter to sign things intimidating her while the accused serial rapist walks free to prey upon more kids. This yelling attorney was reported while she was in jail so that is a recorded call and no subject to privilege.

 

Undue delay V DHS wants, DHS gets.

 

My daughter told me that trying to get justice for her children was making my daughter look bad which implies she is threatening my daughter instead of defending her

 

Free Legal Advice

Undue Delay: Laches

Hrenyk v Preiss estate 2017 SKQB 151 contains a through discussion of the equitable defence of laches- the plaintiff’s undue delay in proceeding with a court action to resolution.

26 Laches is discussed in Ahone v. Holloway (1988), 30 B.C.L.R. (2d) 368 (C.A.), at page 378:

… Laches is established when two conditions are fulfilled:

(1) there must be unreasonable delay in the commencement or prosecution of proceedings, and

(2) in all the circumstances the consequences of delay must render the grant of relief unreasonable or unjust.

27 Laches was more recently considered by Gabrielson J. in Turcot v. Slade, 2010 SKQB 367, 364 Sask. R. 36at para. 15:

[15] … The equitable doctrine of laches was discussed by the Supreme Court of Canada in M. (K.) v. M. (H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, [cites omitted] where the court stated at paras. 97 and 98:

97 The leading authority on laches would appear to be Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874), L.R. 5 P.C. 221, in which the doctrine is explained as follows, at pp. 239-40:

… the doctrine of laches in Courts of Equity is not an arbitrary or a technical doctrine. Where it would be practically unjust to give a remedy, either because the party has, by his conduct, done that which might fairly be regarded as equivalent of a waiver of it, or where by his conduct and neglect he has, though perhaps not waiving that remedy, yet put the other party in a situation in which it would not be reasonable to place him if the remedy were afterwards to be asserted, in either of these cases, lapse of time and delay are most material. But in every case, if an argument against relief, which otherwise would be just, is founded upon mere delay, that delay of course not amounting to a bar by any statute of limitations, the validity of that defence must be tried upon principles substantially equitable. Two circumstances, always important in such cases, are, the length of the delay and the nature of the acts done during the interval, which might affect either party and cause a balance of justice or injustice in taking the one course or the other, so far as relates to the remedy.

. . .

In turn, this formulation has been applied by this Court; see Canada Trust Co. v. Lloyd, [1968] S.C.R. 300Blundon v. Storm, [1972] S.C.R. 135.

98 The rule developed in Lindsay is certainly amorphous, perhaps admirably so. However, some structure can be derived from the cases. A good discussion of the rule and of laches in general is found in Meagher, Gummow and Lehane, supra, at pp. 755-65, where the authors distill the doctrine in this manner, at p. 755:

It is a defence which requires that a defendant can successfully resist an equitable (although not a legal) claim made against him if he can demonstrate that the plaintiff, by delaying the institution or prosecution of his case, has either (a) acquiesced in the defendant’s conduct or (b) caused the defendant to alter his position in reasonable reliance on the plaintiff’s acceptance of the status quo, or otherwise permitted a situation to arise which it would be unjust to disturb …

Thus there are two distinct branches to the laches doctrine, and either will suffice as a defence to a claim in equity. What is immediately obvious from all of the authorities is that mere delay is insufficient to trigger laches under either of its two branches. Rather, the doctrine considers whether the delay of the plaintiff constitutes acquiescence or results in circumstances that make the prosecution of the action unreasonable. Ultimately, laches must be resolved as a matter of justice as between the parties, as is the case with any equitable doctrine.

(Emphasis added)

. . .

35      The applicant asserts that the respondent bears the burden of establishing laches, relying on the following comments of Caldwell J.A. in Olney Estate v. Great-West Life Assurance Co., 2014 SKCA 47, 438 Sask. R. 47 (Sask. C.A.):

75 … the doctrine of laches is an equitable defence which must be made out on the evidence by the party who asserts it. If the evidence adduced by the party relying on the doctrine makes out the availability of the defence, the onus shifts and the other party is logically and properly put to the burden of adducing evidence to dispel its application; however, the law does not require a party to make out the party opposite’s defence.

[emphasis in original]

36      I must first determine whether the respondent has established that the applicant acquiesced in the respondent’s position. In Gottselig Estate v. Gottselig Estate, 2014 SKQB 20 (Sask. Q.B.) at paras 51, 54 and 55, (2014), 436 Sask. R. 144 (Sask. Q.B.), Barrington-Foote J. explained the relationship of acquiescence to the doctrine of laches:

51 Laches is an equitable doctrine. In Waters’ Law of Trustssupra, the principled justification for the doctrine is described as follows: (at p. 1242-43)

No legal system could allow a person who has a legal claim to do nothing over a long period of time to then assert it, and bring his action because it pleases him at that moment to do so. A would-be defendant is reasonably entitled to ask that action shall be brought when the evidence, particularly in his own favor, is still available and at least relatively fresh. Nor is it unreasonable for him to assume, if the would-be plaintiff does nothing for a considerable period of time, that the latter has condoned the wrongdoer’s act or omission, and intends that the wrongdoer may arrange his affairs accordingly. Courts of equity traditionally adopted these views, and applied them in the doctrine of laches. The claimant who delayed bringing his claim for an unreasonable period of time was taken to have acquiesced in the circumstances brought about by the wrongdoing. (footnotes omitted)

. . .

54 Laforest J. [in M. (K.) v. M. (H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6] also explores the concept of acquiescence, which is not only relevant to a consideration of laches, but is a separate equitable doctrine. The following comments in Waters’supra, are instructive: (at p. 1254)

[The doctrine of laches] is also closely related to the doctrine of acquiescence which in recent years has increasingly become associated with delay in bringing action. Indeed, it is more likely that what the courts are really concerned with is implied acquiescence rather than delay itself. This is particularly true today when limitation statutes expressly apply to so many actions brought in equity…[Acquiescence] is something more than a mere abstaining from legal proceedings; it is an adoption established by some positive evidence of the transaction or dealing which the claimant now disputes. … (footnotes omitted)

55 This statement is consistent with Laforest J.’s explanation of acquiescence, and its relationship to laches, which is as follows:

100 Acquiesence [sic] is a fluid term, susceptible to various meanings depending upon the context in which it is used. Meagher, Gummow and Lehane, supra, at pp. 765-66, identify three different senses, the first being a synonym for estoppel, wherein the plaintiff stands by and watches the deprivation of her rights and yet does nothing. This has been referred to as the primary meaning of acquiescence. Its secondary sense is as an element of laches — after the deprivation of her rights and in the full knowledge of their existence, the plaintiff delays. This leads to an inference that her rights have been waived. This, of course, is the meaning of acquiescence relevant to this appeal. The final usage is a confusing one, as it is sometimes associated with the second branch of the laches rule in the context of an alteration of the defendant’s position in reliance on the plaintiff’s inaction.

101 As the primary and secondary definitions of acquiescence suggest, an important aspect of the concept is the plaintiff’s knowledge of her rights. It is not enough that the plaintiff knows of the facts that support a claim in equity; she must also know that the facts give rise to that claim: Re Howlett, [1949] Ch. 767. However, this Court has held that knowledge of one’s claim is to be measured by an objective standard; see Taylor v. Wallbridge (1879), 2 S.C.R. 616, at p. 670. In other words, the question is whether it is reasonable for a plaintiff to be ignorant of her legal rights given her knowledge of the underlying facts relevant to a possible legal claim.

1)   Tags: BC estate lawyerLachesLegal ProceduresProceduresUndue Delay

2)   Categories: Equitable ClaimsLegal Definitions and Terms

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 7:36 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
Excusable Neglect. No Court Date Set, No Discovery to the opposing party, No Notice to me of outcome to naturally interested party denied status as party though Judicial Code of Conduct is required to include and notify all naturally interested parties.

With respect to Marilyn LeBaron V No one

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require court dates to be set before discovery is opened up to both sides. No Notice of Liability, No Respondent Named, No Default Judgement possible, No Court Date Set, No Discovery to the Opposing Party, No Exhibit Presentable, No Subject Matter Jurisdiction, No Refute Possible, No Penal Code, No Furtherance, No Summon of Authority Relied Upon For Summary Judgement.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 7:19 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
Yet no conviction to the assailants of high crimes so no charge of negligence possible on the parent who if being put under pressure needing an acquittal where there is not plea available before her kids could come home to her. No Notice to me of outcome.

 

Excusable Neglect No Notice to me of outcome.

 

This does not apply to me only on the point that I am not a defendant and it is surprise to me that Diligent Efforts is controled by the ADMINISTRATOR instead of the prosecution through unlawful preset disposition.

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 7:05 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
No Crime, No Plea, No Penal Code, and No Furtherance Hearing, No Relief. Is it written in the PENAL CODE kids must experience the equivalent of the death penalty by the emotional loss of every blood relative for being named a victim? No Yes

 

Stand up x Live from Liverpool.

Save our children.

 

How is exposing our kids to a greater risk of harm construed relief through false advertising human trafficking as child protection?

 

How is this relief?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQgJpnXvEj8

(34750) Liverpool Protest against Corporate trafficking of missing kids in care system - YouTube

 

https://youtu.be/KQgJpnXvEj8

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 6:55 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
a Plea bargain up to the bigger fish instead of letting criminals go while plea-bargaining in the juvenile matter without a formal plea or charge just to catch some kids to rape or sell. And I did not walk into the court room in chains.

 

My daughter was not the target for protection on the MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY since pregnant proving MAX RYAN WALL did not consider me a threat to my own flesh and blood intending to use bureaucrat protection and future criminal allegation as prophetic premise just as the Office of the Deputy District Attorney is repeating today as pattern and practice against the Right to the Presumption of Innocence and No Corpus Delicti, No Harm, No Injury, No Claim, No Subject Matter Jurisdiction, then or now to win at any cost. I did not walk into the courtroom in chains though Max Ryan Wall said my daughter was fully advised on the premise of bureaucrat protection when that bureaucrat was removed from the court witness list.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 6:47 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
JJC must present waiver of trial by Jury of Peers to allow Juvenile Justice Complex subject matter jurisdiction on any matters relevant to me on the Diligent Efforts and other no press gossip criminal or civil where not named a defendant or respondent?

 

DHS do not have SUMMON POWER that is the COURT CLERKS JOB or the Process server’s job.

 

So, how is it not an unlawful simulation of process by allowing DHS to set hearing dates and demand a default through fake summon to people not included as party?

 

How do attorneys hide and there is no public listing of hearings or open court record to discover public presidents set and see if the seated ADMINISTRATOR IS JUST AND FAIR since a judge must be recused on the first day the judge is selected yet we are not privileged to the decisions of that judge so not able to determine if a recusal is warranted since at an unlawful legal disadvantage?

 

Linda Hughes is not allowed to be a judge over Diligent Efforts, I do not waive my Rights to Trial by Jury of Peers nor does Victoria Couvillion which protects her familial bonds the DHS destroy with Malice Aforethought since a Treasonous filth allowing the same brand of perjury as premise while the Deputy District Attorney allow DHS to invent lies and allows defenders to double as prosecutors when the prosecution is by law the first line of defense while he had the exculpatory evidence and failed to refute himself with it as the role of the prosecution against my daughter using her like a defendant liable for knowing me and not advising her she was being prosecuted by him with extreme prejudice he was by law required to defend against as a professed defender.

 

What assessor or investigator/jury/DHS is Counsel ever in history had summon power? How is it that the assessor or investigator/jury/DHS is Counsel has no summon power yet the court clerks allows a bill which results from an unlawful accounts payable through a money tree when no discovery is ever presented because not listed as a defendant or respondent and no mandatory scheduling of court dates is applicable, yet try by hearing is the aim? Yet, no mandatory judicial notice can be taken on the discretion since the Juvenile Justice Complex has a preset disposition.

 

How is it that the referee violates the law that a jury cannot be directed by a referee while DHS ambulance chase, seek clients, act as assessor, investigator, expert witness caller, prosecutor team, as well as pseudo jury and also named DHS is Counsel on Juvenile Justice Complex papers while we are guaranteed an independent investigative body, an independent judiciary.

 

How is it the Right to Counsel of Choice is violated while DHS Social Workers act as assessor/ claims adjuster that acts as attorney by selecting expert witnesses while also a member of the prosecutors team while no chain of custody of the most valuable testimony is obstructed and attorneys cannot be claims adjusters?

 

Linda Hughes is not allowed to be a judge over Diligent Efforts, I do not waive my Rights to Trial by Jury of Peers nor does Victoria Couvillion which protects her familial bonds the DHS destroy with Malice Aforethought since a Treasonous filth allowing the same brand of perjury as premise while the Deputy District Attorney allow DHS to invent lies and allows defenders to double as prosecutors when the prosecution is by law the first line of defense while he had the exculpatory evidence and failed to refute himself with it as the role of the prosecution against my daughter using her like a defendant liable for knowing me and not advising her she was being prosecuted by him with extreme prejudice he was by law required to defend against as a professed defender.

 

In support of the above the following verification has not been refuted and I reserve Chandra Snyder (Potter) as a WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION AGAISNT MAX RYAN WALL pursuant to Max Ryan Wall’s  arrest on the charge Treason against my daughter and I with immunities from aiding and abetting Treason as a plea deal for her testimony UPON FULL DISCLOSURE OF ALL THE CHILDREN MAX RYAN WALL ABUSED HIS OATH UPON AFFIRMATION to gain and unlawful legal disadvantage abusing people do not know how to file a refute especially in the cases when DHS had no actual premise since it is obvious Judge Fred Avera had a preset disposition to allow DHS to say, my daughter was fully advised on matter not relevant to child protection as a premise of perjury and unlawful simulation of process to Deprive Rights under Color of Law cover Judge Horner’s Treasonous filth arsenene behavior he committed against my son on DHS perjury Chandra Snyder allowed failing to supervise subordinate social workers as if I had called 911 to report a violation of the Oregon Administrative Rules on her subordinate when it was Chandra Snyder’s name I screamed into the phone while speaking to the 911 operator which is a good Plea Deal for her since she failed as RESONDEAT SUPERIOR fully knowing I had taken the matter to her supervisor and my complaint was with her not the impeached social worker included in Max Ryan Wall the perjurers’  MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY which shows my daughter was not protected since pregnant proving MAX RYAN WALL did not consider me a threat to my own flesh and blood intending to use bureaucrat protection and future criminals allegation as prophetic premise just as the Office of the Deputy District Attorney is repeating today as pattern and practice against the Right to the Presumption of Innocence and Corpus Delicti, No Harm, No Injury, No Claim, No subject matter jurisdiction, then or now to win at any cost. I did not walk into the courtroom in chains.

 

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 5:54 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
So why is the prosecutor not putting my claim of harm into proper form and prosecuting the civil serial criminal acts? Prosecutors are supposed to go the big fish not left over crumbs falling off the plates of fellow bureaucrats. Yes No

 

What you D.U.M.B. A.S.S. Nazi do not see EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE WHEN YOU SEE IT? Filling my banana box of exculpatory evidence.

 

 

So why is the prosecutor not putting my claim of harm into proper form and prosecuting the civil serial criminal acts? Prosecutors are supposed to go get the big fish not left over crumbs falling off the plates of fellow bureaucrats. Yes, how is a human trafficking criminal standing in the place of justice while not serving justice not a bigger fish? Yes, this is a MOTION FOR THE ARREST OF MAX RYAN WALL BUT FIRST YOU HAVE TO DRAG IN CHANDRA SNYDER, MARY ANNE E MILLER, JUDGE FRED AVERA, AND JUDGE HORNER, AND THE PUBLIC DEFENDER CHARLES DOUGLAS BERG IN ON CHARGES then plea bargain up to the bigger fish instead of letting criminals go while plea-bargaining in the juvenile matter without a formal plea or charge just to catch some kids to rape or sell.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 5:28 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
While the Prosecution lets the rapists go yet holds the innocent at a greater risk of being raped again not able to call your family as witnesses since No Subject Matter Jurisdiction over crime, penal code, and not furtherance Yes No

 

Who then is the RESPONDEAT SUPIRIOR? à michael.schmidt@state.or.us

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 3:33 PM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us
Cc: lori.fellows@mcda.us; michael.schmidt@state.or.us
Subject:
So, I am not called as a material witness by the criminal prosecutor but the BAR Members get to intimidate my daughter as defenders as the potential negligent parent to force them to agree to adopt out the material witness against DHS. Yes No

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 10:37 AM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us; michael.schmidt@state.or.us

Cc: lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject: So being raped means to Office of the Deputy District Attorneys Office, "You have no blood ties cuz you got raped or claim you got rapedand that is [not] victims assistance or relief while no comfort from family is made available to you. Yes No

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 10:27 AM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us
Cc: lori.fellows@mcda.us

Bcc: (michael.schmidt@state.or.us (criminal prosecutor automatically omitted along with all our Due Process Rights allowing the Deputy District prosecutor as pattern and practice to direct the ‘unlawful jury of assessor/bureaucrats while the Juvenile Justice Complex arranges their pay and the pay to BAR Affiliates all relaying on the jury/assessors/counsel to select the expert witnesses, manage the housing of our kids, and fail to indict the culpable allowing heinous criminals to walk free clinging to their Due Process Rights while kids are left to grieve without a familiar face) but included criminal prosecutor BCC
Subject: So being raped means to Office of the Deputy District Attorneys Office, "You have no blood ties cuz you got raped or claim you got raped” and that is [not] victims assistance or relief while no comfort from family is made available to you. Yes No

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 10:22 AM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us
Cc: michael.schmidt@state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject:
Charging my daughter criminally would for negligence on the rapes of my grandchildren would put me and my granddaughter in the court room on the side of the prosecution as well as her son only after landing a conviction of the rapists/ rapist. Yes or No

 

DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents and so drag the policemen out of bed that allowed DHS to get it both ways as MOTION FOR THE ARREST OF MAX RYAN WALL

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 10:11 AM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us
Cc: michael.schmidt@state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us

Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents so drag the policemen out of bed that allowed DHS to get it both ways as MOTION FOR THE ARREST OF MAX RYAN WALL

 

Prosecutors are supposed to go the big fish not left over crumbs falling off the plates of fellow bureaucrats

 

Yes, this is a MOTION FOR THE ARREST OF MAX RYAN WALL BUT FIRST YOU HAVE TO DRAG IN CHANDRA SNYDER, MARY ANNE E MILLER, JUDGE FRED AVERA, AND JUDGE HORNER, AND THE PUBLIC DEFENDER CHARLES DOUGLASS BERGE IN ON CHARGES

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 10:02 AM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; Secooper@co.marion.or.us; thomas.balmer@ojd.state.or.us
Cc: michael.schmidt@state.or.us; lori.fellows@mcda.us
Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents avoiding the responsibility through escorting DHS to our front doors i.e. aiding to abet forced client retainer

 

What you D.U.M.B. A.S.S. Nazi do not see EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE WHEN YOU SEE IT?

Filling my banana box of exculpatory evidence.

 

 

Did this BAR Member filth Schmidt Michael DOJDA adjust his answering machine to stop recording more than three seconds yesterday while I was at McDonalds while somehow my playback stopped working while I was out?

 

Schmidt                Michael DOJDA  +1 (503) 3783104              michael.schmidt@state.or.us

 

If I had a ‘hit list’ and if the movie Purge was actually enforced as a Biblical day of familial vengeance as once was in Biblical times (not the prevented depiction of arbitrary legislated violence in the movie) all the people listed as defendants would be needing a city of refuge and are still walking the face of the earth.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 9:38 AM
To: da@mcda.us; SPDTRO; wm_horner@hotmail.com (redacted from recipients)
Cc: alex.salas@dhsoha.state.or.us; andrew.j.cox64mil@mail.mil; angela.d.escalante.mil@mail.mil; becky.emert@dhsoha.state.or.us; becky.page@dhsoha.state.or.us; benjamin.p.brumbaugh.mil@mail.mil; brandon.a.tayor46.mil@mail.mil; brent.a.cadwell.mil@mail.mil; breyton.w.ridgley.mil@mail.mil; brian.w.verwey.mil@mail.mil; brs.mid-valley@dhsoha.stat; brs.referralcentral@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralcolumbia@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referraleastern@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralmetro@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralwestern@dhsoha.state.or.us; candelaria.calvillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; charles.r.cabral.mil@mail.mil; christian.k.perdue.mil@mail.mil; christopher.j.lindseth2.mil@mail.mil; christopher.m.trevisiol.mil@mail.mil; christopher.wright.4@us.af.mil; cody.a.black@doc.state.or.us; cody.r.frame.mil@mail.mil; conner.p.campbell.mil@mail.mil; consuelo.carrasquillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; dakota.p.pinkernell@doc.state.or.us; dalton.m.byrne.mil@mail.mil; danielle.a.maruna@dhsoha.state.or.us; danielle.carpenter@us.af.mil; darrell.r.cornick.mil@mail.mil; dashaun.s.rattray.mil@mail.mil; david.a.schmidt@dhsoha.state.or.us; david.e.leith@ojd.state.or.us; david.s.welter.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.brown25.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.lunski.mil@mail.mil; dustin.n.hayes.mil@mail.mil; edgar.fernandez6.mil@mail.mil; elliotariel@gmail.com; emillio.g.zepedahernandez.mil@mail.mil; erick.torres-renteria@doc.state.or.us; garvin764@gmail.com; glenda.r.marshall@dhsoha.state.or.us; hayden.c.aukland.mil@mail.mil; ikechukwu.l.opara.mil@mail.mil; jacob.gabell@oregon.gov; Gravley Jacquelin; james.a.dickson.mil@mail.mil; james.b.hardy2@us.army.mil; james.jones.115@us.af.mil; james.t.williams282.mil@mail.mil; james.w.stockhoff@doc.state.or.us; jason.c.westlund@state.or.us; jason.m.hyden.mil@mail.mil; jedediah.h.manaea.mil@mail.mil; jennie.m.walker@dhsoha.state.or.us; jennifer.l.newman@dhsoha.state.or.us; jeremy.a.edwards15.mil@mail.mil; jmayer001@student.franciscan.edu; jodie.a.bureta@ojd.state.or.us; johnathan.r.leonard.mil@mail.mil; johnnie.s.mavaega.mil@mail.mil; jonathan.e.edwards.mil@mail.mil; joseph.l.alvarez7.mil@mail.mil; josiah.m.barkes.mil@mail.mil; juan.a.valdezfitz.mil@mail.mil; justin.c.grisham@doc.state.or.us; karl.s.pond2.mil@mail.mil; katie.wyland@dhsoha.state.or.us; katlyn.sorrels@us.af.mil; keenan.b.leahy.mil@mail.mil; kenneth.j.kitchen2.mil@mail.mil; krista.l.delarosa@dhsoha.state.li.us; kyle.m.stolz.mil@mail.mil; MARILYN LEBARON; levi.h.rose.mil@mail.mil; lloyd.b.vanwinkle.mil@mail.mil; mac.m.morris@doc.state.or.us; Marilyn LeBaron; mara.beitzel@dhsoha.state.or.us; marco.a.alvadiaz.mil@mail.mil; maria.ruiz-ceja@dhsoha.state.or.us; mathew.j.lammert.mil@mail.mil; matthew.a.morris.mil@mail.mil; matthew.armstrong@dhsoha.state.or.us; meghan.k.nielson@dhsoha.state.or.us; mia.brown.1@us.af.mil; michael.a.crawford149.mil@mail.mil; michael.thorson@oregon.gov; mitchell.e.espinoza.mil@mail.mil; Marilyn LeBaron; nancy.a.allen@dhsoha.state.or.us; nathan.a.berry6.mil@mail.mil; nicolas.erjavsek@us.af.mil; patrick.j.naas@state.or.us; patrick.j.stover@doc.state.or.us; paul.d.smith5.mil@mail.mil; paul.f.leifer.mil@mail.mil; paul.g.latvala.mil@mail.mil; ppbpio@portlandoregon.gov; quincy.c.nordyke.mil@mail.mil; rafael.a.toler.mil@mail.mil; randi.jenkins@us.af.mil; risk.management@oregon.gov; rob.r.boyle@doc.state.or.us; ryan.kill@ode.state.or.us; sabrina.leaach@dhsoha.state.or.us; sara.b.fox@dhsoha.state.or.us; scott.a.newman14.mil@mail.mil; sean.a.mckelvey.mil@mail.mil; shaun.m.cain2.mil@mail.mil; sterling.d.hall.mil@mail.mil; steven.tjoelker@odot.state.or.us; summer.d.zelinsky.mil@mail.mil; susana.a.dietrich@dhsoha.state.or.us; tanner.r.walker2.mil@mail.miil; trevor.laws.1@us.af.mil; tyler.j.vanvoorhis.mil@mail.mil; vincent.gutierrezsoto.mil@mail.mil; VIXEN BEAUTY; will.o.fleser.mil@mail.mil; will.r.sharp.mil@mail.mil; william.k.peterson21.mil@mail.mil
Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents avoiding the responsibility through escorting DHS to our front doors i.e. aiding to abet forced client retainer

 

Hon. William M Horner
344 Whitman S
Monmouth OR  97361

 

I’m reserving you as a witness against yourself.

So hurry go scrub the court record of anything incriminating to yourself.

You should be put under arrest for altering court record on my family law custody case

 

Oh, I forgot. An open confession to Treason is punishable by death.

Oh, I forgot. You are allowed the Fifth Amendment Right and the General American population (modern negro slave) are not and that is Reasonable Efforts ( redacted).

Oh, I forgot. You and the BAR Association are the only ones allowed to hold a pen.

Oh, I forgot, You and (_____________) we (former _______________) and know what a conflict of interest is while you preside over one continually.

Oh, I forgot, You know those BAR Association member are required to neglect our Due Process Shield of Due Process Rights.

Oh, I forgot, You deleted all the incriminating evidence already exercising your right not to not implicate yourself from the court record.

Oh, I forgot, You are immune to prosecution regardless if your acts are preceptive premeditated Treason.

Oh, I forgot, DHS is a judicial branch you are a ‘Yes man’ to.

Oh, I forgot, Judge Fred Avera was a ‘Yes man’ too.

Oh, I forgot, County regulates practice of law while the STATE incorporates with FEDEAERAL as a two headed snake with you as its belly.

Oh, I did not realize my cartoon of you as a Horner riding a push-me-pull-you was just a little off. I did not know enough to depict you more appropriately as a double headed snake rather than a single horn to imagining you attached to the Biblical Babylonian Whoremongering – b e a s t.

 

Hon. William M Horner

Bar Number 

690814

Status 

Retired

Admit Date 

9/12/1969

Mailing Address 

Hon. William M Horner
344 Whitman S
Monmouth OR  97361

County 

Polk

Phone 

503 838-1149

Fax 

Email 

wm_horner@hotmail.com

Website 

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 12:31 AM
To: Marilyn LeBaron; da@mcda.us; SPDTRO
Cc: alex.salas@dhsoha.state.or.us; andrew.j.cox64mil@mail.mil; angela.d.escalante.mil@mail.mil; becky.emert@dhsoha.state.or.us; becky.page@dhsoha.state.or.us; benjamin.p.brumbaugh.mil@mail.mil; brandon.a.tayor46.mil@mail.mil; brent.a.cadwell.mil@mail.mil; breyton.w.ridgley.mil@mail.mil; brian.w.verwey.mil@mail.mil; brs.mid-valley@dhsoha.stat; brs.referralcentral@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralcolumbia@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referraleastern@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralmetro@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralwestern@dhsoha.state.or.us; candelaria.calvillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; charles.r.cabral.mil@mail.mil; christian.k.perdue.mil@mail.mil; christopher.j.lindseth2.mil@mail.mil; christopher.m.trevisiol.mil@mail.mil; christopher.wright.4@us.af.mil; cody.a.black@doc.state.or.us; cody.r.frame.mil@mail.mil; conner.p.campbell.mil@mail.mil; consuelo.carrasquillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; dakota.p.pinkernell@doc.state.or.us; dalton.m.byrne.mil@mail.mil; danielle.a.maruna@dhsoha.state.or.us; danielle.carpenter@us.af.mil; darrell.r.cornick.mil@mail.mil; dashaun.s.rattray.mil@mail.mil; david.a.schmidt@dhsoha.state.or.us; david.e.leith@ojd.state.or.us; david.s.welter.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.brown25.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.lunski.mil@mail.mil; dustin.n.hayes.mil@mail.mil; edgar.fernandez6.mil@mail.mil; elliotariel@gmail.com; emillio.g.zepedahernandez.mil@mail.mil; erick.torres-renteria@doc.state.or.us; garvin764@gmail.com; glenda.r.marshall@dhsoha.state.or.us; hayden.c.aukland.mil@mail.mil; ikechukwu.l.opara.mil@mail.mil; jacob.gabell@oregon.gov; Gravley Jacquelin; james.a.dickson.mil@mail.mil; james.b.hardy2@us.army.mil; james.jones.115@us.af.mil; james.t.williams282.mil@mail.mil; james.w.stockhoff@doc.state.or.us; jason.c.westlund@state.or.us; jason.m.hyden.mil@mail.mil; jedediah.h.manaea.mil@mail.mil; jennie.m.walker@dhsoha.state.or.us; jennifer.l.newman@dhsoha.state.or.us; jeremy.a.edwards15.mil@mail.mil; jmayer001@student.franciscan.edu; jodie.a.bureta@ojd.state.or.us; johnathan.r.leonard.mil@mail.mil; johnnie.s.mavaega.mil@mail.mil; jonathan.e.edwards.mil@mail.mil; joseph.l.alvarez7.mil@mail.mil; josiah.m.barkes.mil@mail.mil; juan.a.valdezfitz.mil@mail.mil; justin.c.grisham@doc.state.or.us; karl.s.pond2.mil@mail.mil; katie.wyland@dhsoha.state.or.us; katlyn.sorrels@us.af.mil; keenan.b.leahy.mil@mail.mil; kenneth.j.kitchen2.mil@mail.mil; krista.l.delarosa@dhsoha.state.li.us; kyle.m.stolz.mil@mail.mil; MARILYN LEBARON; levi.h.rose.mil@mail.mil; lloyd.b.vanwinkle.mil@mail.mil; mac.m.morris@doc.state.or.us; Marilyn LeBaron; mara.beitzel@dhsoha.state.or.us; marco.a.alvadiaz.mil@mail.mil; maria.ruiz-ceja@dhsoha.state.or.us; mathew.j.lammert.mil@mail.mil; matthew.a.morris.mil@mail.mil; matthew.armstrong@dhsoha.state.or.us; meghan.k.nielson@dhsoha.state.or.us; mia.brown.1@us.af.mil; michael.a.crawford149.mil@mail.mil; michael.thorson@oregon.gov; mitchell.e.espinoza.mil@mail.mil; Marilyn LeBaron; nancy.a.allen@dhsoha.state.or.us; nathan.a.berry6.mil@mail.mil; nicolas.erjavsek@us.af.mil; patrick.j.naas@state.or.us; patrick.j.stover@doc.state.or.us; paul.d.smith5.mil@mail.mil; paul.f.leifer.mil@mail.mil; paul.g.latvala.mil@mail.mil; ppbpio@portlandoregon.gov; quincy.c.nordyke.mil@mail.mil; rafael.a.toler.mil@mail.mil; randi.jenkins@us.af.mil; risk.management@oregon.gov; rob.r.boyle@doc.state.or.us; ryan.kill@ode.state.or.us; sabrina.leaach@dhsoha.state.or.us; sara.b.fox@dhsoha.state.or.us; scott.a.newman14.mil@mail.mil; sean.a.mckelvey.mil@mail.mil; shaun.m.cain2.mil@mail.mil; sterling.d.hall.mil@mail.mil; steven.tjoelker@odot.state.or.us; summer.d.zelinsky.mil@mail.mil; susana.a.dietrich@dhsoha.state.or.us; tanner.r.walker2.mil@mail.miil; trevor.laws.1@us.af.mil; tyler.j.vanvoorhis.mil@mail.mil; vincent.gutierrezsoto.mil@mail.mil; VIXEN BEAUTY; will.o.fleser.mil@mail.mil; will.r.sharp.mil@mail.mil; william.k.peterson21.mil@mail.mil
Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents avoiding the responsibility through escorting DHS to our front doors i.e. aiding to abet forced client retainer

 

  1. No one questioned me regarding any material facts pertinent to prosecution of my daughter for criminal negligence relevant to the claim of my grandson being raped.
  2. That would put me and my granddaughter in the court room on the side of the prosecution as well as her son only after landing a conviction of the rapists.
  3. So being raped means in the Office of the Deputy District Attorneys Office ‘You have no blood ties cuz you got raped or claim you got raped” and that is not victims assistance or relief while no comfort from family is made available to you’ and the potential negligent parent is the one holding the pen and make to sign you away.
  4. While the Prosecution lets the rapists go yet holds the innocent at a greater risk of being raped again not able to call your family as witnesses since No Subject Matter Jurisdiction over crime, No Penal Code, and No Furtherance Hearing is written in the PENAL CODE for kids to experience the equivalent of the death penalty of the emotional loss of every blood relative for being named a victim.
  5. Yet no conviction to the assailants or the charge of negligence on the parent who if being put under pressure needed an acquittal before her kids could come home to her.
  6. So no prosecution of the mother means the defender attorneys should not be yelling at my daughter to sign things intimidating her to sell her kids to avoid criminal prosecution using my grandkids as a plea bargain chip and get out of jail card while her parental rights are ‘not permanently terminated yet’ needing her signature to allow an adoption.
  7. Both my granddaughter and I are material witnesses and will never see each other just to avoid the technicalities of the fact the office of the District Attorney cannot call me to testify against my daughter since no one has asked me anything or deposed me on that subject matter while asking me to chop off my own head and accept my head already rolled before the rapes ever where alleged
  8. So calling the police is just asking to he human trafficked by the Juvenile Justice Complex who cannot summon you to be judges according to adoptive discretions while in violation of the right to an independent investigative body since DHS are adoption prosecution and are my direct opponent no judge can require I have any contact with but since they don’t list me as a party they cannot require me to respond or hold me in contempt of court yet they do and put my grandkid up for sale while intending to all along as a mandate to the from the bench who see us all as dead awaiting resurrection upon our being laden with the unlawful shifting of the burden of proof when the petitioner in the civil court bears the burden of prof yet does not give us a chance at a refute
  9. Relief is intended to put people back to how you was found or as close as possible to which our kids are not getting although DHS placate to provide something they have escape clause after escape clause actually showing they never intended to honor the definition of relief while the burden of proof is upon the petitioner (DHS posing as the voice of the kids) and prosecute the entire family without ever naming them as a defendant or respondent
  10. So no mandatory scheduling of all critical court dates is scheduled stipulated in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and discovery never opens up for the DHS to require I disclose anything therefore they don’t have to disclose anything to me and privilege with predator is born abusing privacy and everybody saying human traffickers are above every good standard of law
  11. So discover is never opened up for DHS since I am not a party to the case either criminal or Juvenile so DHS have no jurisdiction while ignoring all the facts required as evidence and the perversion of bureaucrats acting a paid jury in a court claiming to be a court of record while the referee cannot lawfully direct a jury
  12. The DHS usurp the place of a jury and insurance adjuster and assessor as if we are property belonging personally to the STATE
  13. My daughter told me the attorney was yelling at her to take her legal advise while she was incarcerated so it certainly cannot be relevant to a criminal plea deal and relevant to adoption and my granddaughter better not be used as a plea del to let us sell her or we will open up criminal charges for child endangerment and just keep you in here just so a fucking bar member can satisfy the transaction and deliver a kid for cash he already landed for a future sale

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 11:55 PM
Cc: alex.salas@dhsoha.state.or.us; andrew.j.cox64mil@mail.mil; angela.d.escalante.mil@mail.mil; becky.emert@dhsoha.state.or.us; becky.page@dhsoha.state.or.us; benjamin.p.brumbaugh.mil@mail.mil; brandon.a.tayor46.mil@mail.mil; brent.a.cadwell.mil@mail.mil; breyton.w.ridgley.mil@mail.mil; brian.w.verwey.mil@mail.mil; brs.mid-valley@dhsoha.stat; brs.referralcentral@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralcolumbia@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referraleastern@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralmetro@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralwestern@dhsoha.state.or.us; candelaria.calvillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; charles.r.cabral.mil@mail.mil; christian.k.perdue.mil@mail.mil; christopher.j.lindseth2.mil@mail.mil; christopher.m.trevisiol.mil@mail.mil; christopher.wright.4@us.af.mil; cody.a.black@doc.state.or.us; cody.r.frame.mil@mail.mil; conner.p.campbell.mil@mail.mil; consuelo.carrasquillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; dakota.p.pinkernell@doc.state.or.us; dalton.m.byrne.mil@mail.mil; danielle.a.maruna@dhsoha.state.or.us; danielle.carpenter@us.af.mil; darrell.r.cornick.mil@mail.mil; dashaun.s.rattray.mil@mail.mil; david.a.schmidt@dhsoha.state.or.us; david.e.leith@ojd.state.or.us; david.s.welter.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.brown25.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.lunski.mil@mail.mil; dustin.n.hayes.mil@mail.mil; edgar.fernandez6.mil@mail.mil; elliotariel@gmail.com; emillio.g.zepedahernandez.mil@mail.mil; erick.torres-renteria@doc.state.or.us; garvin764@gmail.com; glenda.r.marshall@dhsoha.state.or.us; hayden.c.aukland.mil@mail.mil; ikechukwu.l.opara.mil@mail.mil; jacob.gabell@oregon.gov; Gravley Jacquelin; james.a.dickson.mil@mail.mil; james.b.hardy2@us.army.mil; james.jones.115@us.af.mil; james.t.williams282.mil@mail.mil; james.w.stockhoff@doc.state.or.us; jason.c.westlund@state.or.us; jason.m.hyden.mil@mail.mil; jedediah.h.manaea.mil@mail.mil; jennie.m.walker@dhsoha.state.or.us; jennifer.l.newman@dhsoha.state.or.us; jeremy.a.edwards15.mil@mail.mil; jmayer001@student.franciscan.edu; jodie.a.bureta@ojd.state.or.us; johnathan.r.leonard.mil@mail.mil; johnnie.s.mavaega.mil@mail.mil; jonathan.e.edwards.mil@mail.mil; joseph.l.alvarez7.mil@mail.mil; josiah.m.barkes.mil@mail.mil; juan.a.valdezfitz.mil@mail.mil; justin.c.grisham@doc.state.or.us; karl.s.pond2.mil@mail.mil; katie.wyland@dhsoha.state.or.us; katlyn.sorrels@us.af.mil; keenan.b.leahy.mil@mail.mil; kenneth.j.kitchen2.mil@mail.mil; krista.l.delarosa@dhsoha.state.li.us; kyle.m.stolz.mil@mail.mil; MARILYN LEBARON; levi.h.rose.mil@mail.mil; lloyd.b.vanwinkle.mil@mail.mil; mac.m.morris@doc.state.or.us; Marilyn LeBaron; mara.beitzel@dhsoha.state.or.us; marco.a.alvadiaz.mil@mail.mil; maria.ruiz-ceja@dhsoha.state.or.us; mathew.j.lammert.mil@mail.mil; matthew.a.morris.mil@mail.mil; matthew.armstrong@dhsoha.state.or.us; meghan.k.nielson@dhsoha.state.or.us; mia.brown.1@us.af.mil; michael.a.crawford149.mil@mail.mil; michael.thorson@oregon.gov; mitchell.e.espinoza.mil@mail.mil; Marilyn LeBaron; nancy.a.allen@dhsoha.state.or.us; nathan.a.berry6.mil@mail.mil; nicolas.erjavsek@us.af.mil; patrick.j.naas@state.or.us; patrick.j.stover@doc.state.or.us; paul.d.smith5.mil@mail.mil; paul.f.leifer.mil@mail.mil; paul.g.latvala.mil@mail.mil; ppbpio@portlandoregon.gov; quincy.c.nordyke.mil@mail.mil; rafael.a.toler.mil@mail.mil; randi.jenkins@us.af.mil; risk.management@oregon.gov; rob.r.boyle@doc.state.or.us; ryan.kill@ode.state.or.us; sabrina.leaach@dhsoha.state.or.us; sara.b.fox@dhsoha.state.or.us; scott.a.newman14.mil@mail.mil; sean.a.mckelvey.mil@mail.mil; shaun.m.cain2.mil@mail.mil; sterling.d.hall.mil@mail.mil; steven.tjoelker@odot.state.or.us; summer.d.zelinsky.mil@mail.mil; susana.a.dietrich@dhsoha.state.or.us; tanner.r.walker2.mil@mail.miil; trevor.laws.1@us.af.mil; tyler.j.vanvoorhis.mil@mail.mil; vincent.gutierrezsoto.mil@mail.mil; VIXEN BEAUTY; will.o.fleser.mil@mail.mil; will.r.sharp.mil@mail.mil; william.k.peterson21.mil@mail.mil
Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents avoiding the responsibility through escorting DHS to our front doors i.e. aiding to abet forced client retainer

 

Yeah, don’t make the District Attorney of Portland look bad your recording device on your computer suddenly quit working.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 8:47 AM
To: lori.fellows@mcda.us; rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us <rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us>
Cc: alex.salas@dhsoha.state.or.us; andrew.j.cox64mil@mail.mil; angela.d.escalante.mil@mail.mil; becky.emert@dhsoha.state.or.us; becky.page@dhsoha.state.or.us; benjamin.p.brumbaugh.mil@mail.mil; brandon.a.tayor46.mil@mail.mil; brent.a.cadwell.mil@mail.mil; breyton.w.ridgley.mil@mail.mil; brian.w.verwey.mil@mail.mil; brs.mid-valley@dhsoha.stat; brs.referralcentral@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralcolumbia@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referraleastern@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralmetro@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralwestern@dhsoha.state.or.us; candelaria.calvillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; charles.r.cabral.mil@mail.mil; christian.k.perdue.mil@mail.mil; christopher.j.lindseth2.mil@mail.mil; christopher.m.trevisiol.mil@mail.mil; christopher.wright.4@us.af.mil; cody.a.black@doc.state.or.us; cody.r.frame.mil@mail.mil; conner.p.campbell.mil@mail.mil; consuelo.carrasquillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; dakota.p.pinkernell@doc.state.or.us; dalton.m.byrne.mil@mail.mil; danielle.a.maruna@dhsoha.state.or.us; danielle.carpenter@us.af.mil; darrell.r.cornick.mil@mail.mil; dashaun.s.rattray.mil@mail.mil; david.a.schmidt@dhsoha.state.or.us; david.e.leith@ojd.state.or.us; david.s.welter.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.brown25.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.lunski.mil@mail.mil; dustin.n.hayes.mil@mail.mil; edgar.fernandez6.mil@mail.mil; elliotariel@gmail.com; emillio.g.zepedahernandez.mil@mail.mil; erick.torres-renteria@doc.state.or.us; garvin764@gmail.com; glenda.r.marshall@dhsoha.state.or.us; hayden.c.aukland.mil@mail.mil; ikechukwu.l.opara.mil@mail.mil; jacob.gabell@oregon.gov; Gravley Jacquelin; james.a.dickson.mil@mail.mil; james.b.hardy2@us.army.mil; james.jones.115@us.af.mil; james.t.williams282.mil@mail.mil; james.w.stockhoff@doc.state.or.us; jason.c.westlund@state.or.us; jason.m.hyden.mil@mail.mil; jedediah.h.manaea.mil@mail.mil; jennie.m.walker@dhsoha.state.or.us; jennifer.l.newman@dhsoha.state.or.us; jeremy.a.edwards15.mil@mail.mil; jmayer001@student.franciscan.edu; jodie.a.bureta@ojd.state.or.us; johnathan.r.leonard.mil@mail.mil; johnnie.s.mavaega.mil@mail.mil; jonathan.e.edwards.mil@mail.mil; joseph.l.alvarez7.mil@mail.mil; josiah.m.barkes.mil@mail.mil; juan.a.valdezfitz.mil@mail.mil; justin.c.grisham@doc.state.or.us; karl.s.pond2.mil@mail.mil; katie.wyland@dhsoha.state.or.us; katlyn.sorrels@us.af.mil; keenan.b.leahy.mil@mail.mil; kenneth.j.kitchen2.mil@mail.mil; krista.l.delarosa@dhsoha.state.li.us; kyle.m.stolz.mil@mail.mil; MARILYN LEBARON; levi.h.rose.mil@mail.mil; lloyd.b.vanwinkle.mil@mail.mil; mac.m.morris@doc.state.or.us; Marilyn LeBaron; mara.beitzel@dhsoha.state.or.us; marco.a.alvadiaz.mil@mail.mil; maria.ruiz-ceja@dhsoha.state.or.us; mathew.j.lammert.mil@mail.mil; matthew.a.morris.mil@mail.mil; matthew.armstrong@dhsoha.state.or.us; meghan.k.nielson@dhsoha.state.or.us; mia.brown.1@us.af.mil; michael.a.crawford149.mil@mail.mil; michael.thorson@oregon.gov; mitchell.e.espinoza.mil@mail.mil; Marilyn LeBaron; nancy.a.allen@dhsoha.state.or.us; nathan.a.berry6.mil@mail.mil; nicolas.erjavsek@us.af.mil; patrick.j.naas@state.or.us; patrick.j.stover@doc.state.or.us; paul.d.smith5.mil@mail.mil; paul.f.leifer.mil@mail.mil; paul.g.latvala.mil@mail.mil; ppbpio@portlandoregon.gov; quincy.c.nordyke.mil@mail.mil; rafael.a.toler.mil@mail.mil; randi.jenkins@us.af.mil; risk.management@oregon.gov; rob.r.boyle@doc.state.or.us; ryan.kill@ode.state.or.us; sabrina.leaach@dhsoha.state.or.us; sara.b.fox@dhsoha.state.or.us; scott.a.newman14.mil@mail.mil; sean.a.mckelvey.mil@mail.mil; shaun.m.cain2.mil@mail.mil; sterling.d.hall.mil@mail.mil; steven.tjoelker@odot.state.or.us; summer.d.zelinsky.mil@mail.mil; susana.a.dietrich@dhsoha.state.or.us; tanner.r.walker2.mil@mail.miil; trevor.laws.1@us.af.mil; tyler.j.vanvoorhis.mil@mail.mil; vincent.gutierrezsoto.mil@mail.mil; VIXEN BEAUTY; will.o.fleser.mil@mail.mil; will.r.sharp.mil@mail.mil; william.k.peterson21.mil@mail.mil
Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents avoiding the responsibility through escorting DHS to our front doors i.e. aiding to abet forced client retainer

 

Did I just put a bulls-eye an that bitches head? Maybe one of your Nazi scum can protect your own, huh? Cuz, well, a good Attorney can protect his witnesses but you all like it this way so you will just let her be silenced before you can get her fully deposed to keep the arguments under redress off the JUDICIAL SEAT.

 

  1. No? Honor among human traffickers?
  2. Yes? There are honorable men that would arrest a Treasonous DA?

                        I vote for 2

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 6:21 AM
To: lori.fellows@mcda.us; rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us <rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us> omitted
Cc: alex.salas@dhsoha.state.or.us; andrew.j.cox64mil@mail.mil; angela.d.escalante.mil@mail.mil; becky.emert@dhsoha.state.or.us; becky.page@dhsoha.state.or.us; benjamin.p.brumbaugh.mil@mail.mil; brandon.a.tayor46.mil@mail.mil; brent.a.cadwell.mil@mail.mil; breyton.w.ridgley.mil@mail.mil; brian.w.verwey.mil@mail.mil; brs.mid-valley@dhsoha.stat; brs.referralcentral@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralcolumbia@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referraleastern@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralmetro@dhsoha.state.or.us; brs.referralwestern@dhsoha.state.or.us; candelaria.calvillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; charles.r.cabral.mil@mail.mil; christian.k.perdue.mil@mail.mil; christopher.j.lindseth2.mil@mail.mil; christopher.m.trevisiol.mil@mail.mil; christopher.wright.4@us.af.mil; cody.a.black@doc.state.or.us; cody.r.frame.mil@mail.mil; conner.p.campbell.mil@mail.mil; consuelo.carrasquillo@dhsoha.state.or.us; dakota.p.pinkernell@doc.state.or.us; dalton.m.byrne.mil@mail.mil; danielle.a.maruna@dhsoha.state.or.us; danielle.carpenter@us.af.mil; darrell.r.cornick.mil@mail.mil; dashaun.s.rattray.mil@mail.mil; david.a.schmidt@dhsoha.state.or.us; david.e.leith@ojd.state.or.us; david.s.welter.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.brown25.mil@mail.mil; dustin.m.lunski.mil@mail.mil; dustin.n.hayes.mil@mail.mil; edgar.fernandez6.mil@mail.mil; elliotariel@gmail.com; emillio.g.zepedahernandez.mil@mail.mil; erick.torres-renteria@doc.state.or.us; garvin764@gmail.com; glenda.r.marshall@dhsoha.state.or.us; hayden.c.aukland.mil@mail.mil; ikechukwu.l.opara.mil@mail.mil; jacob.gabell@oregon.gov; Gravley Jacquelin; james.a.dickson.mil@mail.mil; james.b.hardy2@us.army.mil; james.jones.115@us.af.mil; james.t.williams282.mil@mail.mil; james.w.stockhoff@doc.state.or.us; jason.c.westlund@state.or.us; jason.m.hyden.mil@mail.mil; jedediah.h.manaea.mil@mail.mil; jennie.m.walker@dhsoha.state.or.us; jennifer.l.newman@dhsoha.state.or.us; jeremy.a.edwards15.mil@mail.mil; jmayer001@student.franciscan.edu; jodie.a.bureta@ojd.state.or.us; johnathan.r.leonard.mil@mail.mil; johnnie.s.mavaega.mil@mail.mil; jonathan.e.edwards.mil@mail.mil; joseph.l.alvarez7.mil@mail.mil; josiah.m.barkes.mil@mail.mil; juan.a.valdezfitz.mil@mail.mil; justin.c.grisham@doc.state.or.us; karl.s.pond2.mil@mail.mil; katie.wyland@dhsoha.state.or.us; katlyn.sorrels@us.af.mil; keenan.b.leahy.mil@mail.mil; kenneth.j.kitchen2.mil@mail.mil; krista.l.delarosa@dhsoha.state.li.us; kyle.m.stolz.mil@mail.mil; MARILYN LEBARON; levi.h.rose.mil@mail.mil; lloyd.b.vanwinkle.mil@mail.mil; mac.m.morris@doc.state.or.us; Marilyn LeBaron; mara.beitzel@dhsoha.state.or.us; marco.a.alvadiaz.mil@mail.mil; maria.ruiz-ceja@dhsoha.state.or.us; mathew.j.lammert.mil@mail.mil; matthew.a.morris.mil@mail.mil; matthew.armstrong@dhsoha.state.or.us; meghan.k.nielson@dhsoha.state.or.us; mia.brown.1@us.af.mil; michael.a.crawford149.mil@mail.mil; michael.thorson@oregon.gov; mitchell.e.espinoza.mil@mail.mil; Marilyn LeBaron; nancy.a.allen@dhsoha.state.or.us; nathan.a.berry6.mil@mail.mil; nicolas.erjavsek@us.af.mil; patrick.j.naas@state.or.us; patrick.j.stover@doc.state.or.us; paul.d.smith5.mil@mail.mil; paul.f.leifer.mil@mail.mil; paul.g.latvala.mil@mail.mil; ppbpio@portlandoregon.gov; quincy.c.nordyke.mil@mail.mil; rafael.a.toler.mil@mail.mil; randi.jenkins@us.af.mil; risk.management@oregon.gov; rob.r.boyle@doc.state.or.us; ryan.kill@ode.state.or.us; sabrina.leaach@dhsoha.state.or.us; sara.b.fox@dhsoha.state.or.us; scott.a.newman14.mil@mail.mil; sean.a.mckelvey.mil@mail.mil; shaun.m.cain2.mil@mail.mil; sterling.d.hall.mil@mail.mil; steven.tjoelker@odot.state.or.us; summer.d.zelinsky.mil@mail.mil; susana.a.dietrich@dhsoha.state.or.us; tanner.r.walker2.mil@mail.miil; trevor.laws.1@us.af.mil; tyler.j.vanvoorhis.mil@mail.mil; vincent.gutierrezsoto.mil@mail.mil; VIXEN BEAUTY; vrdc4u@gmail.com; will.o.fleser.mil@mail.mil; will.r.sharp.mil@mail.mil; william.k.peterson21.mil@mail.mil
Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents avoiding the responsibility through escorting DHS to our front doors i.e. aiding to abet forced client retainer

 

Ms. Lori Sue Fellows

Bar Number        892344

Status    Active Member

Admit Date         9/15/1989

Company             Multnomah County District Attorney's Office

Mailing Address                Ms. Lori Sue Fellows

Multnomah County District Attorney's Office

Multnomah County Central Courthouse

1200 SW First Ave Ste 5200

Portland OR  97204

County Multnomah

Phone   503 988-3162

Fax         503 988-3643

Email     lori.fellows@mcda.us

Website               www.mcda.us

 

 

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 5:57 AM
To: chandra.snyder@dhsoha.state.or.us; rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us <rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us>
Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents avoiding the responsibility through escorting DHS to our front doors i.e. aiding to abet forced client retainer

 

DHS do not have SUMMON POWER THAT IS THE COURT CLERKS JOB.

 

Linda Hughes is not allowed to be a judge over Diligent Efforts, I do not waive my Rights to Trial by Jury of Peers nor does Victoria Couvillion which protects her familial bonds the DHS try to destroy with Malice Aforethought since a Treasonous filth allowing the same brand of perjury as premise while the Deputy District Attorney allow DHS to invent lies and allows defenders to double as prosecutors when the prosecution is by law the first line of defense while he had the exculpatory evidence and failed to refute himself with it as the role of the prosecution against my daughter using her like a defendant liable for knowing me and not advising her she was being prosecuted by him with extreme prejudice he was by law required to defend against as a professed defender.

 

In support of the above the following verification has not been refuted and I reserve Chandra Snyder (Potter) as a WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION AGAISNT MAX RYAN WALL pursuant to Max Ryan Wall’s  arrest on the charge Treason against my daughter and I with immunities from aiding and abetting Treason as a plea deal for her testimony UPON FULL DISCLOSURE OF ALL THE CHILDREN MAX RYAN WALL ABUSED HIS OATH UPON AFFIRMATION to gain and unlawful legal disadvantage abusing people do not know how to file a refute especially in the cases when DHS had no actual premise since it is obvious Judge Fred Avera had a preset disposition to allow DHS to say, my daughter was fully advised on matter not relevant to child protection as a premise of perjury and unlawful simulation of process to Deprive Rights under Color of Law cover Judge Horner’s Treasonous filth arsenene behavior he committed against my son on DHS perjury Chandra Snyder allowed failing to supervise subordinate social workers as if I had called 911 to report a violation of the Oregon Administrative Rules on her subordinate when it was Chandra Snyder’s name I screamed into the phone while speaking to the 911 operator which is a good Plea Deal for her since she failed as RESONDEAT SUPERIOR fully knowing I had taken the matter to her supervisor and my complaint was with her not the impeached social worker included in Max Ryan Wall the perjurers’  MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY which shows my daughter was not protected since pregnant proving MAX RYAN WALL did not consider me a threat to my own flesh and blood intending to use bureaucrat protection and future criminals allegation as prophetic premise just as the Office of the Deputy District Attorney is repeating today as pattern and practice against the Right to the Presumption of Innocence and Corpus Delicti, No Harm, No Injury, No Claim, No subject matter jurisdiction, then or now to win at any cost.

 

cit

To Seek Justice: Defining the Power of the Prosecutor

98,545 views Dec 11, 2018

https://youtu.be/5pLAcnFhONY

Mr. Mike Schmidt

Bar Number 

084679

Status 

Active Member

Admit Date 

9/25/2008

Phone 

503 988-3162

Email 

da@mcda.us

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 9:49 PM
To: chandra.snyder@dhsoha.state.or.us; rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us <rebecca.jonesgaston@dhsoha.state.or.us>; linda.hughes@ojd.state.or.us; Kate Brown For Oregon Information
Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents avoiding the responsibility through escorting DHS to our front doors i.e. aiding to abet forced client retainer

 

 

Chandra Snyder, AKA Chandra Potter

500 Summer Street, Northeast, E 71

Salem, Oregon 97301

 

Potter   Chandra               DHS        +1 (541) 2800753              chandra.snyder@dhsoha.state.or.us

 

This is to confirm this is the same Chandra Snyder of DHS Dallas Oregon Polk County, that filed a petition to bring Melanie V LeBaron home at Polk County Circuit Court through Max Ryan Wall, stating the DEPANDENCY HEARING was relevant to the subsequent false arrest, since no exigent circumstances existed in my home, but DHS then put a No Contact Order between me and Melanie V LeBaron without cause, since charging Marilyn LeBaron with two Misdemeanors in the criminal venue i.e., ADMINISTRATIVE INTERFERENCE and a call to 911 (which were dismissed). That the call I placed to the 911 was to report Chandra Snyder circumvented the Oregon Administrative Rules since no exigent circumstances of child abuse or neglect were present in my home, and the two criminal charges relevant to me demanding a SEARCH WARRANT are not Child Abuse relevant subject matter and not under her purview of the DHS nor the purview of Max Ryan Wall, nor relevant to DHS second petition where the perjury began where all the allegations relevant to Melanie Victoria LeBaron’s sibling, Thomas AB LeBaron, were removed from the original petition filed which was used to gain a set of double continuances for both DHS petition and the two criminal charges not relevant to child abuse or child neglect which is an automatic Rule 53 showing a preset disposition at the judicial seat for the criminal allegation to have bearing on DHS petition – sending the message, “Tie me to the whipping post for having a legal argument” after reading the Oregon Administrative Rules and the judiciary allow DHS to commit perjury on court record since DHS had no premise of egregious child abuse upon approach to my home when intending to bring Melanie V LeBaron home. To later invent things not relevant to my call reporting Chandra Snyder was the perpetrator of kidnapping just to invent more lies and trespassing me merely for handing a MOTION TO DISMISS to my Daughter.

 

Marilyn [LeBaron]©

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 5:21 PM
Subject: DAK with respect to police owe us no duty yet a special relationship exists when removing our heirs from the physical custody of parents avoiding the responsibility through escorting DHS to our front doors i.e. aiding to abet forced client retainer

 

CEASE AND DECIST

POLICE VIOLATE THEIR OATH OF OFFCE BY ESCORTING DHS TO OUR FROT DOORS

 

The Child Abuse Hotline is not an elected judiciary or a constitutional judicial seat and cannot skip over the judiciary to determine probable cause without affidavits of truth while colluding with DHS to deprive rights under color of law to allow DHS to appoint child advocates for adoption purposes.

 

This is a violation of Due Process of Law.

 

When you see Treason and do not report Treason you aid Treason under a conspiracy of silence.

 

DOC is a RESPONDEAT SUPIRIOR under which silence is acceptance according to NoL lien process DOC’s allow criminal prosecutors and DHS to abuse money lien non judicial adoption retention through specialty court while it is publicly declared the Deputy District Attorney works closely with the DHS to free children up for adoption so an adoption procurement agent not a criminal prosecutor (not a justice matter which is in violation of the legislative intent of the Office of the District Attorney, where Due Process of Law is subverted) so has no summon power decidedly handing SUMMON POEWER to DHS social workers which is a violation of our right to an independent judiciary.

 

TREASON

 

NAZI TREASON

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2021 5:42 AM
To: donald.a.erickson@dhsoha.state.or.us
Subject: Refute to the Deputy District Attorney of Multnomah County Juvenile Justice Complex - Patricia L McGuire ADMINISTRATOR

 

Due notice of Treason against my daughter and my grandchildren,

 

DHS make money concubines of our heirs. Say we cannot challenge jurisdiction. Then put parents in debtors prison for failure to pay the huge bill DHS run up paying out more money each moth to foster homes and deny kin their blood relatives for things we are not liable for, immune to according to Supreme Court, as a guillotine of statute and code that are not law, while law is utterly ignored by the BAR Members appointed to our families, subverting both state and federal constitutions.

 

My daughter does not need a social worker she needs an attorney who is not a Treasonous Nazi Yes man.

 

 

 

I would like some information regarding the standard of evidence of beyond a reasonable doubt and when that standard was extended to Indigenous populations and what Bill was put in place to raise the standard of evidence prior to Permanent Termination of Parental Rights and how that is also not relevant to permanent termination of all our blood ties through preemption.

 

This topic is relevant to the allegation of Treason, not that you are directly accused of Treason.

 

Prima facia cases are established through uses of the Commercial Lien also known as the Notice of Liability accompanied by a trick of proof of service which is not accomplished by the uses of DHS allegation popping by to tape a notice to the door of perspective adoptable commodities while never required to leverage a Jury verdict against the entire extended family, case by case, equal to the protection extended to hardened serial rapists and serial murderers, which is accomplished on hearsay exception rule and gossip session by paid jurors in control of all the witness referral pool contracting with them directly, when on the one hand the DHS leverage against any given ‘family unit’s extended family members the same pain and penalty, as if the entire family is in jail and accused as well, in lieu of Due Process of Law protecting criminals, family is denied an independent judiciary, while our heirs are stalked in in foster care, since we have no right to family blood ties and made subject to VERDICT IN without a Show Good Cause, which is how DHS operate without a criminal case leverages with respect to all extended family, case by case, making all our nations heirs fictitious plaintiff through Diligent Efforts clause forcing all to be judged by their direct opponent, the Adoption Foster Retention Specialist which is in representation of “DHS is in direct control of Supply and Demand”, Reasonable Efforts and Diligent Efforts (DAK), Supply and Demand, directly tied to the ADMINISTRATIVE money seat paying for it all regardless if Reasonable Efforts were ever actually made under limited discretionary scope of authority that pays DHS regardless if they were reasonable or not.

 

Your help is much appreciated.

 

Thank you,

 

Marilyn [LeBaron]©

 

UH – EXCUSE ME THIS IS ACTUALLY GOING ON RIGHT NOW IN THIS CASE all relevant to a refute against a legalized false prophet

 

When you see Treason and do not report Treason you aid Treason under a Conspiracy of silence.

JFK warned us and was silenced. https://youtu.be/F-AZV3qnwkA

I cannot remain silent – This is an ongoing case of illicit abuse by the Deputy District Attorney’s using legalized secular false prophecy (future crimes - without a Minority Report as seen on T.V.) instead of Corpus Delicti, actual events, yet severed our blood ties and put my family up for sale – below topic all relevant to a refute belonging in open court before a Trial by Jury of Peers to decide if the fact is sustained for the penalty inflicted on gossip between multiple paid bureaucrats that do not qualify as an open court of record or a Jury of Bureaucrats (since The Jury of Bureaucrats is not a thing at law – so not if that is a thing – more bureaucrats need to be called as Juries to judge the juries and see if they would like to be treated this way if DHS ever knocks on their door bringing DAK through police force

 

DHS CANNOT SIGN A COMPLAINT AND BE A JUROR BEFORE THE TRIAL DATE AS WELL AS YOUR DIRECT OPPONENT AT EVERY LEVEL OF THE BUREAUCRACY WHILE ALSO ASSESSOR THROUGH GOSSIP WITHOUT PRESENTMENT OR CRIMINAL CASE FILED - Regardless of how crazy all this BELOW seems to be it is relevant to the refute of the false allegations on my daughter's case. And not available to DHS for pressing for insurance money to their hands since in violation of the No Corruption of blood.

 

cit 

 

While the Constitution only prohibits an attainder (or corruption of blood) for the crime of Treason, the first Federal Crime bill in 1790 prohibited the imposition of either penalty for any Federal crime. On to corruption of blood, which I learned is the result of attainder. (Good thing I looked up attainder first.) Corruption of Blood is defined as: “The effect of an attainder which bars a person from inheriting, retaining, or transmitting any estate, rank, or title. ” 

 AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH AND REPUDIATION

 

LeBaron, Stevens, Couvillion, Family

By Marilyn LeBaron

C/O 4184 Devonshire Court, Northeast, Salem Oregon zip code exempt [97305] not for commercial purposes

dogetty@live.com, madatcps@gmail.com,

 

Claim of Harm

 

SILENCE IS ACTION OF COMPLIANCE UNDER COMPLICITY AND TREASON

 

From: Marilyn lebaron
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 11:02 AM
To: jeffery.g.robinson.mil@mail.mil; US Institute Of Science; APRIL.GREEN@us.af.mil; US Institute Of Sciences, AA Research Group; The Convention of States Team; The Convention of States Team
Subject: COVID NARRATIVE SHATTERED BY LAW AND SCIENTIFIC REASOINING SUBJECT TO THOSE LAWS See this Instagram video by @aussieskeptic (expounded)

 

ECONOMIC WAR WAGED UPON TEXANS BY THEIR GOVEROR AGAINST THE LAWS TEXANS ARE ALL BOUND BY - TIME TO DO A FACT CHECK ON YOUR STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND INSTITUTE A SEVEN DAY PRAYER AND THEN A THREE-DAY FAST FOR GUIDENCE FROM God ON HIGH FOR WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT.

 

See this Instagram video by @aussieskeptic: https://www.instagram.com/tv/ceyzhkugjkb/?Utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet

 

SHUT CPS DOWN

 

Https://blawz.blogspot.com/2020/08/a-planned-trespass-against-mind-of-man.html

 

 

GO TELL A WOLF A DOG BIT YOU TO FIND RELIEF IS LIKE GOING TO DISTRICT COURT TO GET YOUR KIDS BACK

Trespass against the family! A Planned Trespass Against the Mind Of Man

GLOBAL DISTRESS DUE TO PEDOPHILIA AND MISSING CHILDREN IN THE UK ACCUSED OF HARBORING MORE PEDOPHILES THAN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

WAKE UP! WAKE UP! or REPENT BEFORE GOD DESTROYS US ALL

Liverpool Protest against Corporate trafficking of missing kids in care system

She breaks it down. It fits my story perfectly.

https://youtu.be/KQgJpnXvEj8

WHO OF YOU HAVE BEEN PAYING ATTENTION OR IS IT ALL NOW EVIDENCE PISSES AWAY BECAUSE YOU are EITHER FAST ASLEEP OR a PREDATOR YOURSELF? ONE or THE OTHER AIDING IT THROUGH COMPLICITY  OR ACTIVE PARTICIPATION IN THE RAPE AND PLUNDER OF OUR NATIONS HEIRS our heirs globally FOR MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS OF American law; THE SECURITY OF OUR PAPERS AND the segregated right to the security of our PERSONS, the right to COUNSEL OF CHOICE, the right to equal protection of DUE PROCESS OF LAW, the right to have the BILL OF RIGHTS  upheld in the presence of our elected judiciary when facing the equivalent of the death penalty in 'civil court' and sentenced to the penalties affiliated with a criminal case, the EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE violations, to protect us from TREASONOUS HUMAN TRAFFICKING INTO RAPE AND DEATH.​​​​

 

 Not the law of man.

​​A Planned Trespass Against The Mind Of Man https://youtu.be/kqgjpnxvej8

 

'They' censored the media to gain control because they could not beat us in physical warfare.

When the speeches of the powerful are redacted (because they are pieces of a confession) to keep us from knowing the truth and the media is complicit to that end we then have no real news to provide our decision-making process under guidance of true American minded leadership and Fake News is what we get instead and in opposite of what our fallen president asked the press to do. Then hiding truth and going against what John F Kennedy commissioned the press to do in his warning to us before he was assassinated and those that behave that way are assisting the people that shot JFK.

We have no state lines anymore. Our piece of this continent is just a big state and US citizenship is not what it used to mean or what we are taught in public schools as long as we have no Due Process Rights, as defined by criminal prosecution, when our Parental Rights are being terminated. Especially when calling all others defined as next of kin a ‘third party’ leaving the heirs of this nation with no blood relative while the attorney make money and they say, “That is of another type of legality (which is not lawfully applied) under this application of interpretations and they violate our Rights and collectively ignore the equal protection of the laws clause of this land leaving us no equal protection of the words we speak unto our own understanding, where public policy is measured, when the veto of unjust laws are leveraged if we the people are judged by our true judiciary, which is twelve of the un incorporate living soul, or man, a 'jury of 'our' peers'. 

How can we be a country under the treaty between states and have a federal government if we have no sates from which to send delegates to Congress in order to exercise the right to representation under the right to contract by proxy? Making Democrat Vs Republic’ a double myth and everything else commercial so why vote it is all contract by special interests and if you are not rich it is not your business, and you should not stick your nose in His/Her/Their banking issues and quit registering to vote because they are there for themselves and not for your interests. (Too far in my thinking?) Maybe not because since when have you seen a ‘grass roots’ movement that did not involve lots of money that was also not inspired by a bureaucrat and forced to take seed in our yards while we are forbidden to own a lawn mower?

The Fake News says the New World Order was stopped and Jesuit Priests were defeated and the whole world political landscape has inverted itself because Trump is the elect of God. But that is a double lie especially in my family’s life and some of the people i am hearing from. Then also said the marine reserves have been ‘sort of activated’ (Question: Lie?) Under the blessing of Donald Trump and we are not living in a police state when the military is called upon to ‘arrest and try people’ unless there was a war declared against family and we finally responded in kind and stood on the right side of the argument. Or fake troops from the one that said his whole family was in one way or the other 'directly involved' in the rescue of or (i say and/or) victimization of child sex slaves and the activation of his activity (as a 'Trump blessed Marine') is as it has been, and now as then, a Hitler and the Brown Shirts assault on family to handle the matter on both ends as a wolf in sheep's clothing holding a shepherds staff... Which is exactly what he said, while distancing himself from his sister, but not exactly stated the same way i am verbalizing what seems to be true out of his spoken message while rearranging his press release and clarifying his message as it came across to me telling them to “Leave town” and say his (Trump blessed and activated Marines who executed Obama and his sister, without a public trial). Well if they are after the pedophile, and bringing justice, and Trump sent him, he will be under fire if coming in to my town to clean up the testimony of the victims who come forward as it is reported in foster wars that in Florida an attempt has been made on the life of a whistle blower, and that this is a message sent by corrupt police, "If you don't stop making police reports we are coming to take your kids", “The other message is, “You will get no day in court and we cannot be stopped since you cannot identify us”, and “This is your last warning or you will be dead and your murderer, me, will be the new 'parent' for your kids”. If that was a cross confession attempting to implicate the president of being linked to Hitlery's sex trafficking scam I ask, "Well which one of the two out of Hitlery and Trump are attorney?" (I have no further questions at this time).(grits teeth). And thinks, "You can get yourself in trouble reporting what seems like Fake News if it is not Fake News and nobody else believes your version of the interpretations your reasoning brings you to". "And since sheep tend to go right back to grazing after a wolf attacks, well it does not matter, since you are already dead" if the threat on whistle-blower lives is as real as publicized and that Marine, Field Connell, is or is not what he seems to be in the opinions of others under my interpretations of what miss information is actually worth when mixed in with truth". Some of what he said is true so do not go into shock and denial, please. "Because criminals have all the rights," he thinks and "After all the real witch is dead and she cannot testify against me or Obama, well who cares right, Obama and my sister are dead and cannot implicate me". Mentality of the message: Take everybody down with me even the innocent men and make sure the culpable are out of sight and all the witnesses are dead or on a hit list they put themselves on. We need to activate a 'shadow team' and another to audit and inventory all the victims into the public eye.

“On guard! Enemies of the Supreme Lawmaker’, I say… wielding the ‘weaponized pen’... Asking... “What is the meaning of ‘People person’, ‘people PERSON’, and PEOPLE if we are forced to contract while under duress of rape in foster care?" and point out "There is an inherent conflict of interest present in the first place; while we are denied the right to remain silent and tried without a jury; while the culpable prepare the testimony for parent and child while the Juvenile Complex ‘pseudiciary’ have unlawfully delegated the judicial discretion to a phone". Then looking to the canon thinking "Everything seen and heard in the court of law is evidence' is null and void since the judicial seat was diluted further replaced by an algorithm and a phone call to the child abuse hot-line". So how is jurisdiction even relevant when that ‘pseudiciary’ did not make the probable cause call or authorize a warrant and has not held a hearing to weigh evidence and testimony; and a family member is screaming, "Bring me my family", since their rightful seat having been delegated to that call they have not enough information", (even anonymous callers can be heard); then later sit and have all facts presented to them by the ones who benefit financially; while these pseudo attorneys or ‘SS’ are prior to a petition being filed, members of a private for-profit corporation. And the state owns all the complaints in a 'No complaint, No Victim' state with no Special Appearance to challenge the validity of such a compounded pile of multiple contradictions under the influence of crooked interpretations of lawlessness in attempt to explain away the conflict of laws."

GET A CLUE AND SMELL THE REASONING OF THE CRIMINAL MIND RAGING WAR UPON US.

We need to respond diligently by listening to voices of our past presidents on the topic of upholding the historic signing of the original Constitution of the United States of America (under the reading of books they read while understanding their legislative minds) to ensure our families are protected against human traffickers. Please honor your Constitution. All those warmongers are dead, and we were taught that in our agreements we as a people, are interpreted to have the right to not contract, or the definition and word duress should be removed from our vocabulary because the current things going on contradicts that we are not slaves. Why do we need to follow their treasonous agenda when we should dig up their bones and hang them just to send current corrupt policymakers a clear and convincing message? “America will not take it any more”, “You shot our president”, “Your actions made our Philadelphia Convention null & void”, “Our children are falling prey to child sex slavery and grow up to be prostituted for the pleasure of the super-rich”, “They, that afford it and have the money to pay that someone else holding the pen power causing illicit contracts between our heirs and the price of the body slave for their own gain for services rendered when the 'by and between' clause is totally illicit and deplorable dishonoring the will of the contracted and all power lies between those who love not, who continue to gain heavy TAX breaks, and are without natural emotions, having no empathy, while the TAX CODE defines, though not a Life or Liberty venue, our family ties, with definitions therein while they that use dependency tax definition are responsible for getting our babies raped"… (a here and now quote). "Please ask yourself why we and our American heirs are degraded and dejected then oppressed by our leaders not bringing us relief and the ones Christ favors, and are set before Him as an omen of what is in the heart of men, and while He and His Angels look on, the poor are left to grovel to become the equivalent of a third world citizen of nations know for sex tourism, while next of kin are defined as 'third party' in the eyes of the court, while our children are trafficked for federal dollars pumped into the pseudo-State in-corps-er-laidend for profit Juvenile Complex from a federal to State funnel, while commerce is the only reason i see ‘state lines’ exist anymore (yet collectively all states are one in the same as the federal since we have no local state military standing or our state anthem taught to students, while double standards are enforced, one federal and the other state, and we just accept it as the norm when it is an age-old method of ruling under duplicitous applications of law enforcement guidelines), while we self-destruct for the pleasure of our enemy”, Example; Federal enforcement and state enforcement of the possession of marijuana - depending where you were caught with it: either on a plane or in a home while not on Subsidized Housing or under a landlord-tenant lease not federally subsidized. Or in a car or walking down the street, then scrutinized to find if the possessor was intending to distribute under the application of the laws within ‘fake state lines’, either during or after or before the War on Drugs then on a side by side comparison to before and after the legalization with or without the federal or state tax in any given commercial region and see to who and where the money is really going. Then i will surmise the states in which marijuana was legalized are used as drug capitals of 'Amer-ee-ka', ‘a one nation' of  'the medical marijuana trade’ centers which became a ‘gateway’ for the drug lord to infiltrate our leaders, as a fulfilment of a long term goal, and now use for tracking the needle user by replenishing their supply of clean needs, but a secondary system as contact points of their victims with dealers who have also friends as well as they would be postured for investments in the Drug Rehabilitation Centers and Methadone Clinics. COME ON!!!!!!!!! 

Wake the truck up.... V-v-roooom......... There is an intelligence race going on!!

Evidence of the intent of this treason: https://youtu.be/evaamqga2d4?T=490

County lines have no merit anymore according to the speaker presented herein and that is what i said about our state lines as well in another email to the Governors Advocacy Office and they must think I am out of my mind because they chose the other color of pill when choosing ‘red or blue’ and need to continue believing what they learned in the federally controlled public education that dumbed us down (which includes our president). 

(Which includes our president)… and ask yourself who set him up for this embarrassing moment? Well, somebody more legally inclined than him. 

The result is depicted in this 'fake quote' of Brad Pitt in the movie Fury asking his men, “Would Hitler Fuck one of them for a chocolate bar” (see below), but I don’t believe this was actually the agenda outside of their intent to control the individual while naming themselves or their subsidiary or franchises the State of [any State] to confuse us just for the stakeholders sake under the guidance of the true agenda which is the spirit of the love of money, retrospectively duo applicate, but they did want to dumb the entire world down:

Role reversal from the invader's point: “Do you think an under-aged American heir would fuck us for a chocolate bar?”

REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE according to the child sex slavery trafficker, “We need less law and more disinformation and division and Fake News”. 

The reality of the above role reversal. My grandchildren are in child trafficking camps or child sex slavery camps and i am being silenced in the court... I cannot curl my lips back: : https://blawz.blogspot.com/2019/10/i-cant-curl-my-lips-back.html

Sos – sos – please hear my sos 

Marilyn [LeBaron] © copyright - family name redacted because the family tree has been chopped down - the family members, chopped from one another, by monotheistic individualized sequester spreadsheet money plot, to be laid in piles of firewood, then used for making ‘heat’ for the pedophilia movement through the Demonic Hellbent Subversion advertised as the ’royal’ DHS pedophile lead procurement system set up by Hitlery and an activated marines' sister who knows 'who shot Obama' and says it is Hitlery's fault but he acts under Trumps full blessing while other Congressional 'leaders' hold secret meeting about 'impeaching; Donald Trump. Well does he need a change of guard? Shall we put him behind bulletproof glass now since he is 'trying to stop the suspected murderers of Senator Nancy Schaefer?

Maybe some of local men of each state should not leave him alone since he may not know how to identify those that love the smell, texture, and color of dirty green, considering he makes enough already, and since it does look to me that he does have his needs met, considering the topic, he gets the benefit of the doubt and may need a change of guard, under the circumstances, since Senator Nancy Schaefer was killed and reportedly avoiding D.C. and using talk and toss phones, and Trump and his attorneys may not want to touch on the topics that i suspect got Senator Nancy Schaefer killed. 

I worry!

And they (bankers) want us to go paperless while the laws of the inter-net have not been defined yet and may change again soon so post everything on the web instead of the library since posting on land is not exactly subject to the laws of the air and the air is not governed by the laws of the land and if you can't fly we will befall utter lawlessness and anarchy if thoughtfully discerned as three elements waring for the followers luring men to their doom since man is a land dweller, while under the thinking of three types of law; comparison of the rules of the sailor while on a ship under the God (or captain while at sea); comparison of the laws of land when in Georgia during the same act performed in the air (on a table); in the past as bar room panhandler would be arrested and charged with criminal solicitation if standing ‘bottomless’ on the floor while in the presence of a member of the opposite sex, but not while performing as a ‘table dancer’ with her bottoms off while standing on a table, (but not interpreted that way in Oregon) but as long as she remembered to dress ‘below the belt’ just before stepping onto the floor and taking the cash no charges would be filed since she was up in the air when being paid to be naked. So, if the inter-net is ruled by the laws under that tri venue interpretation and because not of Land, but Air, sort of like Sea maybe: How is that equal protection of the law? Is it a moral issue or a matter of ethics or a call to hold an interstate z international convention? Or is it a matter of ownership and subject to estate and inheritance or eminent domain where probate law cannot claim an argument? Or a really sly banker moves of owning everything or just an inventive deception for a ‘dark hole’ where no law is found since law is of land and not Air and Air belongs to the Prince of the Air, and he was flying when the law of the land was put to paper which He would like to make a Treaty with without revealing his vulnerabilities? Well, consider the rights to the minerals and the term property as opposed to Land Grant, and who owns the ocean and air space and who lays claim to space beyond the ozone layer and if satellite messaging is used for Wi-Fi than we need to think NASA is the Prince of the oxygen less airspace and can bill for the seconds the data is in their carbon monoxide free transmission zone then to the billable seconds goes to the people who hold title to homes and have a vested interest? Which has some indications of who grants the use air and who can deny clearance to fly over allied air space or send Wi-Fi messages into a no foreign data zone? Was much of that not already defined by our founding fathers even before December 17, 1903, when Wilbur and Orville Wright Brothers made four brief flights at Kitty Hawk with their first powered aircraft. I say yes but they were of the mind that everything was owned by Nature and Nature’s God. Well we did not have a convention on the air space constitution did we way back then but the water ship or boat method of travel has law in place defined for centuries while horse were still the mode of travel so that is where we must have looked for a parallel from which to gain and apply legislative intentions for our thoughts about what laws apply to air security related to aerial warfare defense and territorial lines when warring and air space security lines are drawn (but when nuclear weapons are in place we only worry where these bombs are pointed, because air space boundary lines apply to the reach of missiles launched from ground to air silo and then the airplanes bombers or missile range, and how is data used to rage war?, and then the cell phone and radio and telegram had their influence on who owned the airwaves and oh boy the invent of the television. Now the web which is an air space thing which only has a militarized interpretation or commercial application that i know of and it seems to be a huge national security issue while they want us to go paperless and plug us with chips and no one ever knows if there has been a breach since data can be duplicated and there is not vault secure enough equivalent to how we hid the Declaration of Independence from the enemy during a wartime invasion but data is vulnerable and can be selected, deleted, or edited at whim even from across the sea and we are absolutely blind fools if we do not make hemp paper and stop chopping down the tree and stop the harvesting of the bloodlines and denying us a 'family tree'. Message: As long as you are in the air you are free to be lawless so, please go paperless where the attorney will be the only one that has access to the record hidden under the seal of a mandatory subpoena and no man will have any proof and no password is really protected and invisible parties can stay hidden while changing your ID or anything else they want. 

So what if our president authorized us to sue the web pages used to display foster children for sex trafficking, ‘there are no laws or statutes’ legislated under that ‘venue or jurisdiction’ yet so it is interpreted that attorneys are now poised to make more money off the victims while they invent a new 'cyber data air ship' and then also who the god is of that ‘cyber data air ship’ and if that god has any limitations of power if you board his ship when you were actually sitting at your computer firmly planted on land, not ever becoming data yourself, since 'space ships' exist already it begs the question, “Are astronauts yet considered in the eyes of the law of the land to be held to the same status exercising the same immunities at the same capacity as a captain of a ship at sea?’ and if yes does that carry over to the ‘cyber data air ship?, to apply 'equal protection' of being a captain of a 'ship’ well iii don’t think you should board a ship unless you know what the rules are because if the captain is corruptible you will not have a redress of grievance and attorneys will make new waves in the Supreme Court at the citizens expense (while the same attorneys invent the substantive due process) and avoid admitting they are avoiding our already established due process rights and the technicalities of proper form are actually the supreme law and we are told it is ‘best interests’ and attorney have decided our right to Special Appearances is concurrently degraded to general appearances ‘only’ which is an attack on our Sovereignty denying us the right to appear and challenge things prior to appearing at all in an attempt to get a case vacated or whittled down while challenging jurisdiction or venue instead of being forced to retain and attorney and then if you cannot afford and attorney you are required to present a case better than an attorney (when that just is not historically so, because we are not lawfully held to the same rules of an attorney, and not yet antiquated since the people are not required to meet the same paper processing discipline of the attorney and present a case better (since they have not attended law school) which would not be a fair trial (as proper form was designed to prevent us from presenting a case and defined by design as a 'legal disability' so the attorney can gain a client, when they are the ones hiding the simple truths, and by doing so abrogate the people from the right to abate a matter forever if choosing not to take an attorney, which forces us to contract, which is law under private agreement between men that want more money, and a violation of the right to counsel of choice, meaning you can choose to not have an attorney or just stand alone without one and appoint Christ if you want for that matter and stand there silently and say to the 'Juvenile Complex ‘pseudiciary', "Hear thine Creator if you can because He said, "My sheep hear My voice and I know them"” and if the ‘pseudiciary’ are deaf it will be evident and if they say, “I heard the voice of your God”, and their constituents will declare them mentally ill according to their judgments under psychology.... Lol... But this should be the interpretation of the Right to Counsel of Choice or that Right will completely dissolve public policy and Special Appearance are truly gone and all appearances must be general only and be ready because God has officially been kicked off the planet again. Amen and lol and in His Holy Name lol (laughing because i’m in shock and hope has got the best of me)

A direct order from our fallen Commander and Chief! 

…No president should fear the scrutiny of his administration…

…The question remains… …Test of National Security… Additional tests…

…No government plan should impose its restraints against your will…

…………………….outright invasion…………………….. ‘i see it coming’…. SOS… 

……………………about-face………….about-face……………about-face…………….

And please have my brother, an actual Marine, a Jag, so named Big Brother of mine go and identify who wrote that executive order allowing us to sue the inter-net child slave trafficker pigs who can just move their web page!!!!! And have them or that attorney put under scrutiny for a grand jury indictment under the penalty of death for conspiracy against our supreme law unless they are as legally literate as our present federally educated president who was taught his business skill by his father who probably was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, silver spoon in his top hat, and left pocket guard, with a gold spoon in both his right and left hand, and cleaned his braces with silver tooth picks, while you reprimand the Fake News mill who authorized the lie against him (and in the name of national security) and bring suit against the MSNBC press (and make them prove their case prior to trying every president in the open press) because how can we expect Trump to go bankrupt while he serves in his post -since in a media war zone - when we knew he was a business man prior to electing him into office but more to the point we did not prior to his election require him to pass a non-religious test... Lol constitutional test? … and go sue the press and tell whoever authorized that press release to Stop Telling False Usurpations against truth and force them to stop talking (STFU Acronym) in honor of our fallen president John F Kennedy! And that would be justice and a big move toward kicking out the use of freedom of speech to slander our nation’s leaders in the press… Fake News is wartime disinformation and the leadership John F Kennedy commissioned as our commander and chief was completely ignored and subverted by the mass purchase and monopolization of the press which is illegal – See: the Breakup of the Bell System and what is becoming of communication (Wi-Fi) today (while sprint can bill you to work there and all our jobs are shipped overseas) and we are put on welfare and the application of a benefit is a lethal use of an ax in the District Attorneys’ hand. 

PLEASE DWEL ON HIS WORDS…. PLEASE DWELL ON John F Kennedy’s WORDS… AND REMIND YOURSELF HE SAID, "NO DEMOCRACY COULD THINK TO OPPOSE"… "NO REPUBLIC COULD SURVIVE" - end quote - AND WE HAVE NO STATE MILITARY LEFT… AND OUR MILITIA HAS BEEN DEMONIZED… AND WE ARE BEING DISARMED… AND OUR CHILDREN RAPED… AND OUR PARENTS DENIED DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHILE GIVEN A BLOODLESS DEATH EQUIVALENT TO THE AFRICAN AMERICAN PRE CIVIL WAR BUT IT IS REDEFINED AS BEST INTERESTS AND NOT TO MAKE THEM WORK IN COTTON FIELDS BUT IN CHILD SEX SLAVE CAMPS LIKE… sos for BOTH MY GRANDCHILDREN sos …. PLEASE ASSIST YOUR NATIONS CHILDREN BEING KIDNAPPED AND RAPED AND NOT GIVEN A VOICE WHEN THEY SAY THEY ARE THE CHILD'S VOICE BUT ONCE THEY GET POSSESSION OF YOUR HEIRS, THEY ARE TOLD TO SHH! AND NO VIDEO IS ALLOWED OR RECORDINGS…. SOS

SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS 

TWO GENERATIONS OF RAPE IN FOSTER CARE IN MY FAMILY AND MY GRANDCHILDREN ARE TOLD TO SHH! AND I AM DENIED THEIR AFFIDAVIT OF FACT OR ALLOWED TO BE PRESENT OR SELECT THE PEOPLE WHO PREPARE IT WHICH IS A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE AND YOUR SEVERED FROM YOUR FLESH AND BLOOD AND LEFT TO DIE A SLOW EMOTIONAL DEATH WHILE RAPED OR PUT AT THE RISK OF RAPE AND THEN END UP IN CHILD RAPE TRAFFICKING AND ONLY CALLED A RUNAWAY … AZ MIRROR… SOS

SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS 

Because Ma’ Bell was a communication monopoly under the definition of the media conglomerate (which is a hypocritical monopoly itself) and we must realize a war time conspiracy of a command of our fallen commander and chief from a public war cry to guide the members of the press itself (and such an advisory was declared by JFK when he openly declared a clear and present danger and became the first casualty of that war) and this disregard for his sacrifice is a ruthless ‘moral’ drain (while the culpable handle the details of his demise in the controlled media - as not to call it ‘the press’) and mislead us and are a morality war on the minds of our heirs who should not learn the behavior of ‘sit down, shut up, step in line weather you respect leadership or not’ which is detrimental to the morals of our future collective worth especially while we are not allowed a blood line anymore under the current BAR led and driven Administration while all their limitations among their own constituents tell us we have no constitutional rights. 

Please go check on the people in Florida responding to the Trump administration Human Trafficking whistle-blower call… they are saying they are targeted for death and that the police tell you not to make police reports or they are coming for your children… and they are an invasion coastline and so is California just below me…. SOS… and police these days use numbers on their badges instead of names and these people could be posing as cops while our citizens are disarmed… 

SOS for California and Florida SOS for Ariana Escobar in Texas…

What is a judicial canon?

CANON 1. A judge shall uphold and promote the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.

CANON 2. A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently, and diligently.

CANON 3. How can a judge uphold his canon 'competently' if his seat has been delegated to a telephone? And a telephone has no judicial eyes or ears and is not present in a court and cannot really tell anything relevant to body language an algorithm takes the place of that as well? Well, what do we expect from the 'pseudiciary' when you are at odds with the fact, they bring no justice to families through their seat and mercy seems to be a living death under their pen?

DHS Child Welfare, 30 N Webster St, Suite D Portland, Oregon 97217
If Robert B Axfortd/Robert Axford, of Lawyer Legion, would have been so kind as to get this properly recognized after being asked to intervene by my hysterical mother, since he is the one that is supposed to be my Defender, on the behalf of the kids, i assert my right to not contract i; Melanie V LeBaron, mother of my heir, Nolan J Stevens and his co heir Victoria R D Couvillion, not to be identified a Nolan Stevens and Victoria Couvillion, since that is not their given names and any petition in the latter two named fictions is void, but not limited to that forgoing cause, i, Melanie Victoria LeBaron, find it necessary to assert, extempore, the right of Attorney in Fact to bar further action of multifarious DHS agents or workers listed as Counsel on their papers filed on the Juvenile Department who don’t offer their name and contact information into court record or public directories, and remove consent for any action on my offspring’s drop file, case, or files in the services/DHS office, and revoke the authority of all court appointed attorneys and especially revoke undisclosed supervisory agents and very specifically Helmar Lochmann and require his files, notes, and any papers Quashed from my case as there is a conflict of interest between him and my heirs, and all Attorneys who do not present themselves personally, who have not contacted me and are not in direct witness to any given fact presented by DHS workers, and revoke the DHS selections of doctor’s, therapists, or otherwise professionals contracting with DHS, or and revoke the power of attorney of all court appointed Attorney’s, the District Attorney, and Robert Axford also known as Robert B Axford, especially those not listed on court documents, weather licensed or unlicensed. And further require all me and my heirs birth dates be redacted from any and all records of any type relevant to services pertaining to adoption or long term placement in foster care or substitute where my heir is sic ties more likely to be MALTREATED and or four percent more likely to be 'SEVERELY' MALTREATED while under the custody and control of the State and subject to Federally Funded State of Oregon, or STATE OF OREGON COURTS which of the two the latter is the allegation being raised and has not to date been refuted and subject to the burden of proof and the inference be sustained since it has been more than 21 days and is Fact to witness of my mother Shannon Stevens and mother in law Marilyn LeBaron:

 

i; Marilyn LeBaron, Nathan Allan Stevens in support of the above, require all the following be sealed for in camera inspection; list of services provided or refused by my heirs and 'family members' after being offered service and notes pertaining to that; notes of the worker drafting any and all letters to my daughter for both children and notes as to why those safety plans were submitted to her and what exhibits are available to document the letters, and who approved the plan prior to it being presented or mailed, and a copy of what police reports are pertinent to the inferences raised regarding the first letter mailed to my daughter on that allegation; also all notes on each individual stressors she is not able to identify and manage, who's testimony is on each, what expert is called to verify that she has the inability to manage each stressor and recommendations made by DHS agents in writing based on expert witness recommendation; a list of dangers to my heirs and what harm is being prevented to them based on the safety plan presented her also naming Nate Stevens in which it is state at least one parent is willing to cooperated or perform; please do not redact from all dated or undated discovery the full names, work addresses, properly listed phone numbers, of each agent, actor, worker, specialist, police officer, sheriff, or otherwise, from which i will redact as i see the situation calls for, so true copies of redacted documents weather intended as court exhibits sustaining inferences raised in support of safety plans or not; all printed papers of any kind delivered or handed to my daughter, narratives of any kind pertaining to any detail of this case, all recordings, voice or video, by and between any party and my grandchildren, and any between her and other solicitors and all between solicitors pertaining to that and any other communication; all recording, video or voice, made during interviews by and between my heirs and caseworkers and caseworker notes and a timeline between interviews and written reports, the dates the interviews were conducted; an explanation as to why my grandchildren were re named on petitions and their full given names are on safety plans or other, and what names are used on medical, dental and each and every other ‘other’ exam, evaluations, of any kind including all reports medical examination reports, copies of un redacted emails by and between all parties or solicitors, police, DHS workers, or phone calls logged on this matter weather privileged or not on any billable communication, all phone logs of calls from all agents to any person or other agency or place made on this matter, supervisory staff notes regarding case management, transportation orders, all papers presented for a signature of any kind by any agent, or attorney, or referee, or police, case notes of all workers, photos or videos taken of my heirs by anybody having contact with my heirs from the date of their removal to now; names of the schools being attended, taxi drivers, names of teachers, school counselors, names of doctors, therapists, psychologists and intake appointment notes and copies of all bills for the same in both names of my grandchildren, given and non-given; notes of why foster providers were changed, who ordered taxi transportation to and from school and why, including addresses and contact information for transportation providers and their mileage records with time and date stamps of pick up and drop off points, petty cash receipts for my grandson's shoes, an inventory of my grandchildren's belongings at each foster home and who provided what clothing item or toy or other to my heirs with receipts and deductions from foster money budget notes allocated for the needs of my heirs in the logs of books kept by foster providers, and the training or each foster provider with respect to my grandchildren's individual needs as directed by the caseworker, pick up orders date time stamped by officials ordering said and issue dates of warrants, and notes from arresting officers and CPS on the date of pick up, attorney notes or recorded conversations copied and sealed on every personal contact by and between any and all attorneys on her case with date and time of the duration of each meeting, calendar entries regarding appointment times scheduled by either mail or phone by and between my daughter and all attorneys, caseworkers, and postage costs, print costs of letters to my daughter, copies of text messages by and between my daughter and caseworkers especially from February 15, 2019 and on the date of the Dependency Hearing on February 19, 2019; all notes on this case by or between Don Dowel and supervisory staff on his contact with me time and date stamped, and any other efforts made by CPS to contact me and for what purpose and by what medium of exchange, deposition dates set or affidavits of fact presented to the courts, names of the caseworkers past and present and why they were replaced, what date the case was moved from the Gresham office to be supervised at the Alberta office, notes of the other agents in any capacity on their contact with me, logs pertinent to those entries it any, arrest records relevant to this case on or before the date of February nineteen twenty thousand and nineteen petitions and drafts of petitions not filed with and without redacted information, court clerk notes, judicial notes or orders handed down from the judicial seat, mileage records pertaining to pick up and drop of to and from any location and another, school records or absences and notes from the party excusing the absence from school for both my grandchildren, dates of after school activities beginning, investigative notes and reports made from contact and who requested that interview, and calls made to the child abuse hotline, and document creation dates for all items above, under the time frame of this request to the next hearing this prodigious amount of papers needs to be secured and delivered to me as I am under obligation to supervise or disentitle any ad hoc executor, solicitor or actor having the character or significance of advocate, and if not I deem it necessary to revoke all authority i unwittingly extended to Congress granting authority to dispense finding to organized philanthropic assistance resulting in the indiscriminate wide open assign of random and legally illiterate Counsel to posterity and heirs; so named, LeBaron, Thomas A, brother of LeBaron, Melanie V, mother of Couvillion, Victoria R, and Stevens, Nolan J; the direct descendants of Benjamin Franklin Johnson, and Joseph Smith by marriage to the sister of the grandfather of LeBaron, Ervil M, begat by virtue of marriage between Alma Dayer LeBaron, (D, Feb, 19, 1951, in Galeana, Chihuahua, Mexico), and Maud Lucinda McDonald LeBaron (D, Feb, 23, 1979, in Colonia Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico); and authorizing signature on documents birth certificate live Birth Vital Records ant at the Social Security Administration, or otherwise, and a I demand it be done. By somebody, since it is EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS under the fact that the will and consent of the governed acts under the belief it is their business, because it was proclaimed, presented as a lawful deed, when it really isn't so, unless it is the position that misleading propaganda is not construed as intent when the people act upon its worth, which it has not worth, since nobody really cares because the heart of man has become wax-cold and refuses under heat to melt. REGARDING: 18 U.S. Code §3509, Child victims’ and child witnesses’ rights. To Verify and Affirm the following; My heir, Nolan [J] Steven’s, has not attained the age of 18 years and is still under the co-perpetrator’s control and is at least six years younger than the perpetrator who’s estimated age is above 30, who’s supervisor Advised him not to speak to me protecting him from liability and also stepping up to shield him from self-incrimination when speaking to me during direct confirmation and turning the ‘guns’ and pointing them at me, while failing to reveal her source to me of whose double barreled pen was aimed at me. And this co-perpetrator aided, shielded, from self-incrimination, making her culpable as well, though her subordinate admitting to be culpable by dereliction of duty to protect or bring into accountability the co-perpetrator after being informed of his maltreatment amounts to two counts of negligent treatment by DHS supervisors collectively, one with direct or indirect knowledge the abuse prior or what was to transpire after such dereliction of duty by negligent treatment had occurred - such occurrence defined as (1) “abuse” under 18 U.S. Code §3509 (A) (i) (B) from entitled code above. And after said deliberate action later supported his own lack of due care and abandoned his charge in the line-of-sight rule at the same address the allegation arose, this applies to Victoria [R] Couvillion who was also at the same address at the time the allegation arose. There was also ‘another’ ‘safety threat identified’ as a second threat, aside from another violent older child not subject to the inference ‘of the lack of proper “background checks”. This ‘another ‘safety threat as i called it was only present at night so Nolan [S} Stevens had to sleep ‘downstairs. This physical and mental injury is compounded to torture when his mother is not allowed to after hearing his cry for help to aid him and actually under duress is forced to leave him under the control of the co-perpetrator who gains financially and also has a ‘representation’ factor over what the mother stated and her word against his is needing to be eliminated from the causality in order to eliminate wrongful continued willful negligence on the part of the supervisory staff and the records at DHS be collected and sealed if due care is given.

 

Please do your part and actively reclaim your inalienable right to Counsel of Choice that includes the right to a privileged relationship that allows you to have privileged relationships with DHS Counsel that are not under DHS control and used as prosecution against you:

 

See: Fifth Amendment: witness box; Joan of Arc; and your doctor patient privilege under attack when a social worker hands you a release of information to a pre-selected referral while saying, “I represent you and yours even unto you and your entire family’s ‘emotional death’ count, by count, by count, by count, multiplied by each person’s own number of losses as it pertains to how many of your ‘next of kin’ need to be comforted but their losses are only limited to their sense of loss which is multiplied and quantified in the opposite direction, but not ‘defined in the O. A. R., or compounded when torn from the Life of your heir and calculated as a multiple loss with every family member or family friend, or extended social acquaintance, or pet, or environment attachments, loss of the belongings, or favorite smell, and even memories of those things will not be wanted because they cause you emotional pain, but not put in a counter algorithm to balance out the algorithm used to determine your future risk of removal and then act in advance on that future outcome before that future outcome is proved by actual coming to pass, and acting into that which will the adjudicated futuristic ‘past’, then become the futuristic‘ past that was imposed upon the future’ once time goes by and everybody will be left to guess what would have been if that prophetic outcome was not acted upon, because there is no multiple universe to test that hypothesis under second and third scientific confirmation tests with the second universe or the first applied as a data base as the controlling hypothesis from where to compare data of the outcome of the test subjects under an exact reproduction of that original hypothesis, but there will need to be three more universes to prove the original hypothesis and three more to test the opposite (and one more for the first test to be flipped in representation of the opposite theory needing to be tested and validated on its own merits) to see if that algorithm is actually preventative since only ignoring the futuristic’ past will actually let this realities outcome stand the test of time in the first dimension, and taking action to prove preventative theory is contradictory in application and in directly in battle against each other needing to be proved three times on both sides of the argument, with one controlling hypothesis in honor of not pitting it against ‘the discretion of a living soul’ and the second ‘do not remove in’ accordance with the application of lawful use of judicial discretion (though not to be synonym of the term (professional discretion’) since the definition ‘judicial discretion’ was written even prior to the conception of phones and the appointment of judicial tribunals which is, and cannot be how the child abuse hotline is defined or screeners at the child abuse hotline would have to swear to and oath of office be subject to an election or be appointed after the manner defined in Title 28, and used in honor of that ‘do not remove’, before an algorithm is allowed to offend the ‘discretion of a living soul’ even before the dictionary gets changed, and is we do not have alternate universes to go back in time and try the same scenario twice (with each tested do not remove and remove) why would we need two more scientific hypothesis to test variables if we can reproduce the exact outcome two times under such a God like manner only God’s can actually perform from which to tell us the future under true prophetic messages, which are used to guide on the most part entire generations, to warning of sudden wrath from His need to rule after His precepts already made known, and an the discretion which should at best be governed either by God or some lawful sense of intellectual scrutiny subject to good faith and social standards of acceptable outcome towards the common good of man which is based on the common collective understanding in a diverse population that all agree and will submit to in honor of God’s order that we submit ourselves one to another, and love one another as we love our own soul yet fearing God more than man, as a guiding compass then to have all that set aside and reduced to oh, “I am not God and cannot be since He does not exist and cannot be called on to help in this case, and I’m not able to ‘prophesy’ so let’s just go with the algorithm, because DANG, look at all those tattoos, and all that criminal history, and oooo he sees a shrink we need the expert opinion of, and well the odds are looking like there is a possibility a safety risk will arise in the next two years that is beyond that person’s ability to properly manage”, when that is the diabolical reverse psychology applied to the mathematical calculation (that had a limited scope or it would not calculate properly) that is what is actually the targeted result of a false prophet, since they had to limit the scope of the data to put in to the equation, so they picked bias to remove it in cross negation of logic that can apply in both directions so it was just extra in show of, “We collect bias but don’t intend to use it so in it goes and out it goes to prove it” to convince you they are not bias, and then those other random cases used are not able to quantify all circumstance and conditions or life variables or stressors when those variables are present at the same time that affect the risk of harm calculations, that we have to consider the person’s integrity, which is not available instantly to the screener, because everything seen and heard in a court room is evidence not seen over a phone call, because everyone on earth is so unique like snowflakes and finger prints, and even freckles, and into the likeness of every aspect that people are being tested and tried to which such is mysterious to our ability to imagine or comprehend that disrespecting this ‘world trial court room’ belongs to the Creator where He claims all the rights to that which is prophetic, as it seemed to be after dwelling and dwelling on this theory in deep disturbing worst case scenario thought, which arose to be the desire of my selection of approach to bring you to the opposite lawful comparison that is being abolished by such chance application, to the result, “You, or you, or you, depending on the screener, may have just lost your right equal protection due to the allowance of the extra opportunity to disregard the law of the presumption of innocence to toss the presumption in the favor of the caseworker and the ‘adjudicator’ had no knowledge of the call at the time of the petition when the presumption is now required to be met with a refute and the burden of proof is shifted and no longer on the court, when the court did not make the judgment call on probable cause, which only leaves a preset disposition since the discretion of the judiciary was not applied so the same discretion can determine if the allegation has been met based on what inference was established, and the good faith is placed on the word of the boxes checked and the unintelligible scribbles which is cookie cutter junk allegations and the child abuse operator is not called on to be cross examined and neither is the witness that called in, so both have been ‘delegated’ unlawfully away from the ‘judicial seat’, and when acting on the algorithm it does not allow for the lawful right for Life to be left alone and go unnoticed, or have an actual claim harm by an actual party deemed as seeking or needing actual relief when the system is known to do irreparable harm as well, since ‘all that system inflicted harm’ is not really valued when looking at your ‘cost and future taxation value’ on a spreadsheet, when there is actually enough statistics to prove the algorithm presented by the DHS should have been the later collected data than what was presented to legislature trying to get more cases assigned for removal, to then have the removed be treated like a bird or parakeet isolated in a cage who will seek a ‘pseudo flock’ and bond more quickly with the human being that spends time putting their hand in the cage to feed you and offer you food, shelter, clothing, and emotional attention, which is not the case when you buy two making it more difficult to tame when they have no natural need for human companionship and cleave to one another meeting the instinct to belong to a ‘flock’, so isolation from family is forced ‘emotional deaths’ and then the State steps in and says ‘they are ready for adoption’ because they don’t feel the pain any longer and need a sense of belonging that we took from them in the process of inflicting harm and granting pseudo relief after isolation and lost has taken its time slowly grinding a sense of ‘emotional deaths’ till they let go of every face they ever knew, which is why the school of origin is a rule, but ignored in this case when moved and moved and moved and them moved away just one more time and isolated again, when they are cut off from the entire ‘family tree’ not actually defined in current psychology as multiple ‘emotional death experience’ which is a sharp opposite of the convenience of the ‘false memory’ that was suddenly discovered by psychologists when a pedophile priest brought into public scrutiny which is not really all that difficult to see an inference and puzzling to me to find the blind public trust placed on that coincidence, that ‘emotional deaths’ are not identified as pains and penalties as your only right for being born onto the ‘wrong family tree’, and all the while the social worker says, “I will also use your offspring’s voice against you based on your own testimony I collect under seeking your signature”, yet attorneys have not identified that as an inherent conflict of interest while the legally illiterate do all the ‘dirty work’ and they wait to make the bank and do not apply their own rules of conduct to that relationship because no law firm is allowed to handle both ends of an argument even if each ‘client’ is assigned a totally different attorney, not argued conveniently making them a living, “Now please sign and we will ignore the conflict of interest and I will say, “You are a willing participant ‘cooperative’ because you cooperated under duress while your children are denied their ‘family tree trunk’”, after isolating you from your offspring and they from their own root by legal definitions like ‘individual’ by who is available and identified as somebody that can include your ‘tree branch’ on your TAX DEDUCTION and under this ‘definition’ you also apply when you used it to get food stamps, when you file for tax return that you fill out to define who is your ‘family’ and that TAX DEDUCTION does not name every other ‘family’ member as ‘family’ (which in effect) actually isolated your ‘tree branches’ and you unwittingly ‘chopped your own tree down’ but never fully informed or told you was the one holding the ax, and instead of using a common dictionary’s definition we all use to define our ‘family’, instead of being fully advised that in opposite of being called extended family, or ‘next of kin’ your entire family will be called ‘third party’ and not allowed to be included as a party to the child welfare case, so like every other tree in the forest you are required to apply for your own family member to be ‘grafted back into your original ‘family tree’, and being then required to apply like all other strangers do to have the automatic right defined as a sapling to be defined as a ‘family tree member’ but isolated as a ‘branch in a pot’, even prior to a call to the child abuse hotline, and your own flesh and blood are not allowed to come to be a part of your household and they use the term ‘dependent’ to their own financial benefit and use your ‘family member’ to gain Federal Funds that have ‘a foster home’ or ‘Federalized Household’ I dub ‘family in a can’, or ‘a rootless branch’ or ‘branch in a pot’, instead of letting you gain your own blood relative as a ‘tax deduction’, which is competition and not best considering ‘family in a can’ has no emotional tie available to comfort your relative, and then you have no right to know anything at all about your own ‘next of kin’ so you cannot compete and just put up for another agent to ‘try you’ without the benefit of the regular guards of trial for non-criminal non allegations called things like ‘codes’ and building exits available, or passing a criminal background check (not being sentenced twice without a criminal trial or an actual civil case being brought against you for adjudication, since being civilly tried is not double jeopardy, as we all learned by watching the O’ Jay civil trial after the criminal trial, and your criminal history may or may not be include a crime against children (which i would not omit from consideration) but when they use all that record against you even if it is not Treason or a Felony that rises to the level of which would have in history gotten congress to declare a war tribunal against you ‘which is a Tittle of Attainder, so to speak, and have social workers allowed to ‘punish you twice’ by that is the equivalent to a Title of Attainder directed at the base of where your heirs are attached to your tree trunk which is equal application of the TAXATION CODE, prior to a call to the child abuse hotline, which is actually directly targeted at the young of your family members cutting of their right to a blood linage (even if your penalty has already been served) but none the less the application for your own family member is where you authorize a non-judicial adjudication by submitting to that application process, and you authorize that Trial by Attainder to be heard and you did not have that actually ‘defined’ to you by any attorney who probably while reading this are asserting the ‘best interests’ is the supreme rule of the Juvenile Department, and say the right to repentance is dead since Jesus Christ is a myth, so nobody ever has turned over a new leaf on life, thought they say they can rehabilitate a pedophile, but the common criminal is not subject to that theory though you served your time, you can be punished twice, which is saying, “The criminal justice system only works for pedophiles, child molesters, and statutory rapists, because a psychologist said they are the pseudo-Jesus Christ of the sexually immoral and have been known to get the kids, but suddenly the presumption of innocence comes into the arguments in a divorce court application of ‘beast interests where the state does not actually contend not being a party to the action, unlike in Juvenile Department, where the DHS is an actual contender against the naturally defined ‘family’ which is a conflict of interest since civil court is established for the opposite of the use of force so blood will not be spilt while settling ones differences, so if those ‘Federalized Household’ requirements are not pre met by education, and people go without a full explanation or an actual warning or fully made knowledgeable of what they gave up when applying for benefits or filing for FEDERAL TAXES that you are paying for the benefits with your tax base and that tax base will be used to chop down your ‘family tree’ is getting ‘cut off’ right at the branch and not ‘relevant till after removal’ but really hard to understand or explain since people are so blind to law and the definition of legal as it pertains to legalized criminal activity or lawful disregard of law that are not synonyms in application or theories that bring the necessity for their applicable interpretations when enforced or applied then adjudicated and yet not both when qualified in the end as not qualified as a ‘justice’ matter befitting crime and punishment which is actually applicable to both theories, but do not see how that is applicable to why the Federally Fed State is not allowing that which is growing on the tree trunk of your family tree, and the term individual steps in and abrogates the common dictionary and our understanding of family is denied us though not defined as ‘removing the tiny branch from a ‘flock’ because the family tree is not seen as an orchard and an orchard is not equated to a ‘flock of sheep’, in the minds of the ones awaiting a petition, but since both the above parables are all construed as property of man in the eyes of a Darwin theorist, calling the government a ‘shepherd’ allows for commercial use, but the deity of God as the Owner, and then on the other parable as children and the term ‘Good Shepherd’ becomes Father, only in the sense that He alone decides the rules of economics which is by and between His flock and not Himself as the consumer, and a TAX would not allow or needed that in there that opposing theory is in fact the basis of this entire argument and the innocent living soul is not seen by their eyes as a branch directly attached to a living growing ‘family tree’ but instead labeled a ‘sapling’ of a bad seed and scheduled for a grafting into another ‘family in a can’ and is what seems to me is actually intended in this matter and ‘grafted’ against the former status as a ‘sapling’ on one count but not the other which just cannot just be put in the ground of an orchard to grow on its own, but put since not scheduled to be put up for adoption and isolated even more than her younger sibling which leads me to believe darker things, which needs a legal refute, but mine will be redacted for secondary confirmation, and for the most part on what seems to be happening to the other orchard flocking together in this world let’s see if suddenly that ‘sapling’ reverts to being seen as a tree ‘branch’ on the juvenile departments spreadsheet of course, and ready for grafting in a ‘Federally Funded Household’ and actually physically redefined again by the evidence of the chain of events and the actual tree physical proof of the how the vein of a tree works to nurture itself under the a cycle of: ‘chop’, preserve in a pot of water, ‘reunite’ or ‘graft’, and never actually defined as ‘no root left’ because you are not defined as a ‘branch’, because tree branches do not survive long in a pot of water, so to that a time limit is placed on when that ‘non root sprouting branch’, that has no tree trunk with roots to hold onto, has to be ‘reunited’, because it is known to have many reports it will be irreparably harmed if made to remain in that ‘unnatural pot’ during the process and damaged while the decision making furnace is dragged out month after month while actually in more danger than if left somewhere in the actual ‘family tree’ to stay rooted if not ‘reunited’ but instead that ‘tree branch is put up ‘in a pot’ waiting to be grafted though it may or may not be loved and nurtured during that time and more likely to be caused to suffer alone without the love of a family member while being MALTREATED and not allowed to heal and when failing to thrive the blame will be shifted to the time prior to the chop taking place. And since the under aged members of your family are not allowed to contract there is a conservator that is not conserving your tree but in fact has chopped it down and selected the saplings as the aim of the Tittle of Attainder when you file a TAX RETURN or use your TAX RETURN to get food stamps. So, do not get a bowl of soup from the State of Oregon because you are trading your bowl for a new status which includes the loss of your inalienable rights when you do.

 

EXAMPLE LETTER OR AFFIDAVIT BASED ON ACTUAL LIFE EVENTS:

 

Helmar Lochmann is disqualified as Counsel of Choice over my heirs when culpable and making a paycheck and year-end bonuses.

 

Melanie said Helmar Lochmann hangs up on Melanie while in phone conversations then calls her back. Do not get on the phone with CPS caseworkers working for the State of Oregon. If he does not tape record every other conversation he has with other heads of house on his caseload that he is planning on having the District Attorney behead he is overly interested in the outcome of this particular case and should be asked to step down as ‘counsel of no choice’, since he is representing my daughter still with his reports to the whole heard of attorneys on this matter that never make any contact with my daughter. Helmar Lochmann should have been removed off this case right after the allegation Nolan was raped in a foster home he failed to screen properly because his liability for that is a conflict of interest between my heirs and him. And also, to every other parent or child, he put in that foster home.

 

Contractual agreement is invalid if negotiated while all parties are in agreement and fully advised. Helmar Lochmann makes my daughter sign things to get visits and does not give her a copy and when a that demand is a valid duress point is not lawful methods for seeking a signature then later call what was obtained an agreement and authorization of representation. But, not a secondary point to the other two points I just made, is, Helmar Lochmann having control over her visitation schedule with her children being a duress point and is not counsel of choice and is further compounded since there is no privileged relationship available to my daughter between her and Helmar Lochmann, as is required under all other standards known when being represented, and her Public Defender is not present to refute the matter under inquiry, which the Public Defender, Robert B Axford, or Robert Axford, is neglecting to contest that which is legalized representation that is appointed and filed to include the privilege that is customarily guarded in ‘client relationships’ which is forced upon family by the court when burden of proof is upon the court which is not met yet when the Juvenile Department named their petitioner’s employer’s as Counsel, relationship to a non 'bar association' power, and he is neither during all this required by code of law to be available or present to provide a verification of conversation and should be required to be present at every face to face Helmar Lochmann requires her to attend and Robert B Axford has not extended to her any way to verify the fine details of the forced 'agreement' of my daughter and also fails to negotiate the legalities his self. And since there is a conflict of interest between my heirs and Helmar Lochmann Robert B Axford is not providing a zealous defense and failing to ask for another caseworker in spite of the inherent conflict of interest already present. Helmar Lochmann is under suspicion of criminal negligence and that is the liability of the District Attorney as well and all others who allow him to remain as social service specialist and supervisor to my heirs.

 

Helmar Lochmann brings things to her while she is in jail so apparently he is keeping close tabs on her arrests and he wants her to release thing to her she does not want him to have which is evident my daughter does not want him as a social service specialist and that is directly impeding the reunification of her and her children and not reasonable efforts and only sabotage and seems to be deliberate since my daughter has accused him of negligence he has told her he is actually responsible for my grandson’s MALTREATMENT by the foster provider.

 

Helmar Lochmann is forcing my daughter to drive all the way from Salem Oregon to have a face-to-face meeting before he gives her anything.

 

Helmar Lochmann delayed giving her a bus pass up till the court hearing on April 30, 2019, which is sabotage, and since she moved to Salem area has delayed providing her a bus pass again but requires her to come to the face-to-face meetings with him and that is a long trip for her. She is upset he will not transfer her case to somebody closer which means the children should have been transferred closer to where she is so visits will be easier. She has been in Salem Oregon and her case was requested to be transferred, though she did not want to be in Polk County it is not honored and was in Salem Oregon when the kids began school and this area is school of origin when school began and both my grandchildren have been moved to another school which is evident Helmar Lochmann is more interested in isolating my grandchildren than obeying the limitations of the legally posted guiding principle of his decision-making processes. It is evident to me Helmar Lochmann is more interested in this case for the double cash bonus he gets than what benefits the children. Every one of Nolan’s family members he has had in his life are within 15 minutes of him if he would have been transferred here to a new place and put in local schools with his friends he has already made.

 

Helmar Lochmann gave my daughter a cloth-covered binder as a gift at the same meeting where she was also asked to sign a release of information which my daughter refused to sign declining to elect Helmar Lochmann as Counsel of Choice and she reported to me that he shot darts at her with his eyes and the time she refused to sign releases of information and when she declined to allow him the privilege to represent her progress on her performance towards reunification on her case while also representing her offspring he has failed to see the conflict of interest and should not be allowed to represent her progress since it is not reasonable to leave him as counsel when she said in her physical actions denying him her signature that he is not authorized by her.

 

My daughter expresses nothing but resentment and anger when she talks about Helmar Lochmann and has reported to me that she refuses to see her children because she is in fear Nolan is being harmed and the transportation and visitation monitor is not documenting my grandson’s spontaneous testimony, which is very valuable testimony there is according to the rules of evidence which makes my daughter the rightful author of that Affidavit since it was uttered in her presence, and not the transportation specialist, who is failing to document and produces another conflict of interest between DHS staff and my heirs, who should not be abrogated from the rule of evidence and the right to Counsel of Choice when she wants neither of these people representing her heirs because Nolan Jase Stevens is being told to, ‘shh!’ to cover the liability of the state or could be a participant in child sex trafficking (MALTREATMENT) while he is being denied the proper representation he deserves with proper documentation of his spontaneous testimony when being raped (MALTREATED), in foster care where Helmar Lochmann left him and my granddaughter instead of removing them immediately even after he admitted to being liable for not screening the foster father properly. Now isolated further while trying to force me to contract for his financial gain while my heirs are slowly dying inside under the guidance of those that benefit financially and avoid liability for the failure to protect under the required screening of adults in the yet another new temporary 'household' that may or may not be used to teach them to be silent while they get are not being comforted and DHS place their bets i will cave and contract against my daughter's wishes the DHS is not AUTHORIZED to gain FEDERAL FUNDS, which i am bond by unto her assign to me while Victoria Couvillion was only three or four months old stating DHS/CPS is not AUTHORIZED.

 

So, it is reasonable to see that this is not reasonable efforts on Helmar Lochmann’s part to continue as ‘representation’ under the desire of the Juvenile Department, who called DHS Counsel on papers filed on the court naming DHS Counsel is indication that the American heirs, especially in this case are being denied Counsel of Choice with privileged relationships included, and this is an egregious example of abuse. This abuse affects my grandchildren to which i am authorized by blood born right to speak up for on behalf of every other American heir who has lost their Constitutional rights to Counsel of Choice which includes a privileged relationship when Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness in hanging in the balance and the safety of your family is at steak and every good standard of law seems to give way to the love of Federal Money, end year bonuses, and children are being silenced when getting raped when it is called ‘a Child welfare case’ and welfare is not actually guarded since children are reportedly six times more likely to die in the custody and control of the state, and 55% more times more likely to be arrested after leaving foster care and many former foster children make up the homeless population, and Senator Nancy Schaefer reported children are at a higher risk of being raped in foster care, which is reported at varying percentages from state to state beginning at 4% higher risk of being rape in foster care, included in the definition of MALTREATED is the new word for molestation and defined in such a way that if given press coverage it would not be exactly clear what is being reported in the press, is my conclusion. So, if child welfare is the phrase used to call kids in the eye of Juvenile Departments it is not anything you want your offspring to be since well-being is not guarded but when put in the system their risk of harm goes up so why is the love of federal dollars preferred over grandparents? Well, i think it is the love of Federal Funds that requires us to use the foster system placement to get those funds and your grandmother has to agree to get Federal Funds or she is counted out and then Attorney’s get to adopt out your family members and that is where they make lots of cash so they aren’t going to kill their cash flow and argue it is unfair to their ‘client’ which is a conflict of interest if the DHS is also in charge of screening everybody to be foster providers and cannot require it as a mandated college study. Since it is a matter of equal protection of the law instead of selective contract enforcement for federal funds, which is mandated contracting while under duress is not equal protection of the law.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron

Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 11:56 PM

To: ALICIA.L.REYNOLDS@dhsoha.state.or.us

Subject:

 

Somebody, please do something other than pass the pen and call on the culpable

 

LETTER TO CONGRESS AND LOCAL LEGISLATURE

 

Please help me get this into the hands of other people whose children have been raped in foster care and especially to those grandparents who have been denied their own flesh and blood due to being called a ‘third party’ or a violator of some other ‘city code’ or other thing that is not an egregious crime against children… please….

 

Will you two please have a conversation about the following public letter to all elders of the Mormon Church and all public officials involved so we can get an (IJRC) for cases such as this where the DHS has failed to protect and have no liability and everybody activity has come to a screeching halt while waiting for an attorney to come forward and play hero or waiting for homage to be paid to the pocketbooks or attorneys and their demand for homage to be paid to the current Sodom and Gomorrite judicial seat.

 

Please pass along to the elders that can assist in getting my grandchildren some help to be escorted around instead of by the DHS transportation providers, there are several incidents that make us believe they are not documenting properly, which was reported to the District Attorney, but that only gets them moved to another foster home, and they keep getting abused, on lots of the points affiliated with the term MALTREATMENT and even reportedly raped by foster a provider not screened properly.

 

What we really need most is people from the congregation of the Mormon Church to be made available as a ride along on the drive from point A to point B, to be available to escort my grandchildren from visits, from pick up and drop off points and to be available during visits in case the kids give sudden outburst of testimony the DHS are not documenting properly, by ignoring or just not legally literate enough to realize the value of the weight of spontaneous testimony in bringing a child rapist to justice while they have returned my grandchildren back to the same place the allegation of rape arose while in foster care, I hope you can help us with find people to let Victoria and Nolan know i love them because i am being ignored and not allowed to see my own blood relatives and am their ‘caregiver relationship’ as defined by (ORS) and that is set aside and ignored as well, and they don’t document if stops are made and that is unconscionable and you know very well they would never treat the governor’s children this way, and so their carelessness is only a clear sign to me of culpable negligence…

 

What Makes a Contract Unconscionable? A contract may be found to be unconscionable based on three different factors all enumerated here in part.

 

If you would please assert your authority and just send a verification of conversation to the DHS of the facts, they have not refuted you would have the clear and convincing evidence to step in and provide me grounds to file upon the court for a police escort to collect my grandchildren from the clutches of the caseworker who put my grandkids in the hand of a child rapist.

 

Your mother, and every other grandmother, would need that available to her if you or other parents should fall in the line of duty because I know child rapists do not discriminate over who their victims are and DHS will, just like the Catholic church did the priest who ‘MALTREATED’ little girls, cover their assets and try the victims in the press. And then if you follow the historical finding that the ‘false memory’ was suddenly discovered while the Catholic church was protecting a pedophile priest who died quietly in his chosen place to sleep. While my grandchildren have no choice, and the rapist is again getting away.

 

I have asked and asked to visit and or have my grandchildren brought home to me and all you people do is sit making a fat paycheck and care not for the blood relative that is also an emotional death experienced ‘equivalent to emotional death’, as a sense of loss documented by psychologists, you all worship as experts, and in a divorce people still get to see their loved ones, which applies to the emotions children experience during a divorce, and this is inflicted upon American families for violations of parental manners in Minnesota, and false allegations of drug use of a grandmother to grab siblings of Ariana Escobar in Texas drafted  the very same day Ariana Escobar ran away because she has been raped several times during a placement in foster care, when her grandmother was not accused at the time her father was accused, so the ‘family tree’ is not what family is all about here it is ‘family in a can’ for federal funds’ and the divorce to the hearts of children from all their family is not what happens when two ‘People, PEOPLE, or People seek a divorce, because there is a regular visitation schedule and the ‘family tree’, though now branching in a new way has not been completely cut off from the ‘branch’ or the ‘branch’ representing each American heir ‘Ariana Escobar as a branch of her grandmother as the grandmother the ‘tree trunk’, or Nolan J Stevens as a ‘branch’ chopped off the ‘tree trunk’ named either Marilyn LeBaron and/or Shannon Stevens or since we both are somehow now a trunk of the same tree that the biological mother and father come from which has also a ‘branch’ named Victoria R Couvillion that also got dragged away and has no Adoption attorney and may just be set and predestined by that to be stuck in substitute care and getting raped too, which i had a vision during a premonition this is the case which is documented and nobody cares because the love of money is the hand that is rocking the cradles of the world today and even Hitler is a better tyrant than the American leaders of today.

 

DHS is not properly addressing conflict of interest between their supervisory staff and my heirs.

 

DHS is not authorized and a conflict of interest is present remaining un-addressed, and all you attorneys are stonewalling a natural relative, me, who though in a documented caregiver relationship and also a relationship as loco parentis but will not be honored as school of origin since you have shown that by moving them to another school and fail to bring them to a family member when they are getting MALTREATED in foster care, which all your power mongering and stonewalling did not prevent, and you still sit there thinking your position on this matter as obedient to the ‘third party’ getting them MALTREATED, while you ignored what postal zone their school would be in right now, which was in the past at my home, because DHS is who is representing all the exhibits you make your decisions from, and you agree to not disagree with DHS till i am forced to come to the incorporated court where, they agree to get your constituents a nice fat retainer fee in the excess of $10,000, when there is a screaming red hot exhibit of a sanctioned preset disposition at the bench because that ‘third party’ you obey have all their forms to fill out which were designed to be authored and sanctioned by the bar association or attorney that pay homage to DHS and make a living in that court has as set a long president of accepting petitions using pre-printed forms 'called petitions' for the legally illiterate non bar associated member that is a next of cousin to that which is MORE OF A THIRD PARTY than me, a natural blood relative, and those same printed forms are not available in equal standing and authority to contend or educate or assist which is not reasonable that they are not available for a 'blood relatives' that do not speak or identify themselves by the definitions of the court and their use of their definitions is not clearly understood or ever made clear that through the DHS being called Counsel your living is made and assured by the court through your compliance to DHS, who appears to be Lead Counsel as well as lead investigative body, with a special place in society, and who has ‘declare by their relationship through the courts adjudications that the 'fruit of man’ has no ‘extended family’ unless it is able to claim them as a ‘dependent’ on a TAX RETURN, which is what ‘caregiver relationship is’ but not exactly honored though i am their own flesh and blood but ignored (till i am forced to come and pay tribute to the beast and get an attorney and become a WARD of the court myself and pay homage to your constituents that rubber stamp the forms drafted by attorneys that work for DHS) and you are working for the actual 'third party', to which you are attached to at the hip, while calling me a 'third party' and i am a blood relative and ‘next of kin’ but in opposite you are following the desires of that ‘third party’, and that ‘third party’ only defines ‘Life’ as a ‘family in a can’ which is only defined by who can rake in federal dollars, or keep your own paycheck rollin’ in, and now you allow that ‘third party’ to move them from the school of origin when my home was also qualified as a school of origin where all their friends are and other extended blood relatives near as well and none of you are around when they are getting MALTREATED but keep them at risk of harm while you keep a paycheck rolling in. And my family has declared that DHS is not our Counsel of Choice and no supervisory staff, no matter how well paid, or well intending cannot represent anybody while there is an inherent conflict of interest compounded by a wrongdoing that is going un-addressed by means of lawful change of venue, and DHS is not the judicial seat to appoint their own agents as Counsel even if assigned by a child abuse hotline screener, since title 28 courts do not have the authority to appoint the child abuse hotline as a judicial seat nor has it been defined as a judicial seat, and because the child abuse hotline is not the judiciary and professional discretion is not ‘judicial discretion’ the child abuse hotline has not the authority to allow DHS a further delegation of judicial power to appoint Counsel when the agent or worker is also an investigative body, and no detective is allowed to go to court and also file a petition, and the child abuse hotline only assigned the case for investigation, so when supervisory staff assign a caseworker when it has begun an investigative assessment, so it cannot also approach the judicial seat and say, “I am representing the case I investigated and filing a petition”, which is a  violation to have an independent investigative body that is independent of the judicial seat and, repeating the main cause of my complaint of harm to my heirs is an investigative body does not either qualify as Counsel or have the authority to appoint it, and also put people under duress to fill our contractual agreements, and also fill our releases of information while selecting all your doctors, and also making all the allegations against you while holding the heirs of your estate till you comply, or by extension of the child abuse hotline have the power to extend to his supervisor any power or authority to appoint DHS as Counsel because DHS is not a bar association and the child abuse hot line not a judicial seat though attached at the hip to one that calls non bar members counsel and no privilege comes with that assign of pen power. So, DHS would not bring my grandkids to me, and you do what DHS tells you and you call your position in all this a Power of Attorney? Right.

 

You do not uphold and defend any point of law that protects the American inheritance to have the right to Counsel of Choice when Life, Liberty and Happiness are at stake, just for the first point i make.

 

You don't care or don’t have the propensity to understand fully the damages you are doing to your nation while under the title Youth Rights Justice, because you have not on one account upheld the rights above, which under your pen power are null and void, and again, you don’t act like you care, because no one holds you accountable: and if they try you can just lawyer up, pass the pen, and then you stand there and watch everybody else do the same, and the sodomite rapists lawyers up and pleads the fifth, and another one of your constituents starts making some more money, too, just like you, and you just keep the money rolling in while your silence is assisting them the rapists because you don’t want to embarrass yourself or the court who appointed you while the Americans heirs who lost their Constitutional rights, were not properly represented under your pen power, while your 'client' really represented by a man who put my grandchildren in the hands or rapist who then lies to you, while you ‘client’ slowly curls up and is dying inside',

 

Limiting Warranty, A contract would be

Unconscionable it one party tries to limit

Their liability to a breach of contract or to

Any damages that ho may incur on other

Party

 

You do not care because no one holds you accountable: Someone can determine to bear false witness and therefore be guilty of premeditation. Not a single one of your hoard of bureaucrats hold yourselves liable for any of the harm that comes to the heirs of this nation while you all willingly keep passing the pen and nobody really is present when the child is getting harmed, but all love raking in the money and pretending to be a Power of their pen and nobody, none of you are present when the lights go out and everybody is asleep, really, you just click it’s top, put it in your desk drawer, and go home to your loved ones, kiss them goodnight, and while your loved ones are having dreams in their comfortable beds with their loving family near to protect them in the case of an intruder, my family members are awoken with an unwanted visitor that became a foster provider so they don’t have to go out and stalk the children openly like Citizen X of Russia, and later are not present when the caseworker is impeaching the cries for help at their once a month visits, and cannot relay in all actuality say what kind of threats were used to silence their victims, who may or may not be a willing participant in this act and getting a kick back, or even have the skills to tell if your heirs are acting differently since they don’t know much about them and have not history of their caseloads cues when already in a state of upset, which is probably a reason why, and are not really able to tell your family member has been getting harmed, but in spite of it, culpable or not, all love the dollar they are making pretending that the money is equally as valuable as the reports they make to other people to follow and pretending to be a Power of their pen. People can be greatly hurt by this malicious form of robbery as you can see nobody can really tell what the truth is when everybody clams up the second somebody cries ‘rape’. Bearing false witness, that your pen holds the true story, robs the victim of the cloak of truth and is closely allied with the command not to steal since it is very expensive to hire an attorney to contend the false testimony harming your heirs even if it is just the word of a rapist very cleverly covering their tracks and harming your offspring’s case when trying to bring a foster rapist to justice, especially when living under a threat of, "if you break silence and tell"... Your mother is the target of a threat of harm the foster rapist will bring to her" or "If you tell you will never see your mother again", or the like. There are several ways in which false witnesses can be borne and i include many the ones that have bearing on this case. A person can help spread a rumor and thus join hands with a perpetrator. One can indulge false witness by turning a blind eye when the truth is known. A person can simply fail to come forward with the truth or insinuate falsehood without actually saying it is so. And, perhaps worst of all, a person can spread gossip about another, thus engaging in some of the worst forms of character assassination. Finally, to the hoard of attorneys or those also representing hearsay as fact causing others to follow your leadership and harming those you claim to represent is bearing false witness that you hold the power of their testimony.

 

 

• Unfair Surprise: When the party who

Creates the contract includes a term in the

Contract without the other parties

Knowledge and is not within the other

Parties expectations

 

Will and consent of the governed is ‘sheep to the slaughter’ and all you cops and judges know it so you are all culpable, criminal kidnappers and putting children at risk of harm and raking in the Federal Funds just to line your own paycheck and retirement packages while calling people who protest the ‘enemy of the state’ when in fact you are the ‘enemy of your own next of kin’.

 

• Limiting Warranty, A contract would be

Unconscionable it one party tries to limit

Their liability to a breach of contract or to

Any damages that ho may incur on other

Party

 

 

NOTICE:

 

This would really bring the point home if a police officer wouldn’t mind role-playing at school to educate children about their constitutional rights so that our American heirs could fully understand this while they consider what their own children may say, “Dear daddy or mommy, COPS minus the letter ‘O’ equals CPS. Please do not commit tree-son against the ‘family tree’ and come to take ‘tree branches’ off ‘family trees’ because I am a branch in grandma’s tree trunk, from where you are still growing as a very loved branch, and i am also growing on that very tree only one branch away. I don’t know if you see that you are tree-son against the ‘family tree’ and if you love me, your own child, please uphold my right to my American heritage and remember what you do unto other Americans, you also do by that act leave that same act available to have others do to me, so that is the best and biggest reason is ask you and every other officer to imagine in your hearts and minds to teach your own children to say, WHILE THEY PALY WITH YOUR HANDCUFFS, as you role play in a game of ‘Cops and Right to Counsel of Choice, and tell your children what you really do at the front door or every American household when you and the DHS knock, and let them say to you, “You are under arrest for your act of treason against me, my American lawful right to a SEARCH WARRANT signed by a judge, supported by two sworn affidavit to show cause that irreparable egregious harm has occurred in the matter of an American heir, which is my American right, and you should remember that when not getting a WARRANT before you carry other tiny branches of other peoples ‘family trees' away”, that by your doing this to ‘other people’s trees' that act it is leaving me vulnerable to not having the right to refute an allegation at the earliest stage during which time the warrant is being sought. And if you should not come home to me one day because the TAX CODE has chopped the 'family tree'  down, and my grandma can’t get me, even if called a 'third party', grandma really is the tree trunk of my 'family tree' though not defined in the eyes of the court as 'next of kin' or family member for its purposes and limitations of power and use for that matter, next to the tax code as is used in light to of the term 'dependency hearing'.

 

• Unfair Surprise: When the party who

Creates the contract includes a term in the

Contract without the other parties

Knowledge and is not within the other

Parties expectations

 

Will and consent of the governed is ‘sheep to the slaughter’ and child welfare is the equivalent of selling your inheritance for a bowl of soup without being fully advised that is the deal in place prior to eating the bowl of soup and all you cops and judges know it so you are all culpable, criminal kidnappers and putting children at risk of harm and raking in the Federal Funds just to line your own paycheck and retirement packages while calling people who protest the ‘enemy of the state’ when in fact you are the ‘enemy of your own next of kin’.

 

Subject to the explicit reservation of all me and my families’ inalienable rights that none of you are upholding or defending and calling it ‘best interests’ while sending the heirs of your nation straight to the pits of hell and you don’t call yourself an ‘imp’ or ‘Agent of Hell.’

 

DHS sent a notice I could not see my grandkids stipulating six months and have been in contempt of court that the sentence inflicted is up while saying DHS did not have to notify me of court dates due to sending 300 page emails and call me uncourteous and accuse me of causing confusion and that I am not allowed to contact any other DHS staff – that I was posting disparaging things publicly regarding the outcry of rape arising in the selected placement of DHS Supervisory Staff while that ‘gag-order’ directly protects the DHS not my grandkids made fictitious plaintiffs and adversely affected while they needed family to protect them against corrupted hands while abusing them telling me to “stop” yet I kept the outcry going sending the message, “A placement called ‘Emergency Certification’ is chosen by someone who can get a cut of dirty money crossing the palm of corrupt hands yet exclude blood and kin using school of origin to keep monies in their purse” so by that and naming names and posting without ceasing while pointing out, “DHS choices over use of School of Origin and Loco parentis abuses of letting adversely affected kids have contact with social workers without a dedicated family present is sanctioned school kidnapping more relevant to caseload bonuses, double billing, changing the kids names on court documents, like Hitler did to hide kids from the nations they were stolen from, and abuse of the school is not the parent to allow access to our kids when not authorized by the people or identified properly as Nazi ideology ‘STATE is mother of all’, where the lack of penal code is ignored yet enlisted against the outcry, “That Foster Placement is not screened by Third Parties outside the referral practices of internal loops DHS set up between themselves and other Adoption Foster placement money seekers” instead ask, “Who must have thought of that transaction above but did not implement the customary protections through option allowing for proper uses of insurance adjusters to authorize payouts to facilities by-and-through assessors (adjusters) to beneficiaries (people selected and screened, community approved emergency babysitting services) with advanced directives in place to mandate the implementation of the advanced directive to mutually agreed upon familial selections or place made known through public knowledge of their locations, without the horror show of waiting for court schedules interfering with our Life, the Happiness of our Kin, and our Liberty, to come and go and attend to one another upon our mutual agreements and contracts between one another, with our notification and approval between one another regarding these locations where family can find their loved ones to maintain familial bonds through access to mandatory Third Party location not contracting for Adoption or custody that is known to all and selected by community (like a church gym) outside DHS MONEY SEEKERS CONTRACTING UNDER CONTROLLED EXPERT WITNESSES ALL SELECTED BY DHS maintaining a chain of custody of evidence strictly kept outside the loop of DHS referrals coordinated with a family member to guard the privacy where it is less conducive to abuse and ‘Privilege with Predator’ now instigated through DHS power trips, where more conducive to Counsel of Choice also controlled by a selected Power of Attorney as stipulated by assign of Principal, preventing the appearance of Contracting with Expert Witnesses Approved ahead of time by themselves”, but, nay, instead while excluding direct family as ‘Emergency Certification’ contacts where giving rise to the question, “Where do DHS get their applicants while denying our kids contact with our selected social circles in our local community that we know and trust and select ourselves, notwithstanding loco parentis is not foster providers/homeschoolers who allow DHS to come in and move the kids at whim when no loving parent would so not worthy of the title ‘parent’ not the school principal at a really washed out level and not intended as, “For stability sake: as they tout the abuses of School of Origin to keep kids away from kin then reserve the power to move them around till they are tied of the revolving door and ‘agree where no meeting of the minds is available and utter abuse of making a feigned word a binding contractual agreement just to fool our heirs into believing “It was their choice” once the psychological abuse kicked in and gave them Stockholm syndrome since in comparison Freeloaders have more rights to Tenancy than foster kids, and secondarily DHS already have an Adoption Foster Retention Specialist yet for some reason need just one more at the Supervisory Staff level that makes yearly bonuses per headcount per social worker and also selects the doctors and the foster homes while poised to later ignore the outcry of rape being allowed time and power to hide the evidence while claiming responsibility for all the aforementioned choices ignoring ALL OBJECTIONS MADE with no verification other than what qualifies as ‘hearsay exception rule’ that police or social workers will not document (which is no equal protection of feigned words) and use in equal force to remove from DHS as easily as they remove from us forcing us to go through a loop and call the child abuse hotline that directs us right back to the abuser’s hand, and can delete his end of the conversation on incoming calls forcing people to have an external recording device to capture what was said on his end?” Well, I ask, “If really intending to honor our family blood ties, why so many exceptions to deny blood ties”, and “Why the use the word ‘preference’?” And “Why are we forced to contract with someone who says they can deny you and hand your loved ones over to be adopted while handling both demand pools Foster and Adoption saying, “DHS UNDERSTANDS” as the only explanation?” – then the supervisory staff selecting the place to toss them in calling it emergency over kin and never meeting you EVER and say their choices were limited since not enough foster facilities for substitute care was available as reasoning for the uses of Emergency Certification, over and over again I presume, and purport they have no choice but to screen other people for Emergency Certification while it is reported DHS has shipped kids over state lines which was supposedly under litigation by attorneys who well milk it for all it is worth and in many cases have no real effect when over and over for over a year DHS has denied even a peek at the one most vulnerable and is a key witness against Helmar Lochmann while the kids are separated on cruelty and lies to the youngest believing his sister would join him in a couple days not wanting to be separated which sets them up to be intimidated into silence while DHS jockey to get their ‘statements officially’ where no inadvertence is plausible anymore once they are trained by transportation / visit supervisors to ‘Stop saying that Nolan” and then the detectives some in to impeach without the presence of mom or dad or family just them and probably an insider dirty cop that raped kids as well all getting a cut from EC Easy Cash from EC Emergency Certifications. When up to then DHS is reportedly short on foster homes having to send kids over state lines for adoptive purposes while not revealing where they are getting these applicants locally to keep in with School of Origin as the rule of thumb to suddenly fill the lack of Foster Adoption Retention Specialists ability to meet the supply and demand ‘regardless’ somehow that is contradiction since how hard is it to pick up the phone and let somebody else screen the intended Emergency Placement? Well? Was everybody dedicated to that job swamped? Could not possible be since there is a shortage since sending kids over state lines and no available places so that negates they were all too busy to step in and do their assigned job and deliberate on Helmar Lochmann’s part and huge lie it was an Emergency Placement since so late in the year of denying all contact with blood and kin that the Emergency was caused by them not us and was the third time the kids were moved, leading me to the question, “WHAT WAS THE EMERGENCY that Helmar Lochmann declared that caused him to use the Emergency Certification so many times? Hmm? Are you even looking and where is the secondary documentation in hard copy by a family member or a third chain of custody of hard copy to preserve the forensics in digital documents that can so easily be edited?” So how was my granddaughter elected to cross state lines into Utah while Morse and Linda Hughes both have relatives there and Sabrina Leach Wendy Polzel and Mat L Hawkins all have relatives withing a third of a degree and Shandra Snyder, who aided and abused my daughter is not promoted to work at the capital with such a stain on her resume of the repeated unprosecuted rape of my daughter in foster care no to fail so miserable and not see the dangers of allowing for Emergency Certification to so many hands and she is in charge of Safety? I COULD JUST BARF! How could she be so blatantly ineffective while the none of the Emergency Certified Foster Providers should be instantly a ‘stay home dad’ and later cry with tears in his eyes saying, “I should have screened him better” regardless of the squeaky clean building code compliance making it a really nice place to come and ‘harm’ in a pretty brothel style home setting” meaning the criteria for screening is a little off and what did Helmar Lochmann mean by ‘better’ and what did he learn during his self-analysis of what to do different next time after a heart to heart with Chandra Snyder that gave him more skills to read people’s hearts as to apply that to the next single gay male he handed my grandson over to with a bottle of barbiturate’s – stay home dad to a stay home gay male – is a pattern and Emergency Certification is a practice just to move on to screened somebody else when he proved his incapability with streaming teas and the game of Russian Roulette continues ‘or does it? Since allowed to do the screening that turned out to become an alleged foster rapist as if to brake in a little boy to be used as the but-hole of society as his chosen cast as a ‘welfare case’? And then why don’t these people get that Helmar Lochmann leaves my grandkids there after the allegation arose with my six year old grandson ‘on a line of sight rule’ with the reported safety threat as reportedly only identified as ‘at night’, while they hustle my daughter for cell phones to give her kids while saying we can’t afford the cell phone bill with two grand a month coming in and the cell phone bill could be as low as $50.00 a month while the alleged attacker in charge during the day as an inconsistency that shows deceit, that falls on deafened ears since the alleged attacker’s wife worked out of the home and the reported safety threat was AT NIGHT and THE MOTHER left the Foster Home every day to leave the alibi for the foster dad to be alone as would be needed to provide an alibi but what else is possible besides falling out of bed or tripping on the way to the bathroom while being made to sleep downstairs and the foster threat identified can get up and go downstairs if he likes so there is collusion and contradiction here and is grounds as probable cause to open a full blown investigation that all of your just leave to deafened eyes and DHS vouch for the offender again and I would have never put that woman with that man as a married couple she was about a seven on the sexually appealing scale and he was about a minus twenty six and vile to look at and I would not want to eat across the table from him let meet his sexual needs and is a clear sign DHS don’t give a holy hell where they get their equal opportunity stay home foster dads that look like they could not get laid in a whore house and select them to attend to our really pretty six year old and really beautiful thirteen year old as if a woman working out of the house would think that her husband not desirable – probably jobless upon screening – which needs verification into his work history to see what qualified this guy as a ‘resume’ that somehow got overlooked and no red flagged went up that he had no resume like I had to go through just to work around kids in a public setting that well what made him so special that the claim of ‘poor screening’ as compared to what a Family Head Start program sub has to pass to be ‘left alone’ where the stringent screening for Program Subs like I know and passed but still was always in a community setting for comparison and see what Helmar Lochmann did to screen and if the is verified by multiple checks and balances or on his sole word that and allows a stay home ‘Foster Husband/Dad’ and everybody ignored we did not like him an would have NEVER APPORVED –  EVER – NOT CHANCE IN HELL - yet we are ignored and then ignored some more while DHS are not ever authorized EVER to take custody and control of my daughter’s kids and told Donald G Dowell to call me to come get the kids which is in violation of the insurance policy that in no way is the Social Security act of 1935, in any of the provisions, to be construed as authority to take kids against the parents’ wishes leaving every single Juvenile Justice Complex seated as MONEY ADMINISTRATORS guilty of Contempt for and warring against the Constitution for the united States of America in breach of contract making every single DECISION to remove and adopt out our kids and act of ‘unconstitutionalism’ as they call it to avoid the ugly sound of Treason.

 

As if the above is enumerated on a penal code for disagreeing in a state of alarm is available to the District Manager as something to inflict a ‘pain and penalty’ upon to end my blood ties permanently on Governor Kate Brown’s letter head, including, you’re not doing business with DHS as reasons I am denied visits or court dates by a District Manager abusing Official Letterhead to silence the outcry of rape while threatening to have me arrested when harassment has to be in a public place in person and intended to provoke a violent response (which is more abuse and a HUGE LIE since I was looking for police or military escort and know they won’t let me document or speak to my heirs so why would I go to their address when it is over a five hour trip for me to get there since I travel by public transit? It is a big fat pretense and abuse of legal definitions when a Redress of Grievance cannot be retaliated against and yet is threatened with police force and arrest and a permanent death sentence! Now to the logic, it takes ten days to cool off does not really apply since it is emotional harm, they inflict without relief that qualifies as torture so how do I stop my outcry when ‘silence is acceptance’ and fraud is identified by being silent when you should speak up – just like they do covering their own liabilities with fraudulent blame shifting like abusers do to inflict pain and penalty not subject to a plea or penal code that does not exist as subject matter purview when not pressed by a criminal prosecutor. 

 

My visits were denied at onset without cause, and this is not available as logic to backtrack regardless since protected by the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine that Patricia L McGuire cannot allow. Plus, I was told they usually do not allow grandparents to visit so at onset a preset disposition is revealed they intend to not facilitate visits which is also proved that they kept the kids so far away even after ‘foster homeschooling started up’ and the foster homes selected were not close to family to allow visits – not even a Skype, social facebook video, or a phone call home! NOTHING! So, terror by total silence is the only inference I can raise here expecting a library environment response from all kin who in a state of terror are belittled and called criminals, similar to Nazi, who would shoot you dead if you even spoke out of turn, so they do not need a reason and business as usual touting ‘preference is to family’ to go and list what is defined as family while also listing ‘family unit’ as mom, dad, heirs as another definition in duplicity while acting in opposite the ‘preference to placement with family’ as policy using yet another escape clause, Diligent Efforts as the right to DHS to show ‘preference is the ADMINISTRATOR’s FINAL CHOICE’ making all final approvals and demanding it so where no settlement is available outside the Diligent Efforts actually preventing it. I see now why I was told grandparents are usually not allowed to visit at the one time I was taken there by my daughter where she dropped much of her kids belongings off just to find out the kids were sent to a clothing closet as if all their stuff was sold or given to someone else or taken from them or left at a different foster home which is indicative of very little belongings and a sign of child sex trafficking according to other social workers reporting the signs of what to look (including the moving kids around lots of times so packing them up is easy while making them perform for their basic needs bit by bit while DHS do not verify or deny anything even though I put a huge demand upon them to answer a whole list of questions they utterly ignore while the DHS are allowed to abuse a commercial lien practices under the uses of ‘silence is acceptance’ and for over a year by this time I had been refused any visits and utterly ignored while I read everywhere to try and figure out what to do and no matter where I turned in the bureaucracy it all fell on a deafened ear and eyes with all of them sending the very same message as if a boomerang back to the abusers that are in charge of gaging our outcry while in the position to abuse us more and sell or pimp out our kids while ordering us to be silent, and no discovery as to why – DHS is silent – to date – but the original letter sent our denying me visits for six months is clearly indicative of ‘pay homage or die’ and stay dead’ and not relevant to a claim of harm to my heirs and from the ADMINISTRATIVE MAGISTRATE there is not relief either since allowing the DHS to be in contempt of court that is utterly ignored as well as yet another deafened ear as if to be ‘neutral seat’ and let the DHS do as DHS will while hordes of attorneys milk these abuses for money and sit waiting to extort $10,000 retainer fees, minimum from the Open Adoption nonprofit organization, while not a single attorney appointed by Patricia L McGuire ever made a single effort, not a one efforts to contact me themselves as if that is how the ‘client’ is best represented all left to DHS who brings in their ‘client pool and allowed to gossip outside their presence or verification’ allowing DHS to extend arbitrary ‘death sentences’ on bureaucrat protection and not doing business with DHS and lack of courtesy and sending way to many emails way too long and not to the point enough for them to understand, and on asking for DHS employees to do specific things with no mention of demeanor or what specifically was objected to that DHS employees asked to perform in total contradiction of the other statements relevant to length, conciseness, so contradiction sending the message, “No matter what you do it is wrong and we get it both ways regardless of relevancy to the scope of advertised intent that Child Protection is the purview of authority” which leaves the only other two things not eliminated by this contradiction too long, too much, too confusing, and the other stop calling and asking DHS employees to do specific clearly defined tasks for you – which cancels both out leaving – you are not doing business with DHS and you must not tell on us and be silent about rape – and you can only contact one entity and named that entity the only route to having anything to do with my family – so do business with DHS or you are dead while no one will know why you was screened out after being screened in by R.S.V.P as if prequalified just to be disqualified in an abuse of double jeopardy set up to contract under a conflict of interests making that contract void in ab initio since the contracting entity is your direct opponent for the intent of the contract – where they have a build in escape clause upon build in escape clause that ensures child endangerment as a pattern and practice and monies in the billions moving through hands of bureaucrats as if the only remaining economy funded by internal racketeering and money plunder abuse using our kids and internal destruction as to buy a house subject to BANKING CODES and liability insurance clause as the only real ‘pain and penalty left’ enslaving us to the equivalent of the death penalty of a criminal case to building codes upon authorizing a WALKTHOUGH that is a violation of ‘I don’t have to sign a WARRANT against myself’ when intended as a penal code to my heirs and myself – against the right to not be sentenced to death by things not applicable to removal upon the general population at large under a violation of seeking moneys where equal protection of the law is required. Where nobody can remove kids that do not have a carbon monoxide detector, or a first aid kid, or a room with a window, or a second exit, or running water, or even electricity turned off, but DHS can use that to deny your kin while touting ‘preference to family’ – and set themselves up to do the direct opposite everywhere you look which is built in breach of contract under a violation of the maxim of laws that set them into their place utterly supplanting the right to due process of law on tricks of self-prosecution to Apply for this abuse as Diligent and Reasonable and is an utter blatant treasonous abusive money plunder human trafficking lie.

 

I was inflicted with a violation being adjudicated for something not tried by a criminal prosecutor that requires a police citation and not subject to an arrest since good faith is given to citizen arrest powers when did then and there commit is supplanted by DHS abusing the hearsay exception rule that they will not allow us to use against themselves and the second we demand law be upheld they assert the Due Process Rights of the criminal in full force and shift the burden of proof yet again to the people when it belongs upon the court. I get this abuse of rogue adjudication in the mail and respond to repudiate it and then much later on get a second version of it from Donald G Dowell with the same date and signature and much in the middle chopped out as if a formal document is not ever a formal document anybody can edit and change as if Governor Brown has no control of who and how the Official Governor’s Seal is used or abused which is Fraud and abuse of the ability to respond or litigate while easily edited in shared DHS documents I imagine have to be submitted the Governor for approval yet I am not aware of any policy that has ever allowed the editing of ‘formal documents’ especially without sending them to the targeted adversely affected when posted online using the Governor’s seal to inflict an increase in ‘pain and penalty’ as permanent termination of all our blood ties as if not already ascertained by preemption, yet the threat is, “If I do not silence my outcry of DHS supervised child endangerment policy, while DHS separate my grandkids and try to get the eldest witness to agree to be adopted, hidden permanently, out while who knows what the DHS is telling her to get her to agree and convince her she is an orphan, denial of all familial bonds is the aim, till I do as the District Director says all your blood ties are dead we never intended to give you any visits anyway”. It is the same message they did to my daughter while denying her visits and shushing my grandson who was saying “Poke in the booty but but but” … and then again with the variable of “Poke in the naked booty but” as he came into the visiting session which is something that shows he is getting molested which is met with a “Shh” and “Nolan stop saying that” and do not let his mother inquire then make her sign things before they will let her visit him again silencing the outcry of rape. So, they do not document the spontaneous outcry and shush him and tell him “Stop saying that Nolan”. And on another occasion have multiple stories speaking for Nolan on other injuries forensically used to raise inferences of rape while forcefully raped on a carpet and that is not properly responded to by the school, the DHS, the police, or the Governor’s Advocacy Office, or the entire chain of command up to the Capital then me with retaliation and threats of arrest instead of a proper refute from an investigative body using Privacy with Predator as the rights attorney declare in violation of the Clearfield Doctrine Attorney do not declare Constitutional Rights to isolate our living heirs with predators while fully accusing the mother of being delusional and addicted and leave her to die in the street knowing she is homeless (which is attempted murder while they will not let her come live with me and tell her “Your mother asked you be sentenced to death” which is a HUGE MOTHER FUCKING LIE! And only serves to isolate her from the only one trying to save her life then now say other garbage abusing Corruption of Blood against the Bill in 1790 that Federal Crimes of the father cannot be used to deny us what is rightfully ours as if a perpetrator of criminal charges is an inheritable thing which is ongoing now. That is just two of the points to which our heirs are being denied the right to an affidavit which bureaucrats cannot write and their documentation is how they cover their liabilities making this visitation supervisor / transportation officer / documenter a huge conflict of interest since it is not used as is customary when documenting ‘pick up and drop off’ at a daycare when an injury of suspected child injury is needing documentation as to prevent being accused of something that happened at home prior to being dropped off at a day care (or being accused of a wrongdoing relevant to a bruise of bump that happened in school or daycare similar to at work injuries, so forth – (liability is the key point) which is not relevant in the line of thinking and direction of the scope of DHS documentation which is not relevant to pick up and drop off points during the visits, and controlled by DHS without a receipt to the mother’s and father’s in attendance, while a conflict of interest not only since utterly one sided and only DHS signatures are on the documents gained in the violation of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, to be interpreted by them where we get no receipt of any of it as is required for professional courteous verification, which both parties, both sides of the arguments, must sign in agreement to what was put on the page by the transportation visitation worker to satisfy between all involved what went on during those visits during which time our kids should feel free to say anything they want and a transfer of authority must take place instead of the DHS preventing this ‘free spontaneous speech’ since the most valuable testimony in the evidence code, yet our nations heirs are hushed and parents told if they inquire they will not be allowed visits as was the threat to my daughter who is blood and kin lawfully required to be present while drafting an affidavit or claim of harm and prevention thereof constitutes witness tampering by DHS as pattern and practice causing much alarm throughout the Abolish CPS movement filing Notice of Treason Charges upon the Capital and Congress which I have done as well.

 

The documentation which goes to ‘sustaining there is not dispute over the facts’ pertinent to how and what and who and where the injury or spontaneous outburst occurred – yet DHS transportation staff are in charge of both pick up and drop off and are alone driving our heirs from point a to point b and a huge danger to the security of our persons while the transporter also shushes and documents while also supervising our kids, but DHS draft and use their documents to abuse the fruit of the poisonous tree to find fault, inflict liability after the fact weather relevant to the reason a case was filed at DEPENDENCY COURT, and do not confirm anything we say or confirm anything they say forcing us to record and video tape while they fight to silence us and keep the upper hand on all the facts pertinent to documentation – all without attorney present which is not an affidavit process while also intending to use all they document to cover their liabilities as well as use what is written down as prosecution against parents during contact creating a compounded conflict of interest between DHS and the people when they are in control of everything, point a and b’, pick up and drop off so definitely not there to blame the foster providers while ignoring and shushing the spontaneous outcry of ‘poke in the booty but but’ while not documenting anything through an secondary non interested party, chain of custody of evidence against the foster perpetrators, while they use their power position to keep direct relatives in the dark, and are supervisory to the location where the outcry of egregious harm arose while the liable party admittedly - my daughter, as other mothers and fathers are directly told do not inquire or your visits will be denied and we are not allowed to document outside their method, told we cannot record of make video while under litigation and ‘he said she said’ is a huge legal disadvantage’ which is met with silence and goes without confirmation or refute making everything ‘our word against theirs’ at all points while all the attorney are in violation of Miranda Vs Arizona and not present during the time of agreements between the prosecution are signed and drafted, while the ADMINISTRATOR MONEY SEAT authorize payment in violation of the right to an independent judicial seat pertinent to DEPENDENCY, while our kids are more likely to be raped or harmed in Foster Facilities as is documented by Congressional reports, while we the family are under threat of being arrested for crying out calling the outcry of rape ‘harassment’ and DHS is put a gag order on a Redress of Grievance we are not to be retaliated upon if we remonstrate yet my permanent denial of visits is fraudulently extended to ‘permanent’ in contempt of court that the ‘pain and penalty’ was only six months – on fraudulent changes to documents bearing the Governor’s Seal - all to tell me to stop an outcry of rape in Foster Facility prohibiting my lawful documentation and public posting which is a criminal act and witness tampering aiding and abetting continued abuse of our heirs while not documented to the satisfaction of blood and kin through an ‘independent investigative body’ NOT CONTROLLED BY DHS – while failing to show cause or respond as to why visits were denied for over a year already and why TIME SERVED was the reasonable conclusion at law – yet DHS tack on more time – arbitrarily –

 

Similarly like the Prison Rape Prevention Act or PRIA we need ‘FRIA’ Foster Rape Prevention Act to resolve the above abuses perpetrated by Multnomah County District Manager going uncorrected by Patricia L McGuire, Governor Brown, Beth A Allen, on what formality I have no clue everything I have read so far has so many escape clauses there is nothing written that is binding to them at all so no contract binding where so many loopholes are built right in that this is more like war than welfare since to date DHS have refused to allow a single visit with the ONLY PARTY by law allowed to write, supervise, or draft, or allow an Affidavit and Claim of Harm while ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISORY BRANCHES all stipulate DHS HAS THE SAY and all the stall tactics of soft shell warmonger would love to hold and rape, sell or just make money concubines of our kids – which as I explained earlier is not lawful for DHS to perform or control testimony since acting as a bureaucratic jury against the American Due Process of law maxims of law juries do not testify – which are screened for bias or preset disposition and are by Law not allowed to be a bureaucrat or public official as it is known as and called Jury of Peers not Jury of Public Officials moving monies to their own hands, yet we do not get to screen or select this counterfeit jury/witness/counsel/assessor or the right to eliminate them as counsel while they are seeking insurance monies and escorted to our front doors by armed police – which  BAR Attorneys are prohibited from doing under Ambulance chasing laws forcing us to go and find our own attorneys which DHS are in direct violation of while seeking insurance monies as jury/witness/counsel/assessor as the voice of the intended ‘beneficiary’ (i.e. The mother, father, and heirs, and relatives as stipulated in the legislative intent of the Social Security Act of 1935 whereas Congress is in breach of contract funneling billions of dollars each year in a budget that exceeds the amount spend on World War I in the amount of $334 billion while the original intent of the Social Security Act does not include third parties as beneficiaries and then allow third parties to name the original beneficiaries as third parties, then deny all the Constitutional Rights enumerated in both state and federal constitutions supplanting the maxims of contract law, which is not a proper ratification process of our First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh, or any of the amendments, when, as well as perverting the Right to Privacy, it allows corruption of blood and title of attainders on hearsay gossip when the military was the enforcer of such acts abolished formally, yet DHS SS (Social Services) are also allowed to prevent the Affidavits lawfully belonging to the voice of the people, while supplanting the voice of the kids, while held as leverage to force all people to attend meetings with the direct opponent, as if on trial every single moment spent in contact with the direct adoptive policy enforcers, intending to keep all family and naturally interested parties in the dark as an opponent to their goals, while failing as ‘counsel’ to verify anything professionally as attorney are required to prove in order to win an insurance suit not settled out of court and need non independent experts to force a case to be settled out of court when in litigation and if no settlement is offered no court can hear the matter and is the laws governing and protecting the HUGE INSURANCE BONDS backed by BANKS that buy and sell our BONDS as if we are nothing more than slave stock and do not offer the same protections of Trial by Jury of Peers or ambulance chasing protection that leaves us utterly defenseless proving what we mean to these BANKERS printing up in excess of the total sum it took to fund the first world war to violate their own policies put in place to prevent racketeering openly inflicted upon the human race while dumbing us down and destroying the economies through the abuses of fiat monies after assassination of the man that intended to stop them while it is said in history Hitler uses insurance to enslave his own people just as we are today over insurance claims relevant to not need to seek a settlement process while the money is granted by immediate lien by DEPENDENCY RULINGS evidence we are dead to one another (all blood ties erased if not able to accept insurance monies while somebody else is given financial management under a conflict of interest as to how that money is used and spent with full power to abuse any limitations of power and then announce that abuse arbitrarily in secret on the Governor’s Letterhead, where out of court statements documented are never put before a true Jury of Peers to verify what fact is proved in support of punishment fits the ‘crime’ thus usurping the place of a jury pool while also not required to keep a chain of custody of evidence and allowed to ignore exculpatory evidence then do not have to refute allegations of Foster Rape while abusing the Governor’s Seal, and this foster care rape has not been properly refuted to date while they are trying to hide the kids away, separate them, where they both can be intimidated in efforts to impeach them as DHS did to my daughter forcing her to sign things to indemnify themselves or they will the they will deny her visits and that should be a huge clue as to something needed a refute yet that refute is gotten through criminal behavior – then to fraudulently changing the content of official government letterhead on one level, then on the secondary level through fraud and using our kids as fictitious plaintiffs (not allowed under law) then to go and changing the documents while in contempt ADMINISTRATIVE PAIN AND PENALTY abusing the fact we the family have never been properly made to stand before an independent judge to face ‘permanent termination of all your blood ties’ in perpetuity, for NOT STANDING AND BEING SILETN TO AN outcry of rape which is abusive use of Governor Brown’s Official Seal and not mailed to us by regular US Mail but edited online and hidden from sight to direct all the DHS social working staff which is retaliation not lawfully allowed.

 

State Police, Salem Police, and Portland Police have a copy cc as if they are only used as a threat of arrest to silence an outcry of rape on fraudulent abuse of official government documents but a copy of both. Well, you should go ask the Portland Police and the two other locations at the Capital and to all other’s listed thereupon the original to see if they printed out a hard copy or if they only use a digital file which can be changed at whim, at any time, as is evident. I do not know which is in the hard copy since I was not in receipt the changes made within a timeframe to which I could respond or provide a refute yet it goes into history as my execution letter to my blood ties while adoption attorney poise to make a huge buck after only being there to handle the mere formalities the DHS utterly ignore or abuse.

 

I know you would not want to be me or have your beloved grandkids suffer this without repudiation.

Under Penalty of Perjury and Right of Remonstrance. All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice. By Marilyn LeBaron for Melanie V LeBaron and her heirs from direct testimony from Melanie Victoria LeBaron, the rightful voice for her heirs not those with culpable hands replacing those not assigned by Melanie V LeBaron or Nathan Allen Stevens as Power of Attorney in Fact by assign of Melanie V LeBaron to oversee matters pertaining to UCC 1-207 by Power of Attorney over matters pertaining to my offspring Victoria R Couvillion and Nolan J Stevens. I, Marilyn LeBaron, maternal grandmother and rightful conservator of heirs, Power of Attorney over my daughters contractual agreements since my signature is on all her vital identifying documents and lawfully required to oversee that contract which is in breach of contract law since deceit is not a binding contract and i was not informed of the consequences to my heirs at the time of their birth, and Power of Attorney in Fact by assign of her mom over Victoria R Couvillion, a living soul, and my living heir, which applies to Nolan J Stevens as well since he is also a living heir, Under Explicit Reservation of all of the Inalienable Rights of my heirs to not have representation where there is an inherent conflict of interest which is compounded by criminal negligence when there is a complainant against their DHS representation and all my/their/your American constitutional rights pursuant to but not limited to UCC 1-207 while subject to UCC 1-308 under Trial by Jury of Peers for all adversely affected or affected in any way.

 

X___________________________________________

Marilyn LeBaron < electronic signature  for material in email at 09:57 AM 09/18/2019 and other dates



X:  sign below with red ink for color of law;

X _______________________________
With explicit reservation of all my/my heir's Inalienable Rights subject to All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice to those Rights, for Nathan Allan Stevens, Shannon L Stevens, living souls, American Nationals, and Melanie V LeBaron, living soul, an Washington National, Nolan J Stevens, an Oregon National, my American heir, Victoria R Couvillion, living soul, Oregon National, signed date: _______________.                      

C/O 4185 Devonshire Court NE, Salem, Oregon Postal Zone [97305]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF: I, _____________________________________, ________________________________,                                                            

of _________________________________________________________________, witnessed, Marilyn LeBaron, Victoria R Couvillion and Nolan J Steven’s maternal grandmother, of 4185 Devonshire Court Northeast, Salem, Oregon, sign this document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF: I, _____________________________________, ________________________________,                                                           

of _________________________________________________________________, witnessed, Marilyn LeBaron, Victoria R Couvillion and Nolan J Steven’s maternal grandmother, of 4185 Devonshire Court Northeast, Salem, Oregon, sign this document.

 

copy to Shannon Stevens mail date ____________ and Nathan A Stevens mail date ____________

L17041901 - TORT CLAIM –

Governor Brown,

 

Where is the penal code or furtherance hearing for the fictitious crime of Willful Failure to Apply to Contract Under Duress that gives the DHS permission to hold our grandkids liable as money concubines? Where is the legislative intent to allow an adoption agency the use of the State of Oregon seal to extend penalties already served three times over were not summoned by the court, to forever while in contempt of time served, without any new information or an actual subject matter relevant to child protection? Where is DHS authorized to use fictitious plaintiffs to put kids up for adoption against supreme court rule man is immune to statute and code and that statute and code are not law? How are our nation's heirs made liable and put up for sale?

 

We do not consent!

 

Marilyn [LeBaron]©

 

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron

Sent: Saturday, August 7, 2021 9:13 PM

To: Kate Brown For Oregon Information; jeffery.g.robinson.mil@mail.mil; abbey.driscoll@odot.state.or.us; abby.king@osp.oregon.gov; William Edmond; Ann Potter; apacurar@nd.edu; abel@sorianolaw.net; Marilyn Patrick; ng.ut.utarng.list.pao@mail.mil

Cc:…redacted…

Subject: The Nazis drug the Jew out of their homes and forced them to shut down their businesses without a trial or revealing the cause for the action but had the power to do it and did. Just like DHS did to me.

 

Ms. Linda Hughes

Multnomah Juvenile Ct Referee

1401 NE 68th Ave

Portland OR  97213

 

Don't you think authoritative use of the Governor's Seal Emblem by an adoption agency is a bit Nazi?

 

You Have Dark Eyes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJOjCwc1xJo

 

What did they die for?

by

Twila Paris

124,206 views

Feb 26, 2009

https://youtu.be/PcHQbo5-Dz0

 

When the prosecutors favor letting criminals go and prosecuting families to death without due process of law on hearsay gossip with bureaucrats as a paid jury that gets bonuses per headcount, what did they die for?

https://youtu.be/5pLAcnFhONY

 

What did they die for?

H Company Marines

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=h+company+marines&qpvt=h+company+marines&FORM=VDRE

 

The Nazis drug the Jew out of their homes and forced them to shut down their businesses without a trial or revealing the cause for the action but had the power to do it and did. Just like DHS did to me.

 

I have a right to know the nature of the allegation against me. I have a right to a rebuttal. I have a right to see the discovery and bring into question their credibility. I have a right to face my accusers in open court. I have been denied these things where no penal code is available for furtherance hearings and denied my flesh and blood and sentenced to the equivalent of the death penalty of a criminal case without a day in court which adversely affects both my heirs.

 

This is war, not welfare https://youtu.be/e9VdZ0m7t9U

This is war, not welfare https://youtu.be/4xvw5bgl9do

This is war, not welfare https://youtu.be/KnrpdH63Lng

This is outright invasion, not welfare https://youtu.be/s5xb7wEAoVk

Suspected Treasonous Warmonger https://lawyers.findlaw.com/profile/view/1659146_1

 

CAUGH IT UP!

 

Where is the penal code or furtherance hearing for the fictitious crime of Willful Failure to Apply to Contract Under Duress?

Where is the penal code for the pain and penalty to our nation's heirs on un perpetrated future crime when there is so much exculpatory evidence you could fit it all into a banana box?

Where is the scheduling clerk for furtherance on future crime?

Where is my Grand Jury Indictment for future crime? 

Where is subject matter jurisdiction for the Deputy District Attorney on a un perpetrated crime?

Where is the Affidavit relevant to future crime in the hand of the future victim?

Where is the claim of harm?

Where is the police report?

Where is the forensics?

Where is the physical proof?

Where is Corpus Delicti?

 

GOSSIP SESSION OVER! OUT WITH IT YOU TREASONOUS PILE OF COLLUDING FILTH! WHERE IS MY DISCOVERY?

 

FAILURE TO RESPOND IS GROUND FOR A QUASH AND A MOTION TO ALL YOUR ARRESTS!

 

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW IS A FELONY

 

Olcott D Thompson,

 

Any Idea what I am talking about? Olcott? Tiffany, Abel?

 

What discovery did you fail to put directly in my hands that is pertinent to my kin and their lives?

 

Is any of that relevant to what you said, “I don’t represent you” about?

 

Pray, do tell? How is it you get to prosecute me without me ever getting a public defender while you aid in the destruction of my blood ties to family through this kind of stealth as prosecutor while I never get any discovery pertinent to me, while my grandkids due to this conspiracy to deprive rights, all Due Process Rights of a future criminal, at a defender’s hand for your duplicity.

 

JUST TO CLARIFY WHY I SAY, “YOU ARE PERPETRATING A MISPRISION FELONY AIDING IN WITNESS TAMPERING.

 

ONCE AGAIN, “WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE BAR MEMBER APPOINTED TO MY DAUGHTER?”

 

ONCE AGAIN, “WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY PROSECUTING THE DHS CASE?” SO I CAN HAVE PROPER VERIFICATIONS ON MY DAUGHTER'S BEHALF RELEVANT TO HER COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY ON THE TOPICS OF DISCOVERY DIRECTLY RELEVANT TO ME, AND SO I MAY GET THE DISCOVERY PERTINENT DIRECTLY TO ME?”

 

THIS SONG IS DEDICATED TO THE CURSING OF LINDA HUGHES BEFORE THE THRONE OF GOD HOPING A BOLT OF LIGHTNING WILL CUT HER DOWN TO A PILE OF DUST THAT BLOWS AWAY BEFORE ANYBODY CAN GIVE HER A PROPER BURIAL AND SEND HER TO HER JUDGEMENT IN HELL. Well because the Marines are sleeping on the job, the Oregon Army National Gard are ignoring the enemy within, the police are aiding the enemy within, the sheriff is also, the Oregon State Police turn a deaf ear, and the BAR Association are colluding with the county bench allowing outright invasion on their own homeland and since no one is there to document for the people I only have the promise of God …

Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,” says the Lord. Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God, for it is written: “VENGEANCE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY,” says the Lord.

Romans 12:19 Do not avenge yourselves, beloved, but leave ...

biblehub.com/romans/12-19.htm

https://youtu.be/GJOjCwc1xJo

 

Linda Hughes,

Treasonous Babylonian yes man Nazi Subjugation Whore,

 

FACT: My granddaughter’s father abandoned his daughter at age three months.

FACT: DHS was advised my daughter did not want to give the father’s name and contact information because he was the one that raped her while under DHS control.

FACT: DHS has not prosecuted the foster mother for allowing my daughter to be repeatedly raped in her unlicensed foster home.

FACT: Chandra Snyder who was listed on the Oregon state employee directory posted online had a meaningless No Contact Order’ n place the whole time my sixteen-year-old was getting statutory raped during which my daughter became pregnant with my granddaughter.

FACT: The DHS show they allow kids to be raped then with a callused disregard for their blood ties will move to isolate and invent treasonous lies to enable them to sell another generation of kids raped in their custody and control.

FACT:  DHS is now putting up for sale the product of Chandra Snyder’s bully tactics allowed under the uses of Reasonable Efforts by Juvenile Justice Complex. 

FACT: DHS committed perjury omitting my home was the home of my grandkids but accused us of homeschooling the kids at my home address in medical assessments but the adoption attorneys making huge retainer fees relevant to Adoption monies Attorneys enjoy for final signature on adoption papers will never be involved in the litigation and cone in blindsided and just use their subjugation power to finalize these criminal activates as a Nazi yes man would.

Who of you refutes these allegations above?

 

Marilyn [LeBaron]©

 

Who will verify the second and third phone numbers of the social workers having multiple cell phones?

 

Rebecca Jones Gaston,

Rebecca Jones Gaston, MSW

Child Welfare Director, Oregon  DHS

Pronouns: She/Her/Hers

C: 971-332-0799

Assistant: …redacted…

 

Linda Hughes must recuse. She has no jurisdiction. She is a human trafficker Nazi subjugator fulfilling Hitter’s dream of enslaving us through abuses of statute and code that are not law for the purposes of subjugation to sever blood ties and commit Nazi genocide!

 

Just a pile of Nazis following orders.

 

Who is going to verify the second and third contact points for social workers for the purposes of verifying diligent efforts were never made while  DHS  do not maintain family bonds and sabotage them instead for over three years and allow the state of Oregon seal to commit fraud and issue death sentences to children?

 

Regarding: Melanie V LeBaron reunification with Nolan Stevens and Victoria Couvillion.

 

My daughter was abused by Max Ryan Wall. He committed an open act of treason in open court before a duly elected judge and took advantage of my daughter while not advising her of her rights. Then Chandra Snyder grabs the motion to dismiss my daughter later signed and filed. So, you have no case to deny my grandkids their relationship with their grandmother since this matter has been refuted and refuted over and over again.  DHS moves to get the third set of continuances when they were out of continuances and asked my daughter to allow a third set of double continuances where the criminal prosecutor lost jurisdiction, but somehow ‘ DHS  wants,  DHS  gets’ is the only rule of thumb subverting all good standards of law. My daughter had a conflicting court date crossing over the one set for trial on Polk County Petition and Nicole K Hall cannot advise my daughter on her rights or have a meeting of the minds nor can Max Ryan Wall extend his bar card to a non-licensed  DHS  agent to give legal advice to my daughter when  DHS is not practicing law which is due process rights, not her job description oar and ORS. Besides, an incorporate personam can have no opinion or have a meeting of the minds with a living being like my daughter, in this case, to say my daughter was fully advised, which amounts to perjury by Max Ryan Wall, an arrestable offense, while colluding to deprive due process under color of law waring against the constitution for the united states of America, which is treason softened by bar constituents as unconstitutional just as sodomy and rape is replaced by maltreatment so cause the reality of an egregious act to fall upon deafened ears avoiding the shock value of truth whitewashing facts dumbing our senses and deductive reasoning. Chandra Snyder stated on the first petition, “we were bringing Melanie home” so no premise relevant to child abuse when I was arrested, so no premise relevant to child abuse when Max Ryan Wall abused the court process to include future crimes not relevant to child abuse to get a third set of double continuances on a non-child abuse related matter and allow a rapist to continue having access to my daughter while she went to trial on a foster rapist she was exposed to and he gets acquitted on the one little inference of willing participant when foster parents should not be having sex with foster kids especially ones that can bust you down and isolate you keeping your from field trips while   DHS   is failing to provide attorneys to my daughter when she demanded on and   DHS   is controlling the topic of her counseling in foster care – she did not even graduate from high school – everywhere she went she was sexually harassed – and   DHS   did not have a shelter hearing to have custody of her when they were bringing her home – my subsequent arrest was not relevant to child abuse and I was never charges with a count of egregious child abuse – never – my daughter was abused and raped due to   DHS   activity without my consent to take my daughter into custody –   DHS   owes her a settlement for the rape she endured and the actions of Sabrina Leach acting as an unlicensed bill collector for the prosecution she is not to work closely with the criminal prosecutors to collect all county charges ‘clear up all county charges’ that is racketeering and my daughter is forced to aid the prosecution against herself while ‘defenders’ set up double jeopardy and double dip as juvenile case defenders and then hop over and act as criminal defenders where   DHS   already offered her kids back and that settlement offer was accepted in July of 2019 by and between Helmar Lochmann and Melanie V LeBaron and it is not justice for the criminal prosecutors to collude and win at all costs – the duty of the criminal prosecutors is to prosecute the most heinous of criminals and it is the duty of the defenders to defend instead of setting up double jeopardy and in two jurisdictions while allowing my daughter to become a fictitious / adversely affected / defendant petitioner on more false allegations not relevant   DHS   subject matter jurisdiction while ignoring all their duties then choking the life out of the people with the only ones they feel like adhering to severing all our communications between kin. Sabrina leach is not retained by my kin to forced divorce – this is not a social service – she is not a divorce attorney and is way out of line! This is a violation of counsel of choice – she is forcing her will upon my kin on matters not relevant to child abuse investigation on subject matter not available in the list of   DHS   forms. She is out of line. My family got along just fine on custody and control – Melanie did not ever have a problem with any of the Stevens family and they were never denied access when they requested it however far and few and between were the requests to visit and phone calls or emails or text messages or face chats were even less while visits were less than a few hours and less than four hours a month so grounds for abandonment in a custody matter, not a forced divorce so  DHS  can hand my grandson over to the same type of allegations they are removing the kids from just to stall and move more federal dollars to their own hands and programs stalling and stalling and not keeping blood ties strong between kin on mere technicalities between common law, nature, and statute and code subject to the Clearfield Doctrine that attorneys do not declare rights – which is Nazi subjugation fulfilling Hitler’s dream to subjugate – which is all you people do is subjugate monies while in breach of contract.

 

All these facts are grounds for the arrest of Sabrina Leach – it is treason – and you are aiding and abetting it and can guarantee nothing

 

DHS  committed treason against me and now again for a second generation selling my kin

 

My granddaughter is not for sale!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You sent August 5 at 9:23 PM

 

Your ORS stating she has to agree to be adopted does not produce a meeting of the minds with a de facto personam ‘the state of Oregon and the Oregon state agents are not living souls and a meeting of the mind can only happen between two living beings – this is racketeering con artistry set up by learned criminals – and  DHS  has to be learned in the law to approach the bench and are not – that is two counts of treason you allow as RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR and is treason on your own hands – you have been put on notice – you are allowing genocide in violation of maxims of law suppressing the rights of the people with statute and code we are immune to – while attorneys, creatures of statute ignoring our immunities, just stand there, take the cash exchanging hands and that is not leadership, that is treason.

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron

Sent: Saturday, August 7, 2021 8:39 PM

Subject: Here is what is not getting much publicity in the news while Biden threatens to put us on lockdown again... Maybe you all should go into the body bag selling business for the predicted COVID deaths showing they know the vaccine is VERY DEADLY https://yout

 

Flash COVID WAR income alert! Here is what is not getting much publicity in the news while Biden threatens to put us on lockdown again... Maybe you all should go into wholesale production of body bags and sell to the UK telling us they have a body count predicted for COVID deaths showing they know the leaky properties of this COVID vaccine is VERY DEADLY at least for the next four years  

https://youtu.be/5a7PLv9JkF4

From: Marilyn LeBaron

Sent: Saturday, August 7, 2021 6:01:00 PM

Dear Altiyan Childs,

 

More on what is going on.

 

Why do these social workers get to ignore the dirt on their hands while the DHS record shows my granddaughter’s dad moved into the foster home and applied for benefits at that foster home address which takes verification and proof of address by the foster mother and she would have had to sign that he was present in the home while they can just delete the evidence of when he applied because that al least had not gone digital yet and they send letters to that address verifying his benefits and such. DHS’s office where his application would have gone to is supposed to know that address is a foster home and all adults are supposed to be registered and screened by DHS which is an inference that this could have been done since well the foster home, if not registered as a foster home, it would have not raised a red flag, meaning that is evidence the foster home was not a licensed facility since DHS now have to show they knew the father was living there and that the foster mother complied and reported his presence and that DHS approved.

 

My daughter knows what goes on in foster adoption placements and sees how easily criminal foster rapists are acquitted and knows by the first-hand account that DHS can guarantee nothing but money moving to the hands of total strangers then after you grow up and leave care they will hunt you and stalk you trying to take your daughter just because you chose to refute them and did so repeatedly, which DHS just ignore, and come up with new reasons to steal your kids, which goes to she would never have agreed to let DHS take custody of her kids EVER. This is a clear sign she is under duress and only did whatever she needed to do to protect her kids by listening to the legal advice given while it is clearly obvious she was under immense duress to get out of jail.

 

MOTION TO QUASH the criminal prosecution from the DHS case.

 

Now all your ‘defenders’ will say, Burden of proof is on the petitioner’ with respect to the claim of harm while DHS use hearsay to shred our blood ties and the criminals are allowed to walk free preventing an affidavit by hiding away the kids.

 

You all are so utterly incompetent it is embarrassing to be represented by such willfully negligent BAR Members allowing future crime as a premise the second generation in a row while not stopping and saying we have ‘co-defendants’ while denying me Due Process of Law or discovery and allowing a change of venue to where you have no subject matter jurisdiction which is collusion to deprive rights that only criminals have while calling me a future criminal.

 

An how do you call yourselves a defender when that is racketeering not qualifying as a defense to my daughter while DHS intends to use that false premise as an allegation to sever our blood ties and call her negligent just for speaking to me as grounds to terminate her parental rights making them a huge pot of cash and of course some for yourselves.

What about that am I wrong about?

Olcott?

Abel?

Tiffany?

Please refute that I was deprived of discovery by your very hands while adding and abetting DHS abuse.

Marilyn [LeBaron]©

https://youtu.be/yM0oyvLx0RQ

 

What a joke. Bill Gates the COVID WAR COMMANDER AND CHIEF getting a monopoly on encrypted digital voting while downloading anything relevant to contradicting his COVID WAR INFORMATION your computer starts running slow after updating through automatic updating which is more conducive to vulnerabilities and forcing everyone to link up to the web and go paperless so no one can track who piggybacked his software update. It seems intentional not merely for the convenience of ease of access to all the spyware so easily hacking his security features. The idea of knowing the vulnerabilities and saying you need to be prepared for the vulnerabilities without any real guarantee is the same as saying, "I know I can't swim but am jumping into the ocean any way to learn how and maybe drown in the process". But, I'm a quick learner and ready to fight for life in dangerous waters". Electronic voting is so obviously a con job it is sickening regardless of the encryption. Digital records can be changed at any time and there are not enough people in the world to verify a single thing and we are just going to have to take their word for it. Just like believing spyware updates are not an infection point, really, who can tell. Not to mention all that digital data can be deleted at any time. Next a chip in the arm that can be remotely erased and updated any way they like it and well it will be called a data breach just like is going on with me. The DHS opens my files on the exact same day they have a dependency hearing set to grab my grandkids as money concubines and send me a new middle initial V and then a social worker physically tries to deliver something to me with the new middle name so they can say they tried to find me and could not since the wrong name at that address. Do you see how that would pan out for them on the Diligent Efforts to find a family member? Of course, I rejected it and say, "That is not my name" and handed the envelope back to her and she tried to use verifying my birthday to accuse me of having a middle initial V when my birthday was not printed on the outside of the envelope so she came prepared to affirm an alias for me without my authority for a name change using common law of AKA they were trying to force down my throat showing she had done some research while DHS was trying to adopt out my grandkids. And tried to make a liar out of me for Hitler mentality of changing people's names to hide them in the system, while congruently the DHS changed my grandkids names on the petition as well, whole none of those social workers use their full names, plus have multiple email addresses and cell phone numbers operating under the stealth of talk and toss cell phones not listed on the Oregon state employee directory posted on the web with no hard copy mailed out to everyone anymore, like the yellow pages used to do called a phone book, now all we have is some spreadsheet that is updated on-line, just as easily as my name was changed, when information changes so easily it is not proof of anything. And DHS just changed all their emails to DHS OHA warping DHS with the Oregon Health Authority, probably mixing all our health information into the file for social workers to get easy access without a court order as if we all suddenly became lab rats during this COVID invasion and destruction of our economy, I call 'Fauci Gates'. She had done some research on privileged information she should not have needed just to hand-deliver a letter to my home since I had rejected other mail that added the middle initial and left a note to the postman to not allow it and put them on notice of the laws surrounding how names are changes and that courts had to be involved or common law methods were not used under my direction to change my name and that I was not their child that they could name me as a full-grown woman. She had no business to have my birthday memorized while attempting to confirm my acceptance of their efforts to change my name saying, "So that is you" when I told her my birthday trying to shove the letter back into my hand as if I should tacitly take it from her to accept the letter and the new name to prove in some way she had made a positive I.D. as someone other than who my grandkids were related to while they also committed perjury about my grandkids addresses leaving out they had lived at my home where the letter was being delivered. Which is the evident extent DHS will go to steal kids and say they could not find any family. When all the other stuff in their files and all their other emails and checks or paperwork from that office did not have a middle initial, so it is really easy to see the con job going on when all I get is a notice of a data breach that resulted in the DHS sending me a new name. all we get is a notice to make it look like somebody other than the DHS did it.

 

This is to verify that this is a subject matter relevant to ADMINISTRATIVE discretion pertinent to Diligent Efforts is designed to force people to apply to contract with DHS through adoption retention specialists as an application which allows DHS to enter your kin into an adoption pool DHS may rule you out of it they so choose or desire to imply we have no choice but to apply regardless if that is duress to where there is no acceptance of terms of the contract we are applying to be approved for.

 

This is to verify that applying to be ‘approved to contract with DHS’ for the purposes of adoption of my grandchildren, ALREADY IN MY LINEAGE, does not stipulate the terms of the contract I am applying for on the application sent me by Adoption Retention Specialists implying Adoption Retention Specialists are allowed to negotiate terms of an agreement between DHS, the Capital, or grandparents, and that I must agree to waive my natural claim to my heirs and allow them to be construed as adoptable commodities in your business practices with DHS but that applies to contract is not publicly posted on DHS web page? Is this correct?

 

This is to confirm that failure to waive my claim to my grandkids is construed as Diligent Efforts although the application to contract does not stipulate the terms of the adoption contract itself and the actual contract or terms and stipulations of an adoptive contract are not posted anywhere relevant to this application to waive my claim to my blood and kin and that you demand I contract under duress to satisfy the Diligent Efforts pertinent to adoption.

 

This is also to verify that DHS can also hold a side premise to prevent a business relationship with DHS for adoption purposes at the Deputy District Attorneys office regardless if forwards me to ‘apply to be approved’ elsewhere, which is to make up for the lack of summon power of an adoption agency and the fact that the court clerk cannot set a court date for Willful Failure to Apply to Contract Under Duress since there is no such penal code while the law stipulating judges cannot impede contracts is actually moot since applying for approval to contract is not a contract and getting me to agree that my grandkids are available for DHS adoptive purposes is really the only aim of this whole Treasonous process without ever a meeting of the minds since it is of a double mind appearing to be a double-headed snake feeding the same belly through getting picked up by one snake and shoved into the mouth of the other with you straddling its back and holding the reigns, one head called Diligent Efforts and the other head Reasonable Efforts.

 

This is to also confirm and clarify that applying to be approved to adopt does not stipulate any terms of a contract therefore not a binding contract so I never rejected any contract since no contract was ever presented to my while my kin are isolated with your personal AUTHORITATIVE intention of putting them up for adoption which is not your subject matter or discretion which you leave up to somebody else as well and cannot guarantee the character or morals of said placement. Just another huge con that your presence in the Juvenile Justice Complex is somehow meaningful.

 

I have a right to know the nature of the allegation against me. I have a right to a rebuttal. I have a right to see the discovery and bring into question their credibility. I have a right to face my accusers in open court. I have been denied these things where no penal code is available for furtherance hearings and denied my flesh and blood and sentenced to the equivalent of the death penalty of a criminal case without a day in court which adversely affects both my heirs.

ONCE AGAIN, “WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE BAR MEMBER APPOINTED TO MY DAUGHTER?”

 

ONCE AGAIN, “WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY PROSECUTING THE DHS CASE?” SO I CAN HAVE PROPER VERIFICATIONS ON MY DAUGHTER'S BEHALF RELEVANT TO HER COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY ON THE TOPICS OF DISCOVERY DIRECTLY RELEVANT TO ME, AND SO I MAY GET THE DISCOVERY PERTINENT DIRECTLY TO ME?”

 

A dog bares his teeth just before he bites! Does Altiyan Childs' testimony spread the message, "The Arrival of the Anti Christ is at hand" while saying "The Titanic is sinking", present as a fear tactic like the growl of a dog about to bite? Since facebook allows his page content yet calls my post spam or false ad or fake news when it is the same exact content on Altiyan Childs' profile not being censored by facebook. Well, no! Altiyan Childs is not the Anti Christ depicted in his warnings to us.

 

I wrote the Sheriff asking to make sure no judge on my case were Mormons clear back around 2005 so it is refuted since I was saying they could secretly be biased against me since I was not a Mormon so not relevant to current prophetic usage of Multnomah County Deputy District Attorney.

 

Brigham Young was later photographed wearing a Freemason ring as is also depicted as one of the hardest workers and also a skilled builder that helped raise the early temples.  https://youtu.be/1xVw6PsSinI

 

Yet Brigham Young is accused of wearing a Freemasons ring. https://www.bitchute.com/video/QgGjQjx3aRAg/ 

 

Nothing about being Freemasons.  https://youtu.be/th6OrORV8os

 

Definition of a cult What is the definition of a cult? | GotQuestions.org https://www.gotquestions.org/cult-definition.html

 

Merely straying a little from; ‘Salvation is free’ to “It is your works that save you” like, i.e. ‘will of man’ topics… like: Oh, you have to speak in tongues, Pentecostals; oh, you must believe in our prophet, Muslims; oh, you must be baptized in our church, Baptists, Seventh Day Adventists, Catholics, Pentecostals, etc; all these churches send the same message (‘will of man’ topics…) while 'a house divided against itself will not stand' as opposed to ‘We are all members of the Body of Christ' when all Yehoshua said is “My sheep hear my voice” and “Whosoever believeth in Me" are what allows us to be restored eternal life, since well, we are all on Death Row Planet awaiting to die

 

The Bible teaches that death entered into the world because of Adam's sin: Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people because all sinned— To be sure, sin was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not charged against anyone’s account where there is no law.

 

(Romans 5:12-21) In Romans 5:12, Paul writes that “through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men because all sinned.” So, justly one man fixed that problem and died for the transgression of Adam showing God does believe in the Corruption of Blood abolished by Congress – so do that make Congress the Anti Christ on just that point? No, because we are Forgiven and must have a chance to Believe so it is just to let the evangelists do their work.

 

Corruption of Blood – Adam’s penalty extended to all living – redeemable by One who died - eternal life revoked – eternal life reinstated through One - all man sentenced to die, furtherance to “Planet Wide Death Row”, awaiting our appointed time to die and “after that the Judgement”, Accusation, opening of the Book of Life to see who believed upon the Name of Yehoshua, and rewarded according to our works, stipulating works do not save you.

 

Exhibit pic1

Included in this video is historical knowledge showing inventions of secret Illuminati pact to control all religion, as a core conspiracy, as well as an allegation of a Secret Illuminati inspired Mormon Pact, not mainstream Mormon teachings, as it originated in a hidden sect mingling through infiltration as wolves (bad shepherds) in sheep’s clothing as always purporting to be true Believers in Yehoshua, as is the same in all other infiltrated religious groups, which applies to the false teaching to the passerby, telling lies to Brown, a non-Mormon, not knowledgeable of the Gospel of Yehoshua, to later be used by Brown as a motive to murder any sinner, just because he was a murderer looking for any reason to commit murder, in conjunction with false pacifist practitioners moving munitions claiming to be men of peace, which is not relevant to current events and not applicable to my immediate kin for going to jail since the Gospel of Yehoshua states if you die in your sins, your good deeds are remembered no more mitigating what is alleged in secret prosecution especially if Mormons are included among those that are considered as cults accused of ‘works save you’ so just garbage can abase ignorant lies against the Congressional act of 1790 that Federal Crimes are not inherited and No Corruption of blood and the bill extending that maxim of law to Federal Crimes so kids do not inherit the pain and penalty of parents - yet I get no discovery or charges therefore no refute!  In violation of the right to a speedy trial and the right to know the nature of the allegation against me while my daughter is used as a future accessory in divide and conquer tactics by human traffickers committing violations of No Double Jeopardy as prosecutor defenders making easy prey of our nation’s heirs into the hands of supply and demand by adoption Nazi mentality subjugators 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QgGjQjx3aRAg/ 

 

The true spelling of the Name of God’s Begotten Son lost in layer upon layer of translations. 

Exhibit pic2

The English spelling of Yeshua is “ Joshua.” However, when translated from Hebrew into Greek, in which the New Testament was written, the name Yeshua becomes Iēsous. The English spelling for Iēsous is “Jesus.” This means Joshua and Jesus are the same names.

Jesus' Real Name: Must We Call Him Yeshua?

www.learnreligions.com/jesus-aka-yeshua-700649

 

NOT THAT I KNOW MUCH ABOUT PENTAGRAMS!

 

Was the pentagram originally a Christian symbol before the cross?

In Christian symbolism, the basic pentagram (without a circle) was originally used to represent the five wounds of Jesus Christ. It was soon supplanted by the symbol of the cross, but the pentagram was still recognizable as a Christian symbol for a few hundred years after Jesus’ resurrection.

 

What is the origin and meaning of the pentagram?

www.gotquestions.org/pentagram-meaning.html

 

Dangerous cult FREEMASON INSIDER: "FREEMASONRY IS A SATANIC SEX CULT" (bitchute.com)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6JXSneTnNMK2/

 

Early meaning before the cross.

What is the origin and meaning of the pentagram? | GotQuestions.org

https://www.gotquestions.org/pentagram-meaning.html

 

Blasphemy of Sacred Symbols (debase holy symbols) Alphonse Louis Constant (1810 - 1875) - Genealogy

http://ldsanswers.org/why-are-inverted-pentagrams-on-lds-mormon-temples/

 

Exhibit pic3

 

Medical Snake: Does this Medical Snake make Moses a Freemason? Does the use of this medical snake mean all doctors are Freemasons?

 

Exhibit pic4

Does the use of a snake make Moses a Freemason or Babylonian Whore by retrospect in Medical Profession being accused of controlling modern medicine today by scholars? Does everybody reading the Book of Moses become a medical conspirator like unto Brigham Young being photographed wearing a Freemason Ring make Joseph Smith a Freemason and all other Mormons by retrospect in Brigham Young photographed wearing a Freemason ring?

 

Exhibit pic5

Does Alphonse Louis Constant abused or the pentagram like Hollywood does today sensationalizing it make all former Christians who once raised it as a symbol of Christianity now Babylonians by retrospect or reveal what was in former hearts prior to the use of a cross – which in some religious beliefs the cross was a pole, not a crucifix? - it is like, unto the logic, ‘a gun in itself is not evil while evil lies in the intent of he who brandishes it’, similarly the pentagram was held up as a Christian symbol, similarly like the snake was in representation of health, healing, and salvation even in the days of Moses. So, the meaning of the use of such a symbol is in the heart of Moses, the Christian, or Brigham Young, the builder, who is later photographed wearing a Masonic ring. Yet, what level of initiation the thirty-three degrees of Masonry was not disclosed in the expository. Which goes to who picked the pentagram for the decoration and who among the members are aware of its intended use – which goes to timeline and Mens Rea.

 

Exhibit pic6

Who knows if this is even true? Anybody could print it up and backdate it. Is any of the following material postmarked prior to the publishing of the Book of Mormon? Besides, goat herders are everywhere even hiding among the Good Shepherd’s flock!

 

Exhibit web7 Solomon Spalding

Solomon Spalding[1] (February 20, 1761 – October 20, 1816) was an American author who wrote two related texts: an unfinished manuscript entitled Manuscript Story – Conneaut Creek, and an unpublished historical romance about the lost civilization of the mound builders of North America called Manuscript Found. Whether these texts are distinct is disputed.[2] After Spalding's death, a number of individuals suggested that Spalding's work was used as a source by Joseph Smith for the Book of Mormon, a scripture in the Latter Day Saint movement.

Biography[edit]

Spalding was born in Ashford, Connecticut. He was a member of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. In 1782, he entered Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, graduating with the class of 1785.[3] In October 1787, he became an ordained Congregationalist preacher in Windham, Connecticut.

In 1795, Spalding married Matilda Sabin and opened a store with her brother Josiah in Cherry Valley, New York. In 1799, they moved the store to Richfield, New York. Around this time, Spalding bought a tract of land in and relocated to Conneaut, Ohio. While in Conneaut, Spalding began writing Manuscript, Found. In 1812, due to the disruptions of the War of 1812, Spalding moved to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In 1814, he moved to Amity, Pennsylvania, where he died two years later.

The Oberlin Manuscript[edit]

From 1809 to 1812, Spalding worked on a historical fiction about a Roman discovery of the Americas. An unfinished manuscript copy of this work exists, called "The Oberlin Manuscript" or "Honolulu Manuscript".[4] It is a historical romance "purporting to have been translated from the Latin, found on 24 rolls of parchment in a cave, on the banks of the Conneaut Creek". It tells of a Roman ship which discovers America.

The text of the Oberlin Manuscript was published by the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (RLDS Church) in 1885, and by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) in 1886 and 1910 under the name Manuscript, Found. In Eber D. Howe's anti-Mormon book Mormonism Unvailed, family members and other witnesses claimed that the true title of the Oberlin Manuscript is actually Manuscript Story – Conneaut Creek, and that Spalding penned another manuscript titled Manuscript, Found which bore no resemblance to the Oberlin Manuscript.[5][6]

Other Manuscript[edit]

Around 1812, Spalding allegedly completed a historical romance distinct from the Oberlin Manuscript which "purported to have been a record found buried in the earth".[6] Spalding moved to Pittsburgh and reportedly took this manuscript to the publisher Patterson & Lambdin, but Spalding died in 1816 before the manuscript could be published.[7]

Unlike the Oberlin Manuscript, there is, to date, no physical evidence of this first manuscript,[8] so the details of this other manuscript are based on testimonies originally published some twenty years later in Mormonism Unvailed.

Alleged contents of second manuscript[edit]Plot

According to John Spalding, Solomon's brother, the plot of Manuscript, Found told "of the first settlers of America, endeavoring to show that the American Indians are the descendants of the Jews, or the lost tribes. It gave a detailed account of their journey from Jerusalem, by land and sea, until they arrived in America, under the command of Nephi and Lehi. They afterward had quarrels and contentions, and separated into two distinct nations, one of which he denominated Nephites and the other Lamanites. Cruel and bloody wars ensued, in which great multitudes were slain. They buried their dead in large heaps, which caused the mounds so common in this country." Spalding gave this as an affidavit to be published in Eber D. Howe's anti-Mormon book Mormonism Unvailed.[6]

Those who claim to have seen the second manuscript testified that it was written "in scripture style of writing" and recalled its repetitive usage of phrases like "and it came to pass" or "now it came to pass", as well as the repeated phrase "I Nephi".[9]

Reliability of witness accounts of a second manuscript[edit]

Some modern scholars question the validity of the eyewitness accounts of this second manuscript. Fawn Brodie, in No Man Knows My History, dismissed the witness statements on grounds of witness tampering and false memory syndrome.[10]

Theorized usage of Spalding's work in Book of Mormon[edit]

In 1832, Latter Day Saint missionaries Samuel H. Smith and Orson Hyde visited Conneaut, Ohio, and preached from the Book of Mormon. Nehemiah King, a resident of Conneaut who knew Spalding when he lived there, said that the Mormon text resembled the story written by Spalding years before. In 1833, Spalding's brother John and seven other residents of Conneaut signed affidavits stating that Spalding had written a manuscript, portions of which were identical to the Book of Mormon. These statements were published in E. D. Howe's 1834 book Mormonism Unvailed, in which the theory was presented that the Book of Mormon was plagiarized from this manuscript. Several years later, Spalding's widow and daughter, other residents of Conneaut, and residents of Amity, Pennsylvania, also signed statements indicating that Spalding had authored a manuscript that was similar to the Book of Mormon.

"I well remember that he wrote in the old style, and commenced about every sentence with 'and it came to pass,' or 'now it came to pass,' the same as in the Book of Mormon, and according to the best of my recollection and belief, it is the same as my brother Solomon wrote, with the exception of the religious matter."[citation needed]

In 1927, Professor Azariah S. Root, who had headed the library at Oberlin College, wrote a letter regarding the origins of the Spalding Manuscript and how it relates to the Book of Mormon. In it he states that the Spalding document to which he had access, The Oberlin Manuscript, "seems pretty clearly not to have been the manuscript from which the Book of Mormon was written". Since neither Root nor anybody else had possession of Spalding's alleged second manuscript, he stated that The Oberlin Manuscript "does not seem to throw very much light" on the question of whether the second manuscript was used as a basis for the Book of Mormon.[4]

See also[edit]

MURDER BY MASTER Vs PUBLIC SERVANT SLAUGHTERED

 

We are terrible about listening to warnings … 911 info John P O'Neill fired by FBI for doing his job and would not stop doing his job 

A Catastrophic Blackout is Coming - Here’s How We Can Stop It | Samuel Feinburg | TEDxBaylorSchool

https://youtu.be/ZGan5NwJ-LM at 2:06 (go to 2:06 for the topic on John P O’Neill)

https://youtu.be/qyM9UKzJocs?t=3833 1:03:06 (cue to 1:03:06 for “911 was an inside job” and “Dick Cheney scheduled a counter terrorism drill” so suspected by me of masterminding the murder of John P O’Neill “Which led to a five trillion dollar war” and ‘Larry Silverstein resolving a huge asbestos problem 'Dick Cheney fixed for him through collusion with insurance companies' to perpetrate murder and insurance fraud, with “Israelis deepening the channel” (to move all the evidence and metal out of the nation hiding the evidence of explosions - implied premise). “Twin Towers hit by missiles not an airplane”. Our military stands by while the super rich keep their paycheck’s rolling in from foreign money and we are pillaged by billionaire families that have a taste for raping our kids. You can take just one look at the other prosecutor/‘defender’ Swogger appointed out of Marion County to my daughter and raise that inference by the actions and lack of action of two other DEFENDER/PROSECUTOR TYPES: Olcott D Thompson and Jason K Pierson both acting in the nature of defender/prosecutors abusing COVID PHONE COURT, Jason K Pierson never meeting my daughter in person, then giving her bad call in numbers excluding her from knowing the nature of the allegation or representation against her not able to make an objection or direct her attorney, after that happening multiple times through Melissa L Miller landing her on House Arrest for failure to appear, with more insults to her intelligence (multiplicity acts of emotional duress and torture) while PROSECUTOR/DEFENDER TYPES are Double Dipping while in violation of No Double Jeopardy after abusing No Trial De Novo, and ignoring Right to Counsel of Choice for over 102 days failing to give the discovery to my daughter! (Not limited to that) On and on and still entering evidence that will get no cross examination attorney after attorney fired and no direct witnesses EVER CALLED!

 

John P O’Neill – Died at the World Trade Center after taking on the position of Head of Security thereafter being fired by the F.B.I. for doing his job. But, well Dick Cheney is accused of having a friend, Larry Silverstein, with an asbestos problem in the Twin Towers and 911 was insurance fraud so they needed a provocation with lots of contacts in that NATO realm to step up (Thesis). So what John P O’Neill heard was planted wartime propaganda ‘disinformation’ and they wanted to quiet him (as a premise) it seems logical since he could point the finger and say, “Negligence” they would have to disprove (Antithesis) so would need another alternate antithesis to counter the Hegelian principal (Thesis v Antithesis/synthesis) already in place that would show too many discrepancies they did not want to manage since ‘well if all the rest is provable’ they would not want to have to disprove it in (Thesis/antithesis/antithesis/synthesis) – exposing the extra lie so shut down the investigation is their answer to control it then eliminate the witnesses and expose that we were never under attack and John P O’Neill was silenced. So they could keep telling lies they wanted to tell never to be questioned. Ask Pelosi - she did a speech on how that works when slandering potential people running for office well since having an honest platform is not authorized anymore in the United States.

 

Well what about the rest of the ‘expendable lives’ that were murdered in 911? Never mind all the American Troops that died under George W Bush’s Shock and Awe that was neither and both Shocking and Awful and Treasonous by a man that is rumored to have married the daughter of Alister Crowley making Alister Crowley the ‘Fist Father in Law’ of the United States via First Lady. Oh, but not slightly as interesting as Obama born in Kenya, right? So, who did sign the birth certificate of Barbara Bush? Just think about it she is not a BOND SERVANT SOLD ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE BY CONGRESS so she would not have one… right? Uh-huh! 

1.    What did John P O’Neill know?

2.    Was he posted at the World Trade Center by somebody that wanted him dead?

3.    How did he get that job? Did he apply to it or join a security company that posted him there?

4.    If so, who owned that security company and secondarily who was in charge of making the schedule and who is in charge of getting contracts for the security company John P O’Neill worked for?

5.    Who was John P O’Neill recruited by or, who made the referral to get his job at that particular security company?

6.    What were his other prospects for work?

7.    Who were his references and what is on his resume?

8.    Were there any similar names related to Cheney’s circle of intelligence friends involved in war and intelligence?

 

Were any of these above questions ever asked by any investigative body or published in any media company covering the mainstream news and were any of these questions raised by the F.B.I?

 

Episode 65 GFM Media Robert David Steele An Ex CIA Agent On The Political Pedophilia Epidemic

 

Relevant testimony to the above question list not that I agree with all his agenda topics it is socialism which is a form of slavery equal to Communism.

 

1.    DHS insider’s whistleblower revelations - ‘Pedophilia’ Lolita Island airplane logs ignored so not really trying to map pedophilia networks like corporate law firms that paper our kids like changing their names just like Hitler did.

2.    One thousand billionaires rule the world and corrupt corporate law firms involved in pedophilia (like Deputy District Attorney’s Offices nationwide making easy access to kids through criminals have more Due Process of Law Rights under mandatory orphan status at DHS taking custody at DAK. Like Jason K Pierson abusing double-dipping in violation of No Double Jeopardy while colluding in three directions with all of you just ignoring the Juvenile Justice Complex is supply and demand into the Adoption Industry)

3.    Divide – legal system just for the rich and dumbed down population with teachers under threat of losing their job if they actually educate our kids.

4.    Clintons are a crime family and ASFA was signed into law by Bill Clinton.

a.    Clintons elevated into power because of C.I.A. connections and most likely subject to blackmail due to their criminal activity.

b.    True motives about pedophilia while spreading child porn to first responders to corrupt their morals with Loretta Lynch and Hillary Clinton planning to legalize pedophilia.

c.     Repressive tolerance.

d.    NSA has very email or phone call ever made by everybody in the USA - nothing about court records being covered by NSA jurisdiction on information gathering – so not working for the people to hold corrupt judges accountable – and yet another huge bureaucracy in place not working for the people.

e.    Honorable exit strategy for pedophiles to eliminate blackmailers who control through pedophilia getting fact on the table with a reconciliation approach to rescue millions of children from institutionalized pedophilia.

5.    The US Oligarchy – Fascists on the Left, Fascists on the Right, No Difference — How Donald Trump Can Take Down the Deep State in 90 Days If He Will Listen and Act… #OSE Open Source EverythingAll Reflections & Story Boards

6.    Electoral reform predicted.

7.    Public sodomized by local state and national officials in a system that creates poverty unnecessarily.

8.    Moving towards putting people in jail for not getting a vaccine

9.    INTELLIGENCE for EARTH: Clarity, Diversity, Integrity, & Sustainability, Robert David Steele

One plane hit and both buildings collapse demolition style.

September 11 Twin Tower Attack - Bing images

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=September+11+Twin+Tower+Attack&form=IRBPRS&first=1&tsc=ImageBasicHover

 

including results for john O'Neill head of security at world trade center. Do you want results only for john O'Neill head of security at World Trade Center?

 

Image: wikipedia.org

John P. O'Neill - Born John Patrick O'Neill February 6, 1952 Atlantic City, New Jersey, U.S. Died September 11, 2001 (aged 49) New York, New York, U.S. Cause of death Collapse of the World Trade Center Nationality American Occupation FBI special agent, World Trade Center security head John Patrick O'Neill (February 6, 1952 – September 11, 2001) was an American counter-terrorism expert, who worked as a special agent and eventually a Special Agent in Charge in the Federal Bureau of Investigation

 until late 2001.

John P. O'Neill - Head of Security at the World Trade ...

www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/o-t-lounge/john-p-oneill---head-of-security-at-the-world-trade-center---9-11-hero/78681857/

 

Exhibit pic8

 Take your pick! 

MURDER BY MASTER Vs PUBLIC SERVANT SLAUGHTERED

Or did I just repeat myself?

Exhibit web9

 

www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/o-t-lounge/john-p-oneill---head-of-security-at-the-w…

Was this helpful?

PEOPLE ALSO ASK

Who was the head of security at the World Trade Center?

Who was John O'Neill in The Looming Tower?

When was Tim O'Neill killed in the World Trade Center?

What did John O'Neill do to the FBI?

Feedback

John P. O'Neill - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_P._O'Neill

 

John Patrick O'Neill (February 6, 1952 – September 11, 2001) was an American counter-terrorism expert who worked as a special agent and eventually a Special Agent in Charge in the Federal Bureau of Investigation. In 1995, O'Neill began to intensely study the roots of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing after he assisted in the capture of Ramzi Yousef, who was the leader of that plot. He subseque…O'Neill was born in Atlantic City, New Jersey, on February 6, 1952. As a child, his favorite television show was The F.B.I., a crime drama based around true cases the bureau had handled. In 1971, after graduating from Holy Spirit High School, he enrolled at American University in Washington, D.C. While there, O'Neill also started working at the FBI's Washington headquarters, first as a fingerprint clerk and later …

Wikipedia · Text under CC-BY-SA license. John O'Neill Is Dead at 49; Trade Center Security Chief ...

https://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/23/nyregion/john-o...

Sep 23, 2001 · John P. O'Neill, who left the F.B.I. last month to become chief of security for the World Trade Center, died in the collapse of the center on Sept. 11. He was 49. Mr. O'Neill spent the last several...

 

Exhibit pic10

 

 

This man invented the PCR test and has been dead a while but after he challenged Fauci to a public debate accusing him of knowing nothing and having an agenda!

 

But this is still very relevant https://youtu.be/Oza1j2_WqBk

 

Inventor of PCR test tells of a more innocent america before all Americans were suspected terrorists in their own homeland kind of reminding us of what went on behind the Berlin wall where people could not even buy parachute cloth in bulk never mind explosives

But this is still very relevant  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSVy1b-RyVM

 

Why doesn’t somebody check out the circumstances surrounding Kary Mullis’ death? I mean, Hitler did kill off scientist, attorneys, school teachers, of opposing minds to maintain control over public opinion.

 

From: BROWN Vicky L * DOC
Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 7:01 AM
To:
Marilyn LeBaron
Subject: RE: We are terrible about listening to warnings … 911 info John P O'Neill fired by FBI since doing his job and would not stop doing his job

 

STOP! UNSUBSCRIBE

 

Vicky Brown

Assistant Food Service Manager

Snake River Correctional Institution

Office-(541) 881-5426

Cell-(541)216-3598

 

From: Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@live.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 3:25 AM
To: Francesca A.Banfield <
nationalcoalitionfc.cpsreform@yahoo.com>; ng.ut.utarng.list.pao@mail.mil <ng.ut.utarng.list.pao@mail.mil>; jeffery.g.robinson.mil@mail.mil; sheriff@co.marion.or.us; Info DOC <DOC.Info@doc.state.or.us>; dockbm@aol.com; GIBLIN Edward C * DOC <Edward.C.Giblin@doc.state.or.us>; PRAEGITZER Edward C * DOC <Edward.C.Praegitzer@doc.state.or.us>; SCHULZ Edward C * DOC <Edward.C.Schulz@doc.state.or.us>; JACKSON Edward F * DOC <Edward.F.Jackson@doc.state.or.us>; LOVSNESS Edward J * DOC <Edward.J.Lovsness@doc.state.or.us>; GRAY Edward L * DOC <Edward.L.Gray@doc.state.or.us>; ASPINALL Edward S * DOC <Edward.S.Aspinall@doc.state.or.us>; ROSE Edward V * DOC <Edward.V.Rose@doc.state.or.us>; RITCHIE Eli E * DOC <Eli.E.Ritchie@doc.state.or.us>; MARTINEZ Eli G * DOC <Eli.G.Martinez@doc.state.or.us>; JOHNSON Elissa M * DOC <Elissa.M.Johnson@doc.state.or.us>; BRADSHAW Elizabeth A * DOC <Elizabeth.A.Bradshaw@doc.state.or.us>; MANCINO Elizabeth C * DOC <Elizabeth.C.Mancino@doc.state.or.us>; FERGUSON Elizabeth G * DOC <Elizabeth.G.Ferguson@doc.state.or.us>; GONZALEZ Elizabeth * DOC <Elizabeth.Gonzalez@doc.state.or.us>; WILDER Elizabeth H * DOC <Elizabeth.H.Wilder@doc.state.or.us>; SNIDER Elizabeth M * DOC <Elizabeth.M.Snider@doc.state.or.us>; PANTHER Emile I * DOC <Emile.I.Panther@doc.state.or.us>; ASAY Emily L * DOC <Emily.L.Asay@doc.state.or.us>; GREENE Emma S * DOC <Emma.S.Greene@doc.state.or.us>; RICH Eric D * DOC <Eric.D.Rich@doc.state.or.us>; KAMA Eric H * DOC <Eric.H.Kama@doc.state.or.us>; NIELSON Eric K * DOC <Eric.K.Nielson@doc.state.or.us>; RICHCREEK Eric V * DOC <Eric.V.Richcreek@doc.state.or.us>; REYES Erin E * DOC <Erin.E.Reyes@doc.state.or.us>; GONZALEZ Esperanza M * DOC <Esperanza.M.Gonzalez@doc.state.or.us>; HOUSTON Essex T * DOC <Essex.T.Houston@doc.state.or.us>; THATCHER Ethan W * DOC <Ethan.W.Thatcher@doc.state.or.us>; LARKIN Eugene D * DOC <Eugene.D.Larkin@doc.state.or.us>; REDING Eugene L * DOC <Eugene.L.Reding@doc.state.or.us>; DEFRANCE Eulinda K * DOC <Eulinda.K.Defrance@doc.state.or.us>; FINN Evan M * DOC <Evan.M.Finn@doc.state.or.us>; GARCIA-MARTINEZ Evette * DOC <Evette.Garcia-Martinez@doc.state.or.us>; HAYNES Ezra J * DOC <Ezra.J.Haynes@doc.state.or.us>; AGUILAR Felix * DOC <Felix.Aguilar@doc.state.or.us>; VARGAS Felix R * DOC <Felix.R.Vargas@doc.state.or.us>; PHASWANA Flo G * DOC <Flo.G.Phaswana@doc.state.or.us>; ROGERS Floyd H * DOC <Floyd.H.Rogers@doc.state.or.us>; LEDBETTER Forest L * DOC <Forest.L.Ledbetter@doc.state.or.us>; PANTOJA Francisco J * DOC <Francisco.J.Pantoja@doc.state.or.us>; HORTON Frank R * DOC <Frank.R.Horton@doc.state.or.us>; GIPSON Fritzi S * DOC <Fritzi.S.Gipson@doc.state.or.us>; GARBER Gabriel D * DOC <Gabriel.D.Garber@doc.state.or.us>; RUSSELL Garry E * DOC <Garry.E.Russell@doc.state.or.us>; GULICK Garth G * DOC <Garth.G.Gulick@doc.state.or.us>; MAXEY Gary D * DOC <Gary.D.Maxey@doc.state.or.us>; GORE Gary * DOC <Gary.Gore@doc.state.or.us>; DAVIS Gary L * DOC <Gary.L.Davis@doc.state.or.us>; GIBBONS Gavin S * DOC <Gavin.S.Gibbons@doc.state.or.us>; LONG Gerald J * DOC <Gerald.J.Long@doc.state.or.us>; ANDREWS Gilbert L * DOC <Gilbert.L.Andrews@doc.state.or.us>; YODER Grant M * DOC <Grant.M.Yoder@doc.state.or.us>; MARTIN Greg E * DOC <Greg.E.Martin@doc.state.or.us>; DELEON Greg J * DOC <Greg.J.DeLeon@doc.state.or.us>; MILLER Greg L * DOC <Greg.L.Miller@doc.state.or.us>; KLIMBACK Greg M * DOC <Greg.M.Klimback@doc.state.or.us>; CARLSON Greg P * DOC <Greg.P.Carlson@doc.state.or.us>; PATINO Guadalupe * DOC <Guadalupe.Patino@doc.state.or.us>; RODRIGUEZ Gustavo P * DOC <Gustavo.P.Rodriguez@doc.state.or.us>; PARKS Harmony M * DOC <Harmony.M.Parks@doc.state.or.us>; BRANCH Harrison * DOC <Harrison.Branch@doc.state.or.us>; WELLS Heath * DOC <Heath.Wells@doc.state.or.us>; RIGGS Heather A * DOC <Heather.A.Riggs@doc.state.or.us>; MILLER Heather K * DOC <Heather.K.Miller@doc.state.or.us>; BECERRIL Henry A * DOC <Henry.A.Becerril@doc.state.or.us>; PROVANCE Hillary K * DOC <Hillary.K.Provance@doc.state.or.us>; MORGAN Hugh * DOC <Hugh.Morgan@doc.state.or.us>; ENRIQUEZ Hugo E * DOC <Hugo.E.Enriquez@doc.state.or.us>; SALINAS Hugo * DOC <Hugo.Salinas@doc.state.or.us>; VALENZUELA Isidro * DOC <Isidro.Valenzuela@doc.state.or.us>; TORRESCHAMU Ismael * DOC <Ismael.TorresChamu@doc.state.or.us>; RICHMOND Israel S * DOC <Israel.S.Richmond@doc.state.or.us>; SILVA Ito V * DOC <Ito.V.Silva@doc.state.or.us>; RAMIREZ Ivan * DOC <Ivan.Ramirez@doc.state.or.us>; GARTON Jackie A * DOC <Jackie.A.Garton@doc.state.or.us>; REEDER Jackie L * DOC <Jackie.L.Reeder@doc.state.or.us>; BRANDT James A * DOC <James.A.Brandt@doc.state.or.us>; MAXWELL James A * DOC <James.A.Maxwell@doc.state.or.us>; jgreen@documentexaminer.info; ARMSTRONG Tom * DOC <Tom.Armstrong@doc.state.or.us>; MCCLELLAN Trish L * DOC <Trish.L.McClellan@doc.state.or.us>; DAVENPORT Trish M * DOC <Trish.M.Davenport@doc.state.or.us>; ZIELASKOWSKI Troy A * DOC <Troy.a.Zielaskowski@doc.state.or.us>; WEDEKIND Troy S * DOC <Troy.S.Wedekind@doc.state.or.us>; HARRIS Tuffton L * DOC <Tuffton.L.Harris@doc.state.or.us>; TU Tuyen C * DOC <Tuyen.C.Tu@doc.state.or.us>; BURCHARD Ty A * DOC <Ty.A.Burchard@doc.state.or.us>; HERBST Tyger Z * DOC <Tyger.Z.Herbst@doc.state.or.us>; JOHNSON Tyler G * DOC <Tyler.G.Johnson@doc.state.or.us>; MOOTHART Tyler J * DOC <Tyler.J.Moothart@doc.state.or.us>; RAMSEY Vicki A * DOC <Vicki.A.Ramsey@doc.state.or.us>; WELDY Vicki B * DOC <Vicki.B.Weldy@doc.state.or.us>; BROWN Vicky L * DOC <Vicky.L.Brown@doc.state.or.us>; MACHUCA Victor J * DOC <Victor.J.Machuca@doc.state.or.us>; PITNER Victor J * DOC <Victor.J.Pitner@doc.state.or.us>; PENA Victor M * DOC <Victor.M.Pena@doc.state.or.us>; SYHABOUT Viengsavanh * DOC <Viengsavanh.Syhabout@doc.state.or.us>; SPARKS Virginia M * DOC <Virginia.M.Sparks@doc.state.or.us>; BRADY Vishami * DOC <Vishami.Brady@doc.state.or.us>; CHIKRIZOV Vitaly * DOC <Vitaly.Chikrizov@doc.state.or.us>; LOR Vong * DOC <Vong.Lor@doc.state.or.us>; SAUER Wade D * DOC <Wade.D.Sauer@doc.state.or.us>; TRYON Wade E * DOC <Wade.E.Tryon@doc.state.or.us>; ROBERTS Wade S * DOC <Wade.S.Roberts@doc.state.or.us>; CUBBAGE-THORP Waunda L * DOC <Waunda.L.Cubbage-Thorp@doc.state.or.us>; ARMITAGE Wendy J * DOC <Wendy.J.Armitage@doc.state.or.us>; WHITLOW Wendy * DOC <Wendy.Whitlow@doc.state.or.us>; ELDREDGE William A * DOC <William.A.Eldredge@doc.state.or.us>; BELLMAN William M * DOC <William.M.Bellman@doc.state.or.us>; PETERSON William T * DOC <William.T.Peterson@doc.state.or.us>; LOR Xue V * DOC <Xue.V.Lor@doc.state.or.us>; SHANNON Zack R * DOC <Zack.R.Shannon@doc.state.or.us>
Subject: We are terrible about listening to warnings … 911 info John P O'Neill fired by FBI since doing his job and would not stop doing his job

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

One of the Social Workers

For real? No name, no callback number?

I can't curl my lips back

David Straight - Arkansas Class 1 of 3 (volume fixed)

STANDING: 'All people are equal in the eyes of the law' https://youtu.be/z-0rYeGlWw4?t=3073