CPS Juvenile Justice Complex Cognizable Misconduct Law and Legal Definition
https://youtu.be/_McLO5xdQo8
On trying to get me arrested for yelling rape and demanding the removal of a social worker when no credible allegation is lawfully available
According to USCS Ct App 11th Cir, Appx § 3 [United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; Addenda; Three. Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings; Article I. General Provisions], cognizable misconduct:
“(1) is conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts. Misconduct includes, but is not limited to:(A) using the judge's office to obtain special treatment for friends or relatives;
This should include giving special preference to BAR Members who are a circle of friends who do not defend your constitutional rights while making money for not defending them by mutual agreement of BAR Members to all agree and say we have not constitutional rights.
(B) accepting bribes, gifts, or other personal favors related to the judicial office;
Taking kids away without due process of law, while imposing the equivalent of the death penalty to all involved including the kids, is making them rich and without cause get money, which is a bribe from the Federal Government to do this corrupt activity.
(C) having improper discussions with parties or counsel for one side in a case;
If DHS is supposed to ask all the questions and they don't have testimonies in open court then the judge has a preset disposition or has conversations with the DHS as a pattern and a practice.
(D) treating litigants or attorneys in a demonstrably egregious and hostile manner;
Yes, giving parents the equivalent of the death penalty without due process of law is egregious and hostile but since they sit there without feeling any emotions it is not put in here as egregious or hostile when it is very commonplace.
(E) engaging in partisan political activity or making inappropriately partisan statements;
Yep, they should keep their mouths shut in public or reveal there true dark side.
(F) soliciting funds for organizations; or
They are soliciting funds for their private court organization.
(G) violating other specific, mandatory standards of judicial conduct, such as those pertaining to restrictions on outside income and requirements for financial disclosure.
They are required to be independent of the DHS but in fact, are working for the DHS.
(2) is conduct occurring outside the performance of official duties if the conduct might have a prejudicial effect on the administration of the business of the courts, including a substantial and widespread lowering of public confidence in the courts among reasonable people.
Those courts are criminal organizations for the purpose of Human Trafficking for Federal Funds
(3) does not include:
(A) an allegation that is directly related to the merits of a decision or procedural ruling. Merits have to be presented and given a refute but are not and they can bar you from your flesh and blood without a hearing. An allegation that calls into question the correctness of a judge's ruling, including a failure to recuse, without more, is merits-related. If the decision or ruling is alleged to be the result of an improper motive, e.g., a bribe, ex parte contact, racial or ethnic bias, or improper conduct in rendering a decision or ruling, such as personally derogatory remarks irrelevant to the issues, the complaint is not cognizable to the extent that it attacks the merits.
Two days after i file CAPITAL FELONY TREASON complaint by email they try to have me arrested by police in Salem when they are clear in Portland. Why don't the police have to stay within the jurisdiction where the matter arose? DHS has a special place in society. They go by what the fake judge did that will not look into child rape since they are a private organization that are not mandatory reporters, that held no hearing or had an investigation and then do what DHS social worker wants when the social worker is responsible for getting my grandson raped, and officially deny me visits and threaten to arrest me, just to make me stop trying to get them arrested for a rape they will not refute.
(B) an allegation about delay in rendering a decision or ruling, unless the allegation concerns an improper motive in delaying a particular decision or habitual delay in a significant number of unrelated cases.”
Who knows about this one because they drag stuff out for over twenty-two months and no crime committed and that is over a year-long sentence like mine is ten months long.
In this video, David Jose drops the real law in the hands of the people that no attorney has ever wished to show before. He then backs it up with laws From Congress, Legislatures at State Level, and Constitution. This video was not made for kids!
Money and law and things you need to know on why to arrest judges; I is the law that if the judges are arrested for wrongdoing all the cases they adjudicate prior all vanish and are overturned. https://youtu.be/9UQYmSey2g0
https://www.facebook.com/groups/602533906750488/wp/1019990438347220/?ext=1576719465&hash=AeTigdm44MM4y7GB&fref=mentions
Comments
Post a Comment