Asking for lightning from the sky
From: Mad Cow
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 5:18 PM
To: crc@portlandoregon.gov; SPDTRO; Isham, Jeff; react@reason.com; Bittick, Richard; Steve Cooper; tcrofts@co.marion.or.us
Cc: DHS.LegislativeTeam@state.or.us; dhs.directorsoffice@state.or.us; dhs.info@state.or.us
Subject: (if they can’t come to grab the kids just because they live with me they cannot eliminate me as a placement just because they grabbed them up then want to force me to contract with them so they can get a Federal Bonus)
It is a matter of equal protection of the law, policy, O.R.S., O.A.R., Federal, State, UCC, or otherwise, no matter who or what status you have.
Pursuant to the IJRC (interim Jurisdictional Review Court) the Oversight Committee
Under the contractual law: Deceit is not a valid enforceable contract.
Under the theory: Vague is not enforceable.
Under: DURESS is not binding.
Under: The attorneys retained by DHS were not retained by me therefor second-hand advisement is not binding to me when their advice is meant to protect the interests of other men and their constituents
My complex is under Landlord Tenancy Law which ensures an environment that covers the bankers and their property and taxation interests and upkeep which is suitable for the general population until DHS step in and then the standard of living is mandated by the implementation of a double standard forced upon us to become a ‘facility’, and when parents are arguing over kids the standard of their upkeep is considered on the basis of what they are accustomed to when alimony is paid to the wife or husband benefiting from that ruling, so after those two examples there is equal protection required when the State of Oregon is ‘divorcing’ kids from their mother and father, which is in effect the DHS stepping in and saying, “I’m the other mother” while collecting all the benefits after hooking up a case through the clerk, then asserts the standard of living must be raised when over and above that which is customarily available to all the population under the protection of the stakeholders in real-estate through landlord tenancy laws, prior to imposing evictions to kids ignoring their tenancy rights when they are supposed to look for relative caregivers and don’t then don’t remove the offending parent. It is not regulated here at my complex on the mass to require all have a carbon monoxide detector and if DHS wants me to have one and they want that standard in place it has to be equally enforced upon all society (that removal is possible if you do not have one ) so denial of your kin is cannot be deemed rightful, since whoever said having a carbon monoxide detector is a Liberty Interest issue, when it is between the Bankers and the Landlord Tenancy Law contracts, and not a reason to deny family to one another while an E Certification walk-through is done since not applicable to Life, Liberty, and Happiness, when it is the scope of liability and insurance underwriters policies and not legislated by Congressional act as Parental Liability Law extended to kin.
'If you cannot remove, DHS cannot with-hold' as a phrase equivalent to organic law related to No Victim, No Crime, as to translate to No Complaint, No Victim, as a standard of thinking with respect to the term ‘placement’ when DHS claim their hands are tied by federal regulations, as congruent to why people call the child abuse hotline and if they would call; “Oh my gosh they don’t have a fire extinguisher!, 911 needs to be called quick!” or “They don’t have a building code of a ‘facility’!, 911 needs to be called quick!” or “Oh my gosh no first aid kit and no carbon monoxide detector!” that is child endangerment!”, call the child abuse hotline.
If it is not a mandatory reported ‘item’ than DHS cannot use a walk-through to prevent family from taking possession of their kin. Why do a walk0through any way if the bankers and insurance underwriters have that already in place to cover their investments with is also an umbrella for the kids and is presumable but not exactly an act of God, but when He acts that is 'an out' for the insurance companies to avoid a payout even if all the other things were in place, and no one can be held in breach. And since family is an act of God why does the DHS get to impose that which is not an act of God, but legislated in the private interests under liability laws, as grounds to deny your family to you as a kid, in a way saying kids are managed by insurance underwriters when the police owe us no duty but are escorting DHS to the front door, which is unconstitutional social science once DHS steps in Child Protection Stops under they are no longer mandatory reporters and the police are no longer called and the right to an independent investigation is lost when a crime is committed in DHS controlled ‘facility’ and equal protection is on those direct matters null and void.
On April 30, 2019 I heard Shannon Stevens, in the presence of Nathan Stevens, her son, and father of N Stevens, ask Helmar Lochman, CPS supervisory staff, how many foster homes the kids have been in, he replied, “They have been in three foster homes”, this since 02/19/2019, and the DHS cannot hold a permanency hearing when no permanency is offered, and say, "If you don't show up we have jurisdiction", the first attorney was not retained and the courts had no permission from the mother to put them in custody or the authority to appoint counsel to my daughter, or the authority prior to April 30, 2019 to appoint counsel to my grand-kin, none at all, which is contested continually due to many technicalities and none of these attorneys have contacted me while drawing a paycheck provided with all their love for the technicalities that keep them from accountability and pass all the obligation of ‘efforts to the DHS’, who are the workers that bring in their opportunities to apply all the technicalities that make bank accounts fill. While i am listed as not appearing as if not interested, i guess, giving rise to a conflict of the laws where attorneys cannot ambulance chase yet have allowed DHS under their paperwork to do so, while not providing a way for the people to respond in equal force with an armful of pre-printed papers for those who do not know how to litigate in a manner which is pleasing to the JUVENILE JUSTICE COMPLEX, (which the lack of said secures a fat retainer fee for their constituents and some adoption bonuses), where we have to present a case better than an attorney, who has delegated all the presenting a case to the DHS who have that proper form all pre-printed for them by the paperwork authored by the attorneys who are the ones making bank, which can be inferred by the box being checked that the DHS has made diligent efforts to locate family and kinder caregivers, which is perjury unless my family was contacted this time (way before the arrest on February 15, 2019, and the DHS can show my the entire family refused to take the kids since it is stated the state strategized in coordinated efforts to take them from their mother and did not have a plan in place to bring them directly to me and then don’t tell me where they are. Even in the conflict of rules that eliminate other family members from having DHS having to put them with relatives already by the use of school of origin, when school is not family, making that little box checked void and DHS the winner by their own rules they set in place to look like they have rules when their rules just eliminate family making the school the ‘other parent’, and if you don’t live near the school, well, the school of origin wins, and if the kids get bounced around all over the place and even moved outside the zone of the school of origin, the other family members are not an option as in this case, this school of origin is highly controversial since no one at the school is there when the light go out and they are not in charge of the pen, and not there in court, or the doctors, or an attorney for that matter, just an empty gesture to keep control of the kids to the local DHS office staff’s who directly benefit from the bonus schedules, and also excludes actual relatives from knowing anything about the kids under DHS control. Goes to Bonnie Kemball saying, this has been in the works for a long time, and my saying we have been hunted through the Welfare Office when Victoria was only five months old. And DHS could not come and grab the kids even if they wanted to and could not for years but once the DHS do get them they can exclude me and say, ‘Get an attorney who cares”, (Haha) "Come get them" if you have and address to where they are hidden from you before the 'dependency hearing' and don’t provide that address or the address of the hearing place or the time of the hearing. And they have my phone number and don’t call me during court. Which directly needs legislative attention to mandate coordinated efforts between DHS, police, and sheriff, to include family BEFORE the grabbing of kids, because the attorney doesn't care about the constitutional rights in civil court, and everything DHS files during CPS involvement needs a copy CC to a relative, and all video recordings of all contact between DHS Supervisory Staff, CPS workers, Doctors, Therapists, Attorney’s, and Police, in any direction between kin and they need to be fully documented sent to the family for verification of conversation, and attestation for proper respectable verification of conversations the courts will accept as evidence instead of DHS checking boxes, that, in this case, are blatant lies. Since the kids were in the year prior in foster care and the DHS in Polk County already made contact with my family members all across the country including my family members living in Texas, Tigard here in Oregon, and one other, (and my family is so big you would need a Rolodex) who contacted them to intervene at my diligent request they do so which is not proof they made reasonable efforts, just me knowing they would not put the kids with me since they are all about money, prejudice, and oh, we have them now, ta-ta, and ha-ha, see if you ever see them again, which is what they actually did. i was not contacted at all that first time and was the one making their ‘reasonable efforts for them', but this time i was and i just found a letter from Bonnie Kemball that is talking about adoptive options, which is pre-emptive, proving bias which is not allowed by supreme court when police are investigating, she texting, "You have a founded" eliminating me as an option, but that past ‘founded’ was based on a future crime against a bureaucrat, not something i actually did to kids prior to 2004 where they should have been looking for evidence to build and prove their case at that time, not future things where the presumption of innocence are subverted on Oath of Affirmation of the District Attorney’s pen. But, my grandchildren have lived with me within the time frame of one year and they could not come and grab them for me just being in their lives, which is evidence there is a double standard (if they can’t come to grab the kids just because they live with me they cannot eliminate me as a placement just because they grabbed them up then want to force me to contract with them so they can get a Federal Bonus, putting my grand-kin in harm's way while the living the situation is already governed under contracts providing ample proof of a secure environment under that contract which has inspectors that are third party not profiting from a bonus schedule. Directly to the fact that if my grand-kin are placed with me those bonuses are lost while the adoption attorney loses a hefty sum of up to $40,000 while the DHS also, actually Helmar Lochman, loses his adoption bonus (while my grand-kin are detained for surety on that bonus schedule which has to do with who holds the power of the pen) while they are in danger and at a higher risk than if placed with kin.
In support of
EXHIBIT A - Page 1 – 5
file:///C:/Users/zONEzERO/Downloads/IMG_20191219_0007_NEW.pdf
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
EXHIBIT B
The Prophet Joseph Smith assigns of Power of Attorney to Benjamin F. Johnson.
On the topic of Trustee in trust and conservator of the power of the pen
Comments
Post a Comment