https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN8_ZcJFnnU&feature=youtu.be Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Institute of Technology
When my grand-kids are harmed by the decision of a DHS employee acting outside of what is not expressly their duty the immunities of a bureaucrat no longer applicable.
Unless it is expressly determined by the body politic under a currently applicable bill enacted by Congress and legislature to assign judicial discretion to DHS employees by the state to become an appellate court without actually petitioning the courts themselves my grandbabies need to be immediately delivered to me and all adoption subject to judicial estoppel or you are all aiding the overthrows of our judicial branch by one man named Helmar Lochmann while he moves to cover his liabilities.
I already made my objections through the ADA and that apparently was honoured since my daughter knows the context of my communications with him by her kicking back that content based on conversations she said she had had with the DHS agents while they were also telling her I was asking the courts to put her to death and have shown other acts of extreme cruelty and dishonesty and a full review needs to be made in this case. If it is not done here than Congress is my next step in the meat grinder that ogresses us and shredding the lives of all our collective national worth.
Case Law; Right of Access, Bill of Rights, 1983 law suits, Speech under scrutiny of public concern, free speech, whistleblowing caselaw applies to ‘employee speech and employee duties’, private entity doing a public service, when that private conduct is an attribution question and encourage that private conduct or allow that conduct and weather you have a state action, which in my case is encouraged conduct, and a there is plenty to prove there is an allegation of a conspiracy, and a motive to show as well, deliberate indifference and a constitutional state of mind and the paperwork abused and the purpose to do harm, petition for REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, public concern requirement, suet against a law enforcement officer and free speech on no probable cause for the prosecution and retaliatory prosecution case and retaliatory arrest for an impermissible reason, which all have a hearing and my case subject matter did not and secret trials are not allowed in a free society,
qualified immunity is based on probable cause being relevant but when there is no probable cause decided and the judiciary is overthrown on a matter that was already decided is there a president that needs to be set before the supreme court decision on the purposes of deciding if there is a qualified immunity needing to be assignee here since Helmar Lochmann is the one responsible for getting my grandson raped, while acting outside of his duties, while the District Attorney is holding the case in the court, who has a higher standard of immunities but even those are limited, and he cannot bring a case against me without somebody else filing upon the court, and certainly they must have had a conversation about me since all of them have ignored me thought they have had multiple emails form me and nobody, out of four attorneys who are responsible to decide the ‘best interest’, ever cared to measure my worth or ask me a single question or test the validity of why DHS are ignoring my caregiver relationship with me kin, which is not in the ‘best interests’ of their emotional needs at any level. Unless it has been decided that grandparents are not necessary at all but that would only come to bare if they never knew me or Shannon Stevens at all.
The entire Oregon State Bill of Rights got tossed out the window when Helmar Lochmann sentenced my grand-kids right to a bloodline relationship null and void and he had no judicial seat or jurisdiction over the subject matter and not an appellate court and that is the equivalent of a tittle of attainder on its face and the District Attorney and the Oregon State Bar is fully advised.
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court, court of appeals, appeal court, court of the second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate under varying rules.
Professor Sheldon Nahmod covers the basics of section 1983 for lawyers. He discusses the elements of the section 1983 claim, individual immunities (absolute and qualified) and local government liability. It also includes Tenth Circuit cases of relevance to this particular audience. This presentation was given in December of 2013 to the New Mexico Defense Lawyers Association.
DeShaney v. Winnebago County; Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. DeShaney v. Winnebago County, 489 U.S. 189 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 22, 1989. The court held that a state government agency's failure to prevent child abuse by a custodial parent does not violate the child's right to liberty for the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Police escorting DHS to the door to remove children during DHS involvement is not intended for the protection of children under the 14 Amendment and is not a Federal Constitutional Act, yet is used to gain Federal Funding for the state, which is redundant, and indicative police presence is a deterrence, under the use of force continuum, and is use of force used for the protection of the bureaucrat, then not available for an independent investigative body after harm comes to our nations heirs since they owe us not duty in the use of protection against private harm, and since child protection was privatized it brings up multiple counts of conflict of laws, and since the 911 or non-emergency police cannot find the kids without going through the DHS it seems to act as an advanced warning system, where the crime of child rape can be covered up by the time a police officer reaches the victims to make a repot since the CPS caseworker does not stop by but one a month and there is not panic button or surveillance by a family member of our nations heirs. Police need to be made available to investigate child rape in foster care without going through the DHS staff, since being responsible for helping get them in there, creating a special relationship with police and this nations heirs, and then can’t find them when an emergency does arise and since no oversight is available it is a violation in both directions in this case of my grandson and granddaughter.
Dates and times on all the paperwork is required for your review and my affidavit in the presence of a judicial review for congressional addendum to forbid that which is already decided by a judge that did not get appealed is on its face not for review by DHS when discretionary decisions are being made on the placement of kids with grandparents under family first legislation being ignored instead of respected.
My grandkids have been harmed by what could have reasonably been foreseeing since it is available for DHS to see that the increase of harm rises while under the physical custody and control of the state when in opposite the statistics show rape and death is less likely to happen in the general population.
Maidgan vs Lavin. ADEA prohibits age discriminations, does not preclude the use of equal protection to allege age discrimination. But since the District Manager has said i am not doing business with DHS that may not apply since ‘not an employee either’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN8_ZcJFnnU&feature=youtu.be Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Institute of Technology
LeBaron Marilyn shared a link. Yesterday at 7:31 AM From: Marilyn LeBaron Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020, 7:38 PM To: DA@mcda.us; Karen.FEICKERT@ojd.state.or.us Cc: OSB CAO Intake; Jessica L. Cheely
Edited and Revised
Social Worker Supervisory Staff make grandparents go to be RSVP'd to the Foster Care Education Program, that asks you what kids you want, (which is creepy when the Supervisory Staff can get E Certification as the hearsay from my daughter said was used to approve the foster home my grandson was allegedly raped in then not moved by Helmar Lochmann since the report to me came after the five days it required to make a determination, making it a couple weeks back, and then it is reported they are moved but not till i screamed an email into the inboxes of the attorneys, and none of this is reported to me while under the Supervision of Lochmann's pen, who did not ask me a single question about the care of my grand-kin, while he is reportedly crying in my daughters presence that my grandson was harmed do to his decisions while saying he did not screen the foster father well enough, and he still gets to make the decisions while claiming liability, since it was called an emergency placement according to my daughter, which is what the grandparents are known to get,
then made to RSVP and take foster care education classes, which is misuse of his power, since he is not allowed to place my kin in a foster home that does not uphold the federal screening criteria, which could not possible be the same standard of that which makes allowances for actual family members, which i have been denied, while he later is abusing the rules that apply to an affidavit while also trying to write affidavits intended to indemnify the DHS from suit to impeach my grandson's outcry, which is a conflict of interest compounded in three directions where an inherent conflict of interest already exists, between actors that are strangers not related to your kin) while denying you on something a judge already overturned himself, when he was the same judge that tried the case, and let you go when the DHS was trying to keep you from your kids, and grand-kids, which is the case here,
on a future crime against a bureaucrat, that never happened yet, but got my parental rights removed by a long interference process, that had a really weak case, according to the Public Defender, but when the extension of time requested by the CPS was denied it shows the duly elected seated judiciary must have thought that that babies and people no longer pregnant are safe around me, unless it was true on the premise pregnant bureaucrats, as alleged, were the only ones in danger, since at that time while it was relevant it was said, "We don't think your mother is going to hurt you or the baby" while my grandbaby was still in the womb, yet prior to that allegation that pregnant bureaucrats were in danger, there was another rape in foster care case pending, yet it was leveraged to get a seconds set of double continuances that should have been dismissed since the presumption of innocence is violated is to get a case to trial on the premise of a future crime against a pregnant bureaucrat, on the DHS imposed diagnosis, without an expert witness, or a doctor visit to get a diagnosis by proper means, or a pretrial opportunity to refute that allegation, while that was the case on Oath on Affirmation on the prophetic abilities of the District Attorney and approved by the same seated and duly elected judge, while the District Attorney intended to call that pregnant bureaucrat, when her accusations under my line of questioning was already impeached to be false on the matters of my son forcing them to refile, then also impeaching the other judge's prior decision to deny me my son on the mere presence of a letter sent out that was never allowed a refute, showing the judicial discretion has been delegated to the DHS, though also DEEMED COUNSEL by the Juvenile Justice Complex, and we do not go to retain them ourselves, when no personal contact was made with me directly within the five days allotted contact with me prior to writing that letter used in court, while the Juvenile Department was the seat that made all the other decisions on my daughter, where that subject matter has no bearing on the relationships in existence today, though DHS have used that history though a duly elected judicial seat did not during a time where age relevancy was the subject matter that has no relevancy to the subject matter of case presented to the Juvenile Justice Complex, and unless the Supervisory Staff of the DHS are an appellate process when not appealing the judicial decision in a timely manner in the past, it is abuse of process to use that subject matter today, when Supervisory Staff are not a duly elected judiciary on this matter now today when no relevancy on the merits of that past judicial decision is applied today, and the Juvenile Justice Complex is allowing that without regard to the actual history being presented to them since the discretion has been delegated to the DHS which makes that a preset disposition if not overturned since the prejudice to over come the decision of the seated judiciary is upon the DHS considering they could not come remove my grand-babies for over eleven years and now use that to deny me their presence in my home.
Who taught Helmar Lochmann he is a judge? And who should have? Failure to train and qualified and absolute immunity. Proximate cause plainly obvious case and liability.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN8_ZcJFnnU&feature=youtu.be
ReplyDeleteChicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Institute of Technology
When my grand-kids are harmed by the decision of a DHS employee acting outside of what is not expressly their duty the immunities of a bureaucrat no longer applicable.
Unless it is expressly determined by the body politic under a currently applicable bill enacted by Congress and legislature to assign judicial discretion to DHS employees by the state to become an appellate court without actually petitioning the courts themselves my grandbabies need to be immediately delivered to me and all adoption subject to judicial estoppel or you are all aiding the overthrows of our judicial branch by one man named Helmar Lochmann while he moves to cover his liabilities.
I already made my objections through the ADA and that apparently was honoured since my daughter knows the context of my communications with him by her kicking back that content based on conversations she said she had had with the DHS agents while they were also telling her I was asking the courts to put her to death and have shown other acts of extreme cruelty and dishonesty and a full review needs to be made in this case. If it is not done here than Congress is my next step in the meat grinder that ogresses us and shredding the lives of all our collective national worth.
ReplyDeleteCase Law; Right of Access, Bill of Rights, 1983 law suits, Speech under scrutiny of public concern, free speech, whistleblowing caselaw applies to ‘employee speech and employee duties’, private entity doing a public service, when that private conduct is an attribution question and encourage that private conduct or allow that conduct and weather you have a state action, which in my case is encouraged conduct, and a there is plenty to prove there is an allegation of a conspiracy, and a motive to show as well, deliberate indifference and a constitutional state of mind and the paperwork abused and the purpose to do harm, petition for REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, public concern requirement, suet against a law enforcement officer and free speech on no probable cause for the prosecution and retaliatory prosecution case and retaliatory arrest for an impermissible reason, which all have a hearing and my case subject matter did not and secret trials are not allowed in a free society,
ReplyDeletequalified immunity is based on probable cause being relevant but when there is no probable cause decided and the judiciary is overthrown on a matter that was already decided is there a president that needs to be set before the supreme court decision on the purposes of deciding if there is a qualified immunity needing to be assignee here since Helmar Lochmann is the one responsible for getting my grandson raped, while acting outside of his duties, while the District Attorney is holding the case in the court, who has a higher standard of immunities but even those are limited, and he cannot bring a case against me without somebody else filing upon the court, and certainly they must have had a conversation about me since all of them have ignored me thought they have had multiple emails form me and nobody, out of four attorneys who are responsible to decide the ‘best interest’, ever cared to measure my worth or ask me a single question or test the validity of why DHS are ignoring my caregiver relationship with me kin, which is not in the ‘best interests’ of their emotional needs at any level. Unless it has been decided that grandparents are not necessary at all but that would only come to bare if they never knew me or Shannon Stevens at all.
ReplyDeleteThe entire Oregon State Bill of Rights got tossed out the window when Helmar Lochmann sentenced my grand-kids right to a bloodline relationship null and void and he had no judicial seat or jurisdiction over the subject matter and not an appellate court and that is the equivalent of a tittle of attainder on its face and the District Attorney and the Oregon State Bar is fully advised.
ReplyDeleteAppellate court
ReplyDeleteAn appellate court, commonly called an appeals court, court of appeals, appeal court, court of the second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate under varying rules.
Professor Sheldon Nahmod covers the basics of section 1983 for lawyers. He discusses the elements of the section 1983 claim, individual immunities (absolute and qualified) and local government liability. It also includes Tenth Circuit cases of relevance to this particular audience. This presentation was given in December of 2013 to the New Mexico Defense Lawyers Association.
DeShaney v. Winnebago County; Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. DeShaney v. Winnebago County, 489 U.S. 189 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 22, 1989. The court held that a state government agency's failure to prevent child abuse by a custodial parent does not violate the child's right to liberty for the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
ReplyDeletePolice escorting DHS to the door to remove children during DHS involvement is not intended for the protection of children under the 14 Amendment and is not a Federal Constitutional Act, yet is used to gain Federal Funding for the state, which is redundant, and indicative police presence is a deterrence, under the use of force continuum, and is use of force used for the protection of the bureaucrat, then not available for an independent investigative body after harm comes to our nations heirs since they owe us not duty in the use of protection against private harm, and since child protection was privatized it brings up multiple counts of conflict of laws, and since the 911 or non-emergency police cannot find the kids without going through the DHS it seems to act as an advanced warning system, where the crime of child rape can be covered up by the time a police officer reaches the victims to make a repot since the CPS caseworker does not stop by but one a month and there is not panic button or surveillance by a family member of our nations heirs. Police need to be made available to investigate child rape in foster care without going through the DHS staff, since being responsible for helping get them in there, creating a special relationship with police and this nations heirs, and then can’t find them when an emergency does arise and since no oversight is available it is a violation in both directions in this case of my grandson and granddaughter.
Dates and times on all the paperwork is required for your review and my affidavit in the presence of a judicial review for congressional addendum to forbid that which is already decided by a judge that did not get appealed is on its face not for review by DHS when discretionary decisions are being made on the placement of kids with grandparents under family first legislation being ignored instead of respected.
ReplyDeleteMy grandkids have been harmed by what could have reasonably been foreseeing since it is available for DHS to see that the increase of harm rises while under the physical custody and control of the state when in opposite the statistics show rape and death is less likely to happen in the general population.
Maidgan vs Lavin. ADEA prohibits age discriminations, does not preclude the use of equal protection to allege age discrimination. But since the District Manager has said i am not doing business with DHS that may not apply since ‘not an employee either’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN8_ZcJFnnU&feature=youtu.be
Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Institute of Technology
LeBaron Marilyn shared a link.
ReplyDeleteYesterday at 7:31 AM
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020, 7:38 PM
To: DA@mcda.us; Karen.FEICKERT@ojd.state.or.us
Cc: OSB CAO Intake; Jessica L. Cheely
Edited and Revised
Social Worker Supervisory Staff make grandparents go to be RSVP'd to the Foster Care Education Program, that asks you what kids you want, (which is creepy when the Supervisory Staff can get E Certification as the hearsay from my daughter said was used to approve the foster home my grandson was allegedly raped in then not moved by Helmar Lochmann since the report to me came after the five days it required to make a determination, making it a couple weeks back, and then it is reported they are moved but not till i screamed an email into the inboxes of the attorneys, and none of this is reported to me while under the Supervision of Lochmann's pen, who did not ask me a single question about the care of my grand-kin, while he is reportedly crying in my daughters presence that my grandson was harmed do to his decisions while saying he did not screen the foster father well enough, and he still gets to make the decisions while claiming liability, since it was called an emergency placement according to my daughter, which is what the grandparents are known to get,
then made to RSVP and take foster care education classes, which is misuse of his power, since he is not allowed to place my kin in a foster home that does not uphold the federal screening criteria, which could not possible be the same standard of that which makes allowances for actual family members, which i have been denied, while he later is abusing the rules that apply to an affidavit while also trying to write affidavits intended to indemnify the DHS from suit to impeach my grandson's outcry, which is a conflict of interest compounded in three directions where an inherent conflict of interest already exists, between actors that are strangers not related to your kin) while denying you on something a judge already overturned himself, when he was the same judge that tried the case, and let you go when the DHS was trying to keep you from your kids, and grand-kids, which is the case here,
ReplyDeleteon a future crime against a bureaucrat, that never happened yet, but got my parental rights removed by a long interference process, that had a really weak case, according to the Public Defender, but when the extension of time requested by the CPS was denied it shows the duly elected seated judiciary must have thought that that babies and people no longer pregnant are safe around me, unless it was true on the premise pregnant bureaucrats, as alleged, were the only ones in danger, since at that time while it was relevant it was said, "We don't think your mother is going to hurt you or the baby" while my grandbaby was still in the womb, yet prior to that allegation that pregnant bureaucrats were in danger, there was another rape in foster care case pending, yet it was leveraged to get a seconds set of double continuances that should have been dismissed since the presumption of innocence is violated is to get a case to trial on the premise of a future crime against a pregnant bureaucrat, on the DHS imposed diagnosis, without an expert witness, or a doctor visit to get a diagnosis by proper means, or a pretrial opportunity to refute that allegation, while that was the case on Oath on Affirmation on the prophetic abilities of the District Attorney and approved by the same seated and duly elected judge, while the District Attorney intended to call that pregnant bureaucrat, when her accusations under my line of questioning was already impeached to be false on the matters of my son forcing them to refile, then also impeaching the other judge's prior decision to deny me my son on the mere presence of a letter sent out that was never allowed a refute, showing the judicial discretion has been delegated to the DHS, though also DEEMED COUNSEL by the Juvenile Justice Complex, and we do not go to retain them ourselves, when no personal contact was made with me directly within the five days allotted contact with me prior to writing that letter used in court, while the Juvenile Department was the seat that made all the other decisions on my daughter, where that subject matter has no bearing on the relationships in existence today, though DHS have used that history though a duly elected judicial seat did not during a time where age relevancy was the subject matter that has no relevancy to the subject matter of case presented to the Juvenile Justice Complex, and unless the Supervisory Staff of the DHS are an appellate process when not appealing the judicial decision in a timely manner in the past, it is abuse of process to use that subject matter today, when Supervisory Staff are not a duly elected judiciary on this matter now today when no relevancy on the merits of that past judicial decision is applied today, and the Juvenile Justice Complex is allowing that without regard to the actual history being presented to them since the discretion has been delegated to the DHS which makes that a preset disposition if not overturned since the prejudice to over come the decision of the seated judiciary is upon the DHS considering they could not come remove my grand-babies for over eleven years and now use that to deny me their presence in my home.
ReplyDeleteWho taught Helmar Lochmann he is a judge? And who should have? Failure to train and qualified and absolute immunity. Proximate cause plainly obvious case and liability.
ReplyDelete