Forced Adoption Exposed

A definition, incarceration, and synonyms for your knowledge and understanding particularly placing emphasis upon synonyms of imprisonment; captivity, custody, and incarceration, as it pertains to duress and the phrase Babylonian Captivity as compared to Babylonian Whore of the Book of Revelation 8:13 in fulfilling the Biblical Prophesy human beings would be transported to be sold as slaves by merchants internationally as they are today.

9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,

10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas, that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.

11 And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:

12 The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble,

13 And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.

14 And the fruits that thy soul lusted after are departed from thee, and all things which were dainty and goodly are departed from thee, and thou shalt find them no more at all.

15 The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing,

'Shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you' as is done by BAR Members ignoring the uses SYNONYMS while saying, "Oh that interpretation does not apply” or “That is arguable” yet don't argue it because it would cost them so much cash.

2 Peter 2:3

Considering human beings as merchandise is not pleasing in 2 Peter 2:3 “And through covetousness: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.”

Incarceration [inˌkärsəˈrāSH(ə)n] NOUN

the state of being confined in prison; imprisonment.

"the public would not be served by her incarceration"

synonyms:

imprisonment · internment · confinement · detention · custody · captivity · restraint · penal servitude · hard labor · time · porridge · chokey · durance · duress

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 7:23 PM
To: US Institute Of Science; sabrina.leach@dhsoha.state.or.us
Cc: Victoria Couvillion; Nolan Stevens
Subject: FW: Adoption Listing

Dear Sabrina Leach,

How much do you know about when a case is supposed to be built prior to sentencing being sought, and how much in your personal knowledge on my grandchildren’s matters are relevant to sentencing under a penal code which would result in almost two years time incarceration under your personal possession dated prior to 2018 that shows cause to merit both my grandkids should be adversely affected by facing the equivalent of the loss of all blood ties and kin, as in what did we do prior to DHS taking physical control of them and of which is in your reports that you personally verified by a criminal prosecutor as valid cause to completely isolate family from one another which is then, by accumulated technicalities of color of law to impose without a trial by jury of peers to impose death penalty of criminal action against two kids ages six and twelve?

I have sent verification that neither Nolan Stevens nor Victoria Couvillion or anyone in Oregon and related to then are being prosecuted for a crime let alone sentenced to multiple counts of death penalties.

I finally got a firm decisive factual statement from Choice Adoption (Whew! All that effort they make to be careful to act under a pretense to privacy and security built into their written responses while kids are shooting into my inbox for my viewing. But, I am told that I’m at the right agency and that Victoria is not with their agency, but confirmation that she was never listed with them is still waiting for an answer. Where else she might be listed is not available to me either. According to  Julie Webb, Victoria’s not listed in their Choice Adoption listing (SEE BOTTOM CUT AND PASTED IN**) and they claim, “Our agency cannot help you and has nothing to do with this’, and contact somebody in DHS, but don’t say who is the information I got.

Posts

Liverpool Protest against Corporate trafficking of missing kids…

“Where are our children!?!”

The warning signs were all reported. It is well known the 'care' system is trafficking children while my grandkids are controlled by them. The signs are reported and they just move them to a new foster home landing them in yet another foster home from the improperly screened home where the worst things were reported, yet they just get moved again. The risk of harm to our nation's heirs is greater while under the control of the SYSTEM fully known to all who participate in displacing our kids, yet not given to kin where they are safer. The money could be why or 'the why' is just something you don't want to know.

https://youtu.be/KQgJpnXvEj8

Rampant Breach of Fiduciary Duty

https://youtu.be/dt3IlvrHt5A

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 4:50 PM
To: Handley Ashley B; Marilyn LeBaron; sabrina.leach2@state.or.us
Subject: RE: Adoption Listing

Thank you

I’ve been sending it to sabrina.leach2@state.or.us <sabrina.leach2@state.or.us>; No wonder!... !!

From: Handley Ashley B
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 4:48 PM
To: Marilyn LeBaron; Marilyn LeBaron
Subject: RE: Adoption Listing

Marilyn,

The worker is Sabrina Leach and her email is sabrina.leach@dhsoha.state.or.us and phone number is (971)673-6800.  Please direct further communication to her.

Thanks,
Ashley

From: Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@live.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 2:47 PM
To: Handley Ashley B <ASHLEY.B.HANDLEY@dhsoha.state.or.us>; Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Adoption Listing

Think twice before clicking on links or opening attachments. This email came from outside our organization and might not be safe. If you are not expecting an attachment, contact the sender before opening it.

Teen 01-13-07        Victoria Couvillion

Sibling 05-20-13     Nolan Stevens

Mom 01-19-89        Melanie LeBaron

Thank you I can’t keep up!

Here attorney would be helpful as well since in the past the attorneys got things done quicker when the supervisor was failing them. The original one is off the case of my grandson Amelia as well as about 4 social workers who keep changing so much like the prosecutor and public Defender are different and their support staff. Am always catching up

From: Handley Ashley B
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 7:20 AM
To: Marilyn LeBaron; Marilyn LeBaron
Subject: RE: Adoption Listing

Marilyn,

Do you know who your granddaughter’s caseworker is?  If not, please give me her name and DOB and I’ll look it up for you.  It would also be helpful to have your granddaughter’s mother’s name and DOB if you have that information. 

Thanks,

Ashley

From: Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@live.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2020 10:39 PM
To: Handley Ashley B <ASHLEY.B.HANDLEY@dhsoha.state.or.us>; Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Adoption Listing

Think twice before clicking on links or opening attachments. This email came from outside our organization and might not be safe. If you are not expecting an attachment, contact the sender before opening it.

Why is my granddaughter getting headshots from a lying down position with dilated pupils while in the custody of the CPS?

From: Handley Ashley B
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 8:16 AM
To: Marilyn LeBaron; Marilyn LeBaron
Subject: RE: Adoption Listing

If you have a relative child in foster care, you’d need to contact the caseworker.  You can apply to be a foster parent for your relative, but the first step would be to speak with the caseworker and let them know you are interested.

Thanks,

Ashley

From: Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@live.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 8:24 PM
To: Handley Ashley B <ASHLEY.B.HANDLEY@dhsoha.state.or.us>; Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Adoption Listing

Think twice before clicking on links or opening attachments. This email came from outside our organization and might not be safe. If you are not expecting an attachment, contact the sender before opening it.

So what other option is there for blood relative besides adoption?

From: Handley Ashley B
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 2:33 PM
To: Marilyn LeBaron; Marilyn LeBaron
Subject: RE: Adoption Listing

Hi Marilyn,

If you have an adoption home study, you can create a profile.  The folks that run that site, will contact your certifier to get a copy of your adoption home study in order to confirm your profile.  If you have questions, please contact your certifier.

Thanks,

Ashley Handley

Foster Home Certifier

Oregon Department of Human Services, Child Welfare, District 9

Phone: (541)506-5263

Fax: (541)296-8722

From: Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 1:45 PM
To: Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@live.com>
Subject: Adoption Listing

Think twice before clicking on links or opening attachments. This email came from outside our organization and might not be safe. If you are not expecting an attachment, contact the sender before opening it.

Victoria Couvillion is listed to be adopted

I would like to see her profile, please…

**)**)CHOICE ADOPTION

Julie,

So what you are saying is she was never photographed or listed by any Heart Gallery photographer or listed at any time? If, not, where else do I look for her posting?

From: Julie Webb
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 3:20 PM
To: Marilyn LeBaron
Subject: Re: Heart gallery Victoria Couvillion

We are the correct agency.  Your granddaughter is not in our agency.  Please contact the DHS worker if you are wanting to connect with someone about this.  Our agency cannot help you and has nothing to do with this.

Thank you, Julie Webb

Director of Adoption Programs

Hours - M, Tu, Th 9-5, Fr 9-1

www.choiceadoptions.org

503-232-1211

Cell phone 971-344-5651

fax 503-232-4756

12901 SE 97th Ave, Ste. 150

Clackamas, OR 97015

**CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE***
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee or it appears from the context or otherwise that you have received this e-mail in error, please advise me immediately by reply e-mail, keep the contents confidential, and immediately delete the message and any attachments from your system.

On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 10:46 PM Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@live.com> wrote:

Why is my granddaughter getting headshots from a lying down position with dilated pupils while in the custody of the CPS?

Why do the Treasonous get to rule while we have to lay our head down to die under the lethal use of the weaponized pen

Marilyn LeBaron Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:43 PM

Politics in the judicial seat.

Notice of Criminal Liability

Notice of Capital Felony Treason

Claim of Harm

Deprivation of Rights

Fraud

Violation of the Oath of Office

So if I am not required to present myself and the District Attorney did not have a case presented to him why am I sitting here with an empty nest? Well, Linda Hughes wants final approval she is inserting herself as a potential opponent – where no mediation is available between her and me – and no way to appeal the ownership of her stance - when she is supposed to be a neutral seat yet reserving herself the right to ‘refuse’ the opinion of the ‘other’ judiciary without any privilege passing that discretion away from her seat then pretending to remain independent by reserving the final veto that belongs to my jury and has no access to the facts and not a violation of canon but is a way to circumvent a bunch of ‘impeachment’ laws since she would be required to act as an accuser, an attorney, and even be one herself, while DHS already had hunted us and she just might be there to finish the job, take the kill shot, as she already has the posture set for her to be able to do.

So, according to the law used to give notice of lack of jurisdiction has a Black woman telling us, white people, you are the ‘New Indentured Negro Slave’ on a plantation that grows no cotton and offers employment of your choice if you are able to compete for the jobs and there is no guarantee since the negotiator of that 'BOND' contract enslaving you has no way to fulfil a promise unless everybody else is a slave of his too, a TAX base con, that can force no one to offer employment' (since it is a privilege) and it is defined that way as moot so not considerable as a ‘negotiation’ tool to enslave you when your BOND cannot be discharged, no one is by law forced to offer employment, and neither to the stakeholders if they go bankrupt your BOND is not discharged, which by other means is enforcing a, “You are not allowed to discriminate while they thin out our population, displacing it like we did the Indians, allow excess immigration, pay them less, send our jobs over seas, and then indenture us AND rape our kids, while they deny us our status, the right to hold a pen, and under their own rules forces us to take people we don't want into the employees' pool, but since no one has to offer anybody employment the contract is void on its face, a con job, so if it is void, moot, why is it not contestable since contracts must come with a guarantee, and my daughter was never a federal employee?” So there goes the right to employment (that is only a privilege wile immigrants take the jobs) and the right to work is dead, the status of man is dead, and the family bloodline is dead as well while the foreign bankers want the money from the taxes so why would we who are governed from across the sea need to be allowed to ‘work’ without being taxed by them who own our BOND?

Well, it would be a slave master’s position to enforce a BOND on an indentured servant that traded 7 years hard labor for passage from Oregon to Virginia so he could stake a claim to land and agree to be taxed by the plantation master for setting him up while contracting with the master by choice. But if he changed his mind and wanted out of the agreement, since the plantation master already delivered his end, ahead of time, and when seeking relief in contract law on party must be in breach, and you have to put it back the way it was, so upon that logic, taking the indentured servant back to before the contract, by round trip to drop him off in Oregon, without just cause, would incur more damages to the plantation master, and the investment would be lost with future damages as well, and that would not qualify as consideration for relief unless the indentured servant was severely abused, so the indentured servant must perform. No way to contest it or settle it or get out of the contract unless somebody could buy you out, compensate your master, and your BOND can ‘be sold’ ‘not the BONDED but the contracted labor’, ‘your word is your BOND’, and you could go to work for someone else.

But, insurance policy BOND enforcement my daughter tried to contest it and does not want to use her insurance policy since she believes her kids are being harmed, and fired her attorney, and asked me to fire her attorney, and the technicalities they use are a chokehold of death, and invalid since she did not offer her kids into servitude to the emolument clause, and usury of her kids does not discharge a BOND since the bond is not backed by the 'slavery of kid standard', instead of currency backed gold standard, while having kids have open-ended unlimited funding of printed money called Title 4e and she has no way to discharge her BOND debt that is bought and sold and is irrelevant to her kids as a cash cow while the judge is ignoring my grandkids are getting raped. She and the District Attorney know innocent until proven guilty buys them time and they do not have to respond until the foster rapist is indicted and just move the kids and they don’t get love from a family member and put with strangers again and more emotional harm befalls them when needing to be comforted by family, and can only get stalk holm syndrome now since the District Attorney did not prosecute the Social Workers, while he is offering ‘exculpatory’ evidence to shield them and the foster rapist from prosecution and directly is giving reasonable doubt to prevent an indictment – while Linda Hughes is by her cannon not allowed to vouch for the credibility of the witnesses and does anyway and sentences my grandkids and me to six more months estrangement and allows her to be trafficked over state lines into Utah while the prosecutor has contacts here. I am denied a single phone call for no good reason ‘AT ALL’ for over an entire year. And that may as well be a jail sentence without a trial and no one will comfort me or refute the allegations of rape when they are the strangers and have the position of right and will not offer me an account while the mother is manipulated, emotionally tortured, and left to die. DHS holding technicalities that have nothing to do with the Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness they are supposed to be guarding, supposedly under the general welfare of the public portion of government duties, which is subverted by their applications while we are not fully advised of the timeline of their use and the NoL, is really what is used, and the due process rights are toppled, and that technology is refuted it now or you forfeit and you have thirty days which is not a day in court but a con job to force us to death using ‘insurance’ they are the prosecution adjusters of on a tittle of attainder in disguise, and has subverted under the direction of Bill Clinton and whoever wrote the Reasonable Efforts clauses to subvert our fifth amendment rights and our blood ties making Linda Hughes a Treasonous pirate, since it is her Oath to provide a trial by jury and they just say, that does not apply since it is contracted we don’t have to honor you while we end your life and take your kids and has ceased to be an American, committed Capital Felony Treason as a pattern and practice, she deserved to die instead of my granddaughter, my grandson, and my daughter, or my son in law, or me or the other grandmother. She is not our plantation master, not our owner, and not a possessor of my daughter’s BOND so cannot assign principle to the attorneys since they do not collect the debt of the bond and was not a party to the original agreement, and not considered a party yet are cashing in on my daughter's bond-like financial cannibals and severing my heirs from family endangering them, and it is not allowed to 'assign' or allow the 're-assign', and ‘re-assign’, and re-assign’ of Counsel since only the owner of an item of property can designate 'principle' and neither can Congress which is all the DHS is. An ad - hoc hoard of people running around practicing law over principle as an agent of the property of the BOND owners called ‘stakeholders’. So who was on the phone calls that got the schools shut down? That is a good place to look for the treason trail all the way to the bankers - using the pen as a lethal force without due process while we lose our shield of due process and our right to wield the pen in equal force and that practice of law is 'regulated by the state bar' which is not allowed - the practice of law is equally available to all but my pen on my own family is dishonored, usurped by DHS under the direction of the BAR that makes lots of money for the trouble they cause us regulating the practice of ad - hoc lawyers (ambulance chasing for insurance policies to prosecute us with and that is illegal for the bar association to do yet do it under their second hand 'out of sight' supervision while no one advising the DHS will present themselves to me even when I request they do - so I can hold them accountable for Treason) And no one will advise the people or print up pre-drafted forms for us to use to respond with. But, in my case “I am made wrongfully irrelevant”. But these hidden parties, whom I did not retain to advise me are my actual opponent, and the opponent of family, and direct the illiterate masses of DHS employees to do their 'bidding' as AUTHORITATIVE ADMINISTRATORS yet not actually affected or involved and have no adverse effects nor can be called as a witness or adjoined, and say that the actual people suffering have the same status that defines themselves, and do not put their names on their work when it is a felony not to identify yourself - and when I asked for the names of the attorneys on the matters Wendy Polzel set before me she aided a felony against me and those people must now S.T.F.U. while they benefit financially for that manipulation while they aid the cover-up of the rape of my grandkids, do not bring the assailant to justice and continue to get paid and have absolute immunities while passing the pen and continue to do so against my objections, my daughter's objections, while the people getting fat with the increased payout are aiding a foreign banking system that could give a rats ass about our nations worth and is another act of treason JFK fell after sounding a warning telling we were being invaded from within and that is an act of war and Linda Hughes can just find a big fat tall tree and hang herself while I offer her a chair to stand on and if she loses her nerve I will gladly kick it out from under her since she is still using my grandkids to make the establishment fat while in violation of the Oath of Office ... etc... etc... on technicalities not relevant to outweigh its worth - under color of law... that has no penal code and is used to shred my family leaving us to die to one another and literally watch my daughter die in the streets while she needed hospitalization and was raped regularly to have a place to rest her head while I'm not allowed to have her here or I wind up in the streets too. Brutality, injustice, violations after violations of law, logic, and all for power and technicalities that no one could learn fast enough to prevent the harm they cause us and is oppression that outweighs their purpose making the seat of the juvenile justice complex a flood gate opening up for hell instead of the gatekeeper of justice by an independent judicial seat and is unconstitutional

Why I write to you, sir,

Jeffrey G Robinson,

Goes to what Donald J Trump said, “As Written”. Uh, this guy has some skills and is just detailed at pointing out we have a class system like the KKK was talking about under a T.V. interview designed to make us disregard the subject matter and looks like to me, I infer, deliberate reverse psychology used to subvert the critical thinking of the viewers and offered ‘prejudice’ instead of lawful interpretations over what solutions were available. ‘AS WRITTEN’ the Constitution gives us a way to say, “Your third party, don’t care if you are a seated duly elected judge” “You have no discretion on the matter so mind your own business S.T.F.U. D.U.M.B. A.S.S. which is what we need to do to the APA P.I.C.O. running B.O.N.D. fraud all across this world … Equal protection of the Law does not translate to Equal protection of statute especially those that have no penalty attached for not applying them making them void under the law… and no equal protection is offered when no liability for its violation is available reducing the people to ‘zero teeth’ in battles against the use of the weaponized pen.

How to tell a judge, “You are none of mine”.

My daughter was told, “You cannot contest the contract” and that is a big fat fucking god damned treasonous Human Trafficking lie told her on the matters of DHS Vs LeBaron family, my daughter contorting herself, to protect her rights while Reasonable Efforts is directly designed to subvert them, and she only had thirty days to refute the claim. So the rest of the process is just a mock-up with no trial while her kids are raped and she is left to die in the street while the family is isolated, alienated, utterly destroyed, and available to intimidation into silence and used for sex slaves. That is how it is done in other drug lord ran nations. Silence under threat of death. No allegation of harm or jury trial and the whole family set asunder and emotional death of us all for the payout of insurance policy we are forced to buy that is a price on the heads of your kids. A bag of money that turns into a bigger bag of money once DHS grabs your kids and they ‘divert monies to themselves’ at a hight payout than if you were getting TANIF Title 4e UNLIMITED FUNDS when some stated limit how long you can get food stamps and the barer fo the BOND (the person BONDED to the bond are not the same) while no lawful disclosure was made to its use or what was available to discharge it – while the judge says, “You cannot contest its validity” and that ***** needs to die instead of us.

I DO INFER IT IS NEEDING A REFUTE.

Why I write to you, sir,

I suddenly found better words to explain why I write to you.

Abraham put the military subordinate to civil and put us under Marshal Rule. Is that not a military police state? That makes you responsible for what is going on in our streets. The frontline. That makes you subordinate to a corrupt chain of command. Your leaders the judiciary is nothing more than a banker mafia infiltration system while subverting both state and federal constitutions by the abuse of the fourteenth amendment. And now we are being taxed by international foreign policies. Our BOND bought and sold. Our children used to enrich the state and the collateral of that bond is left to die while her children raped when collateral is supposed to be locked in a vault and secured for future business deals subject to voluntary freezing and discharge upon delivery of stipulated terms gotten under full advisement.

I sent an email and got a response… Just in case that reply had has something to do with what was marked TOP SECRET (U//LES) – and DON’T EMAIL ME AGAIN – message from the F.B.I. had anything to do with human backed collateralized BOND slavery used to ENRICH THE STATE my theory of the pool of stakeholder banker types as a pool of where the C.I.A. and F.B.I. should have looked when bombarding us with the theories of who shot JFK – while our current money is backed by BONDED FLESH while it is called and used like ‘lethal prosecutor insurance instrument’, and shred the fabric of society using BOND ‘debt transfers’ and leaving the BONDED to die in the streets as their payout to and ‘insurance’ claim when the right to work was abolished by Taft, and the Taft Tart act is also violated by the bar, and forcing people to buy ‘insurance’ is inviting mob mentality enforcement to that collective end, and coupled to the fact income has not been lawfully defined as derived from ‘work’ (when work cannot be TAXED), and historically being TAXED, and what being taxed meant was governed while our money was backed by gold, notes, and a ‘rule of NO DIRECT TAX AUTHORIZED’), to later have Abraham Lincoln shot when fighting the advancement of the Central Banks, without today’s economy degrade to its backing TAXABLES (our labor OR FUTURE WORTH in BOND), while we force everyone to be ‘employees under civil rights’ (WHICH IS ONLY A PREVILEGE) and nobody can force anyone to offer that stipulated privilege making the BOND void and a con job on us by foreigners and when JFK tried to return us to the Gold Standard and got shot after trying to warn us in his President and the Press Speech, was taken out as our watchman on the wall that fell sounding a horn clearly telling us ‘We have an enemy within’ and asked the press to take extraordinary war time precautions, and now all we have is Hitler style FAKE NEWS and slander destroying our nations moral leaving people to think all leadership is corrupt, “So if you can't beat them or respect them you may as well join them” and this is spread into the minds of our developing youth, which follows the wartime policy of ‘corrupt the youth’ which assists in the breakdown of the future morals of our nation giving room and way to criminal minds without honor or respect for the law, to on the other hand strike down those who confront the symptoms, while trying to do something about it, like JFK and Senator Nancy Schaefer who were political figures, while our current president is saying, “Drain the swamp”, “Make America Great Again”, and in his State of the Union Address he said “As written” when offering guidance as to how our Constitution should be respected when that is a qualifying term that the attorneys may not want to hear and makes me wonder, “Who helped him write his speech’. And most people don’t read judicial decisions to understand it’s worth and while its interpretation is left to attorneys who are saying it is irrelevant in the uses we suffer under in civil court, which our families are torn apart by the hands of the INCORPORATED post De Facto STATE, and the vicious circle cannot be broken if we do not educate our children and have a lawfully trained citizen – since directly on that point the attorneys leave it up to us while our pens weigh nothing in the courts – when directly there the state cannot regulate the practice of law but is by limiting our power while being forced to be represented by the attorney of the judiciary's choice. The vicious cycle where the technicalities escape our attention is not properly protected or argued over in court...

And the Executive orders he is signing – well who is the author of those executive orders? I have to ask since I don’t think he draws up all his business contracts himself like most of our corporations since he had dismissed irreverently the allegation he violated the emoluments clause while showing his knowledge of its application when expressing his thoughts to refute the insults he took over its alleged violation ‘for renting out hotel rooms’.

I’ve heard people say the F.B.I. stopped a bank from printing its own gold-backed dollar and saw that dollar in print it had gold interlaced into the art and they got robbed and their collateral was destroyed sort of what DHS is doing to us on the mass – but the kids are too young to be bonded or used as if 'delivery of goods' to discharge a debt so the BOND is not respected the relief is sought on the wrong item of property and DHS is not operational like a car insurance policy and is BOND INSURANCE FRUAD destroying our family bond and by federal regulations ‘strangers have more rights to your blood than your next of kin’ which is the case since the policy adjuster does not make any money unless you are alienated while your risk of harm is unreasonably elevated for the payout that is bigger once your blood ties with your relatives are by design destroyed.

Donald Trump's entire 2019 State of the Union address | Full speech on CNN

The President and The Press

Democratic Terrorism Archive

"The very word "’TOP’ secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes, or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know." http://millercenter.org/president/spe...

"’TOP’ secrecy" <- I just couldn't resist… so maybe you should find out the facts the president said a fully informed citizen should know since you hold our citizen arrest powers but are told they belong to the DHS. And the mafia insurance enforcers at the front door.

Wouldn’t you like to know what was on John F Kennedy's mind while he was writing his speech?

What I don’t get is if it is HER OATH OF OFFICE why she gets to ignore it if we don’t make timely objections when they are overturning the jury saying ‘we can’t weigh fact and law’ so the jury is ignored. This double mind application of hoe do I object to the violations if my natural rights have been subverted so the attorney can sell my grandkids to a potential pedophile or sex trafficker when everyone else has been approved by a search engine that can be edited and doe not really offer full disclosure and a criminal background search is moot since the DHS opened my file and sent me a new name and names can be changed Identities assumed and you can hide your name from search engines like Joshua Lee Murray did hiding he was my next-door neighbor and that his mother had incorporation for ‘passionate youth’ and judge Avera has an LLC called fancy pants in Las Vegas and that is what you call children back in his day and he is the one that let max r wall enter a pre-conviction of future crime and both are potential human traffickers since Judge Horner and Max R Wall share a phone number out of Florida in common and shared a law firm once and I know they both know what a conflict of interest is. They representing two men that were tried for the same crime and split up the case and had two trials. 

Then Wall does what he did to me when having criminal prosecution experience and defended people who by hindsight were accused of an actual event. And me, the Public defender did NOTHING. And innocent until you can be accused of something the has not happened yet does not apply and that secures a trial date with perjury called the oath of affirmation that should have gotten dismissed but is still used to kill my grandkids today.

And you can go put Judge Avera and Max r Wall in front of a firing squat for me too cuz back then I had no idea what I was looking at when Judge Horner had recused – way into the case after being bombarded with my poetic hate mail - but I did not know Max R Wall was one of Judge Horner’s best friends all the way back to the days they lived in corrupt mafia ran Florid and did not know what hit me while he committed Capital Felony Treason to save Judge Horner's ass since Horner was liable and cruel and evil. So, Judge Avera -----------------------------redacted, and -------------------------, it looks like to me they have contacts in ---------,------------, which look to me like ------------------------------ from Oregon, well they are all acting like Treasonous scumbag Human Traffickers

My daughter is a material witness and they just leave her in the streets doing whatever she needs to do to survive.

Federal Education is a farce it only assists in the cycle of subverting our constitution since the attorneys leave it to the people to defend with a limited regulated pen that is not welcome in court forcing us to retain them that do not uphold and defend. 

The treason spelt out for you all the judges sitting there knowing we are BOND slaves sit with folded hands failing to uphold and defend which is supposed to be our front line and not the invasion point for the foreign bankers

In Propria Persona, Sui Juris

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

CLASSES OF CITIZENSHIP

     1. The Constitution for the United States of America recognizes several classes of people who exist in this Union of States, as described in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 (1:2:3).

     2. This Court is herewith mandated to take judicial notice of the Constitution for the United States of America, the Constitution of the California Republic, the Statutes at Large of the United States of America, and all case law presented herein, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Evidence, Section 201, et seq., and Article 4, Section 1 (4:1) of the Constitution for the United States of America (1787).

     3. Excluding "Indians not taxed", since they are not under consideration in this matter, we are left with two other classes of individuals defined in 1:2:3 of the U.S. Constitution, to wit: "free Persons" and "three-fifths of all other Persons".

     4. The term "three-fifths of all other Persons" referred to the Black slave population and all others of races other than "white" who could not and did not have Common Law Citizenship of one of the several States of the Union, at the time the Constitution was adopted. (For an in-depth analysis of this fact, see the cases of Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393 (1856); U.S. v. Rhodes, 1 Abbott 39; Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 74 (1873); Van Valkenburg v. Brown, 43 Cal. 43 (1872); U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898); and K. Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 239 (1927); et al.)

     5. The Thirteenth Amendment, officially and lawfully ratified in 1865, served only to abolish slavery within the corporate United States. No race other than the white race could claim Common Law Citizenship of one of the several States, which Citizenship was afforded the protection of the Constitutions. (This is discussed in depth in Dred Scott v. Sandford supra).

     6. Further proof that this argument applies to the State of California is found in Article 2, Section 1 of the Original California Constitution (1849) which states in part: "Every WHITE male citizen of the United States, and every WHITE male citizen of Mexico ..." [emphasis added]. Obviously, this provision excluded all other races from being Common Law Citizens of California and from having the full protection of the State and Federal Constitutions. This was the case even before the famous Dred Scott decision. It is most notable that the California Constitution was altered after the so-called 14th Amendment so as to delete all references to "white" male Citizens, and today it refers only to "persons".

     7. Following the decision in Dred Scott supra, Congress allegedly enacted and ratified the so-called 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America to afford "statutory citizenship" status to those who were deemed excluded from this Common Law status under the Supreme Court's interpretations of the Constitution. This event unfolds in detail in the case law surrounding the 13th and 14th Amendments, with a very significant difference which is of great importance to the instant matter.

     8. Such cases as the Slaughter House Cases supra; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908); K. Tashiro v. Jordan supra; among many others, all declared that under the Law, "there is a clear distinction between a Citizen of a State and a citizen of the United States".

     9. A famous French statesman, Fredrick Bastiat, noted in the early 1800s that if freedom were to be destroyed in America, it would result from the question of slavery and from the failure to equate all races and all humans as "equals". The Accused is not responsible for the errors of the past and elects not to dwell at length on this subject. However, the so-called 14th Amendment must now be discussed and, as abhorrent as it may sound, it is a matter of fact and law that this is the position (intentional or unintentional) which forms the basis of the law with which we live today.

     10. In brief, as a result of the 13th Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the Union of States known as the United States of America was founded by "white" people and for "white" people, and only "white" people could enjoy the Rights, Privileges and Immunities afforded and protected by the Federal and State Constitutions. This fact is most eloquently set forth in Dred Scott v. Sandford supra, in stating that "... if a black nation were to adopt our Constitution verbatim, they would have the absolute right to restrict the right of citizenship only to the black population if they chose to do so ...."

     11. To overcome the decision in Dred Scott supra, the so-called 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America was allegedly ratified "at the point of a bayonet", and was "declared" to be a part of that Constitution in the year 1868. However, an examination of the ratification by the several States shows that various improper proceedings occurred which, in effect, nullify the Amendment. "I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its faculties, could honestly hold that the amendment was properly approved and adopted." State v. Phillips, 540 P.2d. 936 (1975); see also Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d. 266 (1968) for historical details.

     12. Accused Common Law Citizen [DEFENDANT] will not digress into an in-depth dissertation of the bogus ratification of the so-called 14th Amendment, because the only necessary point to be made here is that the so-called 14th Amendment had a profound effect upon the Union of these United States, and this effect continues to the present time.

     13. The Original Constitution for the United States of America (1787) refers to Common Law Citizens of the several States in the Preamble, in Article 4, Section 2, Clause 1 (4:2:1), and in numerous other sections. Always, the word Citizen is spelled with an upper-case "C" when referring to this class of Common Law Citizen as a "Citizen of the United States", i.e., as a "Citizen of one of the United States". See People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870).

14. In contrast, the so-called 14th Amendment utilizes a lower-case "c" to distinguish this class of citizens whose status makes them "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" as a statutory "citizen of the United States". Similarly, "Person" was spelled with an UPPER-CASE "P" prior to the so-called 14th Amendment, as opposed to "person" with a lower-case "p" in Section 1 of the amendment itself

     15. In law, each word and each use of the word, including its capitalization or the lack of capitalization, has a distinctive legal meaning. In this case, there never was the specific status of a "citizen of the United States" until the advent of the 1866 Civil Rights Act (14 Stat. 27) which was the forerunner of the so-called 14th Amendment. (See Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855). The definition of the "United States" is discussed in the next section of this Memorandum.)

     16. Before the so-called 14th Amendment was declared to be a part of the U.S. Constitution, there were a number of State "residents" who could not enjoy "Common Law Citizenship" in one of the several States under that Constitution, because they were not "white". The effect of the so-called 14th Amendment was to give to all those residents a citizenship in the nation-state that was created by Congress in the year 1801 and named the "United States". (See 2 Stat. 103; see also U.S. v. Eliason, 41 U.S. 291, 16 Peter 291, 10 L.Ed. 968 (1842); U.S. v. Simms, 1 Cranch 255, 256 (1803).) The original Civil Rights Act of 1866 was not encompassing enough, so it was expanded in the year 1964; but the legal effect was the same, namely, to grant to "citizens of the United States" the equivalent rights of the Common Law white Citizens of the several States. In reality, however, those "equivalent rights" are limited by various statutes, codes and regulations and can be changed at the whim of Congress.

     17. Under the Federal and State Constitutions, "... We the People" did not surrender our individual sovereignty to either the State or Federal Government. Powers "delegated" do not equate to powers surrendered. This is a Republic, not a democracy, and the majority cannot impose its will upon the minority simply because some "law" is already set forth. Any individual can do anything he or she wishes to do, so long as it does not damage, injure or impair the same Right of another individual. The concept of a corpus delicti is relevant here, in order to prove some "crime" or civil damage.

     18. The case law surrounding the 13th and 14th Amendments all rings with the same message: "These amendments did not change the status of Common Law Citizenship of the white Citizens of one of the several States of the Union" (now 50 in number).

     19. This goes to the crux of the controversy because, under the so-called 14th Amendment, citizenship is a privilege and not a "Right". (See American and Ocean Ins. Co. v. Canter, 1 Pet. 511 (1828); Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924).)

     20. It was never the intent of the so-called 14th Amendment to change the status of the Common Law Citizens of the several States. (See People v. Washington, 36 C. 658, 661 (1869); French v. Barber, 181 U.S. 324 (1900); MacKenzie v. Hare, 60 L.Ed. 297). Intent is always decisive and conclusive on the courts.

     21. However, over the years, the so-called 14th Amendment has been used to create a fiction and to destroy American freedom through administrative regulation. How is this possible? The answer is self-evident to anyone who understands the law, namely, a "privilege" can be regulated to any degree, including the alteration and even the revocation of that privilege.

     22. Since the statutory status of "citizen of the United States, subject to the jurisdiction thereof" (1866 Civil Rights Act) is one of privilege and not of Right, and since the so-called 14th Amendment mandates that both Congress and the several States take measures to protect these new "subjects", then both the Federal and State governments are mandated to protect the privileges and immunities of ONLY these "citizens of the United States". (See Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906).)

     23. Of course, the amount of protection afforded has a price to pay, but the important fact is that the "privilege" of citizenship under the so-called 14th Amendment can be regulated or revoked because it is a "privilege" and not a RIGHT. It is here that the basic, fundamental concept of "self-government" turns into a King "governing his subjects".

     24. One can be called a "freeman", but that was a title of nobility granted by a King. To be really free encompasses a great deal more than grants of titles and privileges.

     25. Over the years since 1787, because our forefathers would have rather fought than bow to involuntary servitude, the "powers that be" have slowly and carefully used the so-called 14th Amendment and the Social Security Act to force primary State Citizenship into relative extinction, in the eyes of the courts. Nevertheless, this class of Common Law Citizens is not extinct yet; it is simply being ignored, in order to maintain and enlarge a revenue base for Congress.

     26. Since the State of California has been mandated by the so-called 14th Amendment to protect the statutory "citizens of the United States", and since the People in general have been falsely led to obtain "Social Security Numbers" as "U.S. citizens", the State of California, under prompting by the Federal Government, has used the licensing and registration of vehicles and people under the "equal protection" clause for the "Public Welfare" to perpetuate a scheme of revenue enhancement and regulation. This scheme has been implemented, in part, by promoting the fiction that the Common Law "Citizens of a State of the Union of several States" can be regulated to the same degree as statutory "citizens of the United States".

     27. I, [DEFENDANT], contend that both the State of California and the Federal Government (known as the "United States") are committing an act of GENOCIDE upon the Common Law State Citizens of the several States by perpetrating and perpetuating the "fiction of law" that everyone is a statutory "citizen of the United States".

     This allegation is now discussed by proving exactly what the "United States" means and in what capacity it now operates.

WHAT IS THE "UNITED STATES"?

     28. As we begin, it must be noted that this Common Law State Citizen alleges "fraud" by the State and Federal Governments for failing to inform the People that they are all included (through the use of a fiction of law) in that statutory class of persons called "citizens of the United States".

     29. The use of this fiction of law is particularly abhorrent in view of the fact that, when arbitrarily applied to everyone, the States lose their sovereignty, the Common Law Citizens of the State lose their fundamental rights, and the "citizens of the United States" lose the guidelines which established their "civil rights". The net effect is that these actions have lowered everyone's status to that of a "subject".

     30. There is a clear distinction between the meanings of "United States" and "United States of America". The People of America have been fraudulently and purposely misled to believe that these terms are completely synonymous in every context.

     31. In fact, in Law the term "United States of America" refers to the several States which are "united by and under the Constitution"; the term "United States" refers to that geographical area defined in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 (1:8:17) and in Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) of the Federal Constitution.

     32. In 1802, the "Congress Assembled" incorporated a geographical area known as the "United States". The "United States" is, therefore, a nation-state which is separate and unique unto itself. Furthermore, even though the "United States" is not a member of the "Union of States united by and under the Constitution", it is bound by that Constitution to restrict its activities in dealing with the several States and with the Common Law Citizens of those States. Under 1:8:17 and 4:3:2 of the Constitution for the United States of America (1787), Congress has exclusive power to legislate and regulate the inhabitants of its geographical territory and its statutory "citizens" under the so-called 14th Amendment, wherever they are "resident", even if they do inhabit one of the 50 States of the Union.

     33. The term "United States" has always referred to the "Congress Assembled", or to those geographical areas defined in 1:8:17 and 4:3:2 in the U.S. Constitution. The proof of this fact is found in the Articles of Confederation.

ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION

     Whereas the Delegates of the United States of America in Congress Assembled did on the fifteenth day of November in the year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy Seven, and in the Second Year of the Independence of America agree to certain Articles of Confederation and perpetual union between the States of...

     ARTICLE I. The title of this confederacy shall be "The United States of America".

     ARTICLE II. Each State retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every power, jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress Assembled.

     NOTE: The term "UNITED STATES" as used therein refers expressly to "Congress Assembled" on behalf of the several States which comprise the Union of States (now 50 in number).

     34. As can readily be seen from the quote below, with three separate and distinct definitions for the term "United States", it becomes absolutely necessary to separate and define each use of this term in law. It is equally as necessary to separate and define to whom the law applies when there are two classes of citizenship existing side-by-side, with separate and distinct rights, privileges and immunities for each. Such a separate distinction is not made in the Internal Revenue Code. Citizens of the California Republic are nowhere defined in this Code, or in its regulations, but are expressly omitted as such and identified indirectly at best (see IRC 7701(b)(1)(B)).

     The term "United States" may be used in any one of several senses. It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in a family of nations. It may designate territory over which sovereignty of the United States extends, or it may be the collective name of the States which are united by and under the Constitution.

[Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)]

[65 S.Ct. 870, 880, 89 L.Ed. 1252]

[emphasis added]

     35. The term "United States", when used in its territorial meaning, encompasses the areas of land defined in 1:8:17 and 4:3:2, nothing more. In this respect, the "United States" is a separate Nation which is foreign with respect to the States united by and under the Constitution, because the "United States" as such has never applied for admission to the Union of States known as the "United States of America". Accordingly, statutory "citizens of the United States", who are "subject to the jurisdiction thereof", are defined in the wording of the so-called 14th Amendment and of The Civil Rights Acts. At best, this so-called Amendment is a "private Act", rather than a public act, which designates a class of people who are unique to the territorial jurisdiction of the District of Columbia, the Federal Territories and Possessions, and the land which has been ceded by the Legislatures of the 50 States to the foreign nation-state of the "United States" for forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards and "other needful buildings" (see 1:8:17 and 4:3:2). Collectively, this territorial jurisdiction is now termed "The Federal Zone" to distinguish it uniquely from the nation as a whole and from the 50 States of the Union. The "nation" can, therefore, be defined as the mathematical union of the federal zone and the 50 States (using the language of set theory).

     36. The District of Columbia is technically a corporation and is only defined as a "State" in its own codes and under International Law (e.g., see IRC 7701(a)(10)).

     37. The several States which are united by and under the Constitution are guaranteed a "Republican" (or "rule of law") form of government by Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution. However, the foreign nation-state created by Congress and called the "United States", in its territorial sense, is a "legislative democracy" (or "majority rule" democracy) which is governed by International Law, rather than the Common Law.

38. The U. S. Supreme Court has ruled that this foreign nation has every right to legislate for its "citizens" and to hold subject matter and in personam jurisdiction, both within (inside) and without (outside) its territorial boundaries, when legislative acts call for such effects (Cook v. Tait supra).

     39. As a foreign nation under International law, which is derived from Roman Civil Law (see Kent's Commentaries on American Law, Lecture 1), it is perfectly legal for this nation to consider its people as "subjects" rather than as individual Sovereigns. The protections of the State and the Federal Constitutions do not apply to these "subjects" unless there is specific statutory legislation granting specific protections (e.g., The Civil Rights Act). The guarantees of the Constitution extend to the "United States" (i.e., the federal zone) only as Congress has made those guarantees applicable (Hooven supra).

     40. California is a Republic. How does this International Law come into play in the California Republic? The answer to this question is presented in the following section.

FAILURE TO DISCLOSE

     41. Because only "white" people could hold primary Common Law State Citizenship under the Constitution, Congress created a different class of "citizen" and then legislated rights, privileges and immunities which were intended to be mirror images of the Rights, Privileges and Immunities enjoyed by the Common Law Citizens of the several States.

     42. Unfortunately, the nation-state of the "United States" (District of Columbia) is a democracy and not a Republic. It is governed basically under authority of International Law, rather than the Common Law, and its people hold citizenship by "privilege" rather than by "Right".

     43. Certain power-mad individuals, commonly known today as the Directors of the Federal Reserve Board and the twelve (12) major international banking families, have used the so-called 14th Amendment to commit "legal genocide" upon the class of Common Law Citizens known as the Citizens of the several States. This has been accomplished by the application of Social Security through fraud, deception and non-disclosure of material facts, for the purpose of reducing the Union of States to a people who are once again enslaved by puppet masters, in order to gather revenue for the profit of international banks and their owners.

     44. It is a fact so well known and understood that it is indisputable, that "any privilege granted by government is regulatable, taxable and subject to any restrictions imposed by the legislative acts of its governing body", including alteration and even revocation by that governing body.

     45. If necessary to do so, the Accused [DEFENDANT] will submit an offer of proof to show that the "Social Security Act" is, in fact, a private act applying only to the territory of the "United States", acting in its limited municipal capacity, and to its statutory "citizens of the United States", under the so-called 14th Amendment. Yet, this Act has been advertised and promoted throughout the several States of the Union as being "mandatory upon the public in general", rather than a "private" act.

     46. The effect in law is that, when Common Law Citizens of the several States apply for and receive Social Security Numbers, they voluntarily surrender their primary Common Law Citizenship of a State and exchange it for that of a statutory "citizen of the United States". It is most interesting that any State has the power to "naturalize" a non-Citizen, but today everyone is naturalized as "citizens of the United States" under purview of the so-called 14th Amendment. The long-term effect of this procedure is that the Common Law white State Citizens are an endangered species, on the verge of extinction, and only the "subject class citizens" will survive to be ruled at the whim and passion of a jurisdiction which was not intended by our Founding Fathers or the Framers of the original U.S. Constitution.

JURISDICTION OF THE COURT

     47. Section 1 of the so-called 14th Amendment has had a far-reaching effect upon the several States of this Union, because Congress mandated that it would protect its new statutory "citizens" and that each of the States would also guarantee to protect these special statutory "citizens".

     48. This Nation was founded upon the fundamental principles of the Common Law and self-government, with limited actual government. In contrast, the "subjects" of the "United States" are considered to be incapable of self-government and in need of protection and regulation by those in authority.

     49. The majority of statute law is civil and regulatory in nature, even when sanctions of a criminal nature are attached for alleged violations.

     50. Among the rights secured by the Common Law in the Constitution in "criminal" cases are the right to know the "nature and cause" of an accusation, the right to confront an accuser, and the right to have both substantive and procedural due process.

     51. It is a fact that the District Court, in Internal Revenue cases, DOES NOT disclose the nature and cause of the accusation, does not afford "substantive" due process, and rarely produces a "corpus delicti" to prove damage or an injured party.

     52. The final proof is that the rights given to an accused in an Internal Revenue case are "civil rights", rather than Constitutional Rights. The District Court can hear a Constitutional question, but it cannot rule upon the merits of the question, because the Constitution does not apply to regulatory statutes. They are set in place to regulate and protect the statutory "citizens of the United States" who cannot exercise, and are not given, the right of individual self-government.

     53. The Federal Constitution mandates that "counsel" be present at all phases of the proceedings. In contrast, District Court often conducts arraignment proceedings without either counsel for the defense or counsel for the prosecution being present.

CONCLUSION

     54. This Court is proceeding under a jurisdiction which is known to the Constitution, but which is foreign to the intent of the Constitution, unless applied to those individuals who do not have Common Law access by "Right" to the protection of the State and Federal Constitutions.

     55. Whether this jurisdiction be named International Law, Admiralty/Maritime Law, Legislative Equity, Statutory Law or any other name, it is abusive and destructive of the Common Law Rights of the Citizens of the several States. The Constitutions of the California Republic and the United States of America mandate that these rights be guaranteed and protected by all agencies of government. This is the supreme Law of our Land.

     56. The limit of police power and legislative authority is reached when a statutory "law" derogates or destroys Rights which are protected by the Constitution and which belong to the Common Law Citizens of the several States who can claim these Rights.

     57. [DEFENDANT] is a white, male Common Law Citizen of the Sovereign California Republic. This declaration of status is made openly and notoriously on the record of these proceedings.

     58. As an individual whose primary Common Law Citizenship is of the California Republic, [DEFENDANT] claims all the Rights, Privileges and Immunities afforded and protected by the Constitutions of the California Republic (1849) and of the United States of America (1787), as lawfully amended.

     59. [DEFENDANT] has never, to the best of his knowledge and belief, knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily surrendered his original status as a Common Law Citizen of the several States, to become a so-called 14th Amendment Federal citizen who is subject to the jurisdiction of the "United States".

     60. This The court is proceeding in a legislative jurisdiction which allows a "civil" statute to be used as evidence of the Law in a "criminal proceeding", and affords only "civil rights", "procedural due process" and the right to be heard on the facts evidenced in the the statute, rather than the Law and the facts.

     61. It is now incumbent upon the Court to seat on the Law side of its jurisdiction and to order the plaintiff to bring forth an offer of proof that the Accused [DEFENDANT] can be subjected to a jurisdiction which uses civil statutes as evidence of the fundamental Law in criminal cases, which refuses to afford all Rights guaranteed by the Constitution and available to the Accused in criminal matters, and which practices procedural due process to the exclusion of substantive due process, wherein only the "facts" and not the "facts and Law" are at issue.

     62. Should the prosecution fail to bring forth proof that the Accused [DEFENDANT] has surrendered his original status as a Common Law "California State Citizen" for one that is essentially in "legislative/regulatory equity", then this Court has no alternative but to dismiss this matter of its own motion in the interests of justice, for lack of jurisdiction.

From: POLZEL Wendy <Wendy.POLZEL@state.or.us>

Sent: Friday, November 1, 2019 11:05:56 AM

To: Marilyn LeBaron <dogetty@live.com>

Subject: RE: Since we are poor... and my granddaughter is a rare beautiful redhead they won't give them back and equal protection of Executive Order

Ms. LeBaron,

Wendy S. Polzel: DHS respectfully requests that you cease all email communication with me and with worker Helmar Lochmann. The agency is spending a significant amount of our resources documenting, sharing, and saving the emails that you are sending. This is a waste of state resources and is not the best use of state tax dollars. If you continue to contact Helmar or me, we will contact the police and proceed forward with a formal police report. 

Blah, blah…blah… If I fail to respond I forfeit. So she will not litigate I am to get the default. I was never told what the DHS had against me and that is a failure to respond

They pass the pen so often it is evident DHS is not a bar association to be called DHS is Counsel on the petition since attorneys have to appear to withdraw and DHS do not.

Wendy S. Polzel:: ”We understand that you are concerned about your grandchildren. Your reports have been looked into and your grandchildren have not made any disclosures. ”Said the Human Trafficker that will not so much as give me a single phone call not even on Christmas acting like a hostage-taker and a Child Sex Trafficker 

Social workers, as an involved party, liable, cannot take the statements from kids under their control. Second-hand denials do not equate a refute through the proper channels. 

Wendy S. Polzel:: If the children ever make disclosures in the future, the agency will contact the police and an investigation will be initiated. 

DHS failed to get an independent investigation and say they will next time.

Wendy S. Polzel:: DHS has offered to meet with you to discuss your concerns. You have declined to meet. 

DHS is not an independent an investigative body so why would I meet with them. 

Wendy S. Polzel: DHS has provided you with the phone number of the child welfare hotline to report your concerns. 

The child abuse hotline is a boom-a-rang back to the Human Traffickers’ desk and not an elected judiciary qualified to make a probable cause call – no criminal claim of harm is taken by the culpable about their wrongdoing.  

Wendy S. Polzel:: DHS has sent you a letter to let you know how to go about applying to have your grandchildren placed with you. You have not followed through with this referral. 

 My grandchildren are not a benefit or entitlement for DHS to deny us one another and force people to apply for a Liberty Interest denying our property as if living with a relative is defined as an entitlement or benefit since ti is leveraged as currency instead of cold and as collateral which is supposed to have the possibility of discharged or returned to the owner (which would be a crime) since precious metals are lawful money and not human flesh. So this letter sent to let me know you are a Human Trafficker is the equivalent of invisible blood on your hands. Linda Hughes without lawful authority assigned the principle of my two heirs to two separate attorneys and the application are for both my hers indicating two separate negotiations are required for each yet naming me an ‘Applicant’ while also naming my heirs a benefit as if a food stamp or cash has reduced them as payout or medium of exchange like that which is used at every other benefit or entitlement and is a fraud. My heirs are not a benefit or a welfare entitlement for consideration as a medium of exchange. Collateral is left in a vault and Notes are put in circulation since a ten-pound gold bar cannot be put into your wallet any more than you could put two kids in a wallet or shove them into a cash register or a deposit box or used to discharge a debt. What is this referral a pre-approval? No, it is a con. It is deceit you perpetrating. DHS did not present me with cause to deny my heirs who are not the BOND or the debtor yet are being used by DHS as collateral for their continued financial gain instead of presenting discovery and failed to show cause my heirs are denied me and the comfort of a family member then purport DHs has lawful grounds to blame me for their treachery shifting through deceitful use of collateral not available for consideration and is the fault of DHS, not mine saying I did not become an Applicant for something not available or defined as an ‘entitlement. DHS is supposed to make Diligent Efforts yet that amounts to something not defined openly and I am not subject a liability for not knowing what the schedule of Diligent Efforts is therefore at a disadvantage without Advisement as to that schedule making it a means of deceit and evidence of abuse of process and deceit and your liability and not mine since from February 12, 2019, to November of this disappearing email DHS stall, stall, stall, to let the clock run out so the attorney can Adopt or my grandkids can be used to divert monies to yourselves and the six months it takes for ORS to retain a new voice is the aim to continue to keep our heirs under your control by controlling the context of all the arguments or the voices when the state cannot regulate the practice of law, so they can continue ignoring our blood line and right to one another forcing us to Apply to that which is rightfully mine indicates ‘anybody’ but actual family can be an ‘ad – hoc’ under color of law what DHs deprives rights as long at it is a stranger so DHS can get federal funds.

 I have been denied discovery and was never asked to respond or refute anything. I have sent an email after email after email. DHs won't go on record and expect everything to be under the “He said, She said” hearsay basis keeping the people at a disadvantage and do not provide verification of conversation as attorneys do when are allowed to practice law and require communication to be limited to meetings under their control and deny recording or videos or unrecorded phone conversations leaving it all 'verbal' as a common law ‘handshake’ when the common law saying, “My word is my BOND” is not subject to the terms under consideration since then there is nothing but DURESS to negotiate with since my heirs are not lawful collateral or a lawful medium of exchange and there detainment cannot discharge any debt my daughter owes not did they stipulate the amount of her indebtedness so that I could discharge it nor are DHS agents available for such negotiation and the DHS failed to notify me of the Attorney that could while they continue to deny me a documentable medium to communicate regarding what was said during their intended use of undocumented verbal exchanges or verify in writing what was used as advisement over them by attorneys I have not retained. An application implies the BOND is what is being applied for and the monies linked directly to it which is what they are forcing me to apply for and I said I don't want their fucking funds. So, they make no money since not willing to apply to plunder my daughter and leave her to die in the streets as they will. I am applying for that keeps money flowing to them and has usurped you have no right to a bloodline so the attorneys can make money by forcing you to adapt your own kin already in your linage. to their family, The DHS stall, stall, stall while denying phone contact, or visits, and lie about the offers they made, and write lies and pretend to be authorized to refute the abuses my heirs suffer, then pretend this is my lack of effort because I do not tacitly comply with a waiver of my rights, which mean nothing to them at all, and force me to summon my own judged 'employed' by the OPPONENT THEY CONTROL forcing me to sign up under duress for a MISSION STATEMENT to put myself a ‘list of adoptive considerations’, by so doing, waive my rights to my heirs an appoint the ADOPTION AGENCY to be my Judge that is not appointed or elected and is Treason Human Trafficking and criminal.

Wendy S. Polzel:: At this time we are not able to assist you any longer.

Duress to make them money plundering my daughter while she dies so they can on the backside without open court record denies me under Adoption Agency Judiciary they RSVP me to and failed to do so till I made a huge stink so this is a brush off into the Judgment they already passed down ignoring the judge that let us go. Why would I want help from a Human Trafficker ‘enemy within’ that is covering for a a subordinate that allowed my grandson to remain in placement he screened himself after my daughter reported he had been sexually assaulted at that address. While she does not name the attorneys advising her and those attorneys will not sign their work?

Wendy S. Polzel

Principal Executive Manager-C

Permanency Supervisor * ICWA Liaison

Pronouns: She/Her

Desk: 971-673-6827 * Cell: 503-915-7097

30 N. Webster, Suite D, Portland, OR 97217-2767

Fax: 971-673-6871

To: PD, GRAND JURY, et al.,

My grandchildren are not a benefit or entitlement for DHS to deny us one another and force people to apply for a Liberty Interest denying our property as if living with a relative is defined as an entitlement or benefit since ti is leveraged as currency instead of cold and as collateral which is supposed to have the possibility of discharged or returned to the owner (which would be a crime) since precious metals are lawful money and not human flesh. So this letter sent to let me know you are a Human Trafficker who is the equivalent of invisible blood on your hands. Linda Hughes without lawful authority assigned the principle of my two heirs to two separate attorneys and the application is for both my hers indicating two separate negotiations are required for each yet naming me an ‘Applicant’ while also naming my heirs a benefit as if a food stamp or cash has reduced them as payout or medium of exchange like that which is used at every other benefit or entitlement and is a fraud. My heirs are not a benefit or a welfare entitlement for consideration as a medium of exchange. Collateral is left in a vault and Notes are put in circulation since a ten-pound gold bar cannot be put into your wallet any more than you could put two kids in a wallet or shove them into a cash register or a deposit box or used to discharge a debt. What is this referral a pre-approval? No, it is a con. It is deceit you perpetrating. DHS did not present me with cause to deny my heirs who are not the BOND or the debtor yet are being used by DHS as collateral for their continued financial gain instead of presenting discovery and failed to show cause my heirs are denied me and the comfort of a family member then purport DHs has lawful grounds to blame me for their treachery shifting through deceitful use of collateral not available for consideration and is the fault of DHS, not mine saying I did not become an Applicant for something not available or defined as an ‘entitlement. DHS is supposed to make Diligent Efforts yet that amounts to something not defined openly and I am not subject a liability for not knowing what the schedule of Diligent Efforts is therefore at a disadvantage without Advisement as to that schedule making it a means of deceit and evidence of abuse of process and deceit and your liability and not mine since from February 15, 2019, to November of this disappearing email DHS stall, stall, stall, to let the clock run out so the attorney can Adopt or my grandkids can be used to divert monies to yourselves and the six months it takes for ORS to retain a new voice is the aim to continue to keep our heirs under your control by controlling the context of all the arguments or the voices when the state cannot regulate the practice of law, so they can continue ignoring our blood line and right to one another forcing us to Apply to that which is rightfully mine indicates ‘anybody’ but actual family can be an ‘ad – hoc’ under color of law what DHs deprives rights as long at it is a stranger so DHS can get federal funds.

I have sent email after email after email. DHs won't go on record and expect everything to be under the “He said, She said” hearsay basis keeping the people at a disadvantage and do not provide verification of conversation as attorneys do when are allowed to practice law and require communication to be limited to meetings under their control and deny recording or videos or unrecorded phone conversations leaving it all 'verbal' as a common law ‘handshake’ when the common law saying, “My word is my BOND” is not subject to the terms under consideration since then there is nothing but DURESS to negotiate with since my heirs are not lawful collateral or a lawful medium of exchange and their detainment cannot discharge any debt my daughter owes not did they stipulate the amount of her indebtedness so that I could discharge it nor are DHS agents available for such negotiation and the DHS failed to notify me of the Attorney that could while they continue to deny me a documentable medium to communicate regarding what was said during their intended use of undocumented verbal exchanges or verify in writing what was used as advisement over them by attorneys I have not retained.

An application implies the BOND is what is being applied for and the monies linked directly to it which is what they are forcing me to apply for and I said I don't want their fucking funds. So, they make no money since not willing to apply to plunder my daughter and leave her to die in the streets as they will. I am applying for that keeps money flowing to them and has usurped you have no right to a bloodline so the attorneys can make money by forcing you to adapt your own kin already in your linage. to their family, The DHS stall, stall, stall while denying phone contact, or visits, and lie about the offers they made, and write lies and pretend to be authorized to refute the abuses my heirs suffer, then pretend this is my lack of effort because I do not tacitly comply with a waiver of my rights, which mean nothing to them at all, and force me to summon my own judged 'employed' by the OPPONENT THEY CONTROL forcing me to sign up under duress for a MISSION STATEMENT to put me a ‘list of adoptive considerations’, by so doing, waive my rights to my heirs an appoint the ADOPTION AGENCY to be my Judge that is not appointed or elected and is Treason Human Trafficking and criminal.

All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice 

       Marilyn LeBaron