ARE CALIFORNIA/US STATE JUDGES [and DA's] ACTUALLY WORKING FOR ORGANIZED CRIME, DENYING JURY TRIALS TO STEAL ASSETS, ILLEGALLY CONVERT BANK ACCOUNTS AND REAL ESTATE FROM INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZENS, AND THEREBY VICTIMIZING AND KILLING INNOCENT TAX-PAYIN...
MANWILL ET AL. FAMILIES VICTIMIZED AND ROBBED FOR MILLIONS, JUDGE AND APPEALS JUDGE CAUGHT RECEIVING BRIBES 'RED HANDED'
They/Crooks are fraudulently framing court proceedings [in Contra Costa County, etc etc. ] as IN REM (probate/abandoned-property, etc., meaning no citizens involved, only the state and abandoned persons and abandoned properties, etc.) and they admit it, and then thereby DENYING DEMANDED JURY TRIALS TO LOOT AND STEAL THE ASSETS, PROPERTIES, AND FRAUDULENTLY CONVERT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS VIA ILLEGAL FEE IMPOSITION THEFT/EXTORTION SCHEMES AND REAL ESTATE THEFT/ILLEGAL-CONVERSION SCHEMES/RACKETS.... When claimants/possesors/owners/contactors/contractees/etc. appear/object, and these racketeers continue to act in those limited jurisdiction prerogative 'courts' and instead of transferring or staying these proceedings, instead continue to exploit/fraudulently-convert assets while denying jury trials, they have engaged in federal and state felonies/fraud/RICO. JURY, WITNESS, EVIDENCE TAMPERING, GRAND THEFT!!!!!
ORGANIZED CRIME HAS TAKEN OVER OUR COURTS, AND YOU HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED!
JURY TRIALS IN COURTS!!!!!..... AND ACCESS (INCLUDING EFFECTIVELY VIA AGENCIES)TO THE GRAND JURIES FOR REPORTING OF CRIMES, CORRUPTION, AND COURT/RIGHTS VIOLATIONS...... IT WHAT KEEPS IT CONSTITUTIONAL, FAIR, AND CORRUPTION/INJURY FREE/PROOF.
ARE YOUR COURTS SECURE, OPERATING CONSTITUTIONALLY, AND PREVENTING FRAUD? IN ADDITION, ARE YOUR LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATIVE AGENCIES EFFECTIVELY INVESTIGATING, DETECTING, AND PREVENTING/PROSECUTING CRIMINALITIES IN OUR JUDICIAL BRANCHES/AGENCIES? SADLY THE ANSWER IS LARGELY NO, THEY ARE ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING AND FACILITATING FRAUD AND THEFT IN THE COURTS BY ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES! CHECK INTO YOUR PROBATE COURTS AND DIVORCE COURTS, AND CONTACT US FOR MORE INFO!!!
ORGANIZED CRIME HAS TAKEN OVER OUR COURTS, AND YOU HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED! JURY TRIALS IN COURTS NOW!!!!!
They are fraudulently leading citizens into and framing these proceedings as IN REM (probate/abandoned-property, etc., meaning no citizens involved, only the state and abandoned persons and abandoned properties, etc.) and they admit it.
When Claimants / possesors / owners / contactors / contractees /etc. appear/object, and these racketeers continue to act in those limited jurisdiction prerogative 'courts' and instead of transferring or staying these proceedings, instead continue to exploit/fraudulently-convert assets while denying jury trials, they have engaged in federal and state felonies/fraud/RICO.
JURY TRIALS IN COURTS!!!!!..... AND ACCESS (INCLUDING EFFECTIVELY VIA AGENCIES)TO THE GRAND JURIES FOR REPORTING OF CRIMES, CORRUPTION, ANDCOURT/RIGHTS VIOLATIONS...... IS WHAT KEEPS IT CONSTITUTIONAL, FAIR, AND CORRUPTION/INJURY FREE/PROOF.
ARE YOUR COURTS SECURE, OPERATING CONSTITUTIONALLY, AND PREVENTING FRAUD? IN ADDITION, ARE YOUR LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATIVE AGENCIES EFFECTIVELY INVESTIGATING, DETECTING, AND PREVENTING/PROSECUTING CRIMINALITIES IN OUR JUDICIAL BRANCHES/AGENCIES? SADLY THE ANSWER IS LARGELY NO, THEY ARE ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING AND FACILITATING FRAUD AND THEFT IN THE COURTS BY ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES! CHECK INTO YOUR PROBATE COURTS AND DIVORCE COURTS, AND CONTACT US FOR MORE INFO!!!
USINSTITUTEOFSCIENCE@YAHOO.COM
Constitutional Research/Rights Group
Law, Rights, Due Process, Jury Supremacy, Social Physics, Etc.
R.I.C.O. officers or policy police which DHS are as Donald G Dowell could not determine probable cause you have no juresdiction
EVIDENCE OF ACTIS REA WARMONGERING TREASON/SLAVERY/NATZI MENTALITY/ABUSE OF NO DUE PROCESS OF LAW
YOU HAVE MADE YOURSELF THE ENEMY OF YOUR NATION PUTTING OUR KIDS UP FOR SALE LIKE HITLER DID TO POLAND. YOU HAVE MADE YOURSELF A SLAVER PLANTATION MASTER/CHILD SEX SLAVER/BABYLONIAN WHORE
Here is what people are not being told. The gov has declared war on state-only citizens and under the rules of war, the constitutions are silent. The gov has imposed 14th amendment citizenship status upon everyone without regard for constitutional restrictions. During war rights are silent. So, since the state constitutions and the rights they secure are silent, the gov on all levels simply imposes commercial laws upon non-commercial actions. This is the basis for the current 'income tax'. It gets worse because back in the 1950's the judicial branch courts were all replaced with legislative branch 'statutory' courts. This is very important information because these courts can only see people as 14th amendment citizens / non-sovereigns. Thus to go into one and claim you have a right to travel is a waste of time. Legally, the judge cannot hear such arguments and they know it. Sovereign rights arguments must be put forward in a completely different way in the courts.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is “entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State of the Union(2 Black 620, see also Crandell v Nevada, 6 Wall 35]. Plaintiff (libellant) should not be charged fees or costs for the lawful and Constitutional Right to petition this court in this matter in which he/she is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief (Hale v Hinkel, 201 US 43, NAACP v Button, 371 US 415); United Mineworkers v Gibbs, 383 US 715; and Johnson v Avery, 89 S.Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent non- lawyers, can assist other members of the group, achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with “unauthorized practice of law.”
Petitioner (libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no charge can be placed upon a citizen as a condition precedent to exercise his/her Constitutional Rights, his/her rights secured by the Constitution. A fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by public officers or for use of a privilege under control of government.” Fort Smith Gas Co. v Wisemen” 189 Ark.675 74 SW.2d 789,790, from Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed
"PLEASE TAKE MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING"
The ticket is deemed to be a "complaint" and the Supreme Court of the united States of America stated in OVERTON v. OHIO, Tuesday, October 16, 2001 Daily Appellant Report, which says the officer cannot sign the complaint nor the affidavits.
Pursuant to Penal Code §740, which says, "except as otherwise provided by law, all misdemeanors and infractions must be prosecuted by written complaint under oath subscribed by the complainant." Such complaint may be verified on information and belief. If there is no complaint, the court has no jurisdiction over the matter. See RIPLEY v. JOHNSON, 120 CAL2nd 548, 261 P2d 318. Please provide me with a copy of the affidavits in support of the complaint and the judge's determination of the probable cause pursuant to Penal Code §813.
The officer cannot determine the probable cause. See WONG SUN v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.CT. 407 (1963) and OVERTON v. OHIO.
The officer cannot prosecute this case. See Penal Code §691(d) which states "Prosecuting Attorney" whether designated as District Attorney, City Attorney, City Prosecutor, Prosecuting Attorney, or by any other title, have by law the right or duty to prosecute, on the behalf of the people, any charge of public offense. The officer doesn't have a "Bar License" (card), he cannot prosecute nor can he have an opinion in court. If the court does not follow procedures prescribed by law, the court and its officers may held liable under "RICO Act." See U.S. V. FREGA, 179 F.3rd 793 (9th Cir. 1999) where three judges were charged with using the court as a "Racketeering Enterprise to Extort Money."
THE “Counterclaim” is a claim asserted by a defendant against a plaintiff. [Florida Fuel Oil, Inc. v. Springs Villas, Inc., 95 So, 2d 581, 583. A “Counterclaim” is a claim presented by defendant in opposition to or deduction from plaintiff’s claim. [Kauffman v. Kebert, D.C. PA, 16 FRD 225, 228]. To constitute a “Counterclaim”, an answer must be sufficient as a petition and contain a prayer for specific affirmative relief. [Chandler v. Sullivan, Ky, 265 W.S.2d 78].
The Foreign Elected and public Agents Registration Act is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 requiring that agents representing the interests of foreign powers be properly identified to the American public.[1] The act was passed in response to German propaganda in the lead-up to World War II. The Foreign Agent Registration Unit within the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is charged with handling the enforcement of the law.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is “entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State of the Union (2 Black 620, see also Crandell v Nevada, 6 Wall 35].
Plaintiff (libellant) should not be charged fees or costs for the lawful and Constitutional Right to petition this court in this matter in which he/she is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief (Hale v Hinkel, 201 US 43, NAACP v Button, 371 US 415); United Mineworkers v Gibbs, 383 US 715; and Johnson v Avery, 89 S.Ct. 747 (1969).
Members of groups who are competent non- lawyers, can assist other members of the group, achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with “unauthorized practice of law.”
Petitioner (libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no charge can be placed upon a citizen as a condition precedent to exercise his/her Constitutional Rights, his/her rights secured by the Constitution. A fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by public officers or for use of a privilege under control of government.” Fort Smith Gas Co. v Wisemen” 189 Ark.675 74 SW.2d 789,790, from Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed
"PLEASE TAKE MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING"3. The ticket is deemed to be a "complaint" and the Supreme Court of the united States of America stated in OVERTON v. OHIO, Tuesday, October 16, 2001 Daily Appellant Report, which says the officer cannot sign the complaint nor the affidavits.
6. The officer cannot prosecute this case. See Penal Code §691 (d) which states "Prosecuting Attorney" whether designated as District Attorney, City Attorney, City Prosecutor, Prosecuting Attorney, or by any other title, have by law the right or duty to prosecute, on the behalf of the people, any charge of public offense. The officer doesn't have a "Bar License" (card), he cannot prosecute nor can he have an opinion in court. If the court does not follow procedures prescribed by law, the court and its officers may held liable under "RICO Act." See U.S. V. FREGA, 179 F.3rd 793 (9th Cir. 1999) where three judges were charged with using the court as a "Racketeering Enterprise to Extort Money."
The masculine gender includes the feminine and neuter. The Foreign Elected and public Agents Registration Act is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 requiring that agents representing the interests of foreign powers be properly identified to the American public. [1] The act was passed in response to German propaganda in the lead-up to World War II. The Foreign Agent Registration Unit within the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is charged with handling the enforcement of the law.
This guy (sick https://fb.watch/578eag3sz_/) who accused and convicted (through plea deals) used kids as illegal commercial business gets thirty days for each felony and does his time in county jail for child molestation and kidnapping. They are sure going easy on this 'officer' 'of' 'the' 'law' pleading guilty to thirty felonies which he could have served three to seven years for each. Our entire families are concurrently facing the equivalent of the death penalty of a criminal case and we do not get a Trial by Jury of Peers either where we do not LIKE THE ABOVE ACCUSED, REMAINING THE ACCUSED SINCE NOT DULY CONVICTED, like none of our parents are duly convicted of child abuse, since none of them get a Trial by Jury of Peers, like the man above, and neither the man above or parents got or the right to cross examine the witnesses against us appointed by internal policy and anonymous calls.
........................................
Stop and Win a Court Case Using Common Law Arbitration (https://youtu.be/XB0ZPhV0z8o)
.........................................
We are not commerce. Our kids are not commerce. This tells you that we are pulled into congressional authority as international commerce. This tells you we are for sale according to this double talking guy using Scripture as law. This guy said we need to send them a NEW CONTRACT -RECONTRACTING. Congress writes the law and it is all commercial - SO THIS GUY WANTS MONEY for you to sign up to his class to tell you how to NEGOTIATE A NEW CONTRACT WITH CONGRESS THAT THE JUDGES HAVE TO UPHOLD.
He promises to explain what he calls the conditional acceptance (REBUTTAL OF SORTS) to bring you out of their courts into another set of rules (he called equal protection of contracting under commerce) pulling us out of commerce (double speak). So equal protection of the law means equal protection of 'contract law' and ear marked a logic deduced as double standard binding under commerce where our kids are human trafficked. Whew! Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of America does not make such an inhabitant a Citizen of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the Fourteenth Amendment" ... Elk v. Wilkins, Neb (1884), 5s.ct.41,112 U.S. 99, 28 L. Ed. 643.
Administrative Remedy is Identified as, taking two or three witnesses, and don't go off into sovereign and patriot, and focus on what THEY are supposed to follow. Bring witnesses... and CERTIFIED MAIL IS ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY THROUGH CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE (YOU ACCEPT IF THEY PROVE IT APPLIES TO YOU)
This is the same thing Rod Class is saying and the same thing David Straight is saying minus the settlement negotiation being done through a conditional acceptance ---- but it is the same idea of, 'show me the law, prove it is me, and who are you in this contract?, (all subject matter jurisdiction 'i.e.' move it to another court topic).
Yes, double standards implying equal protection of the law is a commercial term under what JFK said is 'suit at equity' and got him shot to prevent him from returning us to the Gold standard.
This guy admits congress is trafficking since CAPTA and ASFA are used to gain BOND MONIES tells us to move our kids out of commercial use with a NEW CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE is the (new contract).... AND WAIT, COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEYS WILL NOT DO THIS - so complicit!.
The Bible is the best law book written. It is like gravity. Common Law is identified as Due Process. Yet, says man cannot serve two masters.
Something from the Bible https://youtu.be/hRoQL7W5jg8
14th includes all Agency's and Elected and public employees as well by the great weight of authority it is acknowledged that generally "public officials" are not immune from suit when they allegedly violate the civil rights of citizens, and that a "public official's" defense of immunity is to be sparingly applied in these kinds of cases. James v. Ogilvie, 1970, DC Ill., 310 F. Sup. 661, 663. Title 18 241-242
• Judge (Accounts payable to adoption procurement agent)
• The Clerk (billing without trial by jury conviction)
• Sheriff policy officer (holding people in jail without jury conviction)
• Police policy officer (handing kids over to adoption agency without probable cause fully knowing the dangers in foster care as bodyguards to CPS activity)
• Includes all Agency's and Elected and public employees as well (goes to above)
JUDICIAL COGNIZANCE. Judicial notice, or knowledge upon which a judge is bound to act without having it proved in evidence. [Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th ed.] - interjection (like things that are common knowledge and published as presumable due to being common knowledge (goes to topics not covered in the press the judges control press release on to prevent certain things from becoming common knowledge) By the great weight of authority it is acknowledged that generally "public officials" are not immune from suit when they allegedly violate the civil rights of citizens, and that a "public official's" defense of immunity is to be sparingly applied in these kinds of cases.
James v. Ogilvie, 1970, DC Ill., 310 F. Sup. 661, 663.
Title 18 241-242
51.20(2)
(2) Notice of hearing and detention.
51.20(2)(a)
(a) Upon the filing of a petition for examination, the court shall review the petition to determine whether an order of detention should be issued. The subject individual shall be detained only if there is cause to believe that the individual is mentally ill, drug dependent or developmentally disabled and the individual is eligible for commitment under sub. (1) (a) or (am) based upon specific recent overt acts, attempts or threats to act or on a pattern of recent acts or omissions made by the individual.
51.20(2)(b)
(b) If the subject individual is to be detained, a law enforcement officer shall present the subject individual with a notice of hearing, a copy of the petition and detention order and a written statement of the individual's right to an attorney, a jury trial if requested more than 48 hours prior to the final hearing, the standard upon which he or she may be committed under this section and the right to a hearing to determine probable cause for commitment within 72 hours after the individual arrives at the facility, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. The officer shall orally inform the individual that he or she is being taken into custody as the result of a petition and detention order issued under this chapter. If the individual is not to be detained, the law enforcement officer shall serve these documents on the subject individual and shall also orally inform the individual of these rights. The individual who is the subject of the petition, his or her counsel and, if the individual is a minor, his or her parent or guardian, if known, shall receive notice of all proceedings under this section. The court may also designate other persons to receive notices of hearings and rights under this chapter. Any such notice may be given by telephone. The person giving telephone notice shall place in the case file a signed statement of the time notice was given and the person to whom he or she spoke. The notice of time and place of a hearing shall be served personally on the subject of the petition, and his or her attorney, within a reasonable time prior to the hearing to determine probable cause for commitment.
51.20(2)(c)
(c) If the law enforcement officer has a detention order issued by a court, or if the law enforcement officer has cause to believe that the subject individual is mentally ill, drug dependent or developmentally disabled and is eligible for commitment under sub. (1) (a) or (am), based upon specific recent overt acts, attempts or threats to act or on a pattern of omissions made by the individual, the law enforcement officer shall take the subject individual into custody. If the individual is detained by a law enforcement officer, the individual shall be orally informed of his or her rights under this section on arrival at the detention facility by the facility staff, who shall also serve all documents required by this section on the individual.
51.20(2)(d)
(d) Placement shall be made in a hospital that is approved by the department as a detention facility or under contract with a county department under s. 51.42 or 51.437, approved public treatment facility, mental health institute, center for the developmentally disabled under the requirements of s. 51.06 (3), state treatment facility, or in an approved private treatment facility if the facility agrees to detain the subject individual. Upon arrival at the facility, the individual is considered to be in the custody of the facility.
51.20(3)
(3) Legal counsel. At the time of the filing of the petition the court shall assure that the subject individual is represented by adversary counsel by referring the individual to the state public defender, who shall appoint counsel for the individual without a determination of indigency, as provided in s. 51.60.
51.20(4)
(4) Public representation. Except as provided in ss. 51.42 (3) (ar) 1. and 51.437 (4m) (f), the corporation counsel shall represent the interests of the public in the conduct of all proceedings under this chapter, including the drafting of all necessary papers related to the action.
51.20(5)
(5) Hearing requirements. The hearings which are required to be held under this chapter shall conform to the essentials of due process and fair treatment including the right to an open hearing, the right to request a closed hearing, the right to counsel, the right to present and cross-examine witnesses, the right to remain silent and the right to a jury trial if requested under sub. (11). The parent or guardian of a minor who is the subject of a hearing shall have the right to participate in the hearing and to be represented by counsel. All proceedings under this chapter shall be reported as provided in SCR 71.01. The court may determine to hold a hearing under this section at the institution at which the individual is detained, whether or not located in the same county as the court with which the petition was filed, unless the individual or his or her attorney objects.
Arrest warrant does not authorize officers to enter the homes of third parties - interjection (or their cars or their phones)
The state county, city ,district attorney is a corporation, Can not an injured party with affidavit. Can Not Write Affidavit
This applies both with Federal Rules of Evidence and State Rules of Evidence.... there must be a competent first hand witness (a body). There has to be a real person making the complaint and bringing evidence before the court. Corporations are paper and can't testify. "Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in the disposition of [a] case." United States v. Lovasco (431 U.S. 783, 97 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752, (06/09/77)"
Please Make Amends Honor thy Oath Elected and public servants, title 5USC2906-3331 0ath of office, title 18 241-242-
"PLEASE TAKE MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING"
The ticket is deemed to be a "complaint" and the Supreme Court of the united States of America stated in OVERTON v. OHIO, Tuesday, October 16, 2001 Daily Appellant Report, which says the officer cannot sign the complaint nor the affidavits.
Pursuant to Penal Code §740, which says, "except as otherwise provided by law, all misdemeanors and infractions must be prosecuted by written complaint under oath subscribed by the complainant." Such complaint may be verified on information and belief. If there is no complaint, the court has no jurisdiction over the matter. See RIPLEY v. JOHNSON, 120 CAL2nd 548, 261 P2d 318. Please provide me with a copy of the affidavits in support of the complaint and the judge's determination of the probable cause pursuant to Penal Code §813.
The officer cannot determine the probable cause. See WONG SUN v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.CT. 407 (1963) and OVERTON v. OHIO.
The officer cannot prosecute this case. See Penal Code §691(d) which states "Prosecuting Attorney" whether designated as District Attorney, City Attorney, City Prosecutor, Prosecuting Attorney, or by any other title, have by law the right or duty to prosecute, on the behalf of the people, any charge of public offense. The officer doesn't have a "Bar License" (card), he cannot prosecute nor can he have an opinion in court. If the court does not follow procedures prescribed by law, the court and its officers may held liable under "RICO Act." See U.S. V. FREGA, 179 F.3rd 793 (9th Cir. 1999) where three judges were charged with using the court as a "Racketeering Enterprise to Extort Money."
THE “Counterclaim” is a claim asserted by a defendant against a plaintiff. [Florida Fuel Oil, Inc. v. Springs Villas, Inc., 95 So, 2d 581, 583. A “Counterclaim” is a claim presented by defendant in opposition to or deduction from plaintiff’s claim. [Kauffman v. Kebert, D.C. PA, 16 FRD 225, 228]. To constitute a “Counterclaim”, an answer must be sufficient as a petition and contain a prayer for specific affirmative relief. [Chandler v. Sullivan, Ky, 265 W.S.2d 78].
The Foreign Elected and public Agents Registration Act is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 requiring that agents representing the interests of foreign powers be properly identified to the American public.[1] The act was passed in response to German propaganda in the lead-up to World War II. The Foreign Agent Registration Unit within the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is charged with handling the enforcement of the law.
Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of America does not make such an inhabitant a Citizen of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the Fourteenth Amendment" ... Elk v. Wilkins, Neb (1884), 5s.ct.41,112 U.S. 99, 28 L. Ed. 643
One last thing: Some cops are really bad news but some are actually very caring people. They don't know the truth and have to follow orders or pay a high price. When in contact with them, for everyone's safety, be polite and non-threatening. Their actions and behavior is generally the result of their training / indoctrination. So, your grievance is not with them but those that give them their instructions. Who do the cops work for? The DA and it could be said they also work for the judges. Interestingly, they all work for the state legislature.
Rod Class Private Attorney General 12/9/15
https://youtu.be/K7-9qh5gB1s
14th includes all Agency's and Elected and public employees as well by the great weight of authority it is acknowledged that generally "public officials" are not immune from suit when they allegedly violate the civil rights of citizens, and that a "public official's" defense of immunity is to be sparingly applied in these kinds of cases. James v. Ogilvie, 1970, DC Ill., 310 F. Sup. 661, 663. Title 18 241-242
Judge (Accounts payable to adoption procurement agent)
The Clerk (billing without trial by jury conviction)
Sheriff policy officer (holding people in jail without jury conviction)
Police policy officer (handing kids over to adoption agency without probable cause fully knowing the dangers in foster care as bodyguards to CPS activity)
Includes all Agency's and Elected and public employees as well
By the great weight of authority it is acknowledged that generally "public officials" are not immune from suit when they allegedly violate the civil rights of citizens, and that a "public official's" defense of immunity is to be sparingly applied in these kinds of cases. James v. Ogilvie, 1970, DC Ill., 310 F. Sup. 661, 663.
You aid Jason K Pierson in committing Treason by allowing him to block an appeal on both cases while he set up Double Jeopardy.
“Holding that arguments not developed in district court are forfeited on appeal”
U.S. Commonwealth v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 727 F.3d 274 (3d Cir. 2013)
“Holding that an arrest warrant does not authorize officers to enter the homes of third parties to execute the warrant, absent exigent circumstances, without first obtaining a warrant to enter the premises”
AL-KIDD v. ASHCROFT, 580 F.3d 949 (9th Cir. 2009)
“Holding that an arrest warrant alone does not authorize officers to enter the home of a third party and that, absent exigent circumstances or consent of the resident, officers must obtain a search warrant before entering the third party's home”
EL BEY v. ROOP, 530 F.3d 407 (6th Cir. 2008)
“Holding that absent exigent circumstances, law enforcement officers must obtain a search warrant or consent prior to entering a home for the purpose of effecting an arrest”
U.S. v. MORELAND, 437 F.3d 424 (4th Cir. 2006)
“Holding that officers could not enter and search the house of a third party simply because they had a "reasonable . . . belief" that the subject of an arrest warrant was a guest there; they had to have evidence that he was a co-resident”
MOTLEY v. PARKS, 383 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2004)
“Holding no exigent circumstances where, upon learning that a federal fugitive might be staying at a house in Atlanta, Georgia, federal agents waited two days before searching the house without a warrant”
U.S. v. WICKS, 995 F.2d 964 (10th Cir. 1993)
“Holding that government lost right to raise lack of expectation of privacy argument on appeal when it failed to raise argument below”
U.S. v. SWEPSTON, 987 F.2d 1510 (10th Cir. 1993)
“Holding that police may not lawfully enter the home of a third party to search for a person named in an arrest warrant without first obtaining a search warrant”
Franklin v. Civil City of S. Bend, CAUSE NO.: 3:13-CV-207-TLS (N.D. Ind. Sep. 3, 2015)
“Holding that, in the absence of consent or exigent circumstances, a law enforcement officer must procure a search warrant before “search[ing] for the subject of an arrest warrant in the home of a third party””
Adams v. Springmeyer, 17 F.Supp.3d 478 (W.D. Pa. 2014)
“Holding that an arrest warrant is insufficient to provide authority to enter the home of a third person to look for the suspect.”
United States v. Powers, 1 F.Supp.3d 470 (M.D.N.C. 2014)
“Holding that a search warrant is required to enter the home of a third party to make an arrest absent consent or exigent circumstances”
Engleman v. Cumberland Cnty., No. 5:12-cv-00147-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2013)
“Holding that absent consent or exigent circumstances, law enforcement officers cannot legally search for the subject of an arrest warrant in the home of a third party without first obtaining a search warrant”
Muhammad v. United States, 884 F.Supp.2d 306 (E.D. Pa. 2012)
“Holding that absent exigent circumstances, law enforcement officers with an arrest warrant may not enter a third party's home to search for the subject of the arrest warrant”
Carter v. St. John Baptist Parish Sheriff's Office, CIVIL ACTION NO: 11-1401 (E.D. La. May. 16, 2012)
“Holding that, "in the absence of consent or exigent circumstances," search inside residence "is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment unless done pursuant to a warrant"”
Molieri v. Cnty. of Marin, No. C-10-5430 MMC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2012)
U.S. Code › Title 42 › Chapter 136 › Subchapter IX › Part B › § 14141
42 U.S. Code § 14141 - Cause of action
Current through Pub. L. 113-86, except 113-79. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
(a) Unlawful conduct It shall be unlawful for any governmental authority, or any agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
(b) Civil action by Attorney General Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation of paragraph (1) [1] has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.
CORPUS DELICTI
"For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party (Corpus Delicti) There can be no sanction or penalty imposed on one because of this Constitutional right." Sherer v. Cullen 481 F. 945:
Supreme courts ruled "Without Corpus delicti there can be no crime"“In every prosecution for crime it is necessary to establish the “corpus delecti”, i.e., the body or elements of the crime.” People v. Lopez, 62 Ca.Rptr. 47, 254 C.A.2d 185.
"In every criminal trial, the prosecution must prove the corpus delecti, or the body of the crime itself-i.e., the fact of injury, loss or harm, and the existence of a criminal agency as its cause. " People v. Sapp, 73 P.3d 433, 467 (Cal. 2003) [quoting People v. Alvarez, (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1161, 1168-1169, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 903, 46 P.3d 372.].
"As a general principal, standing to invoke the judicial process requires an actual justiciable controversy as to which the complainant has a real interest in the ultimate adjudication because he or she has either suffered or is about to suffer an injury. " People v. Superior Court, 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 793.
“Without standing, there is no actual or justiciable controversy, and courts will not entertain such cases. (3 Witlen, Cal. Procedure (3rd ed. 1985) Actions § 44, pp 70-72.) “Typically, … the standing inquiry requires careful judicial examination of a complaint’s allegations to ascertain whether the particular plaintiff is entitled to an adjudication of the particular claims asserted. ” (Allen v. Wright, (1984) 468 U.S. 737, 752…Whether one has standing in a particular case generally revolved around the question whether that person has rights that may suffer some injury, actual or threatened. ” Clifford S. v. Superior Court, 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 333, 335
Please Make Amends Honor thy Oath Elected and public servants, title 5USC2906-3331 0ath of office, title 18 241-242-
WHAT YOU DON'T KNOW-THE B.A.R. ASSOCIATION IS UNDER THE VATICAN OWNED CITY OF LONDON WATER AND SEWER UTILITY AND THEY'RE COMMITTING TREASON AND WAR CRIMES AGAINST AMERICA BY VIOLATING ARTICLES 16 AND 70 OF THE LIEBER CODE. NOW THERE IS A REMEDY FOR CORRUPT JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS. BTW, THEY ARE NOT JUDGES. THEY'RE BROKERS AS B.A.R. ATTORNEYS.
R.I.C.O. officers or policy police which DHS are as Donald G Dowell could not determine probable cause you have no juresdiction
EVIDENCE OF ACTIS REA WARMONGERING TREASON/SLAVERY/NATZI MENTALITY/ABUSE OF NO DUE PROCESS OF LAW
YOU HAVE MADE YOURSELF THE ENEMY OF YOUR NATION PUTTING OUR KIDS UP FOR SALE LIKE HITLER DID TO POLAND. YOU HAVE MAKE YOURSELF A SLAVER PLANTATION MASTER/CHILD SEX SLAVER/BABYLONIAN WHORE
Here is what people are not being told. The gov has declared war on state-only citizens and under the rules of war, the constitutions are silent. The gov has imposed 14th amendment citizenship status upon everyone without regard for constitutional restrictions. During war rights are silent. So, since the state constitutions and the rights they secure are silent, the gov on all levels simply imposes commercial laws upon non-commercial actions. This is the basis for the current 'income tax'. It gets worse because back in the 1950's the judicial branch courts were all replaced with legislative branch 'statutory' courts. This is very important information because these courts can only see people as 14th amendment citizens / non-sovereigns. Thus to go into one and claim you have a right to travel is a waste of time. Legally, the judge cannot hear such arguments and they know it. Sovereign rights arguments must be put forward in a completely different way in the courts.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is “entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State of the Union(2 Black 620, see also Crandell v Nevada, 6 Wall 35]. Plaintiff (libellant) should not be charged fees or costs for the lawful and Constitutional Right to petition this court in this matter in which he/she is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief (Hale v Hinkel, 201 US 43, NAACP v Button, 371 US 415); United Mineworkers v Gibbs, 383 US 715; and Johnson v Avery, 89 S.Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent non- lawyers, can assist other members of the group, achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with “unauthorized practice of law.”
Petitioner (libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no charge can be placed upon a citizen as a condition precedent to exercise his/her Constitutional Rights, his/her rights secured by the Constitution. A fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by public officers or for use of a privilege under control of government.” Fort Smith Gas Co. v Wisemen” 189 Ark.675 74 SW.2d 789,790, from Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed
WHEN YOU SEE TREASON AND YOU DO NOT REPORT TREASON YOU AID AND ABET TREASON UNDER A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE
DOING MY BEST TO REPORT ALL KINDS OF TREASON GOING ON
OUR FALLEN TROOPS ARE THE TROPHY OF THE ENEMY
• IWO JIMA - HITLER
• REVOLUTIONARY WAR - THE BRITISH QUEEN
• CIVIL WAR - JUVENILE JUSTICE BAR - AGENTS OF THE BRITISH
The A.B.A. and State Bar Associations are Non-Governmental, Private 'Professional Associations,' aforeign agency or power with respect to government, and NOT a 'Licensing Agency' in fact or Law, though AT it apparently, attempting to copyright theoperation and administration of that which originates with the author of thelaw, under color of law pursuant to public policy and legalism it would seem,whereas no one stands in between man and God who is the author of the naturaland common law, which cannot be copyrighted for private use in publicadministration of the law for the purposes of graft, fraud, and legal plunder.No legislation creates the bar association in any state, being a private closedunion and power foreign to government, operating in the Americas in violationof the Taft/Hardy act as The 81st Congress in 1950 confirmed by investigation,and determination that the A.B.A is, in fact and law, proof of which can alsobe located in the hard copy printing of 28 USC 3002, section 15a, a branch ofthe National Lawyers Guild Communist Party, and is run by communist, whereasthe on-line version of Title 28 USC has been altered to read something entirelydifferent, apparently because this fact has shown up in too many courtpetitions and memorandums of law over the past 100 years.
The Foreign Elected and public Agents Registration Act is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 requiring that agents representing the interests of foreign powers be properly identified to the American public.[1] The act was passed in response to German propaganda in the lead-up to World War II. The Foreign Agent Registration Unit within the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is charged with handling the enforcement of the law.
1) Act of Treason number one; Reasonable Efforts. You pay money to social workers to violate the right to not aid the prosecution
2) Act of Treason number two: You allow an adoption procurement agent to press policy not relevant to a penal code inflicting substantive Death Penalties of a Criminal Case were not clearly defined as a penalty
3) Act of Treason number three: You subjugate anyone that opposes you just like Hitler claimed it was hIS right to subjugate anyone who opposed him
4) Act of Treason number four: Substantive Due Process is not Due Process of Law when subverting all constitutional law replacing supreme law with statute and policy warring against human rights
5) Act of Treason number five: Judicial Code of Conduct is made void when accounts payable to an adoption agent
6) Act of Treason number six: You force people to sign their own execution letters
7) Act of Treason number seven: You full knowingly appoint attorneys who do not uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America the Oregon State Constitution or the Bill of Rights of either aforesaid
8) Act of Treason number eight: You allow hearsay to suvvert the right to crossexamine testimony evidence abolishing instead of honoring the inalienable right to confront your accusers yet you impose the equivalent of the death penalty of a criminal case to multiple innocent lives not limited to the little kids
9) Act of Treason number nine: You willfully engage in money plunder while endangering the lives of our nation’s heirs fully advised by congress of your wrongdoing
10) Act of Treason number ten: You allow double jeopardy while intending to subjugate cash to the hands of strangers while alienating young from their family causing emotional deaths between kin for profit
11) Act of Treason number eleven: You declare strangers parties to the action while blood and kin are declared irrelevant non-contenders, total strangers, non-parties, voiceless unless you approve when you can guarantee their safety while raising the risk of harm to our nations heirs
Rod Class Private Attorney General 12/9/15
https://youtu.be/K7-9qh5gB1s
COVID SHOT *** ALERT *** WARNING *** WARNING ***
The Nuremberg Code aimed to protect human subjects from enduring the kind of cruelty and exploitation the prisoners endured at concentration camps. The 10 elements of the code are: Voluntary consent is essential. The results of any experiment must be for the greater good of society.
Animals injected with CORONA VIRUS CACCINE the ferrets after exposer to the virus had their innards turn to liquid.
Schools trying to override informed parental consent at public schools
Greek Translations of the Bible, interestingly enough mistranslated into English as it pertains to mythology is relevantly explained in what was left out. Very interesting things with respect to rebellion and war and prophesy.
Two Topics: One; Condemnation before investigation as it pertains to Due Process of Law. Two; Sons of God, and what that phrase, ‘sons of God’ really means with respect to rape. Here is a preacher that believes the Bible was mistranslated and that nine out of ten pastors are confused about Genesis Chapter Six. Understanding this chapter is key to understanding the rest of the Bible and prophesy and what American Indians knew about Son’s of God. (https://youtu.be/5ywprOHXs0U)
This dispels the allegation God allows incest since we supposedly all came directly from the sons and daughters of Adam.
Obliterate Christianity came into vogue through psychology, Sigmund Freud, Darwinism, Fredrick Nietzsche, Karl Marx, Fredrick Ingles, enemies of freedom of religion (https://youtu.be/hRoQL7W5jg8)
‘Sons of God’ means angels The Days of Noah and the Return of the Nephilim had the same goal Hitler also aimed to fulfill. (https://youtu.be/WhLKH9WkMyc)
History of Christianity (2000) | Full Movie | Dr. Timothy George | Mona Hurlbert Fisher(https://youtu.be/WhLKH9WkMyc)
1. Sigmund Freud Austrian neurologist: Sigmund Freud was an Austrian neurologist and the founder of psychoanalysis, a clinical method for treating psychopathology through dialogue between a patient and a psychoanalyst. Freud was born to Galician Jewish parents in the Moravian town of Freiberg, in the Austrian Empire.
2. Darwinism Evolutionist: Darwinism is a theory of biological evolution developed by the English naturalist Charles Darwin and others, stating that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce.
3. Friedrich Nietzsche Philosopher: Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher who became one of the most influential of all modern thinkers. His attempts to unmask the motives that underlie traditional Western religion, morality, and philosophy deeply affected generations of theologians, philosophers, psychologists, poets, novelists, and playwrights.
4. Karl Marx German philosopher: Karl Heinrich Marx was a German philosopher, economist, historian, sociologist, political theorist, journalist, and socialist revolutionary. Born in Trier, Germany, Marx studied law and philosophy at university. He married Jenny von Westphalen in 1843.
5. Friedrich Engels: Philosopher: Friedrich Engels, sometimes anglicized as Frederick Engels, was a German philosopher, economist, historian, political theorist, and revolutionary socialist. He was also a businessman, journalist, and political activist, whose father was an owner of large textile factories in Salford and Barmen, Prussia.
6. Adolf Hitler: Dictator: Responsible for the deaths of 11 million people through genocide taking children as spoils of war for adoption purposes relevant to germination to grow his population and remembered to say he had the right to subjugate all who opposed him. Hitler also is remembered to say, 'Nazism is the real fulfillment of the Gospel', a lie told to allow false conversion to infiltrate Christian churches by Nazi, evidence he did not just intend to eliminate the Jew, he intended to eliminate Christianity as a lesser-known mission of Adolf Hitler. A Christian German tried to assassinate him.
I sent you some video to watch relevant to history and huge bones found proving Darwin and modern science does not want us to know the Giants that lived
The Best movie explaining Noah's Flood Ever made! Darwin was a fake as many of the other evolutionists who hid the huge bones of giants or 'giants' or Nephilim. (https://youtu.be/hRoQL7W5jg8)
The giants were killed by Indians who used their greeting 'How' to prove you did not have six fingers since Nephilim has six fingers. The Nephilim are mysterious beings or people mentioned in the Hebrew Bible. They are large and strong; the word Nephilim is loosely translated as giants in some Bibles but left untranslated in others. Some traditional Jewish explanations interpret them as fallen angels.
Relevant to modern abuses in violation of Due Process of Law. “Condemnation before investigation”. (Or modern-day conviction without testimony or cross-examination or proper investigation for modern actions)
Two kinds of Involuntary servitude as it pertains to children who are sex trafficked (a) or full grown women taken by Nephilim (b) rapists according Pastor Chuck Missler and backsided adoption an illicit marriage proposal
(a) COP FOSTER SEX TRAFFICKER 40 BOYS https://fb.watch/576505Iqzp/
(b) The Days of Noah and the Return of the Nephilim https://youtu.be/5ywprOHXs0U
(c) Validity of bankruptcy of 1933 https://youtu.be/XB0ZPhV0z8o
We are robbed of our constitutional and oregon bill of rights. Our kids are seized without due process of law.
Eyewitness accounts https://youtu.be/pfJgelz-AVY
(This is happening all over the world through the same method)
Expert Educational 1) https://youtu.be/XB0ZPhV0z8o
(What attorneys are not doing and what you must do for yourself)
Expert Educational 2) https://youtu.be/CQayCpnSMIg
(What attorneys do not explain or obligated to declare)
Expert Educational 3) https://youtu.be/K7-9qh5gB1s
(What you must do. This is how it works. This is how we have been taught)
On last thing: Some cops are really bad news but some are actually very caring people. They don't know the truth and have to follow orders or pay a high price. When in contact with them, for everyone's safety, be polite and non-threatening. Their actions and behavior is generally the result of their training / indoctrination. So, your grievance is not with them but those that give them their instructions. Who do the cops work for? The DA and it could be said they also work for the judges. Interestingly, they all work for the state legislature.
Comments
Post a Comment