Conflict of Laws

USES OF THE DEFINITION;  SHALL SEVERABILITY UNSEVERABILITY  AS THEY PERTAIN TO CONSTITUTION AND ENFORCEABILITY PERTINENT TO INSURACE From: Victoria Couvillion Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 11:26 AM To: paralegal@patbrownlaw.com ; corey@patbrownlaw.com ; jessica@patbrownlaw.com ; laura@patbrownlaw.com ; tiffanylouisehumphrey@gmail.com ; drwilson@co.marion.or.us ; Aiello Jody L ; Reynolds Alicia L ; vixybellaz@gmail.com ; Victoria Couvillion ; tcrofts@co.marion.or.us ; SPDTRO ; ppbpio@portlandoregon.gov ; Nolan Stevens ; KELLI CARPENTER ; Jesse Turner ; ipr@portlandoregon.gov ; execdir@youthrightsjustice.org ; dhs.info@state.or.us ; DHS.INFO@dhsoha.state.or.us ; DA@mcda.us ; cpitman@pps.net ; crc@portlandoregon.gov ; rep.alissakenyguyer@oregonlegislature.gov ; Rep.SheriSchouten@oregonlegislature.gov ; Rep.RonNoble@oregonlegislature.gov ; Rep.TawnaSanchez@oregonlegislature.gov ; Rep.CheriHelt@oregonlegislature.gov ; Rep.AnnaWilliams@oregonlegislature.gov ; Rep.MarkMeek@oregonlegislat

Utter garbage! Utter Garbage! if he could do it while the president and his advisors allowed and he got legal advice and they told him it is not unlawful and people followed his leadership that they elected him to perform and did not squabble or protest while he was presiding as the president that qualifies as failure to prosecute or failure to state a claim while it mattered if you were harmed or damaged in some way. Which nobody did and now malicious attorneys and enemies of our due process system are slandering him some more as if he committed an impeachable offense they allowed to continue and quickly enumerate their own silence for not standing up before and is utter court abuse. If he is immune from prosecution or they can all get sued with him and it is slander and abuse of process and utter fake abusive slanderous news.

Q & A With Rod Class #1 We are not without a remedy when dragged in front of a Judicial Setting which is an Administrative Agency and not an independent court. Administrative Hearings not listed and the DHS skip all of it with the Notice of Liability that shifts the burden of proof. The tail end of it. Who are you? Where is your authority come from? Show me the law. Prove it is me,  Bypassed the Administrative hearing we never were summoned to and never had. No jurisdiction for a judicial review Title 5 Section 702. And give us a penalty equivalent to death without a penal code available in Judicial Justice Complex with no jurisdiction to impose death sentences. The Administrative Court to deal with these administrative  Rules, Jub description, language, Administrative Offices, for impeachment before representatives before each state to hold them accountable. Where are the Affidavits? to prove the standard prima facia evidence what upheld on my daughter's case with corroboratio

Notice they don't help unless they can make money.  Herein is described as criminal racketeering legalized and the senator says he cannot fix it for this family.  “Indeed, no more than (affidavits) is necessary to make the prima facie case.” United States v. Kis, 658 F.2 Nd , 526, 536 (7th Cir. 1981); Cert Denied, 50 U.S. L.W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982 DOES DHS MAKE A prima facie case? DOES DHS write Affidavits? No. A Bureaucrat cannot. A man or woman must so they do not make a prima facie case. They grab your kids and JJC declares themselves DEPENDENT on the money they make taking kids from family. This video is proof attorneys will bleed you for all you own while they are helpless like this senator is as well and cannot step in and still stand in line for more money. Another video Angela Cook has made has her testimony called a Narrative instead of an Affidavit and nobody ever comes to arrest the social workers. I don’t have $100,00 dollars yet DHS has forms, court, cars, cell