Worse
case: next to the bad dreams about a rapist who kept his victim
isolated due to warrants for her arrest. This dream can be extend the
the kind of predators that can have access to victims when a warrant
is a 'rock' and not being able to call the police as a 'hard place'.
Next to this pertinent to a bad dream of the sitting sheriff entering
to use his office to blackmail instead of arrest. The sheriff said,
“I can arrest you and have you prosecuted', but, I won't if you
'service' my needs”, and tilted his head to the two officers
standing by the bathroom door saying, “And that of my boys here”.
This was over heard by a woman in the living room though it was not
intended for her to hear. The door closed and the other uniformed
police stood by the door looking respectable and chatting. The kids
could not tell there was anything wrong. At that point there was no
gun on hand to offer assistance. The dream went on to the room though
the door was closed where the active rape took place. Only a partial
profile of the officer raping her was available from an angle under
his chin. His nose obscured by her head. He was a medium build with,
for a man, a handsome delicate jaw. He was a pretty type with dark
brown to brunette shade for hair kept cut short with his ears
visible. His ears were delicate and well shaped like a woman's but a
little bigger. He was wearing a light colored suit shirt, slacks, and
dress shoes. The other men were taller and a heavier build, muscular,
one brunet and one blond with a slight look of being overweight about
20 pounds rounding out his face a little. Both handsome and in good
physical shape with V-shape builds giving a GQ broad shouldered
appearance to their physique. The blond wider and larger chested and
more muscular through the arms. Both, of them displayed badges, and
the blond a star badge. The blond man's jacket was denim, short,
exposing his belt and his pant legs were miss matched, like the style
was wrong for his duty, with an ironed crease down the middle. The
blond drew the eye more though the other, a brunet, moved more who
was laughing during the chatting, shifted his feet, moved his arms,
and swaying his upper body slightly while he held back loud laughter.
He, not at all over a weight for his body frame, looked good in
comparison to the other, just starting to lose some eye appeal due to
being heavy for his frame. The blond's facial bone structure was oval
with a strong muscular jaw and high hairline making his forehead
tall. The fact that the sitting sheriff actually reminds me of the
the sheriff in this dream I decided to write this down. I have
ignored this dream till now. The sheriff was not in uniform like the
other two and only unzipped and was fully dressed having intercourse
with his naked victim in the middle of her mother's bedroom on a
twin mattress that was laying a little crooked on the floor.
This
is my worst fear, that this bad dream could actually be true, or come true after what has been the allegation about not calling 911 for help during an actual rape because of a warrant out
and not wanting the children to go into foster care. But, this can
happen making a women with a warrant a slave and possibly what our
posterity will inherit under this current mix or format of law being
enforced and mixed and mix matched, while, “Not my hierarchy',
is the standard when agencies have their own supervisory
chain of command, and the complaint of the child assigned to the
state, the woman's voice and complaint over rape her own, and the
squatter only being chased off by an agent of the landlord. Which in
my research the lease holder is not an agent in the contract so I am
under the impression the landlord has to file a complaint and can not
partially evict on person, but everybody. So getting a restraining
order is the only way to get a squatter out. Like in the early history of this case real life case.
Men
can become so corrupt and the current application of laws enforced
are making rocks and hard places.
Rape
Victim With a Warrant
No
Complaint, No Victim, No Complaint Heard, No Victim Found,
Leaseholder
Vs. Squatter Freeloader
No
Authority Extended, No Complaint Possible
Bureaucrat
abuse of power
Not
my Department, No Complaint Pursued
Voice
of a Child in Foster Care
No
Physical Rape, No Inquiry
All Rights Reserved
All Rights Reserved
My daughter get's arrested when showing up for court hearings so the Sheriff is making it impossible for her to participate in the hearings.
ReplyDeleteThey hold her drivers license in one county her children in another and put her probation on still another county then expect her to go back and forth while her children are raped. She is denied visits and told she has to sign a statement she is asking them leading questions and the kids are told to 'Shh!" by both the SSA (transportation officer and visitation monitor who gets unsupervised alone time with your offspring) and they say the Sheriff is in charge of sex trafficking prisoners and they will put you in jail for the judicial seat who take your kids form you. Well that is a direct conflict of interest and the Trump Human Trafficking agenda is looking for whistle blowers.
ReplyDeleteNightmare On America Street (a really bad dream) really coming to pass...
ReplyDeleteTenancy of your heirs not respected and the eviction and displacement of child abuse victims is a conflict of laws where the judicial seat is not consulted prior to removal while freeloaders can stay even if raping your entire family. And after you kids get raped in foster care the all evidence of ‘rape trauma is gone’ even if the report stated there was ‘symptoms of trauma’ and the District Attorney did not get a serial rapist prosecuted – well because he is probably got dirty hands and knows that the symptoms later displayed from a stay in foster care is a cover for any new damage. “Because if you kick damaged garbage can just one more time who is going to be able to tell what dent came from what foot” and his ‘exculpatory evidence’ of the initial complaint of rape directly benefits the pedophilia in the foster care industry. No doubt about it even if he is not actually raping kids he is assisting in the cover-up of raping kids and cannot prosecute with dirty hands especially when putting parents to death without a jury of their peers to determine if facts fit the law, the punishment fits the non-crime, and even if found guilty. Well, it will be called a ‘pre-existing condition’ but not in my family's case and I yelled rape loudly but this is what happened here.
h t t p s : / / y o u t u . b e / m n G j Q K d J r P U
To: Bittick, Richard; Isham.Jeff@co.polk.or.us; ask.osp@state.or.us; raxford@mpdlaw.com Cc: Merritt.Jodi@co.polk.or.us; Settell.Lisa@co.polk.or.us; Polen.Cassy@co.polk.or.us; Nyberg.John@co.polk.or.us; Beier.Angela@co.polk.or.us; Garner.Rick@co.polk.or.us; Harnden.Shawna@co.polk.or.us; Henderson.Randy@co.polk.or.us; Marmolejo.Melissa@co.polk.or.us; Mendoza.Mayra@co.polk.or.us; Rydzewski.Jim@co.polk.or.us; Warren.Lee@co.polk.or.us; Zuniga.Adriana@co.polk.or.us; Rincon.Lexi@co.polk.or.us; Schindler.Chris@co.polk.or.us
ALL THE BELOW POINT DIRECTLY TO CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING IN THE DHS
ReplyDeleteRape Victim With a Warrant
No Complaint, No Victim, No Complaint Heard, No Victim Found,
Leaseholder Vs. Squatter Freeloader
No Authority Extended, No Complaint Possible
Nightmare On America Street (a really bad dream) really coming to pass...
Tenancy of your heirs not respected and the eviction and displacement of child abuse victims is a conflict of laws where the judicial seat is not consulted prior to removal while freeloaders can stay even if raping your entire family. And after you kids get raped in foster care the all evidence of ‘rape trauma is gone’ even if the report stated there was ‘symptoms of trauma’ and the District Attorney did not get a serial rapist prosecuted – well because he is probably got dirty hands and knows that the symptoms later displayed from a stay in foster care is a cover for any new damage. “Because if you kick damaged garbage can just one more time who is going to be able to tell what dent came from what foot” and his ‘exculpatory evidence’ of the initial complaint of rape directly benefits the pedophilia in the foster care industry. No doubt about it even if he is not actually raping kids he is assisting in the cover-up of raping kids and cannot prosecute with dirty hands especially when putting parents to death without a jury of their peers to determine if facts fit the law, the punishment fits the non-crime, and even if found guilty. Well, it will be called a ‘pre-existing condition’ but not in my family's case and I yelled rape loudly but this is what happened here.
The Trap investigates how prisons and jails across the United States have become recruiting grounds for human traffickers, who are targeting incarcerated women and trafficking them out of correctional facilities and into pimp-controlled prostitution
Bureaucrat abuse of power (multiple exhibits of it)
Not my Department, No Complaint Pursued
Voice of a Child in Foster Care
No Physical Rape, No Inquiry
They don’t check out a complaint of foster care misconduct ‘like sitting around in your red under ware in front of 10 year old girls’ (like what happened to me when i complained on behalf of mine and nothing happened’) and the social worker just emailed over the weekend that it was ‘plain red shorts’ did not go to talk to my granddaughter in person and just asked the foster providers to ‘vouch for themselves’
All Rights Reserved
RE: Verification of Conversation Denied to my direct heir by her Probation Officer (No Receipt of True Copy of Document)
ReplyDeleteOn behalf of my direct heir, hereby revoke any and all authority previously granted to Polk County Probation Officer, SM Harnden, at Polk County Corrections, Polk County, 850 Main Street, Dallas, Oregon 97338, on the grounds that she did not give my daughter a copy of the release of information with wet ink on it she sets before my daughter to sign, as per her request for proof of the agreements of who and why she is allowed to divulge the content of their relationship or communications, which is a Counsel of Choice matter, where the technicalities are not guarded properly and in violation of the fifth amendment, but not limited to that, and since anything bearing your signature is your personal property under the right to the security of your papers, and SM Harnden has committed and act of theft, and leaves My Direct Heirwith no recourse or verification of the limits of her use of that release, and cannot without much dilemma argue that the agreement was met or if the application is in use is in breech of agreement which is harmful at so many levels and I require a quash on all past disclosures by and between DHS and SM Harnden, especially if Helmar Lochman is still holding the pen over what the Attorneys in Multnomah County see or hear, since nobody can hold anybody accountable when the document can be changed at a later date with no True Copy available for redress of any kind and is in breech of contract law, and since there is not accountability check where SM. Harden, did not allow for future verification of the obedience to limitations of those releases they are impeachable and all should be quashed for the protection and preservation of the rules of admissibility, and it is arguable now that due to the lack of transparency, we cannot verify if the scope or limitations of her authority were honored keeping her release of information under that agreement if bounds were exceeded no matter who or what entity she intended to or had communicated with, and this practice is nothing but evidence of crooked and underhanded thought and evidence of dark intentions from Person or Actor encouraging this activity and impeachable behavior, and she agreed not to share or divulge any information and agreed that is not a valid way to contract, and since she is not my daughter’s Counsel of Choice and also stated she had settled this matter with my daughter and agreed with me she had no authority while failing to give Melanie a copy of any documents sighed and understood i say this practice exhibits underhanded intentions and practices, and further she is not allowed to represent my daughter in any matter set before a court or before any other agency, person,
Actor, or entity (living, contracting, or incorporated) and she is hereby denied any authority whatsoever to speak, report, or advise anyone any further regarding my daughter’s matters for any reason in any jurisdiction, venue, lawful or otherwise, since not acting trustworthy; and agrees this practice must stop, and i hereby verify and affirm that my daughter has revoked her authorization on any release of information bearing my daughter’s signature and any implied consent or authority granted her to represent to any other party communications by and between SM Harnden and My Direct Heir or any other entity or party at any date, but not limited to that, and i forbid her to further communicate by any means for any purpose or reason on any matter or cause regarding my daughter’s matters until my daughter is happy with her Counsel (as a Social Worker is listed as Counsel on Court Documents), and implied she understood the other issues i brought up and otherwise stipulated her agreement to be addressed in her Official Capacity, and understood i do not directly accuse her of being a Human Trafficker, and understands she is herby put on NOTICE that these practices are making the heirs of this nation easy targets for Child Sex Trafficking and Human Trafficking through adoption agencies to the benefit of BAR Members gaining huge retainer fees and understood i am forwarding this communication to Congress and the Attorney General of the United States, for review under my request for a Subpoena for new legislation under compliance to my right and obligation to oversee documents i put my signature on and that i did not intend to represent my daughter in court or ask for her to divulge any information to me, that the purpose of my call was merely to educate her and put her on NOTICE that those agreements for release of information are damaging and bringing harm to the American family tree, and she should be replaced my daughter should demand another Probation Officer, unless this behavior is common practice, which, either way, needs to stop. h t t p s : / / y o u t u . b e / G K A c G k I n j N o ? t = 6
ReplyDeleteFor full record of my verbal communication you may request a recording of my intentions to which she will be able to deny her end of this conversation if she wishes and will be receiving a copy bcc Congress and the Human Trafficking Counsel, which i ask all of you to be involved in since we are living breathing souls and not dead personam in the eyes of God, which only a vulture would deny while enjoying carnage in the form of money’s gained.
Marilyn LeBaron, on behalf of My Direct Heir October, 29, 2019 and the rest of our nation for the purposes of oversight to my contract agreements set in pace at her birth under the Social Security Act bringing the BAR Association into accountability for Human Trafficking through all the releases of information between agencies when families are chopped up, labeled ‘individual’ like firewood traded for federal funds, and put in harms way up to 10 times more likely to be raped or killed or both wind, and up an unreported runaway, or hidden and called a runaway, while being sex trafficked, while foster parents still collect a federal funded check.
NOTARY REPUBLIC of Oregon
LeBaron Marilyn shared a link.
ReplyDeleteYesterday at 7:31 AM
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020, 7:38 PM
To: DA@mcda.us; Karen.FEICKERT@ojd.state.or.us
Cc: OSB CAO Intake; Jessica L. Cheely
Edited and Revised
Social Worker Supervisory Staff make grandparents go to be RSVP'd to the Foster Care Education Program, that asks you what kids you want, (which is creepy when the Supervisory Staff can get E Certification as the hearsay from my daughter said was used to approve the foster home my grandson was allegedly raped in then not moved by Helmar Lochmann since the report to me came after the five days it required to make a determination, making it a couple weeks back, and then it is reported they are moved but not till i screamed an email into the inboxes of the attorneys, and none of this is reported to me while under the Supervision of Lochmann's pen, who did not ask me a single question about the care of my grand-kin, while he is reportedly crying in my daughters presence that my grandson was harmed do to his decisions while saying he did not screen the foster father well enough, and he still gets to make the decisions while claiming liability, since it was called an emergency placement according to my daughter, which is what the grandparents are known to get, then made to RSVP and take foster care education classes, which is misuse of his power, since he is not allowed to place my kin in a foster home that does not uphold the federal screening criteria, which could not possible be the same standard of that which makes allowances for actual family members, which i have been denied, while he later is abusing the rules that apply to an affidavit while also trying to write affidavits intended to indemnify the DHS from suit to impeach my grandson's outcry, which is a conflict of interest compounded in three directions where an inherent conflict of interest already exists, between actors that are strangers not related to your kin) while denying you on something a judge already overturned himself, when he was the same judge that tried the case, and let you go when the DHS was trying to keep you from your kids, and grand-kids, which is the case here, on a future crime against a bureaucrat, that never happened yet, but got my parental rights removed by a long interference process, that had a really weak case, according to the Public Defender, but when the extension of time requested by the CPS was denied it shows the duly elected seated judiciary must have thought that that babies and people no longer pregnant are safe around me,
unless it was true on the premise pregnant bureaucrats, as alleged, were the only ones in danger, since at that time while it was relevant it was said, "We don't think your mother is going to hurt you or the baby" while my grand-baby was still in the womb, yet prior to that allegation that pregnant bureaucrats were in danger, there was another rape in foster care case pending, yet it was leveraged to get a seconds set of double continuances that should have been dismissed since the presumption of innocence is violated is to get a case to trial on the premise of a future crime against a pregnant bureaucrat, on the DHS imposed diagnosis, without an expert witness, or a doctor visit to get a diagnosis by proper means, or a pretrial opportunity to refute that allegation, while that was the case on Oath on Affirmation on the prophetic abilities of the District Attorney and approved by the same seated and duly elected judge, while the District Attorney intended to call that pregnant bureaucrat, when her accusations under my line of questioning was already impeached to be false on the matters of my son forcing them to refile, then also impeaching the other judge's prior decision to deny me my son on the mere presence of a letter sent out that was never allowed a refute, showing the judicial discretion has been delegated to the DHS, though also DEEMED COUNSEL by the Juvenile Justice Complex, and we do not go to retain them ourselves, when no personal contact was made with me directly within the five days allotted contact with me prior to writing that letter used in court, while the Juvenile Department was the seat that made all the other decisions on my daughter, where that subject matter has no bearing on the relationships in existence today, though DHS have used that history though a duly elected judicial seat did not during a time where age relevancy was the subject matter that has no relevancy to the subject matter of case presented to the Juvenile Justice Complex, and unless the Supervisory Staff of the DHS are an appellate process when not appealing the judicial decision in a timely manner in the past, it is abuse of process to use that subject matter today, when Supervisory Staff are not a duly elected judiciary on this matter now today when no relevancy on the merits of that past judicial decision is applied today, and the Juvenile Justice Complex is allowing that without regard to the actual history being presented to them since the discretion has been delegated to the DHS which makes that a preset disposition if not overturned since the prejudice to over come the decision of the seated judiciary is upon the DHS considering they could not come remove my grand-babies for over eleven years and now use that to deny me their presence in my home.
ReplyDelete